Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T23:19:36.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Forecasting the Incidence of Neurosis in Officers of the Army and the Navy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

W. Mayer-Gross
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Research, Crichton Royal, Dumfries
J. N. P. Moore
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Research, Crichton Royal, Dumfries
Patrick Slater
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Research, Crichton Royal, Dumfries
H. N. Davy
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Research, Crichton Royal, Dumfries
P. Turquet
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Research, Crichton Royal, Dumfries

Extract

The most important contribution the psychiatrist could make to the selection of officer candidates or of applicants for comparable leading or managerial positions would be the exclusion of potential neurotics. The Report on the Work of Psychologists and Psychiatrists in the services acknowledges and commends the contribution made by psychiatrists to the selection of officers in the Army; but evidence has not yet been published to enable the extent of their particular contribution to the efficiency of the whole procedure to be assessed in measured terms. Other services have not followed the example of the Army. The Admiralty and Civil Service Selection Boards, which were created after the War Office Selection Boards, and have adapted many features of the Army procedure for their own requirements, have decided against employing psychiatrists for this purpose; and the extent to which the War Office Selection Boards make use of psychiatric services for selection has been reduced. The effectiveness of existing psychiatric methods for this kind of work may thus be felt still open to some doubt.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1949 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Eysenck, H. J. (1947), Dimensions of Personality. Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1938), Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar
Slater, E. (1937), in A Social Problem Group? ed. Blacker, C. P. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Slater, P. (1945), Brit. J. Psychol., 35, 40.Google Scholar
Slater, P. (1947), J. Roy. Stat. Soc., 9 (Supplement), 114.Google Scholar
Sutherland, J. D. (1941), Brit. Med. J., ii, 365.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.