Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T20:48:38.746Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Patterns of Cognitive Test Performance As Functions of the Lateral Localization of Cerebral Abnormalities in the Temporal Lobe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

Victor Meyer
Affiliation:
Guy's-Maudsley Neurosurgical Unit and Institute of Psychiatry, University of London
H. Gwynne Jones
Affiliation:
Guy's-Maudsley Neurosurgical Unit and Institute of Psychiatry, University of London

Extract

Various investigations into the effects of brain injury on psychological test performance (Weisenburg and McBride, 1935; Patterson and Zangwill, 1944; Anderson, 1951; McFie and Piercy, 1952; Bauer and Becka, 1954; Milner, 1954) suggest the overall conclusion that patients with left hemisphere lesions are relatively poor at verbal tasks, while those with right-sided lesions do worst at practical tasks, particularly the manipulation of spatial or spatio-temporal relationships. Heilbfun's (1956) study confirmed that verbal deficits result from left-sided lesions but his left and right hemisphere groups produced almost identical scores on spatial tests. In so far as these workers paid attention to the specific sites of the lesions, their findings indicate that the pattern of test performance is a function of the hemisphere in which the lesion occurs rather than of its specific locus.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1957 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, A. L., J. Clin. Psychol., 1951, 7, 149.3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battersby, W. S., Bender, M. B., Pollack, M., and Kahn, R. L., Brain, 1956, 79, 68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem , Krieger, H. P., and Bender, M. B., Amer. J. Psychol., 1955, 68, 562.Google Scholar
Bauer, R., and Becka, D., J. nerv. ment. Dis., 1954, 120, 379.Google Scholar
Collins, A. L., J. consult. Psychol., 1951, 15, 392.Google Scholar
Desai, M., Brit. J. med. Psychol., 1952, 25, 48.Google Scholar
Elithorn, A., J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat., 1955, 18, 287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., Brit. J. med. Psychol., 1944, 20, 100.Google Scholar
Falconer, M. A., Proc. R. Soc. Med., 1953, 46, 971.Google Scholar
Idem , Brit. med. J., 1954, ii, 939.Google Scholar
Idem , Hill, D., Meyer, A., Mitchell, W., and Pond, D. A., Lancet, 1955, i, 827.Google Scholar
Falsom, A., Epilepsia, 1953, 2, 15.Google Scholar
Foulds, G. A., and Raven, J. C., J. Ment. Sci., 1948, 94, 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, J. C., and German, W. J., Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1935, 33, 791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerboth, R., J. consult. Psychol., 1950, 14, 365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodglass, H., and Quadfasel, F. A., Brain, 1954, 77, 521.Google Scholar
Hebb, D. O., J. gen. Psychol., 1939, 21, 73.Google Scholar
Idem , Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1945, 54, 10.Google Scholar
Hécaen, H., and Piercy, M., J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat., 1956, 19, 194.Google Scholar
Heilbrun, A. B., J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1956, 49, 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, D., Proc. R. Soc. Med., 1953, 46, 965.Google Scholar
Humphrey, M. E., and Zangwill, O. L., J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat., 1952, 15, 184.Google Scholar
Jayasundera, M. G., “The relationship between discrepancy in intelligence quotient scores and EEG abnormality in the temporal lobe.” (Unpublished dissertation for the academic postgraduate diploma in psychological medicine. University of London, 1954.)Google Scholar
Jones, H. G., Revue de Psychologie Appliquée, 1953, 3, 209.Google Scholar
Idem , Brit. J. educ. Psychol., 1956, 26, 141.Google Scholar
Kennedy, F., and Wolf, A., J. nerv. ment. Dis., 1936, 84, 125, 293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreuger, E. C., Price, P. A., and Teuber, H. L., J. Psychol., 1954, 38, 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFie, J., and Piercy, M. F., Brain, 1952, 75, 292.Google Scholar
Idem, and Zangwill, O. L., Brain, 1950, 73, 167.Google Scholar
Meyer, A., Falconer, M. A., and Beck, E., J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat., 1954, 17, 276.Google Scholar
Meyer, V., and Yates, A. J., J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat., 1955, 18, 44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, Barbara, Psychol. Bull., 1954, 51, 46.Google Scholar
Nielsen, J. M., and Raney, R. B., Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1939, 42, 189.Google Scholar
Paterson, A., and Zangwill, O. L., Brain, 1944, 67, 331.Google Scholar
Quadfasel, A. F., and Pruyser, P. W., Epilepsia, 1955, 4, 80.Google Scholar
Raven, J. C., Guide to using the Mill Hill Vocabulary Scale with Progressive Matrices, 1938a. London: H. K. Lewis & Co., Ltd Google Scholar
Idem , Guide to using Progressive Matrices, 1938b. London: H. K. Lewis & Co., Ltd.Google Scholar
Rey, J. H., “The relationship of electroencephalography, diagnostic, and intelligence test patterns.” (Unpublished Study, 1956.)Google Scholar
Idem , Pond, D. A., and Evans, C. C., Proc. R. Soc. Med., 1949, 42, 891.Google Scholar
Roberts, L., Trans. Amer. neurol. Ass., 1951, 76, 43.Google Scholar
Idem , ibid., 1955, 80, 143.Google Scholar
Sandler, J., Brit. J. Psychol., 1955, 46, 225.Google Scholar
Semmes, J., Weinstein, S., Ghent, L., and Teuber, H. L., J. Psychol., 1955, 39, 227.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D., The measurement of adult intelligence, 1944. Baltimore, U.S.A.: The Williams and Wilkins Co Google Scholar
Idem , The Wechsler-Bellevue intelligence scale Form 11, 1946. New York: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Weisenburg, T., and McBride, Katharine, Aphasia: a clinical and psychological study, 1935. New York: Commonwealth Fund Google Scholar
Yates, A. J., J. Ment. Sci., 1956, 102, 428, 409.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.