¹ For a more general discussion of the effects of new thinking in the region, see Kempton, Daniel R., ‘Superpower Cooperation in Southern Africa’, in Kanet, Roger E. and Kolodziej, Edward A. (eds.), The Cold War as Cooperation (London, 1990).Google Scholar

² In Mozambique's case, Moscow announced that nearly all its military advisors are to be withdrawn by the end of 1990, and its aid will reportedly decrease by about 40 per cent. See Maier, Karl, ‘Soviet Military Advisors to Leave Mozambique’, in The Washington Post, 3 06 1989.Google Scholar

³ See Kempton, Daniel R., Soviet Strategy Toward Southern Africa: the national liberation connection (New York, 1989), pp. 151–212, for a discussion of the Kremlin's South African policy prior to 1975.Google Scholar

⁴ According to Campbell, Kurt M., Soviet Policy Toward South Africa (New York, 1986), pp. 48–51, the Soviets were anxious to have a representative in South Africa who could monitor the flow of lend-lease materials destined for the U.S.S.R.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁵ After the Communist Party of South Africa was banned in 1953, it was reformed underground as the South African Communist Party. The change in nomenclature was indicative of the shift in the organisation's policy, which was thereafter more focused on the ‘African’ liberation struggle.

⁶ Lodge, Tom, ‘The African National Congress in South Africa, 1976–1983’, in Journal of Contemporary African Studies (Pretoria), 1–2, 1984, p. 170.Google Scholar

⁷ African National Congress, Forward to People's Power (Harare, 1986), published by the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Republic of Zimbabwe.Google Scholar

⁸ On this point, compare the views of Shubin, Vasiliy, ‘ANK: gody podpol'ia vooruzhennoi bor'by’, in Aziya i Afrika segodnya (Moscow), I, 1982, pp. 34 and 37,Google Scholar with those expressed earlier by other analysts, such as Y. Shvestov, ‘The African Working Class Strengthens the Struggle’, in ibid. 1, 1977, p. 11, and Tyunkov, Yuri, ‘Battle for Human Dignity’, in New Times (Moscow), 27, 1976, p. 15,Google Scholar as well as in Pravda (Moscow), 28 August 1976.

⁹ According to Weymouth, Lally, ‘A Moscow–Pretoria Axis?’, in The Washington Post, 18 12 1988,Google Scholar and Burns, John F., ‘Soviet Press for South Africa Accord’, in The New York Times, 16 03 1989, Moscow repeatedly urged the A.N.C. to avoid civilian targets. However, public opposition by the A.N.C. risks alienating young radicals within the townships, as well as raising expectations that probably cannot be fulfilled.Google Scholar

¹⁰ Honey, Peter, ‘ANC Issues Near Apology for Bombings’, in The New rork Times, 18 08 1988,Google Scholar and John Battersby, ‘ANC Acts to Halt Civilian Attacks’, in ibid. 21 August 1988.

¹¹ Gleb Starushenko, ‘Problems of Struggle Against Racism, Apartheid and Colonialism in South Africa’, 2nd Soviet-African Conference ‘For Peace, Co-operation and Social Progress’, Moscow, 24'26 June 1986, and Goncharov, Victor, ‘Soviet Policy in Southern Africa’, in Work in Progress (Johannesburg), 48, 1987, p. 7.Google Scholar

¹² Asoyan, Boris, ‘Time to Gather Stones’, in International Affairs (Moscow), 9, 1988, pp. 67–77.Google Scholar

¹³ Quoted in Burns, loc. cit.

¹⁴ Battersby, John, ‘S. Africans Vow Intensified Struggle’, in Christian Science Monitor (Boston), 19 01 1990, p. 4,Google Scholar and ‘S. African Activist Calls for Intensified Armed Struggle’, in ibid. 24 January 1990, p. 4.

¹⁵ In contrast, it is worth noting that the Soviet Union tried to undermine the 1979 Lancaster House agreement by continuing to arm its only ally. See Kempton, 1989, op. cit. pp. 130–3.

¹⁶ Friedman, Steven and Narsoo, Mony, A New Mood in Moscow: Soviet attitudes to South Africa (Johannesburg, 1989), p. 11.Google Scholar

¹⁷ Goncharov, loc. cit. p. 7.

¹⁸ Reported by Sparks, Allister, ‘Moscow's New Game in Africa’, in The Washington Post, 8 10 1988.Google Scholar

¹⁹ Friedman, and Narsoo, , op. cit. p. 16.Google Scholar

²⁰ ‘Soviet Union: a true friend’, in The African Communist (London), 109, 1987, pp. 79–81.Google Scholar

²¹ Weymouth, loc. cit.

²² Ilyin, Yu. M., ‘Btoraia sovetsko-afrikanskaia nauchno-politicheskaia konferentsiia, “Za mir, sotrudnichestvo i sotsial'ni progress”’, in Narody Azii i Afriki (Moscow), 1, 1987, pp. 22–31.Google Scholar

²³ Quoted by Legum, Colin, ‘What “Glasnost” Means in Southern Africa’, in Third World Reports (London), 1, 1987, p. 2.Google Scholar

²⁴ Indicative of the changing official view of Starushenko's proposals is that in apparent deference to the A.N.C. he was not sent in October 1988 to the Soviet-South African meetings in East Germany. However, when the A.N.C. opened its much heralded diplomatic mission to Moscow less than three months later, Starushenko was the most prestigious Soviet representative present. Soviet Revue (Stellenbosch), 1989, 2, p. 28, and 3, p. 32.Google Scholar

²⁵ Izvestia (Moscow), 5 08 1989.Google Scholar

²⁶ Quoted in Sparks, loc. cit.

²⁷ Asoyan, Boris, in Literaturnaya gazeta (Moscow), 46, 1988, pp. 6–7.Google Scholar

²⁸ Tikhomirov, Vladimir I., ‘South Africa: is a political settlement possible?’, in Soviet Revue, 2, 1989, p. 16.Google Scholar

²⁹ Quoted in Burns, loc. cit.

³⁰ Reuters, 15 March 1989, and Yukalov quoted in Younghusband, Peter, ‘Soviets Urge OK to Thatcher's African Plan’, in The Washington Times, 22 03 1989.Google Scholar

³¹ The Economist (London), 25 03 1989.Google Scholar

³² Pravda, 12 March 1989, and Moscow Television Service, 21 March 1989, reported in Foreign Broadcast Information Service: Soviet Union (Washington, D.C.), 22 03 1989, pp. 34–5, hereafter FBIS/SOV.Google Scholar

³³ Tass, 14 March 1989, in ibid. 15 03 1989, pp. 7–8.

³⁴ Younghusband, , loc. cit. and The Economist, 25 March 1989.Google Scholar

³⁵ In order to seal the deal on Angola the Soviet Union had agreed to the South African Government's request that the A.N.C. camps be removed. It is not known to what extent the A.N.C. was consulted about this decision, and although its top official in Angola, Uriah Mokeba, described the loss as a ‘temporary setback’, it meant that the A.N.C. no longer had any camps in states directly bordering South Africa. See Brooke, James, ‘Angolan Sanctuary Closing to Rebels’, in The New York Times, 10 01 1989.Google Scholar Soviet commentaries praising the A.N.C. for its ‘strategic wisdom and maturity’ – for example, Vladimir Valentinov, Radio Moscow in English, 9 January 1989, in FBIS/SOV, 11 January 1989, pp. 28–9 – could not make up for the tactical loss. A.N.C. officials at first tried to put a positive light on the Angola-Namibia agreement by contending that this had refocused attention on the region's remaining problem: if one-person-one-vote was acceptable for Namibia, why not in South Africa itself? Thurow, Roger, ‘Main Anti-Apartheid Group is Certain Namibia Settlement Will Help its Cause’, in Wall Street Journal (New York), 26 01 1989. Later, however, Tambo asked how Moscow could ‘ensure that the agreements are honoured’? Radio Moscow in Zulu, 10 March 1989, in FIBS/SOV, 14 March 1989, p. 20.Google Scholar

³⁶ Adamishin, Anatoly, Moscow Television Service, 1 April 1989, in FBIS/SOV, 3 April 1989, p. 15.Google Scholar

³⁷ According to Nathan Shamuyarira, currently the Foreign Minister of Zimbabwe, the A.N.C. was even then (in the 1960s) among an elite group of so-called ‘super authentics’ which were especially favoured by Moscow. Interview by author in Harare, 12 January 1987.

³⁸ Kempton, , Soviet Strategy Towards Southern Africa, pp. 185–7.Google Scholar

³⁹ Kirsanov, V., ‘South Africa mounting popular wrath’, in International Affairs, 2, 1985, p. 103,Google Scholar and A. Pokrovsky, ‘The Apartheid Regime and its Patrons’, in ibid. 9, 1986, pp. 101–5.

⁴⁰ Davies, Rob, O'Meara, Dan, and Dlamini, Sipho, The Struggle for South Africa: a reference guide to movements, organizations and institutions, Vol. 2 (London, 1894), pp. 387–95.Google Scholar

⁴¹ Campbell, op. cit. p. 183.

⁴² Bochkaryov, Y., ‘The Racists at a Dead End’, in New Times, 16, 28 04 1986, pp. 20–2;Google ScholarBogdanov, Boris, ‘South Africa: the wedge that must not be driven’, in Aziya i Afrika segodnya, 11, 1986, pp. 21–4,Google Scholar and ‘Cracks in the Monolith, or the Unexploded Myth’, in ibid, 4, 1986, pp. 24–7; V. G. Bushin, ‘Panafricanistskii kongress Azanii: proshloc i nastoiashchee’, in ibid. 2, 1986, pp. 21–30; and Pokrovsky, loc. cit. pp. 101–5.

⁴³ von Lucius, Robert, in Frankfurter Aligemeine Zeitung, 4 July 1987.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ Konovalov, Y., ‘Problems of Leberation of the Last Colonies in Africa’, in International Affairs, 10, 1964, pp. 35–41.Google Scholar

⁴⁵ See, especially, Bushin, loc. cit. pp. 21–30.

⁴⁶ ibid. and Tetekin, Vyacheslav, ‘South Africa: realities of confrontation’, in Asia and Africa Today (Moscow), 2, 1988, p. 60.Google Scholar

⁴⁷ ‘Blacker Power’, in The Economist, 12 11 1988,Google Scholar and Nel, Philip, ‘The Current Soviet Approach to South Africa and its Implications’, 1989 draft article, pp. 27–8.Google Scholar

⁴⁸ Radio Moscow in English to Southern Africa, 16 June 1989, in FBIS/SOV, 20 June 1989, pp. 23–4.

⁴⁹ Asoyan, loc. cit. pp. 71–2.

⁵⁰ For example, Bogdanov, ‘Cracks in the Monolith’, loc. cit. p. 68, and Tikhomirov, Vladimir I., Parhya apartheid (Moscow, 1987),Google Scholar and ‘The Parties of the White Population of South Africa: plans for the political development of the country’, in Narody Azil i Afriki, 4, 1988, pp. 83–9.Google Scholar See also, MacFarlane, S. Neil, ‘The Soviet Union and the National Liberation Movements’, in Saivetz, Carol R. (ed.), The Soviet Union in the Third World (Boulder, 1990), p. 89.Google Scholar

⁵¹ Fedorov, Alexander, Radio Moscow in English, 6 July 1989, in FBIS/SOV, 12 July 1989, pp. 38–9.Google Scholar

⁵² Tass International Service, 15 March 1989, in ibid. 6 March 1989, pp. 23–4.

⁵³ Gennady Gerasimov, Radio Moscow in Zulu, 10 March 1989, in ibid. 17 March 1989, p. 21.

⁵⁴ Tikhomirov, , ‘The Parties of the White Population of South Africa’, pp. 86–9.Google Scholar

⁵⁵ Fedorov, Alexander, Radio Moscow in English, 17 April 1989, in FBIS/SOV, 20 April 1989, p. 34.Google Scholar

⁵⁶ Gromyko, Anatoly, ‘Racism and Colonialism in Africa Must be Ended’, in Asia and Africa Today, 4, 1986, pp. 6–8;Google Scholar Vyacheslav Molev, ‘South Africa: Storm troopers of neofascism’, in ibid. 11, 1987, pp. 58–62; and Pokrovsky, loc. cit. pp. 101–5.

⁵⁷ Asoyan ‘Time to Gather Stones’, pp. 68–70, and ‘Russia and South Africa’. in International Affairs, 12, 1989, pp. 41–9 and 144.Google Scholar

⁵⁸ Adamishin, Anatoly, South African Press Association in English, 31 March 1989, in FBIS/SOV, 3 April 1989, p. 16.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ See, especially, Tikhomirov, , Partya apartheid and ‘South Africa’.Google Scholar

⁶⁰ Alexander Fedorov, Radio Moscow in English, 16 February 1989, in FBIS/SOV, 17 February 1989, p. 26, and Mikhail Tsirdov, Radio Moscow in Zulu, 27 June 1989, in ibid. 10 July 1989, pp. 34–5.

⁶¹ Gennady Gerasimov, Tass International Service, 10 February 1989, in ibid. 13 February 1989, p. 41.

⁶² Boris Asoyan, Radio Moscow in Zulu, 20 February 1989, in ibid. 24 February 1989, p. 27, and Soviet Revue, 2, 1989, pp. 21–2;Google Scholar and The Weekly Mail (Johannesburg), II, 1989.Google Scholar

⁶³ Campbell, Kurt M., ‘The Soviet-South African Connection’, in Africa Report (New Brunswick), 2, 1986, pp. 72–3, and Soriet Policy Toward South Africa, pp. 94–126.Google Scholar

⁶⁴ Rahr, Alexander and Richmond, John, ‘Wind of Change in South Africa from Unexpected Quarter’, in Radio Liberty Report on the USSR (Washington, D.C.), 1, 19, 12 05 1989, p. 26.Google Scholar

⁶⁵ Adamishin, Anatoly, Moscow Television Service, 1 April 1989, in FBIS/SOV, 3 April 1989, p. 16.Google Scholar

⁶⁶ According to Weymouth, ‘A Moscow-Pretoria Axis?’, during the talks in Brazzaville some months previously the South African Foreign Minister, ‘Pik’ Both, had met with Adamishin for several hours to discuss future monitoring arrangements.

⁶⁷ Reshetnyak, Nikolai, ‘Southern Africa: a troubled April?’, in New Times, 18, 1989, pp. 14–15, and Tass, 3 April 1989, in FBIS/SOV, April 1989, pp. 3–4.Google Scholar

⁶⁸ Adamishin quoted by A. Nikanorov, ‘Namibia: situation remains tense’, in Izvestia, 16 April 1989, and Boris Asoyan, ‘UN Plan Under Threat’, in ibid. 6 April 1989.

⁶⁹ M. Pavlov, ‘Namibia: outcome of complex debates’, in ibid. 24 April 1989, p. 3.

⁷⁰ See Kempton, ‘Superpower Cooperation in Southern Africa’.

⁷¹ The Times (London), 10 09 1990.Google Scholar

⁷² This claim was somewhat contradicted by Gorbachev, Mikhail, Perestroika (New York edn. 1988), p. 164, when he none the less reaffirmed the potential for co-operation by stressing the Soviet Union's commitment not to jeopardise America's own interests in Southern Africa.Google Scholar

⁷³ Goncharov, Victor, ‘Soviet Union and Southern Africa: the issues of ensuring regional security’, in Southern Africa Record (Johannesburg), 47–48, 1987, pp. 77–83,Google Scholar and ‘Soviet Policy in Southern Africa’, pp. 2–7.

⁷⁴ Coker, Christopher, ‘Moscow and Pretoria: a possible alignment’, in The World Today (London), 44, 1988, p. 7;Google Scholar Tass International Service in Russian, 21 March 1989, in FBIS/SOV, 22 March 1989, p. 5; Soviet Revue, 2, 1989, pp. 23–4;Google Scholar and Tikhomirov, , ‘South Africa’, p. 18.Google Scholar

⁷⁵ Johannesburg, S.A.P.A. in English, 31 March 1989, in FBIS/SOV, 3 April 1989, pp. 15–16.

⁷⁶ Washington Post Week1y, 4–10 December 1989, p. 17.

⁷⁷ Telephone conversation with Lindiwe Mabuza, head of the A.N.C. office in Washington, D.C., 21 February 1990.

⁷⁸ Washington Post Weekty, 4–10 December 1989, p. 17.

⁷⁹ Cf. Kempton, Soviet Strategy Toward Southern Africa, pp. 1–35, and especially MacFarlane, ‘The Soviet Union and the National Liberation Movements’, pp. 21–51, and Golan, Galia, The Soviet Union and National Liberation Movements in the Third World (Boston and London, 1988), pp. 257–8.Google Scholar

⁸⁰ Nel, op. cit. p. 5.

⁸¹ According to Peter Clement, ‘The USSR and Sub-Saharan Africa’, in Saivetz, (ed), op. cit. p. 165, Margaret Thatcher has claimed that annual Soviet aid to the A.N.C. amounts to approximately U.S. $80 million.Google Scholar

⁸² Fukuyama, Francis, ‘The End of History’, in The National Interest (Washington, D.C.), 19, 1989, pp. 3–35.Google Scholar

⁸³ On this point, Lewis, Stephen R. Jr, The Economics of Apartheid (New York, 1989), argues that the end of apartheid will increase the South African G.D.P. by up to U.S. $2,000 million.Google Scholar

⁸⁴ Weymouth, loc. cit.

⁸⁵ Coker, loc. cit. pp. 6–9.

⁸⁶ ibid.

⁸⁷ Flornoy, Michèle A. and Campbell, Kurt M., ‘South Africa's Bomb: a military option’, in Orbis (Philadelphia), Summer 1988, p. 394.Google Scholar

⁸⁸ Nel, Philip, ‘Explaining Soviet Policy Towards South Africa’, in Soviet Revue, 5, 3, 1989, p. 14.Google Scholar

⁸⁹ Buksin, Y., ‘USSR-RSA: the road to diplomatic relations, and an end to conflict’, in Moscow News, 16 04 1989, p. 7, in FBIS/SOV, 21 April 1989, p. 38;Google ScholarYukalov, Yuri, in Soviet Revue, 5, 2, 1989, p. 23;Google Scholar Tass, 12 April 1989, in FBIS/SOV, 13 April 1989, pp. 26–7, and 13 July 1989, in ibid. 4 July 1989, p. 21.

⁹⁰ Breslauer, George W., ‘All Gorbachev's Men’, in The National Interest, 12, 1988, pp. 91–100,Google Scholar and Wallander, Celeste A., ‘Third-World Conflict in Soviet Military Thought’, in World Politics (Princeton), XLII, 1, 10 1989, pp. 31–63.Google Scholar

⁹¹ Battersby, John, ‘Soviets Seek Conciliatory Role in South Africa’, in Christian Science Monitor, 31 October 1989Google Scholar, and Wren, Christopher, ‘Seeing Change, Apartheid's Foes Seek a Path of Less Resistance’, in The New Tork Times, 23 July 1989Google Scholar.

⁹² Izvestia, 16, 2i, and 24 August 1990.

⁹³ ‘Africa South’, Johannesburg International Service, 26 October 1989, in FBIS/SOV, 1 November 1989, pp. 33–4, and Gennady Gerasimov, Tass, 7 May 1990, in ibid.. 8 May 1990.

⁹⁴ Radio Moscow, 23 March 1990, in FBIS/SOV, 27 March 1990, p. 34.

⁹⁵ Tass, 7 May 1990, in ibid. 8 May 1990, p. 1. For a Soviet discussion of the future of the U.N., see Nesterenko, Alexie, ‘The Potential of the United Nations’, in International Affairs, 6, 1990, pp. 65–71.Google Scholar