Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-04T00:27:27.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Selected chiefs, elected councillors and hybrid democrats: popular perspectives on the co-existence of democracy and traditional authority*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2009

Carolyn Logan
Carolyn Logan*
Affiliation:
Deputy Director, Afrobarometer, and Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Michigan State University, 303 S. Kedzie Hall, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA
*
Email: clogan@msu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The long-standing debate about the proper role for Africa's traditional leaders in contemporary politics has intensified in the last two decades, as efforts to foster democratisation and decentralisation have brought competing claims to power and legitimacy to the fore, especially at the local level. Questions persist as to whether traditional authority and democratic governance are ultimately compatible or contradictory. Can the two be blended into viable and effective hybrid systems? Or do the potentially anti-democratic features of traditional systems present insurmountable obstacles to an acceptable model of integration? Survey data collected by the Afrobarometer indicate that Africans who live under these dual systems of authority do not draw as sharp a distinction between hereditary chiefs and elected local government officials as most analysts would expect. In fact, popular evaluations of selected and elected leaders are strongly and positively linked. They appear to be consistently shaped by each individual's ‘leadership affect’, and by an understanding of chiefs and elected officials as common players in a single, integrated political system, rather than as opponents in a sharply bifurcated one. Moreover, there is no evident conflict between supporting traditional leadership and being a committed and active democrat. Rather than finding themselves trapped between two competing spheres of political authority, Africans appear to have adapted to the hybridisation of their political institutions more seamlessly than many have anticipated or assumed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Modern African Studies , Volume 47 , Issue 1 , March 2009 , pp. 101 - 128
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I would like to thank Michael Bratton and E. Gyimah-Boadi, as well as the editor and two anonymous reviewers for the Journal of Modern African Studies, for their very helpful comments and critiques. The author, however, bears full responsibility for the paper's contents.

References

REFERENCES

Ake, C. 1991. ‘Rethinking African democracy’, Journal of Democracy 2, 1: 32–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayittey, G. B. N. 1991. Indigenous African Institutions. New York: Transnational Publishers.Google Scholar
Beall, J. 2006. ‘Cultural weapons: traditions, inventions and the transition to democratic governance in metropolitan Durban’, Urban Studies 43, 2: 457–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beall, J., Mkhize, S. & Vawda, S.. 2005. ‘Emergent democracy and “resurgent” tradition: institutions, chieftaincy and transition in KwaZulu-Natal’, Journal of Southern African Studies 31, 4: 755–71.Google Scholar
Bowen, M. 1994. ‘Peace, politics, and peasants: the rural challenge in Mozambique’, paper presented at the Workshop on Political Transitions in Africa, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 11–12 March.Google Scholar
Buur, L. & Kyed, H. M.. 2006. ‘Contested sources of authority: re-claiming state sovereignty by formalizing traditional authority in Mozambique’, Development and Change 37, 4: 847–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chief, Linchwe II. 1989. ‘The role a chief can play in Botswana's democracy’, in Holm, J. & Molutsi, P., eds. Democracy in Botswana: the proceedings of a symposium held in Gabarone, 1–5 August 1988. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press, 99–102.Google Scholar
Comaroff, J. L. 1978. ‘Rules and rulers: political processes in a Tswana chiefdom’, Man 13, 1: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Sousa Santos, B. 2006. ‘The heterogenous state and legal pluralism in Mozambique’, Law and Society Review 40, 1: 39–76.Google Scholar
Ekeh, P. 1975. ‘Colonialism and the two publics in Africa: a theoretical statement’, Comparative Studies in Society and History 17, 1: 91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Englebert, P. 2000. State Legitimacy and Development in Africa. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Englebert, P. 2002. ‘Born-again Buganda or the limits of traditional resurgence in Africa’, Journal of Modern African Studies 40, 3: 345–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ensminger, J. 1997. ‘Changing property rights: reconciling formal and informal rights to land in Africa’, in Nye, J. & Droback, J., eds. Frontiers of the New Institutional Economics. New York: Academic Press, 165–96.Google Scholar
Geddes, B. 1991. ‘Paradigms and sand castles in comparative politics of developing areas’, in Crotty, W., ed. Comparative Politics, Policy, and International Relationsii. Political Science: looking toward the future. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 45–75.Google Scholar
Karlström, M. 1996. ‘Imagining democracy: political culture and democratisation in Buganda’, Africa 66, 4: 485–505.Google Scholar
Keulder, C. 1998. Traditional Leaders and Local Government in Africa: lessons for South Africa. Pretoria: HSRC.Google Scholar
Landell-Mills, P. 1992. ‘Governance, cultural change, and empowerment’, Journal of Modern African Studies 30, 4: 543–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, L. 2002. ‘The House of Chiefs: indigenizing democracy in Africa?’, paper presented at the 45th Annual Meeting of the African Studies Association, Washington, DC, 5–8 December.Google Scholar
Lewis, I. M. 1961. A Pastoral Democracy: a study of pastoralism and politics among the northern Somali of the Horn of Africa. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Logan, C. 2002. ‘Rebuilding Somali political systems: growing new roots in indigenous realities, or merely reconstructing the past?’, Fletcher School, Tufts University, Medford, MA, PhD Dissertation.Google Scholar
Logan, C. 2008. ‘Traditional leaders in modern Africa: can democracy and the chief co-exist?’, Michigan State University, Afrobarometer Working Paper 93, available at <http://www.afrobarometer.org/abseries.html>..>Google Scholar
Lund, C. 2006. ‘Twilight institutions: public authority and local politics in Africa’, Development and Change 37, 4: 685–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mamdani, M. 1996. Citizens and Subjects: contemporary Africa and the legacy of late colonialism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mattes, R. 1997. ‘Building a democratic culture in traditional society’, paper presented to the International Conference on Traditional Leadership in Southern Africa, hosted by Konrad Adenauer Stiftung and University of Transkei, Umtata, South Africa, 16–18 April.Google Scholar
Molutsi, P. 2004. ‘Botswana: the path to democracy and development’, in Gyimah-Boadi, E., ed. Democratic Reform in Africa: the quality of progress. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 159–82.Google Scholar
Murray, C. 2004. ‘South Africa's troubled royalty: traditional leaders after democracy’, Law and Policy Paper 23, Canberra: Centre for International and Public Law.Google Scholar
North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oomen, B. 2000. Tradition on the Move: chiefs, democracy and change in rural South Africa. Amsterdam: Netherlands Institute for Southern Africa.Google Scholar
Osabu-Kle, D. T. 2000. Compatible Cultural Democracy: the key to development in Africa. Peterborough, Ontario & Orchard Park, NY: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Owusu, M. 1992. ‘Democracy and Africa – a view from the village’, Journal of Modern African Studies 30, 3: 369–96.Google Scholar
Owusu, M. 1996. ‘Tradition and transformation: democracy and the politics of popular power in Ghana’, Journal of Modern African Studies 34, 2: 307–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Republic of South Africa (RSA), Department of Provincial and Local Government. 2002. Draft White Paper on Traditional Leadership and Governance. Pretoria: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Schaffer, F. C. 1998. Democracy in Translation: understanding politics in an unfamiliar culture. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Sklar, R. L. 1999. ‘African polities: the next generation’, in Joseph, R., ed. State, Conflict, and Democracy in Africa. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 165–77.Google Scholar
Simuyu, V. G. 1988. ‘The democratic myth in the African traditional societies’, in Oyugi, W. O., Atieno-Odhiambo, E. S., Chege, M. & Gitonga, A., eds. Democratic Theory and Practice in Africa. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, 49–70.Google Scholar
United Nations Development Program (UNDP). 2002. Human Development Report 2002. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Kessel, I. & Oomen, B.. 1997. ‘One chief, one vote: the revival of traditional authorities in post-apartheid South Africa’, African Affairs 96, 385: 561–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Rouveroy van Nieuwaal, E. A. B. 1999. ‘Chieftaincy in Africa: three facets of a hybrid role’, in van Rouveroy van Nieuwaal, E. A. B. & van Dijk, R., eds. African Chieftaincy in a New Socio-Political Landscape. Hamburg: LIT Verlag, 21–47.Google Scholar
West, H. G. & Kloeck-Jenson, S.. 1999. ‘Betwixt and between: “traditional authority” and democratic decentralization in post-war Mozambique’, African Affairs 98, 393: 455–84.Google Scholar
Williams, J. M. 2004. ‘Leading from behind: democratic consolidation and the chieftaincy in South Africa’, Journal of Modern African Studies 42, 1: 113–36.Google Scholar