Article contents
US Policy and Democratisation in Africa: the Limits of Liberal Universalism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 November 2008
Extract
Without the overriding concern of Soviet domination, Americans are engaging in an introspective re-evaluation of their national interests, values, and priorities. Despite the heterogeneity of all the participants, including the key opinion-makers, a near-consensus has emerged that the United States should be pushing and supporting an external process that has come to be known as ‘democratisation’. This policy stems from widespread perceptions about the special nature of America's identity and rôle in the world. The thesis presented here is that the United States is primarily defined by a particular liberal philosophy and concept of modernity, and that the projection of ‘democracy’ abroad is not necessarily a ‘natural’ or universal evolution of human development. Africa's increasing marginalisation has allowed certain groups committed to spreading ‘American values’ an unprecedented ability to shape policy and turn the continent into a liberal socio-political experiment.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995
References
1 May, Earnest, ‘Who Are We?’, in Foreign Affairs (New York), 72, 2, 03—04 1994, p. 135.Google Scholar
2 Weigel, George, American Interests, American Purpose (New York, 1989), p. 2.Google Scholar
3 Christopher, Warren, ‘Democracy and Human Rights: where America stands’, address at the World Conference on Human Rights, Vienna, 14 June 1993.Google Scholar
4 Kegley, Charles and Wittkopf, Eugene, American Foreign Policy: patterns and process (London, 1987), p. 255.Google Scholar
5 This concept is similar to World Bank claims to deal with ‘technical’ rather than ‘political’ issues. See Williams, David and Young, Tom, ‘Governance, the World Bank and Liberal Theory’, in Political Studies (Oxford), 42, 1, 03 1994, p. 93.Google Scholar
6 Weigel, op. cit. p. 3.
7 Dobrainsky, Paul, ‘Human Rights and U.S. Foreign Policy’, in The Washington Quarter1y, Spring 1989, p. 155.Google Scholar
8 Cingranelli, David, Ethics, American Foreign Policy, and the Third World (New York, 1993), p. viii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Vlahos, Michael, ‘The End of America's Postwar Ethos’, in Foreign Affairs, 66, 5, Summer 1988, p. 1095.Google Scholar
10 Kegley and Wittkopf, op. cit. p. 78.
11 Schlesinger, Arthur Jr, ‘Foreign Policy and the American Character’, in Foreign Affairs, 62, Fall 1983, p. 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12 Clough, Michael, Free at Last? U.S. Policy Toward Africa and the End of the Cold War (New York, Council on Foreign Relations, 1992), p. 4.Google Scholar
13 Cullen, David, ‘Human Rights Quandary’, in Foreign Affairs, 72, 5, Winter 1992–1993, p. 80.Google Scholar
14 Smith, Rogers, ‘Morality, Humanitarianism, and Foreign Policy: a purposive view’, in Nichols, Bruce and Loescher, Gil (eds.), The Moral Nation: humanitarianism and foreign policy today (Notre Dame, IN, 1989), p. 41.Google Scholar
15 Kissinger, Henry, American Foreign Policy (New York, 1977 edn.), p. 197.Google Scholar
16 Gardner, Richard, ‘The Comeback of Liberal Internationalism’, in Roberts, Brad (ed.), U.S. Foreign Policy After the Cold War (Cambridge, MA, 1992), p. 352.Google Scholar
17 Quoted in May, loc. cit. p. 136.
18 Kissinger, op. cit. p. 201.
19 Smith, Tony, ‘Making the World Safe for Democracy’, in The Washington Quarterly, Autumn 1993, pp. 298–9.Google Scholar
20 Schlesinger, loc. cit. p. 1.
21 Christopher, Warren, ‘A New Relationship’, in Africa Report (New York), 07—08 1993, p. 37.Google Scholar
22 Moose, George, address at African–American Institute, Washington, DC, 19 May 1993.Google Scholar
23 Christopher, ‘Democracy and Human Rights’, op. cit.
24 Moose, op. cit.
25 Lake, Anthony, ‘National Security Advisor Outlines U.S. Africa Policy’, address at Brooking Institute, Washington, DC, 3 May 1993.Google Scholar
26 See Jeifries, Richard, ‘The State, Structural Adjustment and Good Government’, in journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics (London), 31, 1, 03 1993 p. 31, for similar criticisms of the World Bank for moving towards ‘remodelling African societies to a greater extent than the remodelling of the familiar Western institutions’.Google Scholar
27 Johuston, Harry, Chairman of House Sub-Committee on African Affairs, address to seminar, ‘U.S. Foreign Policy: an African agenda’, Washington, DC, 5 March 1993.Google Scholar
28 Clough, op. cit. p. 55.
29 Clough, Michael, ‘Grass-Roots Policymaking’, in Foreign Affairs, 73, 1, 01—02 1994, pp. 2 and 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30 Schraeder, Peter J., United States Foreign Policy Toward Africa: incrementalism, crisis and change (Cambridge, 1994), pp. 2–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31 Michaels, Marguerite, ‘Retreat from Africa’, in Foreign Affairs, 72, I, 1992–1993, p. 94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32 Hicks, John F., Assistant Administrator, Bureau for Africa, Agency for International Development, statement before the Sub-Committee for Africa, Committee on Foreign Affairs, US House of Representatives, Washington, DC, 24 February 1994, p. 2.Google Scholar
33 Rotberg, Robert, ‘The Clinton Administration and Africa’, in Current History (Philadelphia), 92, 574, 05 1993, p. 1.Google Scholar
34 Clough, op. cit. p. 14.
35 Wiley, David, ‘Academic Analysis and U.S. Policymaking on Africa: reflections and conclusions’, in Issue: quarterly journal of opinion (Los Angeles), 19, 2, 1991, p. 45.Google Scholar
36 Woods, James in Kitchen, Helen, Some Guidelines on Africa for the Next President (Washington, DC, Centre for Strategic and International Studies, 1988), p. 31.Google Scholar
37 See Jehl, Douglas, ‘Rwanda Stand Reflects New U.S. Caution’, in International Herald Tribune (Paris), 19 05 1994, p. 4.Google Scholar
38 Walter Pincus, ‘CIA Proposal to Cut Back in Africa is Drawing Fire’, in ibid. 24 June 1994, p. 1. For a contrary view, see Hudson, Valerie, Ford, Robert, and Pack, David with Giordano, Eric, ‘Why the Third World Matters, Why Europe Probably Won't: the geoeconomics of circumscribed engagement’, in Journal of Strategic Studies (London), 14, 3, 09 1991, pp. 255–98.Google Scholar
39 See Greenhouse, Steven, ‘U.S. Conference on Africa Under Fire’, in International Herald Tribune, 28 06 1994, p. 3, for further reflections of low-level political and diplomatic interest.Google Scholar
40 Clough, loc. cit. p. 15.
41 Chesnault, Victor, ‘Que faire de l'Afrique noire?’, in Le Monde (Paris), 28 02 1990, p. 2,Google Scholar quoted by Chege, Michael, ‘Remembering Africa’, in Foreign Affairs, 71, 1, 1991–1992, p. 148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42 Lancaster, Carol, The U.S. and Africa: into the twenty-first century (Washington, DC, Overseas Development Council, 1993), p. 59.Google Scholar
43 Hilsman, Roger, ‘Policymaking is Politics’, in Rosenau, James (ed.), International Polities and Foreign Policy: a reader in research and theory (New York, 1969), p. 233.Google Scholar
44 Kitchen, Helen, U.S. Interests in Africa (New York, 1983), pp. 3–4.Google Scholar
45 Wiley, loc. cit. p. 40.
46 Clough, op. cit. pp. 43–4.
47 Bratton, Michael et al., ‘How Africanists View U.S. Africa Policy: results of a survey’, in Issue, Fall 1991.Google Scholar
48 Clough, op. cit. p. 29.
49 Ibid. pp. 23–4.
50 Morris, Milton, ‘African-Americans and the New World Order’, in The Washington Quarterly, Autumn 1992, p. 5.Google Scholar
51 Johnston, op. cit.
52 Morris, loc. cit. p. 12. Also, there are certain questions that need to be raised about the effects of the patronising exoticism, excessive commercialism, and ungrounded idealism that frame Africa's image in America. Ideas about Africa are usually bound up in such cultural icons as music, clothes, and names, and rarely go beyond such relatively superficial levels to discuss the deeper meanings and values of another culture, such as philosophy, authority, or conceptions of self and community. Current American multiculturalism is much more about consumption than understanding.
53 The Congressional Black Caucus led calls during 1994 for military intervention to implant democracy by force in Haiti.
54 Clough, op. cit. p. 35, raises a further question: ‘Implicitly, the argument that African- Americans have a greater claim on policy toward Africa than other people suggests that they have a lesser claim on policy toward other parts of the world.’
55 Ibid. p. 38.
56 Christopher, Warren, ‘Foreign Assistance Priorities After the Cold War’, in US Department of State Dispatch (Washington, DC), 4, 22, 31 05 1993, p. 393.Google Scholar
57 Clough, loc. cit. p. 7.
58 Schlesinger, James, ‘Quest for a Post-Cold War Foreign Policy’, in Foreign Affairs, 71, I, 1992–1993, p. 18.Google Scholar
59 Hicks, op. cit. p. 8.
60 Clough, op. cit. p. 20.
61 See Blustein, Paul and Lippmann, Thomas, ‘Clinton Says Trade Boosts Rights Issue’, in The Washington Post, 15 November 1994.Google Scholar
62 Without their former rôle as anti-Communist bulwarks, Daniel arap Moi and Mobutu Sese Seko have had to redefine their utility to the West. Their cooperation during the humanitarian crises in Somalia and Rwanda have effectively, if temporarily, served that purpose and tempered US pressures.
63 See Lippmann, Thomas, ‘Asian Nations Often Defy U.S. Wishes’, in The Washington Post, 15 November 1994.Google Scholar
64 Smith, loc. cit. p. 202.
65 Dobriansky, loc. cit. p. 166.
66 Smith, loc. cit. p. 203.
67 See World Bank, Governance and Development (Washington, DC, 1992). There remains an unresolved paradox: the desire for accountable and responsive government as well as autonomous technocrats isolated from special political interests.Google Scholar
68 Moose, George, interview with Novicki, Margaret, in Africa Report, January—February 1994 p. 24.Google Scholar
69 Healey, John and Robinson, Mark, Democracy, Governance, and Economic Policy (London, Overseas Development Institute, 1992), p. 157.Google Scholar
70 Moore, Barrington, Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: lord and peasant in the making of the modern world (London, 1967 edn.), argues that certain historical processes need to develop, notably the emergence of a large middle-class, in order to sustain a viable democratic state.Google Scholar
71 See Haggard, Stephan and Kaufman, Robert, ‘Economic Adjustment and the Prospects for Democracy’, in Haggard, and Kaufman, (eds.), The Politics of Economic Adjustment (Princeton, 1992), pp. 319–50.Google Scholar
72 There are very definite limits as to how far political legitimacy can be correlated to economic performance since other factors such as ethnicity, patron–client relationships, or nationalism can be more relevant.
73 Quoted in Cingranelli, op. cit. p. 8.
74 Huntington, Samuel P., ‘The Clash of Civilizations?’, in Foreign Affairs, 72, 3, Summer 1993, p. 41.Google Scholar
75 Williams and Young, loc. cit. p. 97.
76 Huntington, loc. cit. p. 25.
77 Smith, loc. cit. p. 204.
78 Quoted in Kymlicka, Will, Liberalism, Community, and Culture (Oxford, 1989), p. 82.Google Scholar
79 George Keenan, quoted in Smith, loc. cit. p. 200.
80 Herman Cohen, quoted in Schraeder, op. cit. p. 257.
81 In ‘The Seedlings of Hope’, US State Department, Washington, DC, June 1989, the US Ambassador to South Africa, Edward J. Perkins, spoke of US goals in promoting democracy, pluralism, and the free market, and in the next paragraph of ‘respect for African aspirations’.
82 Chomsky, Noam, Human Rights and Foreign Policy (Nottingham, 1978), p. 9, claims that the US ‘is no more engaged in programs of intellectual good than any other state has been’.Google Scholar
83 Lancasters, op. cit. p. 49.
84 Wiley, loc. cit. p. 46.
85 Smith, loc. cit. p. 208.
86 Hendrickson, David, ‘The Renovation of American Foreign Policy’, in Foreign Affairs, 71, 2, Spring 1992, p. 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
87 Ibid, p. 211.
88 Kissinger, Henry, ‘Foreign Policy is About National Interest’, in International Herald Tribune, 25 October 1993.Google Scholar
89 Moose, op. cit.
90 Historical examples of democratic features in African political systems have been given considerable significance by some authors, including Davidson, Basil, The Black Man's Burden: Africa and the curse of the nation-state (London, 1992), pp. 62–73. However, they represent the exception and are certainly divorced from current trends.Google Scholar
91 Schatzberg, Michael, ‘Power, Legitimacy and Democratisation in Africa’, in Africa (London), 63, 4, 1993, pp. 445–61.Google Scholar
92 See, for example, Lancaster, op. cit. p. 51.
93 See Meredith, Martin, South Africa's New Era: the 1994 election (London, 1994), p. 2, ‘Time and time again, voters leaving polling stations spoke of how their dignity had been restored.’Google Scholar
94 Young, Tom, ‘Elections and Electoral Politics in Africa’, in Africa, 63, 3, 1993, p. 306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
95 Lancaster, op. cit. p. 29.
96 Moose, interview with Novicki, loc. cit. p. 22.
97 Huntington, loc. cit. p. 49.
98 Smith, loc. cit. p. 205.
99 Young, loc. cit. pp. 300–1.
100 See Wilson, Ken, ‘Cults of Violence and Counter-Violence’, in Journal of Southern African Studies (Oxford), 18, 3, 09 1992, pp. 527–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
101 See Hyden, Goran, Beyond Umajaa in Tanzania: underdevelopment and an uncaptured peasantry (London, Ibadan, and Nairobi, 1980).Google Scholar
102 African adaptations of European religions are often very visible examples. Christianity, while widely accepted, has maintained aspects of ‘traditional’ African imagery and practice. In the words of Bayart, Jean-Fran¸ois, The State in Africa: the politics of the belly (London and New York, 1993), p. 27, ‘all borrowings are also acts of reappropriation and reinvention’.Google Scholar
103 Chabal, Patrick, ‘Interpreting Contemporary Black Africa’, draft paper for Conference on ‘Identity, Modernity, and Politics’, School of Oriental and African Studies, London, 14–15 September 1994.Google Scholar
- 13
- Cited by