Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T02:13:14.245Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluating ILS and MLS Sites without Flight Tests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2009

P. R. Mahapatra  and
M. M. Poulose
P. R. Mahapatra
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Indian Institute of Science
M. M. Poulose
Affiliation:
Officer-in-Charge, ACS NAAI, Bangalore Airport
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Instrument landing systems (ILS) and the upcoming microwave landing systems (MLS) are (or are planned to be) very important navigational aids at most major airports of the world. However, their performance is directly affected by the features of the site in which they are located. Currently, validation of the ILS performance is through costly and time-consuming experimental methods. This paper outlines a powerful and versatile analytical approach for performing the site evaluation, as an alternative to the experimental methods. The approach combines a multi-plate model for the terrain with a powerful and exhaustive ray-tracing technique and a versatile and accurate formulation for estimating the electromagnetic fields due to the array antenna in the presence of the terrain. It can model the effects of the undulation, the roughness and the impedance (depending on the soil type) of the terrain at the site. The results computed from the analytical method are compared with the actual measurements and good agreement is shown. Considerations for site effects on MLS are also outlined.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 42 , Issue 2 , May 1989 , pp. 278 - 290
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Poulose, M. M., Mahapatra, P. R. and Balakrishnan, N. (1985). Microwave landing system– a favoured alternative to the current ILS. IETE Tech. Review, 2, 375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Kayton, M. (1969). Landing guidance. Avionics Navigation Systems (ed. Kayton, M. and Fried, W. R.) ch.14. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
3 Federal Aviation Administration (1969). Installation instructions for ILS. DOT/FAA Handbook 6750. 6A. Washington, DC: Dept of Transportation, FAA.Google Scholar
4 Plessey Radar (1972). Technical Manual on ILS, TP-3140. Addlestone, England.Google Scholar
5Hill, D. A. and McFarland, R. H.(1966).The effects of irregular contour on image glidepath systems. Report EER 5–4. Athens, Ohio: Avionics Research Group, Dept of Electrical Eng, Ohio University.Google Scholar
6Morin, S.Newsom, P., Kahn, D. and Jordan, L. (1974). ILS Glideslope Performance Prediction, Vol. A. Report No. FAA-RD-74–157 A. Cambridge, Mass.: Transportation Systems Center.Google Scholar
7Ramakrishna, S. and Sachidananda, M. (1974). Calculating the effect of uneven terrain on glidepath signals. IEEE. Trans, on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, AES-10, p.380.Google Scholar
8Keller, J. B. (1962). Geometrical theory of diffraction. J. Opt. Soc. America, 52, 116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Kouyoumjian, R. G. and Pathak, P. H. (1974). A uniform geometrical theory of diffraction for an edge in a perfect conducting surface. Proc. IEEE, 62, 448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Ahluwalia, D. S.Lewis, R. M. and Boersma, J. (1968). Uniform asymptotic theory of diffraction by a plane screen. SIAM J. Appl. Math., 16, 783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Poulose, M. M., Mahapatra, P. R. and Balakrishnan, N.(1987). Terrain modelling of glideslope for instrument landing system. Proc. IEEE, 134 H, 275.Google Scholar
12 International Civil Aviation Organization (1973). Manual on Testing Radio Navigation Aids, Annexure II. Montreal, Canada: ICAO.Google Scholar
13 International Civil Aviation Organization (1968). International Standards and Practices, Annexure 10. Montreal, Canada: ICAO.Google Scholar
14Poulose, M. M., Mahapatra, P. R. and Balakrishnan, N. (1986). Accurate prediction of terrain undulation and roughness effects in radiating systems. Proc.of IEEE MONTECH'86 Conference on Antennas and Communications, Montreal, Canada, 29 september. to 1 october 1986.Google Scholar