Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-lvtdw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T00:25:42.025Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Submarine Morphology of certain Port Approach Channel Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2010

A. H. W. Robinson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Many of the major ports of the British Isles, including two of the most important, London and Liverpool, are situated at or near the head of sand-filled bays or estuaries. Their continued utility depends not only on the provision of adequate berthing facilities within the harbour area itself but also on the maintenance of a deep-water approach channel through the shoals of the outer estuary. In some cases the latter requisite is the more difficult of the two to achieve, especially where the bottom configuration is liable to considerable change over a relatively short period of time.

The problems connected with a changing sea-bed configuration come within the scope of loose-boundary hydraulics, a branch of flow mechanics which has only begun to be investigated. Some success in this direction has already been achieved using scale models of specific areas but many unsolved problems remain and much remains to be done.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , January 1956 , pp. 20 - 46
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Hydraulics Research 1947–1950, p. 1.Google Scholar
2Allen, J. (1947). Scale Models in Hydraulic Engineering.Google Scholar
3Van Veen, J. (1950). Eb-en vloedschaar systemen in de Nederlandse getijwatern. Tijd. van het Kon. Ned. Aardr. Gen., 67, 303.Google Scholar
4Stevenson, R. (1837). Report on improvements in the River Ribble. Second Report of the Tidal Harbours Commission (1846), p. 288.Google Scholar
5Van Veen, J. (1950). Dredge, Drain, Reclaim, p. 99.Google Scholar
6Cunningham, D. (1894). The estuary of the Tay. Min. Proc. lnst. Civ. Eng., 120, 299.Google Scholar
7Russell, R. C. H. and Macmillan, D. H. (1952). Waves and Tides, p. 123.Google Scholar
8Cashin, J. A. (1949). Engineering works for the improvement of the estuary of the Mersey. Journ. lnst. Civ. Eng., 7, 296.Google Scholar
9King, W. B. R. (1954). The geology of the English Channel. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. 110, 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Cloet, R.A hydrographic analysis of the Goodwin sands. Geogr. Journ., 120, 214.Google Scholar
11Thompson, P. (1820). Topographical and Historical Account of Boston, 130.Google Scholar
12Wheeler, W. H. (1896). The Lincolnshire Fens, (2nd Edition).Google Scholar
13Robinson, A. H. W. (1951). The changing navigation routes of the Thames Estuary. This Journal, 4, 357.Google Scholar
14Hewitt, W. (1922). The Wirral Peninsula, p. 63.Google Scholar
15Hodges, R. (1953). The Dock System of the Port of Liverpool: A Scientific Survey of Merseyside, p. 164.Google Scholar
16Baines, T. (1860). Liverpool in 1859, p. 33.Google Scholar
17Woods, E. C. (1944). Some history of the coastwise lights of Lancashire and Cheshire. Part 1. Trans. Hist. Soc. of Lancashire and Cheshire, 96, 99.Google Scholar
18Denham, H. M. (1840). Sailing Directions from Port Lynas to Liverpool, p. 142.Google Scholar
19Hills, G. F. (1859). The Navigation of the Irish Sea, p. 28.Google Scholar
20Bedford, E. (1902). Sailing Directions for the West Coast of England, ( 5th Edition).Google Scholar
21Diclcson, E. (1903). The Ribble Estuary. British Association Handbook for Southport, p. 66.Google Scholar
22Ashton, A. (1921). The Evolution of a Coastline: Barrow to Aberystwyth, p. 85.Google Scholar
23Hydraulics Research 1952, pp. 3–5.Google Scholar