Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T04:22:30.560Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Agglutinated protists from the Lower Cambrian of Nevada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

M. Streng ,
L. E. Babcock  and
J. S. Hollingsworth
M. Streng
Affiliation:
Institutionen för geovetenskaper, Paleobiologi, Uppsala Universitet, Norbyvägen 22, 75236 Uppsala, Sweden,
L. E. Babcock
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, 125 South Oval Mall, The Ohio State University, Columbus 43210,
J. S. Hollingsworth
Affiliation:
729 25 Road, Grand Junction, Colorado 81505,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Skeletonized protists (or protoctists) appear as body fossils in the late Neoproterozoic and the lower Cambrian (e.g., Allison and Hilgert, 1986; Lipps, 1992; Culver, 1994; Porter et al., 2003) and are well known from the post-Cambrian fossil record. However, molecular data and biomarkers of groups such as ciliates and foraminiferans indicate a long Precambrian history unrecorded by fossils, and also suggest that foraminiferans were important components of Neoproterozoic protistan communities (e.g., Summons et al., 1988; Wright and Lynn, 1997; Lipps, 2003; Pawlowski et al., 2003). The recent discovery of agglutinated microfossils interpreted as foraminiferans from the Neoproterozoic of Uruguay (Gaucher and Sprechmann, 1999) supports the inferences made from molecular data. Although foraminiferans are known for certain since the earliest Cambrian (e.g., McIlroy et al., 2001), their diversity and variability during the Cambrian is limited to a few agglutinated unilocular genera (e.g., Lipps, 1985; Culver, 1991, 1994; Cope and McIlroy, 1998; Zhigulina, 1999; McIlroy et al., 2001). Among these, Platysolenites Pander, 1851 is one of the best known genera because it has a wide distribution and high abundance in lower Cambrian sediments, especially those of Baltica and Avalonia (e.g., Rozanov, 1983; Lipps and Rozanov, 1996; McIlroy et al., 2001). Whether Platysolenites has an affinity with the foraminifera has been questioned by some authors (e.g., Eichwald, 1860; Rozanov, 1983; Brasier, 1989b), but the similarity of its morphology and wall structure to the foraminiferan genus Bathysiphon Sars, 1872 (e.g., Glaessner, 1978), and the presence of proloculi in Platysolenites (e.g., McIlroy et al., 2001) is strong evidence in favor of an affinity with the foraminifera. It should be emphasized that the preservation of proloculi in Platysolenites is rare, reported only in a few cases (McIlroy et al., 1994, 2001; Lipps and Rozanov, 1996) prior to this one.

Type
Paleontological Notes
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 79 , Issue 6 , November 2005 , pp. 1214 - 1218
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, C. W., and Hilgert, J. W. 1986. Scale microfossils from the Early Cambrian of northwest Canada. Journal of Paleontology, 60:973–1015.Google Scholar
Babcock, L. E., Rees, M. N., Robison, R. A., Langenburg, E. S., and Peng, S. C. 2004. Potential Global Standard Stratotype-section and Point (GSSP) for a Cambrian stage boundary defined by the first appearance of the trilobite Ptychagnostus atavus, Drum Mountains, Utah, USA. Geobios, 37:149–158.Google Scholar
Brasier, M. D. 1980. Microfossils. George Allen and Unwin, London, 193 p.Google Scholar
Brasier, M. D. 1989a. Sections in England and their correlation, p. 82–104. In Cowie, J. W. and Brasier, M. D. (eds.), The Precambrian–Cambrian Boundary. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Brasier, M. D. 1989b. Towards a biostratigraphy of the earliest skeletal biotas, p. 117–165. In Cowie, J. W. and Brasier, M. D. (eds.), The Precambrian–Cambrian Boundary. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Colom, G. 1948. Fossil tintinnids. Journal of Paleontology, 22:233–263.Google Scholar
Cope, J. C. W., and McIlroy, D. 1998. On the occurrence of foraminiferans in the lower Cambrian of the Llangynog Inlier, South Wales. Geological Magazine, 135:227–229.Google Scholar
Culver, S. J. 1991. Early Cambrian Foraminifera from West Africa. Science, 253:689–691.Google Scholar
Culver, S. J. 1994. Early Cambrian foraminifera from the southwestern Taoudeni Basin, West Africa. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 24:191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichwald, E. 1860. Lethaea Rossica ou Paléontologie de la Russie. Stuttgart, 1657 p.Google Scholar
Fairchild, T. R., Barbour, A. P., and Haralyi, L. E. 1978. Microfossils in the “Eopaleozoic” Jacadigo Group at Urucum, Mato Grosso, southwest Brazil. Boletim Instituto de Geosciências, Universidade de São Paulo, 9:74–79.Google Scholar
Firby-Durham, J. B. 1977. Platysolenites iz nizhnego kembriya kalifornii. Izvestiya Akademii Nauk SSSR, Seriya Geologicheskaya, 9:146–149. (In Russian) Google Scholar
Føyn, S., and Glaessner, F. 1979. Platysolenites, other animal fossils, and the Precambrian–Cambrian transition in Norway. Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift, 59:25–46.Google Scholar
Fritz, W. H. 1992. Walcott's Lower Cambrian olenellid trilobite collection 61K, Mount Robson area, Canadian Rocky Mountains. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin, 432,65p.Google Scholar
Gaucher, C., and Sprechmann, P. 1999. Upper Vendian skeletal fauna of the Arroyo del Soldado Group, Uruguay. Beringeria, 23:55–91.Google Scholar
Geyer, G., and Shergold, J. H. 2000. The quest for international recognized divisions of Cambrian time. Episodes, 23:188–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaessner, M. F. 1978. The oldest Foraminifera. Bulletin of the Australian Bureau for Mineral Research, Geology and Geophysics, 192:61–65.Google Scholar
Hollingsworth, J. S. 1999a. Stop 10. A candidate position for the base of the Montezuman stage, p. 34–37. In Palmer, A. R. (ed.), Laurentia 99. V Field Conference of the Cambrian Stage Subdivision Working Group, International Subcommission on Cambrian Stratigraphy, 12–22 September 1999. Institute for Cambrian Studies, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
Hollingsworth, J. S. 1999b. Stop 11. Proposed stratotype section and point for the base of the Dyeran Stage, p. 38–42. In Palmer, A. R. (ed.), Laurentia 99, V Field Conference of the Cambrian Stage Subdivision Working Group, International Subcommission on Cambrian Stratigraphy, 12–22 September 1999. Institute for Cambrian Studies, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
Hollingsworth, J. S. 2005. The earliest occurrence of trilobites and brachiopods in the Cambrian of Laurentia. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 220:153–165.Google Scholar
Koshevoj, V. V. 1987. Some bell-shaped Infusoria from Precambrian sedimentary rocks of Czechoslovakia. Izvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedenii, Geologiya i Razvedka, 2:20–24. (In Russian) Google Scholar
Landing, E., Myrow, P., Benus, A. P., and Narbonne, G. M. 1989. The Placentian Series: Appearance of the oldest skeletalized faunas in southeastern Newfoundland. Journal of Paleontology, 63:739–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipps, J. H. 1985. Earliest Foraminifera and Radiolaria from North America: Evolutionary and geological implications. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 17(7):644–645.Google Scholar
Lipps, J. H. 1992. Proterozoic and Cambrian skeletonized protists, p. 237–240. In Schopf, J. W. and Klein, C. (eds.), The Proterozoic Biosphere: A Multidisciplinary Study. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lipps, J. H. 2003. Precambrian–Cambrian evolutionary history of protists. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 35(6):384.Google Scholar
Lipps, J. H., and Rozanov, A. Y. 1996. The late Precambrian–Cambrian agglutinated fossil Platysolenites . Palaeontological Journal, 30(6):679–687.Google Scholar
Luo, H., Jiang, Z., Wu, X., Song, X., and Ouyang, L. 1982. The Sinian–Cambrian boundary in eastern Yunnan. People's Publishing House, Yunnan, 265 p. (In Chinese) Google Scholar
McIlroy, D., Green, O. R., and Brasier, M. D. 1994. The world's oldest foraminiferans. Microscopy and Analysis, 147:13–15.Google Scholar
McIlroy, D., Green, O. R., and Brasier, M. D. 2001. Palaeobiology and evolution of the earliest agglutinated foraminifera: Platysolenites, Spirosolenites and related forms. Lethaia, 34:13–29.Google Scholar
Onken, B. R., and Signor, P. W. 1988. Lower Cambrian stratigraphic paleontology of the southwestern Great Basin (White-Inyo Mountains of eastern California and Esmeralda County, Nevada). Bulletin of the Southern California Paleontological Society, 20:131–150.Google Scholar
Palmer, A. R. 1998. A proposed nomenclature for stages and series for the Cambrian of Laurentia. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 35:323–328.Google Scholar
Pander, C. H. 1851. Sur une découverte des fossiles faîte dans la partie inférieure du terrain Silurien de la Russie. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France, 8:251–259.Google Scholar
Pawlowski, J., Holzmann, M., Berney, C., Fahrni, J., Gooday, A. J., Cedhagen, T., Habura, A., and Bowser, S. S. 2003. The evolution of early Foraminifera. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 100:11494–11498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peng, P., Sheng, G., Fu, J., and Yan, Y. 1998. Biological markers in 1.7 billion year old rock from the Tuanshanzi Formation, Jixian strata section, North China. Organic Geochemistry, 29:1321–1329.Google Scholar
Peng, S. C., and Babcock, L. E. 2001. Cambrian of the Hunan-Guizhou region, South China, p. 3–51. In Peng, S., Babcock, L. E., and Zhu, M. (eds.), Cambrian System of South China. University of Science and Technology of China Press, Hefei.Google Scholar
Peng, S. C., Zhu, X. J., Babcock, L. E., and Wang, H. F. 2004a. Potential global stratotype sections and points in China for defining Cambrian stages and series. Geobios, 37:253–258.Google Scholar
Peng, S. C., Babcock, L. E., Robison, R. A., Lin, H. L., Rees, M. N., and Saltzman, M. R. 2004b. Global Standard Stratotype-section and Point (GSSP) of the Furongian Series and Paibian Stage (Cambrian). Lethaia, 37:365–379.Google Scholar
Porter, S. M., and Knoll, A. H. 2000. Testate amoebae in the Neoproterozoic Era: Evidence from vase-shaped microfossils in the Chuar Group, Grand Canyon. Paleobiology, 26:360–385.Google Scholar
Porter, S. M., Meisterfeld, R., and Knoll, A. H. 2003. Vase-shaped microfossils from the Neoproterozoic Chuar Group, Grand Canyon: A classification guided by modern testate amoebae. Journal of Paleontology, 77:409–429.Google Scholar
Posti, E. 1978. Novye nakhodki platisolenitid i gastropod iz lontovaskogo gorizonta Estonii. Eesti NSV Teaduste Akadeemia Toimetised, Köide Geoloogia, 27(3):103–107. (In Russian with English summary) Google Scholar
Remane, J. 1978. Calpionellids, p. 161–170. In Haq, B. U. and Boersma, A. (eds.), Introduction to Marine Micropaleontology. Elsevier, New York.Google Scholar
Rozanov, A. Y. 1983. Platysolenites , p. 94–100. In Urbanek, A. and Rozanov, A. Y. (eds.), Upper Precambrian and Cambrian Paleontology of the East European Platform. Wydawnictwa Geoloiczne, Warsaw.Google Scholar
Sars, G. O. 1872. Undersøgelser over Hardangerfjordens Fauna. Forhandlinger i Videnskabs-Selskabet i Kristiania, 1871:246–255.Google Scholar
Signor, P. W., and McMenamin, M. A. S. 1988. The Early Cambrian worm tube Onuphionella from California and Nevada. Journal of Paleontology, 62:233–240.Google Scholar
Summons, R. E., Brassell, S. C., Eglinton, G., Evans, E., Horodyski, R. J., Robinson, N., and Ward, D. M. 1988. Distinctive hydrocarbon biomarkers from fossiliferous sediment of the late Proterozoic Walcott Member, Chuar Group, Grand Canyon, Arizona. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 52:2625–2637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tappan, H. 1993. Tintinnids, p. 285–303. In Lipps, J. H. (ed.), Fossil Prokaryotes and Protists. Blackwell Scientific Publishing, Oxford.Google Scholar
Vidal, G., Palacios, T., Moczydłowska, M., and Gubanov, A. P. 1999. Age constraints from small shelly fossils on the early Cambrian terminal Cadomian Phase in Iberia. GFF, 121:137–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1908. Cambrian geology and paleontology, No. 3.–Cambrian brachiopoda: description of new genera and species. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 53:53–137.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1913. Cambrian geology and paleontology, No. 11.–New Lower Cambrian subfauna. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 57:309–326.Google Scholar
Wright, A.-D. G., and Lynn, D. H. 1997. Maximum ages of ciliate lineages estimated using a small subunit rRNA molecular clock: Crown eukaryotes date back to the Paleoproterozoic. Archiv für Protistenkunde, 148:329–341.Google Scholar
Zhigulina, M. S. 1999. A new species of foraminifera Luekatiella estonica from the Lower Cambrian of Estonia. Palaeontological Journal, 33:498–501.Google Scholar