Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:09:53.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Biostratinomy of ostracode assemblages from a small reef flat in Maunalua Bay, Oahu, Hawaii

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2016

Scot K. Izuka
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Museum of Invertebrate Paleontology, The University of Kansas, Lawrence 66045
Roger L. Kaesler
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Museum of Invertebrate Paleontology, The University of Kansas, Lawrence 66045

Abstract

Comparisons of biotopes based on ternary plots and cluster analyses of living ostracode assemblages with those from subfossil assemblages from a small reef flat show that biostratinomic processes modify the assemblages before they are incorporated into the sediment of the reef flat. Selective preservation changes the assemblages by preferentially preserving robust carapaces over fragile carapaces. The thin-shelled Paradoxostomatidae, which are abundant in the algae-dwelling assemblages, are largely destroyed by biostratinomic processes and are represented by only a few individuals in the subfossil assemblages.

Mixing of algae-dwelling assemblages and sediment-dwelling assemblages results in a lower relative proportion of many species in the subfossil assemblages than in the living assemblages. The Leptocytheridae, which comprise a large portion of the sediment-dwelling fauna, are reduced in relative proportion in the subfossil assemblages as a result of dilution of the sediment-dwelling fauna with an abundant, algae-dwelling fauna.

Transportation of ostracode remains by wave-induced currents removes the patchiness that is characteristic of the biotopes of the living ostracode assemblages but does not completely homogenize the assemblage despite the close spacing of sampling and the small areal extent of the biotopes studied.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, E. C. and Holden, J. C. 1971. Recent ostracodes from Clipperton Island eastern tropical Pacific. Transactions of the San Diego Society of Natural History, 16(7):165216.Google Scholar
Boucot, A. J. 1975. Evolution and Extinction Rate Controls. Developments in Paleontology and Stratigraphy, No. 1. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 427 p.Google Scholar
Boucot, A. J. 1981. Principles of Benthic Marine Paleoecology. Academic Press, New York, 463 p.Google Scholar
Brady, G. S. 1880. Report on the Ostracoda dredged by the H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873–1876, p. 1184. In Great Britain, Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger, Zoology 1(3).Google Scholar
Brady, G. S. 1890. On the Ostracoda collected by G. S. Brady in the South Sea Islands. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 35:48525.Google Scholar
Elofson, Olaf. 1941. Zur Kenntnis der marinen Ostracoden Schwedens mid besonder Berücksichtigung des Skageraks. Zoologiska Bidrag fran Uppsala, 19:215534.Google Scholar
Frydl, P. M. 1982. Holocene ostracodes in the southern Boso Peninsula, p. 61140. In Hanai, T. (ed.), Studies on Japanese Ostracoda. University Museum, University of Tokyo Bulletin, 20.Google Scholar
Fürsich, F. T. 1978. The influence of faunal condensation and mixing on the preservation of fossil benthic communities. Lethaia, 11:243250.Google Scholar
Holden, J. C. 1967. Late Cenozoic ostracodes from the drowned terraces in the Hawaiian Islands. Pacific Science, 21(1):150.Google Scholar
Holden, J. C. 1976. Late Cenozoic Ostracoda from Midway Island drill holes. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper, 680F, 43 p.Google Scholar
Horne, D. J. 1982a. The ostracode fauna of an intertidal Sabellaria reef at Blue Anchor, Somerset, England. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 15:671678.Google Scholar
Horne, D. J. 1982b. The vertical distribution of phytal ostracods in the intertidal zone at Gore Point, Bristol Channel, U.K. Journal of Micropalaeontology, 1:7184.Google Scholar
Izuka, S. K. 1983. Biostratinomy of ostracode assemblages from a small reef flat in Maunalua Bay, Oahu, Hawaii. Unpublished M.S. thesis, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, 61 p.Google Scholar
Kaesler, R. L. 1970. The cophenetic correlation coefficient in paleoecology. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 81:12611266.Google Scholar
Kaesler, R. L., Cairns, J. and Crossman, J. S. 1974. Redundancy in data from stream surveys. Water Research, 8:637642.Google Scholar
Kay, E. A. 1979. Hawaiian marine shells. Reef and Shore Fauna of Hawaii, Section 4: Mollusca. Bishop Museum Press, Honolulu, Hawaii, 653 p.Google Scholar
Kilenyi, T. I. 1971. Some basic questions on the paleoecology of ostracodes, p. 3144. In Oertli, H. J. (ed.), Paléoécologie des Ostracodes, Colloque Pau (1970), Bulletin Centre de Recherches Pau-SNPA, vol. 5 suppl.Google Scholar
Kontrovitz, M. 1967. An investigation of ostracode preservation. Quarterly Journal of the Florida Academy of Science, 29(3):171177.Google Scholar
Kontrovitz, M. 1975. A study of differential transportation of ostracodes. Journal of Paleontology, 49(5):937941.Google Scholar
Krutak, P. R. 1978. Holocene Ostracoda of Bay St. Louis, Mississippi, U.S.A. Micropaleontology, 24(3):225250.Google Scholar
Landsberg, L. B. 1951. Statistical investigations into the climatology of rainfall on Oahu. Meteorological Monographs, 1(3):723.Google Scholar
Macdonald, G. A. and Abbott, A. T. 1970. Volcanoes in the Sea. University Press of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, 441 p.Google Scholar
Maddocks, R. F. 1966. Distribution patterns of living and subfossil podocopid ostracodes in the Nosy Béarea, northern Madagascar. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Paper 12, 72 p.Google Scholar
Moberly, R. M. 1973. The ocean, p. 4752. In Armstrong, R. W. (ed.), Atlas of Hawaii. University Press of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii.Google Scholar
Murray, J. W. 1976. Comparative studies of living and dead benthic foraminiferal distributions, p. 45109. In Hedley, R. H. and Adams, C. G. (eds.), Foraminifera 2. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Pollock, J. B. 1928. Fringing and fossil coral reefs of Oahu. Bernice P. Bishop Museum Bulletin 55, 56 p.Google Scholar
Resig, J. M. 1969. Paleontological investigations of deep borings on the Ewa plain, Oahu, Hawaii. Hawaii Institute of Geophysics Report HIG-62–9, 99 p.Google Scholar
Reyment, R. A. 1967. Paleoethology and fossil drilling gastropods. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science, 70(1):3349.Google Scholar
Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, F. J. 1981. Biometry. The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, 2nd ed. W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, 859 p.Google Scholar
Sokal, R. R. and Sneath, P. H. A. 1963. Principles of Numerical Taxonomy. W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, 359 p.Google Scholar
Stanton, R. J. 1976. Relationship of fossil communities to original communities of living organisms, p. 107142. In Scott, R. W. and West, R. R. (eds.), Structure and Classification of Paleocommunities. Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Whatley, R. C., Trier, K. and Dingwall, P. M. 1982. Some preliminary observations on certain mechanical and biophysical properties of the ostracode carapace, p. 76104. In Bate, R. H., Robinson, E. and Sheppard, L. M. (eds.), Fossil and Recent Ostracods. Ellis Horwood Limited, Chichester, U.K. Google Scholar