Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:29:07.125Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Clinal variation, heterochrony, and facies in the Trentonian Sowerbyella Lineage (Ordovician, New York State)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Robert Titus
Robert Titus*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Hartwick College, Oneonta, New York 13820
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Clinal variation is systematic, morphologic variation within a species along a geographic or ecologic gradient. While common among today's biotas, it has rarely been well documented in the fossil record. It is, however, clearly displayed among the large populations of the Trentonian brachiopod genus Sowerbyella. In general, shallow agitated waters were populated by specimens with flat or round pedicle valve exteriors and ornately sculptured brachial valve interiors. Deeper, quieter facies were populated by forms with medial folds on pedicle valve exteriors and plain brachial valve interiors. This clinal variation was apparently the product of heterochrony with either the shallow-water forms having been peramorphic or the deeper water forms having been paedomorphic.

The distributions of the Sowerbyella clines are directly related to the facies developed within approximately eight million years of continuously deposited strata of the Trenton Limestone. Evolution of the Trentonian species of Sowerbyella appears to have been phyletic and locally adaptive. New clinal variants evolved by orthoselection during episodes when new environments were becoming available for occupation. The lower Trentonian transgression and the middle Trentonian shallowing were the major examples. Some clinal variants were eliminated when they failed to pass through facies bottlenecks in the lower and upper Trentonian. Thus, the history of the Sowerbyella lineage of the Trenton Group is the product of the facies-controlled production and selection of clinal variants. Clinal variation appears to be a central factor of phyletic evolution.

Sowerbyella kayi n. sp. is described.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 66 , Issue 5 , September 1992 , pp. 758 - 771
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cisne, J., Molenock, J., and Rabe, B. D. 1980a. Evolution in a cline: the trilobite Triarthrus along an Ordovician depth gradient. Lethaia, 11:341–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cisne, J., Chandlee, G. O., Rabe, B. D., and Cohen, J. A. 1980b. Geographic variation and episodic evolution in an Ordovician trilobite. Science, 209:925–927.Google Scholar
Cisne, J., Chandlee, G. O., Rabe, B. D., and Cohen, J. A. 1982. Clinal variation, episodic evolution and possible parapatric speciation: the trilobite Flexicalymene senaria along an Ordovician depth gradient. Lethaia, 15:325–341.Google Scholar
Clark, T. H. 1919. A section in the Trenton Limestone at Martinsburg, New York. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College, 63:1–21.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1838. Report of T. A. Conrad on the Palaeontological Department of the Survey. New York State Geological Survey Annual Report, 2:107–119.Google Scholar
Cooper, G. A. 1956. Chazyan and Related Brachiopods. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 127, 1,245 p.Google Scholar
Eldridge, N. 1985. Unfinished Synthesis. Oxford University Press, New York, 237 p.Google Scholar
Endler, J. A. 1977. Geographic Variation, Speciation and Clines. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 246 p.Google Scholar
Fisher, D. W. 1979. Folding in the foreland, Middle Ordovician Dolgeville facies, Mohawk Valley, New York. Geology, 7:455–459.Google Scholar
Foerste, A. 1912. Strophomena and other fossils from Cincinnatian and Mohawkian horizons chiefly in Ohio, Indiana, and Kentucky. Bulletins of the Scientific Laboratories of Dennison University, 17:17–172.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. 1977. Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 501 p.Google Scholar
Grant, V. 1963. The Origin of Adaptations. Columbia University Press, New York, 606 p.Google Scholar
Grant, V. 1985. The Evolutionary Process. Columbia University Press, New York, 496 p.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1847. Paleontology, Vol. 1, New York Geological Survey. C. Van Benthuysen, Albany, New York, 339 p.Google Scholar
Jones, O. T. 1928. Plectambonites and some allied genera. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of Great Britain, Palaeontology, 1:367–527.Google Scholar
Kay, M. 1933. The Ordovician Trenton Group in northwestern New York, stratigraphy of the lower and upper limestone formations. American Journal of Science, 5th series, 26:1–15.Google Scholar
Kay, M. 1953. Geology of the Utica quadrangle, New York. New York State Museum Bulletin, 347, 126 p.Google Scholar
Mather, K. 1917. The Trenton fauna of Wolfe Island, Ontario. Ottawa Naturalist, 31:33–40.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. 1942. Systematics and the Origin of Species. Reprint ed.Columbia University Press, New York, 1982, 334 p.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. 1954. Change of genetic environment and evolution, p. 157–180. In Huxley, J., Hardy, A. C., and Ford, E. B. (eds.), Evolution as a Process. Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. 1969. Populations, Species, and Evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 453 p.Google Scholar
Öpik, A. A. 1930. Brachiopoda Protremata der estlandischen Ordovizischen Kukruse-Stufe: Tartu Univ. (Dorpat) Acta & Commentationes, Series A, 17:1–262.Google Scholar
Öpik, A. A. 1934. Uber Klitamboniten. Tartu Universität (Dorpat) Acta & Commentationes, Series A, 26:1–239.Google Scholar
Prosser, C. S., and Cumings, E. R. 1897. Sections and thickness of the Lower Silurian formations on West Canada Creek and in the Mohawk Valley. New York State Museum Annual Report, 15:615–659.Google Scholar
Raup, D., and Stanley, S. 1978. Principles of Paleontology, Second Edition. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 481 p.Google Scholar
Raymond, P. E. 1903. The faunas of the Trenton at the type section and at Newport, N.Y. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 17:1–18.Google Scholar
Rodgers, J. 1971. The Taconic Orogeny. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 82:1141–1178.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. G. 1944. Tempo and Mode of Evolution. Columbia University Press, New York, 237 p.Google Scholar
Sowerby, J. de C. 1839. P. 636. In Murchison, R. I., The Silurian System, Pt. 2. John Murray, London.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1978. Chronospecies' longevities, the origin of genera, and the punctuational model of evolution. Paleobiology, 4:26–40.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1979. Macroevolution, Pattern and Process, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 332 p.Google Scholar
Titus, R. 1982a. Fossil communities of the middle Trenton Group (Ordovician) of New York State. Journal of Paleontology, 56:477–485.Google Scholar
Titus, R. 1982b. Fossil communities, paleoecology and tectonic history of the Trenton Group of central New York State, p. B1–B34. In Globensky, Y. (ed.), North American Paleontological Convention, Field Trip Guidebook.Google Scholar
Titus, R. 1986. Fossil Communities of the upper Trenton Group (Ordovician) of New York State. Journal of Paleontology, 60:805–824.Google Scholar
Titus, R. 1989a. Clinal variation in the evolution of Ectenocrinus simplex. Journal of Paleontology, 63:81–91.Google Scholar
Titus, R. 1989b. Facies of the Trenton Group of New York, p. 77–86. In Keith, B. D. (ed.), The Trenton Group (Upper Ordovician Series) of Eastern North America, Deposition, Diagensis, and Petroleum. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Studies in Geology 29.Google Scholar
Titus, R. 1991. Patterns of phyletic evolution in the Trenton Group, p. 103–118. In Ebert, J. (ed.), New York State Geological Association, 63rd Annual Meeting, Field Trip Guidebook.Google Scholar
Titus, R., and Cameron, B. W. 1976. Fossil communities of the lower Trenton Group (Middle Ordovician) of central and northwestern New York State. Journal of Paleontology, 50:1209–1225.Google Scholar
Vanuxem, L. 1842. Geology of New York, Part III, Comprising the Survey of the Third Geological District. White and Visscher, Albany, New York, 307 p.Google Scholar
White, T. G. 1895. The fauna of the upper Ordovician strata at Trenton Falls, Oneida Co., N.Y. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 15:71–96.Google Scholar
Willard, B. 1928. The brachiopods of the Ottosee and Holston Formations of Tennessee and Virginia. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College, 68:255–292.Google Scholar
Wilson, A. E. 1932. Ordovician fossil from the region of Cornwall, Ontario. Transactions Royal Society of Canada, 26:373–408.Google Scholar
Wilson, A. E. 1946. Brachiopoda of the Ottawa Formation of the Ottawa–St. Lawrence Lowland. Bulletin Geological Survey, Canada Department of Mines and Resources, 8, 149 p.Google Scholar
Wright, S. 1931. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics, 16:97–159.Google Scholar