Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T07:13:06.021Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lyre-shaped hornerid bryozoan colonies: homeomorphy in colony form between Paleozoic Fenestrata and Cenozoic Cyclostomata

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Frank K. McKinney ,
Paul D. Taylor  and
Victor A. Zullo
Frank K. McKinney
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina 28608
Paul D. Taylor
Affiliation:
Department of Palaeontology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, England
Victor A. Zullo
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, University of North Carolina at Wilmington 28403
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Reticulate Hornera reteramae (Bryozoa, order Cyclostomata) have been discovered as free-lying, lyre-shaped colonies in the Castle Hayne Limestone (Eocene) in North Carolina. These specimens represent a striking instance of homeomorphy in colony form with the Late Mississippian genera Lyropora and Lyroporella of the order Fenestrata.

Bryozoans with reticulate growth habit most commonly develop upright colonies. Living representatives generally grow in quiet environments or microenvironments, and fossils are generally found in situ in quiet-water deposits. However, lyre-shaped Hornera reteramae occur in skeletal packstones inferred to have been deposited in a moderate-energy, shallow, open shelf environment near normal wave base. Upper Mississippian lyre-shaped colonies are preserved in skeletal packstones and grainstones in localized channels or on upper surfaces of low-angle cross-bedded sheets interpreted as high-energy, marine shoal deposits. Modification of the reticulate growth habit to low, peripherally weighted, free-lying structures apparently allowed invasion of higher energy sand bottoms, both in Mississippian and Eocene times.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 67 , Issue 3 , May 1993 , pp. 343 - 354
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anstey, R. L. 1990. Bryozoans, p. 232–252. In McNamara, K. J. (ed.), Evolutionary Trends. Belhaven Press, London.Google Scholar
Baum, G. R. 1980. Petrography and depositional environments of the middle Eocene Castle Hayne Limestone, North Carolina. Southeastern Geology, 21:175–195.Google Scholar
Bigey, F. 1981. Fénestellides Paléozoïques et rétéporides actuels (bryozoaires), convergence morphologique et analogie écologique. Annales de Paléontologie Invertébrés, 67:59–80.Google Scholar
Blake, D. B. 1980. Homeomorphy in Paleozoic bryozoans: a search for explanations. Paleobiology, 6:451–465.Google Scholar
Boardman, R. S., and McKinney, F. K. 1976. Skeletal architecture and preserved organs of four-sided zooids in convergent genera of Paleozoic Trepostomata (Bryozoa). Journal of Paleontology, 50:25–78.Google Scholar
Boardman, R. S., McKinney., F. K., and Taylor, P. D. 1992. Morphology, anatomy, and systematics of the Cinctiporidae, new family (Bryozoa: Stenolaemata). Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, 70:1–80.Google Scholar
Borg, F. 1926. Studies on Recent cyclostomatous Bryozoa. Zoologiska Bidrag från Uppsala, 10:181–507.Google Scholar
Brooks, D. R., and McClennan, D. A. 1991. Phylogeny, Ecology, and Behavior. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, 434 p.Google Scholar
Busk, G. 1852. An account of the Polyzoa, and sertularian Zoophytes, collected in the Voyage of the Rattlesnake, on the Coasts of Australia and the Loisade Archipelago, &c, p. 343–402. In MacGillivray, J., Narrative of the Voyage of H.M.S. Rattlesnake, … During the Years 1846–1850, Vol. 1. Boone, London.Google Scholar
Canu, F., and Bassler, R. S. 1920. North American early Tertiary Bryozoa. U.S. National Museum Bulletin, 106:1–879.Google Scholar
Cuffey, R. J., and Blake, D. B. 1991. Cladistic analysis of the phylum Bryozoa. Bulletin de la Société des Sciences Naturelles de l'Ouest de la France, Mémoire HS 1:97–108.Google Scholar
Cuffey, R. J., and Drexler, W. W. 1979. Castle Hayne hornerid cyclostomes (Bryozoa, Eocene, North Carolina), p. 491–502. In Larwood, G. P. and Abbott, M. B. (eds.), Advances in Bryozoology. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Drexler, W. W. 1976. Wilmington Jacksonian hornerids—important cyclostome bryozoans from the upper Eocene Castle Hayne Limestone in southeasternmost North Carolina. Unpubl. Ed.D. dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, College Park, 112 p.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, C. G. 1831. Hemprich et Ehrenberg Symbolae Physicae. Animalia Evertebrata exclusis Insectis. Officina Academica, Berolini [unpaginated].Google Scholar
Gautier, T. G. 1972. Growth, form, and functional morphology of Permian acanthocladiid Bryozoa from the Glass Mountains, west Texas. Unpubl. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Kansas, Lawrence, 148 p.Google Scholar
Gregory, J. W. 1896. Catalogue of the Fossil Bryozoa in the Department of Geology of the British Museum (Natural History). The Jurassic Bryozoa. British Museum (Natural History), London, 239 p.Google Scholar
Haq, B. U., Hardenbol, J., and Vail, P. R. 1987. The new chronostratigraphic basis of Cenozoic and Mesozoic sea level cycles, p. 7–13. In Ross, C. A. and Haman, D. (eds.), Timing and Depositional History of Eustatic Sequences: Constraints on Seismic Stratigraphy. Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, Special Publication 24.Google Scholar
Harris, W. B., and Zullo, V. A. 1989. Sequence stratigraphy and correlation of Eocene through lower Miocene strata, North Carolina Coastal Plain, p. 43–52. In Harris, W. B., Hurst, V. J., Nystrom, P. G. Jr., and Ward, L. W. (leaders), Upper Cretaceous and Cenozoic Geology of the Southeastern Atlantic Coastal Plain. 28th International Geological Congress, Field Trip Guidebook T172.Google Scholar
Key, M. M. Jr. 1990. A new family of trepostome bryozoans from the Ordovician Simpson Group of Oklahoma. Journal of Paleontology, 64:700–724.Google Scholar
Key, M. M. Jr. 1991. The halloporid trepostome bryozoans from the Ordovician Simpson Group of Oklahoma. Journal of Paleontology, 65:200–212.Google Scholar
Lamouroux, J. 1821. Exposition méthodique des genres de l'ordre des Polypiers avec leur description et celle des principales espèces, figurées dans 84 planches; les 63 premières appartenant à l'Histoire naturelle des zoophytes d'Ellis et Solander. Agasse Éd., Paris, 115 p.Google Scholar
McGuirt, J. H. 1941. Louisiana Tertiary Bryozoa. Louisiana Geological Survey Bulletin 21, 177 p.Google Scholar
McKinney, F. K. 1977. Functional interpretation of lyre-shaped Bryozoa. Paleobiology, 3:90–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinney, F. K. 1978. Astogeny of the lyre-shaped Carboniferous fenestrate bryozoan Lyroporella . Journal of Paleontology, 52:83–90.Google Scholar
McKinney, F. K. 1980. Erect spiral growth in some living and fossil bryozoans. Journal of Paleontology, 54:597–613.Google Scholar
McKinney, F. K. 1981. Planar branch systems in colonial suspension feeders. Paleobiology, 7:344–354.Google Scholar
McKinney, F. K. 1986a. Evolution of erect marine bryozoan faunas: repeated success of unilaminate species. The American Naturalist, 128:795–809.Google Scholar
McKinney, F. K. 1986b. Historical record of erect bryozoan growth forms. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 228:133–149.Google Scholar
McKinney, F. K., and Boardman, R. S. 1985. Zooidal biometry of Stenolaemata, p. 193–203. In Nielsen, C. and Larwood, G. P. (eds.), Bryozoa: Ordovician to Recent. Olsen & Olsen, Fredensborg, Denmark.Google Scholar
McKinney, F. K., and Gault, H. W. 1980. Paleoenvironment of Late Mississippian fenestrate bryozoans, eastern United States. Lethaia, 13:127–146.Google Scholar
McKinney, F. K., and Jackson, J. B. C. 1989. Bryozoan Evolution. Unwin Hyman, Inc., Boston, 238 p.Google Scholar
McKinney, F. K., Listokin, M. R. A., and Phifer, C. D. 1986. Flow and polypide distribution in the cheilostome bryozoan Bugula and their inference in Archimedes . Lethaia, 19:81–93.Google Scholar
McKinney, F. K., and Raup, D. M. 1982. A turn in the right direction: simulation of erect spiral growth in the bryozoans Archimedes and Bugula . Paleobiology, 8:101–112.Google Scholar
Mongereau, N. 1972. Le genre Hornera Lamouroux, en Europe (Bryozoa—Cyclostomata). Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums, Wien, 76:311–373.Google Scholar
Natali, P. M. 1984. Paleoecologic interpretation of the Castle Hayne Limestone in North Carolina utilizing bryozoan zoarial form. Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, 16:183.Google Scholar
Smitt, F. A. 1867. Kritisk förteckning öfver Skandinaviens Hafs-Bryozoer. II. Öfversigt af Kongl. Vetenskaps-Akademiens Förhandlingar, Stockholm, 23 (Supplement):395–533.Google Scholar
Tavener-Smith, R. 1968. Skeletal structure and growth in the Fenestellidae (Bryozoa) (preliminary report). Atti della Societa Italiana di Scienze Naturali e del Museo Civico de Storia Naturale di Milano, 108:85–92.Google Scholar
Tavener-Smith, R. 1969. Skeletal structure and growth in the Fenestellidae (Bryozoa). Palaeontology, 12:281–309.Google Scholar
Taylor, P. D. 1985. Polymorphism in melicerititid cyclostomes, p. 311–318. In Nielsen, C. and Larwood, G. P. (eds.), Bryozoa: Ordovician to Recent. Olsen & Olsen, Fredensborg, Denmark.Google Scholar
Tavener-Smith, R. 1987. Fenestrate colony-form in a new melicerititid bryozoan from the U. Cretaceous of Germany. Mesozoic Research, 1:71–77.Google Scholar
Tavener-Smith, R. In press. Bryozoa. In Benton, M. J. and Whyte, M. (eds.), The Fossil Record 2. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
Tavener-Smith, R., and Larwood, G. P. 1990. Major evolutionary radiations in the Bryozoa, p. 209–233. In Taylor, P. D. and Larwood, G. P. (eds.), Major Evolutionary Radiations. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Vavra, N. 1988. Actinopora complicata Viskova & Endelman (Cyclostomata), eine seltene Bryozoa aus dem Helvetikum (Paleozän) des Haunsberges (N Salzburg, Österreich). Mitteilungen des Bayerische Staatssammunlung für Paläontologie und historische Geologie, 28:49–55.Google Scholar
Winston, J. E. 1978. Polypide morphology and feeding behavior in marine ectoprocts. Bulletin of Marine Science, 28:1–31.Google Scholar
Winston, J. E. 1979. Current-related morphology and behaviour in some Pacific coast bryozoans, p. 247–268. In Larwood, G. P. and Abbott, M. B. (eds.), Advances in Bryozoology. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Worsley, T. R., and Laws, R. A. 1986. Calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphy of the Castle Hayne Limestone, p. 289–296. In Textoris, D. A. (ed.), SEPM Field Trip Guidebooks, Southeastern United States, Third Annual Midyear Meeting, Raleigh, North Carolina. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists.Google Scholar
Zullo, V. A. 1983. Paleogene barnacles as depth/distance-from-shore indicators. Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, 15:53.Google Scholar
Zullo, V. A., and Harris, W. B. 1987. Sequence stratigraphy, biostratigraphy, and correlation of Eocene through lower Miocene strata in North Carolina, p. 197–214. In Ross, C. A. and Haman, D. (eds.), Timing and Depositional History of Eustatic Sequences: Constraints on Seismic Stratigraphy. Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, Special Publication 24.Google Scholar