Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T10:50:43.882Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Observations on the tunnel morphology of Heterocerus brunneus Melsheimer (Coleoptera: Heteroceridae) and its paleoecological significance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2016

George R. Clark II  and
Brett C. Ratcliffe
George R. Clark II
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506
Brett C. Ratcliffe
Affiliation:
Division of Entomology, University of Nebraska State Museum, Lincoln 68588
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The burrow structures of Heterocerus brunneus Melsheimer and its larvae are described from both field (northeastern Kansas) and laboratory habitats. These are further interpreted in light of known North American heterocerid biology. Two important observations are that significant features of any one burrow varied with the consistency (especially the water content) of the substrate, and that different insects were making superficially similar burrows at the same field site. It would require exceptional preservation, or associated body parts, to positively identify fossil traces of these structures as heterocerid burrows, but their general pattern should be readily recognized as foraging traces in even the most degraded preservations.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 63 , Issue 2 , March 1989 , pp. 228 - 232
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnett, R. H. Jr. 1968. The Beetles of North America. American Entomological Institute, Ann Arbor, 1,112 p.Google Scholar
Bryson, H. R. 1939. The identification of soil insects by their burrow characteristics. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science, 42:245–253.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, C. K. 1975. Recent lebensspuren in nonmarine aquatic environments, p. 431–458. In Frey, R. W. (ed.), The Study of Trace Fossils. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
Claycomb, G. B. 1919. Notes on the habits of Heterocerus beetles. Canadian Entomologist, 51(2):25.Google Scholar
Hallam, A. 1975. Preservation of trace fossils, p. 55–64. In Frey, R. W. (ed.), The Study of Trace Fossils. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
Häntzschel, W. 1975. Trace fossils and problematica. Part W, Miscellanea, Supplement 1. In Teichert, C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Pacheco, F. 1964. Sistematica, filogenia y distribucion de los heteroceridos de America (Coleoptera: Heteroceridae). Monografias del Colegio de Post-Graduados, no. 1, Escuela Nacional de Agricultura, Chapingo, Mexico, 111 p.Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, B. C., and Fagerstrom, J. A. 1980. Invertebrate lebensspuren of Holocene floodplains: their morphology, origin and paleoecological significance. Journal of Paleontology, 54:614–630.Google Scholar
Rhoads, D. C. 1975. The paleoecological and environmental significance of trace fossils, p. 147–160. In Frey, R. W. (ed.), The Study of Trace Fossils. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
Stanley, K. O., and Fagerstrom, J. A. 1974. Miocene invertebrate trace fossils from a braided river environment, western Nebraska, U.S.A. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 15:63–82.Google Scholar
Silvey, J. K. G. 1935. An investigation of the burrowing inner-beach insects of some fresh-water lakes. Michigan Academy of Science, Arts and Letters, Paper 21:655–696.Google Scholar