Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T03:21:26.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Occurrence of the rare genus Anapteris (Bivalvia: Corbulidae) in the Eocene of California

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Charles R. Givens*
Affiliation:
Earth Science Department, Nicholls State University, Thibodaux, Louisiana 70310

Extract

Anapteris van winkle (1919) is a distinctive corbulid genus characterized by the left valve having a peculiar wing-like flare anteriorly and both valves having the posterior area set off by a prominent umbonal keel (Vokes, 1945; Keen, 1969). Heretofore this genus has been known only from the type species, A. regalis Van Winkle (1919; 1921), which has been recorded only from the upper middle Eocene (Bartonian) Piney Point Formation in Virginia (Ward, 1985). The purpose of this note is to record the second known occurrence of Anapteris. The genus is present in the lower middle Eocene of southern California, where it is represented by Corbula wardii Hanna (1927).

Type
Paleontological Notes
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bukry, D. 1973. Low-latitude coccolith biostratigraphic zonation. Deep Sea Drilling Project, Initial Reports, 15:685703.Google Scholar
Bukry, D., and Kennedy, M. P. 1969. Cretaceous and Eocene coccoliths at San Diego, California, p. 3343. In Short Contributions to California Geology. California Division of Mines and Geology Special Report 100.Google Scholar
Clark, B. L., and Vokes, H. E. 1936. Summary of the marine Eocene sequence of western North America. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 47:851877.Google Scholar
Cossmann, A. E. M. 1886. Catalogue illustré des coquilles fossiles de l'Eocène des environs de Paris. Annales de la Société Royale Malacologique de Belgique, 21:17186.Google Scholar
Deshayes, G. P. 1856-1866. Description de animaux sans vertèbres découverts dans le bassin de Paris. 3 volumes text (2536 p.), 2 volumes atlas. J. B. Bailliere et fils, Paris.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. M. 1971. Benthonic foraminifera of the Ardath Shale and Stadium Conglomerate (Eocene), San Diego basin, California. Southern California Academy of Sciences, Bulletin 70:125130.Google Scholar
Givens, C. R. 1990. First record of the Tethyan genus Volutilithes (Gastropoda: Volutidae) in the Paleogene of the Gulf Coastal Plain, with a discussion of Tethyan molluscan assemblages in the Gulf Coastal Plain and Florida. Journal of Paleontology, 63:852856.Google Scholar
Givens, C. R., and Kennedy, M. P. 1979. Eocene molluscan stages and their correlation, San Diego area, California, p. 8195. In Abbott, P. L. (ed.), Eocene Depositional Systems, San Diego, California. Pacific Section, Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Field Trip Guide, Geological Society of America Annual Meeting.Google Scholar
Hanna, M. A. 1927. An Eocene invertebrate fauna from the La Jolla quadrangle, California. University of California, Publications in Geological Sciences, 16:247398.Google Scholar
Keen, A. M. 1969. Superfamily Myacea Lamarck, 1809, p. N690N699. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. N, Mollusca 6, Volume 2, Bivalvia. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Keen, A. M., and Bentson, H. 1944. Check List of California Tertiary Marine Mollusca. Geological Society of America Special Papers No. 56, 280 p.Google Scholar
Kennedy, M. P., and Moore, G. W. 1971. Stratigraphic relations of Upper Cretaceous and Eocene formations, San Diego coastal area, California. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 55:709722.Google Scholar
de Lamarck, J. B. 1818-1819. Histoire naturelle des animaux sans vertèbres: Volume 5. Paris, 612 p.Google Scholar
Lohmar, J. M., May, J. A., Boyer, J. E., and Warme, J. E. 1979. Shelf edge deposits of the San Diego Embayment, p. 1534. In Abbott, P. L. (ed.), Eocene Depositional Systems, San Diego, California. Pacific Section, Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Field Trip Guide, Geological Society of America Annual Meeting.Google Scholar
May, J. A., Warme, J. E., and Slater, R. A. 1983. Role of submarine canyons on shelfbreak erosion and sedimentation: modern and ancient examples, p. 315332. In Stanley, D. J. and Moore, G. T. (eds.), The Shelfbreak: Critical Interface on Continental Margins. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Special Publication 33.Google Scholar
May, J. A., Lohmar, J. M., Warme, J. E., and Morgan, S. 1991. Field trip guide: Early to middle Eocene La Jolla Group of Black's Beach, La Jolla, California, p. 2736. In Abbott, P. L. and May, J. A. (eds.), Eocene Geologic History San Diego Region. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Pacific Section, Book 68.Google Scholar
May, J. A., and Warme, J. E. 1991. Marine sedimentology of the early to middle Eocene La Jolla Group, p. 7388. In Abbott, P. L. and May, J. A. (eds.), Eocene Geologic History San Diego Region. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Pacific Section, Book 68.Google Scholar
Murray, J. W. 1973. Distribution and Ecology of Living Benthic Foraminiferids. Crane, Russak & Company, Inc., New York, 274 p.Google Scholar
Okada, H., and Bukry, D. 1980. Supplementary modification and introduction of code numbers to the low-latitude coccolith biostratigraphic zonation (Bukry, 1973; 1975). Marine Micropaleontology, 5:321325.Google Scholar
Palmer, K. V. W., and Brann, D. C. 1965. Catalogue of the Paleocene and Eocene Mollusca of the southern and eastern United States. Part I. Pelecypoda, Amphineura, Pteropoda, Scaphopoda, and Cephalopoda. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 48(218):1466.Google Scholar
Palmer, K. V. W., and Brann, D. C. 1966. Catalogue of the Paleocene and Eocene Mollusca of the southern and eastern United States. Part II. Gastropoda. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 48(218):4711057.Google Scholar
Squires, R. L. 1984. Megapaleontology of the Eocene Llajas Formation, Simi Valley, California. Los Angeles County Natural History Museum Contributions in Science, 350, 76 p.Google Scholar
Squires, R. L. 1987. Eocene Molluscan Paleontology of the Whitaker Peak Area, Los Angeles and Ventura Counties, California. Los Angeles County Natural History Museum Contributions in Science, 388, 93 p.Google Scholar
Steineck, P. L., Gibson, J. M., and Morin, R. W. 1972. Foraminifera from the Middle Eocene Rose Canyon and Poway Formations, San Diego. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 2:137144.Google Scholar
Stoliczka, F. 1870-71. Cretaceous Fauna of Southern India, v. 3. The Pelecypoda, With a Review of All Known Genera of This Class, Fossil and Recent. Geological Survey of India, Palaeontologia Indica, Series 6, 3, 537 p.Google Scholar
Van Winkle, K. E. H. 1919. Remarks on Virginia Eocene fossils, p. 612. In Van Winkle, K. E. H. and Harris, G. D., New or Otherwise Interesting Tertiary Molluscan Species from the East Coast of America. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 8 (33):5–32.Google Scholar
Van Winkle, K. E. H. 1921. Illustrations and descriptions of fossil Mollusca contained in the paleontological collections at Cornell University. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 8(38):312.Google Scholar
Vokes, H. E. 1945. Supraspecific groups of the pelecypod family Corbulidae. American Museum of Natural History, Bulletin 86(1):132.Google Scholar
Ward, L. W. 1985. Stratigraphy and Characteristic Mollusks of the Pamunkey Group (Lower Tertiary) and Old Church Formation of the Chesapeake Group—Virginia Coastal Plain. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1346, 78 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar