Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-20T18:06:48.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The oldest sigmodontine rodent revisited and the age of the first South American cricetids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2018

Franck Barbière Open the ORCID record for Franck Barbière [Opens in a new window] ,
Pablo E. Ortiz  and
Ulyses F.J. Pardiñas
Franck Barbière
Affiliation:
Instituto Superior de Correlación Geológica (INSUGEO), Av. Presidente Perón s/n, 4107 Yerba Buena, Tucumán, Argentina
Pablo E. Ortiz
Affiliation:
Instituto Superior de Correlación Geológica (INSUGEO), Av. Presidente Perón s/n, 4107 Yerba Buena, Tucumán, Argentina Cátedra de Paleontología, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo, Miguel Lillo 205, 4000 San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina
Ulyses F.J. Pardiñas
Affiliation:
Instituto de Diversidad y Evolución Austral (IDEAus-CONICET), Boulevard Brown 2915, 9120 Puerto Madryn, Chubut, Argentina and Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad (INABIO), Ecuador
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

New fossil material of Auliscomys formosus Reig 1978 allows restudy of the oldest known South American representative of the subfamily Sigmodontinae. Description of Auliscomys formosus was based on a fragmentary dentary exhumed from the Monte Hermoso Formation of central Argentina. Previous studies allocated A. formosus to the early Pliocene. A reevaluation of dental and cranial morphology, including for the first time the upper dentition, and the inclusion of A. formosus in a phylogenetic analysis of the tribe Phyllotini indicate that A. formosus represents a new genus, Kraglievichimys. Kraglievichimys shares a mosaic of characters with the living Auliscomys Osgood, 1915 and Loxodontomys Osgood, 1947. The taxonomic reassignment of A. formosus and the possibility that the Monte Hermoso Formation may be younger than early Pliocene in age provide a new understanding of cricetid diversification in South America. Estimates of sigmodontine ancestry by molecular approaches are biased toward older ages, whereas this new interpretation of the history of K. formosus suggests that the South American history of sigmodontines spans less than 4 million years.

UUID: http://zoobank.org/49dd8f60-56b1-4e8a-a044-6cea3a1bd52b

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 93 , Issue 2 , March 2019 , pp. 368 - 384
Copyright
Copyright © 2018, The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, S., and Yates, T.L., 2000, A new genus and species of phyllotine rodent from Bolivia: Journal of Mammalogy, v. 81, p. 18–36.Google Scholar
Barbière, F., Ortiz, P.E., and Pardiñas, U.F.J., 2015, Diagnosis morfológica y diversidad fósil de la tribu Reithrodontini (Rodentia, Sigmodontinae), in Libro de Resúmenes, III Simposio del Mioceno-Pleistoceno del Centro y Norte de Argentina, Corrientes, Argentina, September 2015, p. 4.Google Scholar
Barbière, F., Cruz, L.E., Ortiz, P.E., and Pardiñas, U.F.J., 2016a, A new genus of Sigmodontinae (Mammalia, Rodentia, Cricetidae) from the Pliocene of central Argentina: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, doi: 10.1080/02724634.2016.1199557.Google Scholar
Barbière, F., Ortiz, P.E., and Pardiñas, U.F.J., 2016b, Evolución de los roedores Cricetidae en América del Sur: Una visión desde el registro paleontológico, in Agnolin, F., Lio, G., Brissón-Egli, F., Chimento, N. and Novas., F., eds., Historia evolutiva y paleobiogeográfica de los vertebrados de América del Sur: Contribuciones Científicas del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia,” No. 6, p. 335–346.Google Scholar
Baskin, J.A., 1978, Bensonomys, Calomys and the origin of the phyllotine group of Neotropical cricetines (Rodentia: Cricetidae): Journal of Mammalogy, v. 59, p. 125–135.Google Scholar
Baskin, J.A., 1986, The late Miocene radiation of Neotropical sigmodontine rodents in North America: Vertebrates, Phylogeny, and Philosophy, v. 24, p. 287–303.Google Scholar
Bonaparte, J., 1960, La sucesion estratigrafica de Monte Hermoso (Provincia de Buenos Aires): Acta Geologica Lilloana, v. 3, p. 273–290.Google Scholar
Braun, J.K., 1993, Systematic Relationships of the Tribe Phyllotini (Muridae: Sigmodontinae) of South America: Norman, Oklahoma, Oklahoma Museum of Natural History, 52 p.Google Scholar
Braun, J.K., and Mares, M.A., 1995, A new genus and species of phyllotine rodent (Rodentia: Muridae: Sigmodontinae: Phyllotini) from South America: Journal of Mammalogy, v. 76, p. 504–521.Google Scholar
Carleton, M.D., and Musser, G.G., 1989, Systematic studies of oryzomyine rodents (Muridae, Sigmodontinae): A synopsis of Microryzomys: Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, v. 191, p. 1–83.Google Scholar
Carrizo, L.V., and Catalano, S.A., 2015, First phylogenetic analysis of the tribe Phyllotini (Rodentia: Sigmodontinae) combining morphological and molecular data: Cladistics, v. 31, p. 593–620.Google Scholar
Cione, A.L., and Tonni, E.P., 1995, Chronostratigraphy and “land-mammal ages” in the Cenozoic of southern South America: Principles, Practices, and the “Uquian” problem: Journal of Paleontology, v. 69, p. 135–159.Google Scholar
Cione, A.L., and Tonni, E.P., 2005, Bioestratigrafía basada en mamíferos del Cenozoico superior de la provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina, in de Barrio, R.E., Etcheverry, R.O., Caballé, M.F., and Llambias, E., eds., Geología y recursos minerales de la provincia de Buenos Aires: Buenos Aires, Argentine Geological Association, p. 183–200.Google Scholar
Cione, A.L., Gasparini, G.M., Soibelzon, E., Soibelzon, L.H., and Tonni, E.P., 2015, The Great American Biotic Interchange: Dordrecht, Springer, 97 p.Google Scholar
Cohen, K.M., Finney, S.C., Gibbard, P.L., and Fan, J.-X., 2013, The ICS international chronostratigraphic chart: Episodes, v. 36, p. 199–204.Google Scholar
Cuvier, F., 1837, Du genre Eligmodonte et de l'Eligmodonte de Buenos-Aires, Eligmodontia typus: Annales des Sciences Naturelles, Zoologie, v. 7, p. 168–171.Google Scholar
Deschamps, C.M., and Tomassini, R.L., 2016, Late Cenozoic vertebrates from the Southern Pampean Region: Systematic and bio-chronostratigraphic update: Publicación Electrónica de la Asociación Paleontológica Argentina, v. 16, p. 202–225.Google Scholar
Deschamps, C.M., Vucetich, M.G., Verzi, D.H., and Olivares, A.I., 2012, Biostratigraphy and correlation of the Monte Hermoso Formation (early Pliocene, Argentina): The evidence from caviomorph rodents: Journal of South American Earth Sciences, v. 35, p. 1–9.Google Scholar
Engel, S.R., Hogan, K.M., Taylor, J.F., and Davis, S.K., 1998, Molecular systematics and paleobiogeography of the South American sigmodontine rodents: Molecular Biology and Evolution, v. 15, p. 35–49.Google Scholar
Fabre, P.-H., Hautier, L., Dimitrov, D., and Douzery, E.J., 2012, A glimpse on the pattern of rodent diversification: A phylogenetic approach: BMC Evolutionary Biology, v. 12, p. 88.Google Scholar
Fischer, G., 1817, Adversaria zoological fasciculus primus: Mémoires de la Société Impériale des Naturalistes de Moscou, v. 5, p. 357–428.Google Scholar
Folguera, A., and Zárate, M., 2009, La sedimentación neógena continental en el sector extrandino de Argentina central: Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina, v. 64, p. 692–712.Google Scholar
Gazin, C.L., 1942, The late Cenozoic vertebrate faunas from the San Pedro Valley, Arizona: Proceedings of the United States National Museum, v. 92, p. 475–518.Google Scholar
Goloboff, P.A., Farris, J.S., and Nixon, K.C., 2008, TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis: Cladistics, v. 24, p. 774–786.Google Scholar
Hershkovitz, P., 1962, Evolution of neotropical cricetine rodents (Muridae) with special reference to the phyllotine group: Fieldiana: Zoology, v. 46, p. 1–524.Google Scholar
Kimura, Y., Hawkins, M.T.R., McDonough, M.M., Jacobs, L.L., and Flynn, L.J., 2015, Corrected placement of Mus-Rattus fossil calibration forces precision in the molecular tree of rodents: Scientific Reports, v. 5.Google Scholar
Kraglievich, L., 1927, Nota preliminar sobre algunos géneros y especies de roedores de la fauna argentina: Physis, v. 8, p. 591–598.Google Scholar
Leite, R.N., Kolokotronis, S.O., Almeida, F.C., Werneck, F.P., Rogers, D.S., and Weksler, M., 2014, In the wake of invasion: Tracing the historical biogeography of the South American cricetid radiation (Rodentia, Sigmodontinae): PLoS ONE, v. 9, p. e100687.Google Scholar
Lindsay, E.H., 2008, Cricetidae, in Janis, C.M., Gunnell, G.F., and Uhen, M.D., eds., Evolution of Tertiary Mammals of North America. Volume 2: Small Mammals, Xenarthrans, and Marine Mammals: Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 456–479.Google Scholar
Maestri, R., and Patterson, B.D., 2016, Patterns of species richness and turnover for the South American rodent fauna (Mpodozis, J., Ed.): PLoS ONE, v. 11, p. e0151895.Google Scholar
Marshall, L., 1985, Geochronology and land-mammal biochronology of the Transamerican Faunal Interchange, in Stehli, F.G., and Webb, S.D., eds., The Great American Biotic Interchange: New York, Springer, p. 49–85.Google Scholar
Marshall, L., Hoffstetter, R., and Pascual, R., 1983, Mammals and stratigraphy. Geochronology of the continental mammal-bearing Tertiary of South America: Palaeovertebrata, Mémoire Extraordinaire, p. 1–93.Google Scholar
Martínez, J.J., and Gardenal, C.N., 2016, Phylogenetic relationships among species of the Neotropical genus Graomys (Rodentia: Cricetidae): Contrasting patterns of skull morphometric variation and genetic divergence: Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, v. 118, p. 648–667.Google Scholar
Myers, P., 1977, A new phyllotine rodent (genus Graomys) from Paraguay: Occasional Papers, Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, v. 676, p. 1–7.Google Scholar
Nasif, N.L., Esteban, G.I., and Ortiz, P.E., 2009, Novedoso hallazgo de egagrópilas en el Mioceno tardío, Formación Andalhuala, provincia de Catamarca, Argentina: Serie Correlación Geológica, v. 25, p. 105–114.Google Scholar
Ortiz, P.E., Pardiñas, U.F.J., and Steppan, S.J., 2000, A new fossil Phyllotine (Rodentia: Muridae) from Northwestern Argentina and relationships of the Reithrodon group: Journal of Mammalogy, v. 81, p. 37–51.Google Scholar
Ortiz, P.E., Jayat, J.P., and Steppan, S.J., 2012, A New fossil phyllotine (Rodentia, Sigmodontinae) from the late Pliocene in the Andes of northern Argentina: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, v. 32, p. 1429–1441.Google Scholar
Osgood, W.H., 1915, New mammals from Brazil and Peru: Field Museum of Natural History, Zoological Series, v. 10, p. 187–198.Google Scholar
Osgood, W.H., 1947, Cricetine rodents allied to Phyllotis: Journal of Mammalogy, v. 28, p. 165–174.Google Scholar
Parada, A., Pardiñas, U.F.J., Salazar-Bravo, J., D'Elía, G., and Palma, R.E., 2013, Dating an impressive Neotropical radiation: Molecular time estimates for the Sigmodontinae (Rodentia) provide insights into its historical biogeography: Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, v. 66, p. 960–968.Google Scholar
Parada, A., D'Elía, G., and Palma, R.E., 2015, The influence of ecological and geographical context in the radiation of Neotropical sigmodontine rodents: BMC Evolutionary Biology, v. 15, p. 172–188.Google Scholar
Pardiñas, U.F.J., 1997, Un nuevo sigmodontino (Mammalia: Rodentia) del Plioceno de Argentina y consideraciones sobre el registro fósil de los Phyllotini: Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, v. 70, p. 543–555.Google Scholar
Pardiñas, U.F.J., and Tonni, E.P., 1998, Procedencia estratigráfica y edad de los más antiguos muroideos (Mammalia, Rodentia) de América del Sur: Ameghiniana, v. 35, p. 473–475.Google Scholar
Pardiñas, U.F.J., D'Elía, G., and Ortiz, P.E., 2002, Sigmodontinos fósiles (Rodentia, Muroidea, Sigmodontinae) de América del Sur: Estado actual de su conocimiento y prospectiva: Mastozoologia Neotropical, v. 9, p. 209–252.Google Scholar
Pardiñas, U.F.J., Lessa, G., Teta, P., Salazar-Bravo, J., and Câmara, E.M.V.C., 2014, A new genus of sigmodontine rodent from eastern Brazil and the origin of the tribe Phyllotini: Journal of Mammalogy, v. 95, p. 201–215.Google Scholar
Pardiñas, U.F.J., Myers, P., León-Paniagua, L., Ordóñez Garza, N., Cook, J.A., Kryštufek, B., Haslauer, R., Bradley, R.D., Shenbrot, G.I., and Patton, J.L., 2017a, Family Cricetidae (true hamsters, voles, lemmings and new world rats and mice), in Wilson, D.E., Lacher, T.E. Jr., and Mittermeier, R.A., eds., Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Volume 7. Rodents II. Barcelona, Lynx Edicions, p. 204–279.Google Scholar
Pardiñas, U.F.J., Prevosti, F.J., Voglino, D., and Cenizo, M., 2017b, A controversial unit within the Argentine Neogene: The “Irenean” Fauna: Ameghiniana, v. 54, p. 655–680.Google Scholar
Patton, J.L., Pardiñas, U.F.J., and D'Elía, G., 2015, Mammals of South America, Volume 2: Rodents: Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1384 p.Google Scholar
Pascual, R., and Herrera, H.E., 1973, Adiciones al conocimiento de Pliolestes tripotamicus Reig, 1955 (Mammalia, Marsupialia, Caenolestidae) del Plioceno superior de la Argentina: Ameghiniana, v. 10, p. 36–50.Google Scholar
Pearson, O. P., 1958, A taxonomic revision of the rodent genus Phyllotis: University of California Publications in Zoology, v. 56, p. 391–496.Google Scholar
Pearson, O.P., 1972, New information on ranges and relationships within the rodent genus Phyllotis in Peru and Ecuador: Journal of Mammalogy, v. 53, p. 677–686.Google Scholar
Pearson, O.P., and Patton, J.L., 1976, Relationships among South American phyllotine rodents based on chromosome analysis: Journal of Mammalogy, v. 57, p. 339–350.Google Scholar
Philippi, R.A., 1858, Beschreibung einiger neuen chilenischen Mäuse: Archiv für Naturgeschichte, v. 24, p. 77–82.Google Scholar
Prevosti, F.J., and Pardiñas, U.F.J., 2009, Comment on “The oldest South American Cricetidae (Rodentia) and Mustelidae (Carnivora): Late Miocene faunal turnover in central Argentina and the Great American Biotic Interchange” by Verzi, D.H. and Montalvo, C.I. [Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 267 (2008) 284–291]: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 280, p. 543–547.Google Scholar
Quintana, C.A., 2002, Roedores cricétidos del Sanandresense (Plioceno Tardío) provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina: Mastozoología Neotropical, v. 9, p. 263–275.Google Scholar
R Core Team, 2014, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, The R Foundation, http://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Reig, O., 1958, Notas para una actualización del conocimiento de la fauna de la Formación Chapadmalal. I Lista faunística preliminar: Acta Geológica Lilloana, v. 11, p. 241–253.Google Scholar
Reig, O.A., 1972, The evolutionary history of the South American cricetid rodents [Ph.D. dissertation]: London, College University, 453 p.Google Scholar
Reig, O.A., 1977, A proposed unified nomenclature for the enamelled components of the molar teeth of the Cricetidae (Rodentia): Journal of Zoology, v. 181, p. 227–241.Google Scholar
Reig, O.A., 1978, Roedores cricétidos del Plioceno superior de la provincia de Buenos Aires (Argentina): Publicación del Museo Municipal de Ciencias Naturales de Mar del Plata “Lorenzo Scaglia,” v. 2, p. 164–190.Google Scholar
Reig, O.A., 1980, A new fossil genus of South American cricetid rodents allied to Wiedomys, with an assessment of the Sigmodontinae: Journal of Zoology, v. 192, p. 257–281.Google Scholar
Reig, O.A., 1984, Distribuçâo geográfica e história evolutiva dos roedores muroideos sulamericanos (Cricetidae: Sigmodontinae): Revista Brasileira de Genética, v. 7, p. 333–365.Google Scholar
Reig, O.A., 1986, Diversity patterns and differentiation of high Andean rodents, in Vuilleumier, F., and Monasterio, M., eds., High Altitude Tropical Biogeography: New York and Oxford, Oxford University Press, p. 404–439.Google Scholar
Reig, O.A., 1987, An assessment of the systematics and evolution of the Akodontini, with the description of new fossil species of Akodon (Cricetidae, Sigmodontinae): Studies in Neotropical Mammalogy, v. 39, p. 347–399.Google Scholar
Salazar-Bravo, J., 2015a, Genus Auliscomys Osgood, 1915, in Patton, J.L., Pardiñas, U.F.J., and D'Elía, G., eds., Mammals of South America, Volume 2: Rodents: Chicago, University of Chicago Press, p. 1479–1499.Google Scholar
Salazar-Bravo, J., 2015b, Tribe Phyllotini Vorontsov, 1959, in Patton, J.L., Pardiñas, U.F.J., and D'Elía, G., eds., Mammals of South America, Volume 2: Rodents: Chicago, University of Chicago Press, p. 1457–1738.Google Scholar
Salazar-Bravo, J., Dragoo, J.W., Tinnin, D.S., and Yates, T.L., 2001, Phylogeny and evolution of the neotropical rodent genus Calomys: Inferences from mtDNA sequence data: Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, v. 20, p. 173–184.Google Scholar
Salazar-Bravo, J., Pardiñas, U.F.J., and D'Elía, G., 2013, A phylogenetic appraisal of Sigmodontinae (Rodentia, Cricetidae) with emphasis on phyllotine genera: Systematics and biogeography: Zoologica Scripta, v. 42, p. 250–261.Google Scholar
Schultz, P.H., Zárate, M., Hames, W.E., Camilion, C., and King, J.A., 1998, 3.3 Ma impact in Argentina and possible consequences: Science, v. 282, p. 2061–2063.Google Scholar
Schultz, P.H., Zárate, M., Hames, B., Koeberl, C., Bunch, T., Storzer, D., Renne, P., and Wittke, J., 2004, The Quaternary impact record from the Pampas, Argentina: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 219, p. 221–238.Google Scholar
Schultz, P.H., Zárate, M., Hames, W.E., Harris, R.S., Bunch, T.E., Koeberl, C., Renne, P., and Wittke, J., 2006, The record of Miocene impacts in the Argentine Pampas: Meteoritics & Planetary Science, v. 41, p. 749–771.Google Scholar
Smith, M.F., and Patton, J.L., 1999, Phylogenetic relationships and the radiation of sigmodontine rodents in South America: Evidence from cytochrome b: Journal of Mammalian Evolution, v. 6, p. 89–128.Google Scholar
Steppan, S.J., 1995, Revision of the tribe Phyllotini (Rodentia: Sigmodontinae), with a phylogenetic hypothesis for the Sigmodontinae: Fieldiana: Zoology (new series), v. 80, p. 1–112.Google Scholar
Steppan, S.J., and Pardiñas, U.F.J., 1998, Two new fossil muroids from the early Pleistocene of Argentina: Phylogeny and Paleocology: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, v. 18, p. 640–649.Google Scholar
Steppan, S.J., and Schenk, J.J., 2017, Muroid rodent phylogenetics: 900-species tree reveals increasing diversification rates: PLoS ONE, v. 12, e0183070, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183070.Google Scholar
Steppan, S., Adkins, R., and Anderson, J., 2004, Phylogeny and divergence-date estimates of rapid radiations in muroid rodents based on multiple nuclear genes: Systematic Biology, v. 53, p. 533–553.Google Scholar
Steppan, S.J., Ramirez, O., Banbury, J., Huchon, D., Pacheco, V., Walker, L.I., and Spotorno, A.E., 2007, A molecular reappraisal of the systematics of the leaf-eared mice Phyllotis and their relatives, in Kelt, D.A., Lessa, E.P., Salazar-Bravo, J., and Patton, J.L., eds., The Quintessential Naturalist: Honoring the Life and Legacy of Olivier P. Pearson: Berkeley, University of California Press, p. 799–826.Google Scholar
Teta, P., Pardiñas, U.F.J., Sauthier, D.E.U., and D'Elía, G., 2009, Loxodontomys micropus (Rodentia: Cricetidae): Mammalian Species, v. 837, p. 1–11.Google Scholar
Thomas, O., 1884, On a collection of Muridae from Central Peru: Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1884, v. 3, p. 447–458.Google Scholar
Thomas, O., 1898, On some new mammals from the neighbourhood of Mount Sahama, Bolivia: Annals and Magazine of Natural History, v. 1, p. 277–283.Google Scholar
Thomas, O., 1900a, Descriptions of two new murines from Peru and a new hare from Venezuela: Annals and Magazine of Natural History, series 7, v. 5, p. 354–357.Google Scholar
Thomas, O., 1900b, New Peruvian species of Conepatus, Phyllotis, and Akodon: Annals and Magazine of Natural History, v. 6, p. 466–469.Google Scholar
Thomas, O., 1900c, New South American mammals: Annals and Magazine of Natural History, series 7, v. 5, p. 148–153.Google Scholar
Thomas, O., 1902, On mammals from Cochabamba, Bolivia and the region north of that place: Annals and Magazine of Natural History, series 7, v. 9, p. 125–143.Google Scholar
Thomas, O., 1912, New bats and rodents from S. America: Annals and Magazine of Natural History, series 8, v. 10, p. 403–411.Google Scholar
Thomas, O., 1916, On the grouping of the South American Muridae that have been referred to Phyllotis, Euneomys and Eligmodontia: Annals and Magazine of Natural History, v. 8, p. 139–143.Google Scholar
Thomas, O., 1917, On the arrangement of the South American rats allied to Oryzomys and Rhipidomys: Annals and Magazine of Natural History, v. 20, p.192–198.Google Scholar
Thomas, O., 1919, On some small mammals from Catamarca: Annals and Magazine of Natural History, v. 3, p. 115–118.Google Scholar
Tomassini, R.L., Montalvo, C.I., Deschamps, C.M., and Manera, T., 2013, Biostratigraphy and biochronology of the Monte Hermoso Formation (early Pliocene) at its type locality, Buenos Aires Province, Argentina: Journal of South American Earth Sciences, v. 48, p. 31–42.Google Scholar
Verzi, D.H., and Montalvo, C.I., 2008, The oldest South American Cricetidae (Rodentia) and Mustelidae (Carnivora): Late Miocene faunal turnover in central Argentina and the Great American Biotic Interchange: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 267, p. 284–291.Google Scholar
Verzi, D.H., Montalvo, C.I., and Deschamps, C.M., 2008, Biostratigraphy and biochronology of the late Miocene of central Argentina: Evidence from rodents and taphonomy: Geobios, v. 41, p. 145–155.Google Scholar
Vilela, J.F., Mello, B., Voloch, C.M., and Schrago, C.G., 2014, Sigmodontine rodents diversified in South America prior to the complete rise of the Panamanian Isthmus: Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, v. 52, p. 249–256.Google Scholar
Vorontsov, N.N., 1959, The system of the hamster (Cricetinae) in the sphere of the world fauna and their phylogenetic relations: Biuletin Moskovskogo Obshtschestva Ispitately Prirody, Otdel Biologia, v. 64, p. 134–137.Google Scholar
Wagner, J.A., 1843, Die Saugthiere in Abbildungen nach der Natur mit Beschreibungen. Supplementband 3: Die Beutelthiere und Nager: Leipzig, Erlangen, 614 p.Google Scholar
Waterhouse, G.R., 1837, Characters of new species of the genus Mus, from the collection of Mr. Darwin: Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1837, v. 5, p. 15–21.Google Scholar
Waterhouse, G.R., 1846, Hesperomys Boliviensis: Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1846, v. 14, p. 9–10.Google Scholar
Williams, D.F., and Mares, M.A., 1978, A new genus and species of phyllotine rodent (Mammalia: Muridae) from northwestern Argentina: Annals of Carnegie Museum, v. 47, p. 193–221.Google Scholar
Zavala, C., 1993, Estratigrafia de la localidad de Farola Monte Hermoso (Plioceno-Reciente), Provincia de Buenos Aires: XII Congreso Geologico Argentino y II Congreso de Exploracion de Hidrocarburos, v. 2, p. 228–235.Google Scholar