Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:09:22.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Review of Eohiodon (Teleostei: Osteoglossomorpha) from western North America, with a phylogenetic reassessment of Hiodontidae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Li Guo-Qing ,
Mark V. H. Wilson  and
Lance Grande
Li Guo-Qing
Affiliation:
1Department of Biological Sciences and Laboratory for Vertebrate Paleontology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E9, Canada 3Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Academia Sinica, P.O. Box 643, Beijing 100044, P. R. China
Mark V. H. Wilson
Affiliation:
1Department of Biological Sciences and Laboratory for Vertebrate Paleontology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E9, Canada
Lance Grande
Affiliation:
2Department of Geology, Field Museum of Natural History, Roosevelt Road at Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60605
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Review of recently collected material of Eohiodon from North America suggests that there are two valid species, E. rosei (Hussakof) and E. woodroffi Wilson. Eohiodon falcatus Grande is identical to E. woodruffi in known skeletal features and nearly all meristic features and is treated as a junior synonym of the latter. The fossil genus Eohiodon Cavender differs from Hiodon Lesueur, which is known from both fossil and extant species, in numerous meristic and osteological features. The caudal skeleton in Eohiodon is nearly identical to that in Hiodon.

The traditionally accepted Notopteroidei, containing Lycopteridae, Hiodontidae, and Notopteridae, is a polypheletic group. The Asian fossil family Lycopteridae is not more closely related to Hiodontidae than it is to other taxa in the Osteoglossomorpha, but is sister to all other Osteoglossomorpha. The Hiodontiformes sensu stricto, including only the family Hiodontidae, is the sister-group of the Osteoglossiformes. This family is not more closely related to notopterids than to other taxa in Osteoglossiformes. The Notopteridae are most closely related to the Mormyroidea; together they and the fossil family Ostariostomidae constitute the sister-group of the Osteoglossoidei.

Fossil records of Hiodontiformes sensu stricto and Notopteroidei indicate a widespread pre-Neogene biogeographic range of these freshwater teleosts, suggesting that extinction must have been involved in the Cenozoic evolution of these two osteoglossomorph sublineages.

Type
Review Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 71 , Issue 6 , November 1997 , pp. 1109 - 1124
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arratia, G. 1991. The caudal skeleton of Jurassic teleosts; a phylogenetic analysis, p. 249–340. In Chang, M.-M., Liu, Y.-H., and Zhang, G.-R. (eds.), Early Vertebrates and Related Problems in Evolutionary Biology. Science Press, Beijing.Google Scholar
Arratia, G., and Schultze, H.-P. 1991. Palatoquadrate and its ossifications: development and homology within osteichthyans. Journal of Morphology, 208:1–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berg, L. S. 1940. Classification of Fishes both Recent and Fossil. Travaux de l'Institute Zoologique de l'Academie des Sciences de URSS, 5(2):87–517. (Russian and English texts. Also: J. W. Edwards, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1947, Lithoprint.)Google Scholar
Bridge, T. W. 1900. The air-bladder and its connection with the auditory organ in Notopterus borneensis. The Journal of the Linnean Society of London (Zoology), 27:503–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J. L. 1992. A Catalogue of Type Specimens of Fossil Fishes in the Field Museum of Natural History. Fieldiana, Geology, New Series, No. 23, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, 54 p.Google Scholar
Cavender, T. 1966. Systematic position of the North American Eocene fish, “Leuciscus“ rosei Hussakof. Copeia, 1966:311–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, M-M., and Chou, C.-C. 1977. On Late Mesozoic fossil fishes from Zhejiang Province, China. Institute of Vertebrate Palaeontology and Palaeoanthropology, Academia Sinica, Memoir 12:1–59. (In Chinese with English abstract.)Google Scholar
Gaudant, J. 1968. Recherches sur l'anatomie et la position systématique du genre Lycoptera (Poisson téléostéen). Mémoires de la Société Géologique de France (Nouvelle Série), 109:1–40.Google Scholar
Gaudant, J. 1988. L'ichthyofaune Éocène de Messel et de la Geiseltal (Allemagne): Essai d'approche paléobiogéographique. Courier Forschungs–Institut Senckenberg, 107:355–367.Google Scholar
Gosline, W. A. 1960. Contributions toward a classification of modern isospondylous fishes. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Zoology, 6:325–365.Google Scholar
Grande, L. 1979. Eohiodon falcatus, a new species of hiodontid (Pisces) from the late early Eocene Green River Formation of Wyoming. Journal of Paleontology, 53:103–111.Google Scholar
Grande, L. 1984. Paleontology of the Green River Formation, with a review of the fish fauna, 2nd edition. The Geological Survey of Wyoming, Bulletin 63, 334 p.Google Scholar
Grande, L. 1985. Recent and fossil clupeomorph fishes with materials for revision of the subgroups of clupeoids. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 181:231–372.Google Scholar
Grande, L. 1991. Transferred type specimens of well-preserved Eocene fishes from the Green River Formation. Journal of Paleontology, 65:889–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grande, L. 1994a. Studies of paleoenvironments and historical biogeography in the Fossil Butte and Laney members of the Green River Formation. Contributions to Geology, University of Wyoming, 30:15–32.Google Scholar
Grande, L. 1994b. Repeating patterns in nature, predictability, and “impact” in science, p. 61–84. In Grande, L. and Rieppel, O. (eds.), Interpreting the Hierarchy of Nature. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
Grande, L., and Buchheim, H. P. 1994. Paleontological and sedimentological variation in early Eocene Fossil Lake. Contributions to Geology, University of Wyoming, 30:33–56.Google Scholar
Grande, L., and Cavender, T. M. 1991. Description and phylogenetic reassessment of the monotypic Ostariostomidae (Teleostei). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 11:405–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, P. H. 1963. The swimbladder in African Notopteridae (Pisces) and its bearing on the taxonomy of the family. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Zoology, 11:377–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, P. H. 1970. On the genus Lycoptera and its relationship with the family Hiodontidae (Pisces, Osteoglossomorpha). Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Zoology, 19:257–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, P. H. 1973. Interrelationships of osteoglossomorphs, p. 307–332. In Greenwood, P. H., Miles, R. S., and Patterson, C. (eds.), Interrelationships of Fishes. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Greenwood, P. H., Rosen, D. E., Weitzman, S. H., and Myers, G. S. 1966. Phyletic studies of teleostean fishes, with a provisional classification of living forms. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 131:339–456.Google Scholar
Gregory, W. K. 1933. Fish skulls: a study of the evolution of natural mechanisms. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 23:75–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbs, C. L., and Lagler, K. F. 1964. Fishes of the Great Lakes Region. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 213 p.Google Scholar
Hussakof, L. 1916. A new cyprinid fish Leuciscus rosei from the Miocene of British Columbia. American Journal of Science, 42:18–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jin, F. 1991. A new genus and species of Hiodontidae from Xintai, Shandong. Vertebrata PalAsiatica, 29:46–54. (In Chinese with English abstract.)Google Scholar
Jin, F. 1994. A nomen novum for Tanichthys Jin, 1991. Vertebrata PalAsiatica, 32:70. (In Chinese with English abstract.)Google Scholar
Jin, F., Zhang, J.-Y., and Zhou, Z. H. 1995. Late Mesozoic fish fauna from western Liaoning, China. Vertebrata PalAsiatica, 33:169–193. (In Chinese with English abstract.)Google Scholar
Lauder, G. V., and Liem, K. F. 1983. The evolution and interrelationships of the actinopterygian fishes. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 150:95–197.Google Scholar
Leidy, J. 1873. Notice of remains of fishes in the Brider Tertiary Formation of Wyoming. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 25:97–99.Google Scholar
Lesueur, C. A. 1818. Description of several new species of North American fishes. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 1:359–369.Google Scholar
Li, G.-Q. 1987. A new genus of Hiodontidae from Luozigou Basin, east Jilin. Vertebrata PalAsiatica, 25:91–107. [In Chinese with English abstract.]Google Scholar
Li, G.-Q. 1994a. New Osteoglossomorphs (Teleostei) from the Upper Cretaceous and Lower Tertiary of North America and Their Phylogenetic Significance. Unpubl. , University of Alberta, Canada, 290 p.Google Scholar
Li, G.-Q. 1994b. Systematic position of the Australian fossil osteoglossid fish Phareodus (=Phareoides) queenslandicus Hills. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum, 37:287–300.Google Scholar
Li, G.-Q., and Wilson, M. V. H. 1994. An Eocene species of Hiodon from Montana, its phylogenetic relationships, and the evolution of the postcranial skeleton in the Hiodontidae (Teleostei). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 14:153–167.Google Scholar
Li, G.-Q., and Wilson, M. V. H. 1996a. The discovery of Heterotidinae (Teleostei: Osteoglossidae) from the Paleocene Paskapoo Formation of Alberta, Canada. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 16:198–209.Google Scholar
Li, G.-Q., and Wilson, M. V. H. 1996b. Phylogeny of Osteoglossomorpha, p. 163–174. In Stiassny, M., Parenti, L., and Johnson, G. D. (eds.), Interrelationships of Fishes. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, California.Google Scholar
Li, G.-Q., Grande, L., and Wilson, M. V. H. 1997 The species of †Phareodus (Teleostei: Osteoglossidae) from the Eocene of North America and their phylogenetic relationships. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 17:487–505.Google Scholar
Liu, H.-T., Su, T.-T, Huang, W.-L., and Chang, K.-J. 1963. Lycopterid fishes from North China. Institute of Vertebrate Palaeontology and Palaeoanthropology, Academia Sinica, Memoir 6:1–53. [In Chinese with English abstract.]Google Scholar
Ma, F.-C. 1980. A new genus of Lycopteridae from Ningxia, China. Vertebrata PalAsiatica, 18:286–295. [In Chinese with English abstract.]Google Scholar
Ma, F.-C. 1987. Review of Lycoptera davidi. Vertebrata PalAsiatica, 25:8–19. [In Chinese with English abstract.]Google Scholar
Maddison, W. P., and Maddison, D. R. 1992. MacClade: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution. Version 3.05. Sinauer Associates, Inc-Publishers, Sunderland, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
McAllister, D. E. 1968. Evolution of branchiostegals and classification of teleostome fishes. Bulletin of National Museum of Canada, 221:1–239.Google Scholar
Müller, J. 1846. Über den bau und die grenzen der ganoiden und über des natürliche system der fische. Abhandlungen der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 1846:117–216.Google Scholar
Müller, J. 1847. Fossile Fische, p. 260–264. In Von Middendorff, A. Th. (ed.), Reise in den aussersten norder und osten Sibiriens wahrend der Jahre 1843 und 1844 (Erster Band). Buchdruckerei der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, St. Petersburg.Google Scholar
Nelson, G. J. 1972a. Cephalic sensory canals, pitlines, and the classification of esocoid fishes, with notes on galaxiids and other teleosts. American Museum Novitates, 2492, 49 p.Google Scholar
Nelson, G. J. 1972b. Observations on the gut of the Osteoglossomorpha. Copeia, 1972:325–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, G. J. 1973. Notes on the structure and relationships of certain Cretaceous and Eocene teleostean fishes. American Museum Novitates, 2524, 31 p.Google Scholar
Nelson, J. S. 1994. Fishes of the World, 3rd edition. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 600 p.Google Scholar
Nolf, D. 1985. Otolithi Piscium. Handbook of Paleoichthyology, Volume 10. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, New York, 145 p.Google Scholar
Patterson, C. 1970. Two Upper Cretaceous salmoniform fishes from the Lebanon. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Geology, 19:205–296.Google Scholar
Patterson, C., and Rosen, D. E. 1977. Review of ichthyodectiform and other Mesozoic teleost fishes and the theory and practice of classifying fossils. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 158:81–172.Google Scholar
Regan, C. T. 1909. The classification of teleostean fishes. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 8, 3:75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridewood, W. G. 1904. On the cranial osteology of the fishes of the families Mormyridae, Notopteridae, and Hyodontidae. The Journal of the Linnean Society of London (Zoology), 29:188–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rojo, A. L. 1991. Dictionary of Evolutionary Fish Osteology. CRC press, Boca Raton, Florida, 273 p.Google Scholar
Sanders, M. 1934. Die fossilen fische der alttertiaren süsswasserablagerungen aus Mittel-Sumatra. Verhandelingen van het Geologisch-Mijnbouwkundig Genootschap voor Nederland en Kolonien (Geologische Serie), 11:1–144.Google Scholar
Schultze, H.-P., and Arratia, G. 1988. Reevaluation of the caudal skeleton of some actinopterygian fishes: II. Hiodon, Elops, and Albula. Journal of Morphology, 195:257–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shen, M. 1989. Eohiodon from China and the distribution of osteoglossomorphs. Vertebrata PalAsiatica, 27:237–247. [In Chinese with English abstract.]Google Scholar
Shen, M., Jin, F., and Zhang, J.-Y. 1991. The interrelationships of Huashiidae (Teleostei) and its implication on systematics. Vertebrata PalAsiatica, 29:245–263. [In Chinese with English abstract.]Google Scholar
Su, D.-Z. 1986. The discovery of fossil osteoglossid fish in China. Vertebrata PalAsiatica, 24:10–19. [In Chinese with English abstract.]Google Scholar
Swofford, D. 1993. PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony, Version 3.1.1. Computer Program for Macintosh Computers. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Sytchevskaya, E. K. 1986. Palaeogene freshwater fish fauna of the USSR and Mongolia. The Joint Soviet–Mongolia Paleontological Expedition (Transactions), 29:1–157. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Taverne, L. 1977. Ostéologie, phylogénese et systématique des téléostéens fossiles et actuels du super-ordre des ostéoglossomorphes. Premiere Partie. Académie Royale de Belgique, Mémoires de la Classe des Sciences, XLII-Fascicule 3:1–235.Google Scholar
Taverne, L. 1978. Ostéologie, phylogénese et systématique des téléostéens fossiles et actuels du super-ordre des ostéoglossomorphes. Deuxieme Partie. Académie Royale de Belgique, Mémoires de la Classe des Sciences, XLII-Fascicule 6:1–213.Google Scholar
Taverne, L. 1979. Ostéologie, phylogénese et systématique des téléostéens fossiles et actuels du superordre des ostéoglossomorphes. Troisieme Partie. Académie Royale de Belgique, Mémoires de la Classe des Sciences, XLIII-Fascicule 3:1–168.Google Scholar
Valenciennes, M. A. 1846. Histoire naturelle des poissons. P. Bertrand, Paris, 534 p.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, R. H. 1910. The caudal fin of Teleostomi. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1910:590–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, M. V. H. 1974. Fossil fishes of the Tertiary of British Columbia. Unpubl. , University of Toronto, Canada, 375 p.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. V. H. 1977. Middle Eocene freshwater fishes from British Columbia. Life Sciences Contributions, Royal Ontario Museum, 113:1–61.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. V. H. 1978. Eohiodon woodruffi n. sp. (Teleostei, Hiodontidae) from the middle Eocene Klondike Mountain Formation near Republic, Washington. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 15:679–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, M. V. H., and Williams, R. R. G. 1991. New Paleocene genus and species of smelt (Teleostei: Osmeridae) from freshwater deposits of the Paskapoo Formation, Alberta, Canada, and comments on osmerid phytogeny. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 11:434–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, M. V. H., and Williams, R. R. G. 1993. Phylogenetic, biogeographic, and ecological significance of early fossil records of North American freshwater teleostean fishes, p. 224–244. In Mayden, R. L. (ed.), Systematics, Historical Ecology, and North American Freshwater fishes. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.Google Scholar
Zhang, M.-M., and Zhou, J.-J. 1976. Discovery of Plesiolycoptera in Songhuajiang–Liaoning Basin and origin of Osteoglossomorpha. Vertebrata PalAsiatica, 15:146–153. (In Chinese.)Google Scholar
Zhang, M.-M., Zhou, J.-J., and Qin, D.-R. 1985. Tertiary fish fauna from coastal region of Bohai Sea. Memoirs of Institute of Vertebrate Palaentology and Palaeoanthropology, Academia Sinica, 17:1–60. (In Chinese with English abstract.)Google Scholar