Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:35:31.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rhamphidoceras saxatilis n. gen. and sp., a micromorph ammonite from the lower Turonian of Trans-Pecos Texas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

W. J. Kennedy  and
W. A. Cobban
W. J. Kennedy
Affiliation:
Geological Collections, University Museum, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PW, United Kingdom
W. A. Cobban
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey, Box 25046, Mail Stop 919, Denver Federal Center, Denver, Colorado 80225
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Over the past few years, the authors, along with colleagues, have documented the late Cenomanian and early Turonian ammonite faunas of the Western Interior region of the United States and its extension into Texas (Cobban, 1987, 1988a, 1988b; Cobban and Hook, 1983; Cobban et al., 1989; Kennedy, 1988; Kennedy and Cobban, 1988a, 1988b; Kennedy et al., 1989; Kennedy et al., 1987; Kennedy and Cobban, 1989, 1990). In these works the authors have recognized a series of micromorph genera and species, taxa that are genuinely diminutive and adult at diameters of 6.5–38 mm. These taxa show characteristic features indicating them to be adult, such as crowding of septa and reduction or loss of ornament at or near the aperture. Where large numbers of specimens are available, dimorphism can be demonstrated (as in Nannometoicoceras Kennedy, 1988, p. 63, with Metoicoceras acceleratum Hyatt, 1903, p. 127, PI. 14, figs. 11–14, as type species) so that they are indeed micromorphs, not simply juveniles or microconchs of “normal-sized” taxa. Such micromorphs are known from other parts of the world (e.g., Protacanthoceras Spath, 1923; see Wright and Kennedy, 1980, 1987; Kennedy and Wright, 1985; Lymaniceras Matsumoto, 1965, and Haboroceras Toshimitsu, 1988). Not uncommonly, these micromorphs are found associated with “normal-sized” taxa that have similar early ontogenetic stages to the co-occurring micromorph. There is little doubt that the evolutionary origin of these small forms was through progenesis and precocious sexual maturation in which the early developmental stage of the ancestral taxon is preserved to a much later developmental stage of the descendant. The latter matured at much smaller size, and new characters are present in the latest phragmocone and body chamber, or sometimes only in the latter. These micromorphs are not unique to the Western Interior seaway, but are better represented there than elsewhere. This may simply be due to the remarkable preservation in concretions in the mudrocks of the Interior sequence, or it may reflect a repeated evolutionary strategy to deal with the stresses of the atypical environments developed there (Hattin, 1986). It also perhaps removed some of the taxa concerned from competition for trophic resources with their “normal-sized” contemporaries, although it could equally be argued that it turned them into suitably sized prey.

Type
Taxonomic Notes
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 64 , Issue 4 , July 1990 , pp. 666 - 668
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cobban, W. A. 1987. Some middle Cenomanian (Upper Cretaceous) acanthoceratid ammonites from the Western Interior of the United States. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1445, 28 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobban, W. A. 1988a. Some acanthoceratid ammonites from upper Cenomanian (Upper Cretaceous) rocks of Wyoming. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1353, 15 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobban, W. A. 1988b. The Upper Cretaceous ammonite Watinoceras Warren in the Western Interior of the United States. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1788, 15 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobban, W. A., and Hook, S. C. 1983. Mid-Cretaceous (Turonian) ammonite fauna from Fence Lake area, west-central New Mexico. New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources Memoir 41, 50 p.Google Scholar
Cobban, W. A., Hook, S. C., and Kennedy, W. J. 1989. Upper Cretaceous rocks and ammonite faunas of southwestern New Mexico. New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources Memoir 45, 37 p.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1855. Descriptions of eighteen new Cretaceous and Tertiary fossils. Proceedings of the Philadelphia Academy of Natural Sciences, 7:265–268.Google Scholar
de Grossouvre, A. 1894. Recherches sur la craie supérieure, 2, Paléontologie. Les ammonites de la craie supérieure. Mémoires de la Carte Géologique Détaille de France, 264 p. (1893 imprint).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hattin, D. E. 1986. Carbonate substrates of the Late Cretaceous sea, central Great Plains and southern Rocky Mountains. Palaios, 1:347–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinz, R. 1935. Unterkreide-Inoceramen von der Kapverden-Insel Maio. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläontologie, Beilage-Band, 73:302–311.Google Scholar
Hyatt, A. 1900. Cephalopoda, p. 502–604. In von Zittel, K. A., Textbook of Paleontology, translated by Eastman, C. R.Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Hyatt, A. 1903. Pseudoceratites of the Cretaceous. U.S. Geological Survey Monograph 44, 351 p.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. J. 1988. Late Cenomanian and Turonian ammonite faunas from northeast and central Texas. Palaeontological Association, Special Papers in Paleontology, 39, 131 p.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. J., and Cobban, W. A. 1988a. Mid-Turonian ammonite faunas from northern Mexico. Geological Magazine, 125:593–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, W. J., and Cobban, W. A. 1988b. The Upper Cretaceous ammonite Romaniceras Spath, 1923 in New Mexico. New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources Bulletin, 114:23–34.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. J., and Cobban, W. A. 1989. Acompsoceras inconstans zone, a lower Cenomanian marker horizon in Trans-Pecos Texas. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, 178:133–145.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. J., and Cobban, W. A. 1990. Cenomanian ammonite faunas from the Woodbine Formation and lower part of the Eagle Ford Group, Texas. Palaeontology, 33:75–154.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. J., Cobban, W. A., Hancock, J. M., and Hook, S. C. 1989. Biostratigraphy of the Chispa Summit Formation at its type locality: a Cenomanian through Turonian reference section for Trans-Pecos Texas. Bulletin of the Geological Institution, Uppsala University, new series, 15:39–119.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. J., and Wright, C. W. 1985. Evolutionary patterns in Late Cretaceous ammonites. Palaeontology, 33:131–143.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. J., Wright, C. W. and Hancock, J. M. 1987. Basal Turonian ammonites from west Texas. Palaeontology, 30:27–74.Google Scholar
Kummel, B., and Decker, J. M. 1954. Lower Turonian ammonites from Texas and Mexico. Journal of Paleontology, 28:310–319.Google Scholar
Mantell, G. A. 1822. The fossils of the South Downs; or illustrations of the geology of Sussex. Lupton Relfe, London, 372 p.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, T. 1965. A monograph of the Collignoniceratidae from Hokkaido, Part 1. Memoirs of the Faculty of Science, Kyushu University, Series D, Geology, 16:1–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pervinquière, L. 1907. Etudes de paléontologie tunisienne. 1. Céphalopodes des terrains secondaries. Carte géologique Tunisie, de Rudeval, Paris, 438 p.Google Scholar
Powell, J. D. 1963. Cenomanian–Turonian (Cretaceous) ammonites from Trans-Pecos Texas and north-eastern Chihuahua, Mexico. Journal of Paleontology, 37:309–322.Google Scholar
Renz, O. 1982. The Cretaceous ammonites of Venezuela. Maraven, Basel, 132 p.Google Scholar
Renz, O., and Alvarez, F. G. 1979. Two new ammonite genera from the lower Turonian of Venezuela. Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae, 72:973–979.Google Scholar
Reyment, R. A. 1954. Some new Upper Cretaceous ammonites from Nigeria. Colonial Geological Survey Mineral Resources Division, 4:149–164.Google Scholar
Spath, L. F. 1923. On the ammonite horizons of Gault and contiguous deposits. Summary of Progress of the Geological Survey of Great Britain for 1922:139–149.Google Scholar
Thomel, G. 1972. Les Acanthoceratidae cénomaniens des chaines subalpines méridionales. Mémoires de la Société Géologique de France, n.s., 116, 204 p.Google Scholar
Toshimitsu, S. 1988. Biostratigraphy of the Upper Cretaceous Santonian Stage in northwestern Hokkaido. Memoirs of the Faculty of Science, Kyushu University, Series D, Geology, 26:125–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, C. W., and Kennedy, W. J. 1980. Origin, evolution and systematics of the dwarf acanthoceratid Protacanthoceras Spath, 1923 (Cretaceous Ammonoidea). Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History (Geology), 34:65–107.Google Scholar
Wright, C. W., and Kennedy, W. J. 1987. The Ammonoidea of the Lower Chalk. Palaeontographical Society Monographs, Part 2:127–215.Google Scholar