Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T22:42:49.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Taxonomic discussion of the scolecodont genera Nereidavus Grinnell, 1877, and Protarabellites Stauffer, 1933 (Annelida: Polychaeta)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Mats Eriksson*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Lund, Sölvegatan 13, S-223 62 Lund, Sweden

Abstract

The scolecodont genera Nereidavus Grinnell, 1877, and Protarabellites Stauffer, 1933, have been used for several different fossil polychaete taxa over the years. Nereidavus is here considered a nomen dubium, as the holotype of the type species is lost and the original information is insufficient for identification. Protarabellites is reevaluated and constitutes, besides Ramphoprion, a second genus in the family Ramphoprionidae. The “paratype” of N. varians (named Ramphoprion sp. in this paper), and the holotype of P. humilis are redescribed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bergman, C. F. 1979. Polychaete jaws, p. 92102. In Jaanusson, V., Laufeld, S., and Skoglund, R. (eds.), Lower Wenlock Faunal and Floral Dynamics—Vattenfallet Section, Gotland. Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning, C C 762, 294 p.Google Scholar
Bergman, C. F. 1989. Silurian paulinitid polychaetes from Gotland. Fossils and Strata, 25:1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergman, C. F. 1991. Revision of some Silurian paulinitid scolecodonts from western New York. Journal of Paleontology, 65:248254.Google Scholar
Dales, R. P. 1963. Annelids. Hutchinson University Library, London, 200 p.Google Scholar
Edgar, D. R. 1984. Polychaetes of the Lower and Middle Paleozoic: A multi-element analysis and a phylogenetic outline. Review of Paleobotany and Palynology, 43:255284.Google Scholar
Eller, E. R. 1945. Scolecodonts from the Trenton series (Ordovician) of Ontario, Quebec, and New York. Annals of the Carnegie Museum, 30:119212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eller, E. R. 1963. Scolecodonts from the Sheffield Shale, Upper Devonian of Iowa. Annals of the Carnegie Museum, 36:159172.Google Scholar
Eriksson, M. 1997. Lower Silurian polychaetaspid polychaetes from Gotland, Sweden. GFF, 119:213230.Google Scholar
Eriksson, M., and Bergman, C. F. 1998. Scolecodont systematics exemplified by the polychaete Hadoprion cervicornis (Hinde, 1879). Journal of Paleontology 72:477485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grinnell, G. B. 1877. Notice of a new genus of annelids from the Lower Silurian. American Journal of Science and Arts, 14:229230.Google Scholar
Gries, J. P. 1935. Ordovician scolecodonts. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago, Chicago, 44 p.Google Scholar
Hinde, G. J. 1879. On annelid jaws from the Cambro-Silurian, Silurian and Devonian Formations in Canada and from the Lower Carboniferous in Scotland. The Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 35:370389.Google Scholar
Hints, O. 1998a. Revision of the Ordovician and Silurian ramphoprionid polychaetes from Severnaya Zemlya, Russian arctic. Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences, 47:7785.Google Scholar
Hints, O. 1998b. Late Viruan (Caradoc) polychaete jaws from North Estonia and the St. Petersburg region. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 43:471516.Google Scholar
Howell, B. F. 1962. Worms, p. W3W65. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. W, Miscellanea, Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. 1985. International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature (third edition). London. 338 p.Google Scholar
Jansonius, J., and Craig, J. H. 1971. Scolecodonts: I. Descriptive terminology and revision of systematic nomenclature; II Lectotypes, new names for homonyms, index of species. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, 19:251302.Google Scholar
Kielan-Jaworowska, Z. 1962. New Ordovician genera of polychaete jaw apparatuses. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 7:291325.Google Scholar
Kielan-Jaworowska, Z. 1966. Polychaete jaw apparatuses from the Ordovician and Silurian of Poland and comparison with modern forms. Palaeontologia Polonica, 16, 152 p.Google Scholar
Kozur, H. 1970. Zur Klassifikation und phylogenetischen Entwicklung der fossilen Phyllodocida und Eunicida (Polychaeta). Freiberger Forschungshefte, C 260:3581.Google Scholar
Männil, R. M., and Zaslawskaya, N. M. 1985. Silurian polychaetes from northern Siberia [in Russian], p. 98119, 127–130. In Gudina, V. I. and Kanigin, A. V. (eds.), Palaeozoic Microfauna from Siberia with Surroundings. Trudy Instituta Geologii i Geofiziki SO AN SSSR, 615. Nauka, Novosibirsk.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1889. North American geology and palaeontology. Mattocks, Cincinnati, 664 p.Google Scholar
Orensanz, J. M. 1990. The eunicemorph polychaete annelids from Antarctic and Subantarctic seas. Biology of the Antarctic seas 21, Antarctic Research Series, 52, 183 p.Google Scholar
Shimer, H. W., and Schrock, R. R. 1944. Index Fossils of North America. The Technology Press, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. New York, John Wiley and Sons, 837 p.Google Scholar
Stauffer, C. R. 1933. Middle Ordovician Polychaeta from Minnesota. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, 44:11731218.Google Scholar
Szaniawski, H. 1974. Some Mesozoic scolecodonts congeneric with recent forms. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 19:179199.Google Scholar
Szaniawski, H. 1996. Scolecodonts, p. 337354. In Jansonius, J. and McGregor, D. C. (eds.), Palynology: Principles and Applications. American Association of Stratigraphic Palynologists Foundation, Volume 1.Google Scholar
Szaniawski, H., and Wrona, R. 1973. Polychaete jaw apparatuses and scolecodonts from the Upper Devonian of Poland. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 18:223267.Google Scholar
Ward, D. J. 1983. Addition to the fish fauna of the English Palaeogene. 4. A new batoid genus from the Bracklesham Group of Selsea, Sussex. Tertiary Research, 5:105114.Google Scholar