Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T09:19:47.671Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Upper Cambrian and lowest Ordovician articulate brachiopods from the Arbuckle and Wichita Mountains, Oklahoma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Rebecca J. Freeman
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana 70118
James H. Stitt
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia 65211

Abstract

Brachiopods assigned to eight genera and 15 species have been recovered from Upper Cambrian (Franconian and Trempealeauan Stages) and lowest Ordovician strata in the Arbuckle and Wichita Mountains of Oklahoma. Species of Ocnerorthis and Eoorthis occur in the Reagan Sandstone and Honey Creek Limestone of the Timbered Hills Group. Species of Billingsella appear in the Honey Creek and range upward into the overlying Fort Sill and Signal Mountain Limestones of the Arbuckle Group. Species of Cymbithyris, Finkelnburgia, Nanorthis, and Apheoorthis succeed each other upsection in the Signal Mountain Limestone. Five brachiopod zones and one subzone have been established that can be used to correlate the measured sections in the Arbuckle and Wichita Mountains, and to correlate with varying degrees of confidence from Oklahoma to similar brachiopod occurrences in other areas in the United States.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bell, W. C. 1941. Cambrian Brachiopoda from Montana. Journal of Paleontology, 15:193255.Google Scholar
Bell, W. C., Berg, R. R., and Nelson, C. A. 1956. Croixan type area-Upper Mississippian Valley, p. 415446. In Rodgers, J. (ed.), Australia, America, part 2, El sistema Cambrico, su paleogeografia y el problema de su base. 20th International Geological Congress, Mexico City.Google Scholar
Bell, W. C., Berg, R. R., and Ellinwood, H. L. 1962. Upper Franconian and Lower Trempealeauan Cambrian trilobites and brachiopods, Wilberns Formation, Central Texas. Journal of Paleontology, 36:385423.Google Scholar
Cooper, G. A. 1952. New and unusual brachiopods from the Arbuckle group in Oklahoma. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 117, 35 p.Google Scholar
Davidson, T. 1853. On some fossil Brachiopoda of the Devonian age from China. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 9:353359.Google Scholar
Duméril, A. M. C. 1806. Zoologie analytique ou méthode naturelle de classification des animaux. Allais, Paris, 344 p.Google Scholar
Grant, R. E. 1965. Faunas and stratigraphy of the Snowy Range Formation (Upper Cambrian) in Southwestern Montana and Northwestern Wyoming. Geological Society of America Memoir, 96, 171 p.Google Scholar
Gregg, J. M., Palmer, J. R., and Kurtz, V. E. 1989. Field guide to the Upper Cambrian of southeastern Missouri: stratigraphy, sedimentology, and economic geology. Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Missouri-Rolla, 124 p.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1863. Preliminary notice of the fauna of the Potsdam sandstone. Sixteenth Annual Report to the New York State Cabinet of Natural History, p. 119222.Google Scholar
Hall, J., and Clarke, J. M. 1892. An introduction to the study of the genera of Paleozoic Brachiopoda. New York Geological Survey, 8, 367 p.Google Scholar
Ham, W. E. 1950. Geology and petrology of the Arbuckle limestone in the southern Arbuckle Mountains, Oklahoma. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University, 229 p.Google Scholar
Ham, W. E. 1955. Field conference on geology of the Arbuckle Mountain region. Oklahoma Geological Survey Guide Book, 3, 61 p.Google Scholar
Hintze, L. F. 1952. Lower Ordovician detailed stratigraphic sections for western Utah. Utah Geologic and Mineralogic Survey Bulletin, 39, 99 p.Google Scholar
Huxley, T. H. 1869. An introduction to the classification of animals. John Churchill and Sons, London, 147 p.Google Scholar
Jensen, R. G. 1967. Ordovician Brachiopods from the Pogonip Group of Millard County, Western Utah. Brigham Young University Geology Studies, 14:67100.Google Scholar
Kurtz, V. E. 1971. Upper Cambrian Acrotretidae from Missouri. Journal of Paleontology, 45:470476.Google Scholar
Kurtz, V. E. 1975. Franconian (Upper Cambrian) trilobite faunas from the Elvins Group of southeast Missouri. Journal of Paleontology, 49:10091043.Google Scholar
Kurtz, V. E. 1976. Biostratigraphy of the Cambrian and lowest Ordovician, Bighorn Mountains and associated uplifts in Wyoming and Montana, p. 215227. In Robison, R. A. and Rowell, A. J. (eds.), Paleontology and depositional environments: Cambrian of western North America. Brigham Young University Geology Studies, 23 (2).Google Scholar
Loch, J. D., Stitt, J. H., and Derby, J. R. 1993. Cambrian-Ordovician boundary interval extinctions: implications of revised trilobite and brachiopod data from Mount Wilson, Alberta, Canada. Journal of Paleontology, 67:497517.Google Scholar
Lochman, C., and Hu, C. H. 1960. Upper Cambrian faunas from the northwest Wind River Mountains, Wyoming, Part 1. Journal of Paleontology, 34:793834.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B. 1872 [1873]. Preliminary paleontological report: 6th annual report of the U.S. Geological Survey of Montana, Idaho, Wyoming, and Utah. Washington D.C., p. 429518.Google Scholar
Miller, J. F. 1978. Upper Cambrian and lowest Ordovician conodont faunas of the House Range, Utah, p. 133. In Miller, J. F. (ed.), Upper Cambrian to Middle Ordovician conodont faunas of western Utah. Southwestern Missouri State University Geoscience Series, 5.Google Scholar
Miller, J. F., Taylor, M. E., Stitt, J. H., Ethington, R. L., Hintze, L. F., and Taylor, J. F. 1982. Potential Cambrian-Ordovician boundary stratotype sections in the western United States, p. 155180. In Bassett, M. G. and Dean, W. T. (eds.), The Cambrian-Ordovician Boundary: sections, fossil distributions and correlations. National Museum of Wales, Geological Series Number 3, Cardiff.Google Scholar
Palmer, A. R. 1954. The faunas of the Riley Formation in central Texas. Journal of Paleontology, 28:709786.Google Scholar
Ross, R. J. Jr. 1951. Stratigraphy of the Garden City Formation in northeastern Utah, and its trilobite faunas. Yale University Peabody Museum of Natural History Bulletin, 6, 161 p.Google Scholar
Schuchert, C. 1893. A classification of the Brachiopoda. American Geologist, 11:141167.Google Scholar
Schuchert, C., and Cooper, G. A. 1931. Synopsis of the brachiopod genera of the suborders Orthoidea and Pentameroidea, with notes on the Telotremata. American Journal of Science, Series 5, 22:241251.Google Scholar
Schuchert, C., and Cooper, G. A. 1932. Brachiopod genera of the suborders Orthoidea and Pentameroidea. Peabody Museum of Natural History Memoir, 4(1):1270.Google Scholar
Shumard, B. F. 1860. Descriptions of five new species of Gastropoda from the Coal Measures and a brachiopod from the Potsdam sandstone of Texas. Transactions of the Academy of Science of St. Louis, 1:624627.Google Scholar
Staatz, M. H., and Carr, W. J. 1964. Geology and mineral deposits of the Thomas and Dugway Ranges, Juab and Tooele Counties, Utah. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 415, 188 p.Google Scholar
Stitt, J. H. 1971. Late Cambrian and earliest Ordovician trilobites, Timbered Hills and lower Arbuckle Groups, western Arbuckle Mountains, Murray County, Oklahoma. Oklahoma Geological Survey Bulletin, 110, 83 p.Google Scholar
Stitt, J. H. 1977. Late Cambrian and earliest Ordovician trilobites, Wichita Mountains area, Oklahoma. Oklahoma Geological Survey Bulletin, 124, 79 p.Google Scholar
Stitt, J. H. 1983. Enrolled Late Cambrian trilobites from the Davis Formation, southeastern Missouri. Journal of Paleontology, 57:93105.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. E., and Palmer, A. R. 1981. Cambrian stratigraphy and paleontology of the Great Basin and vicinity, western United States. Guidebook for Field Trip 1, Second International Symposium on the Cambrian System, Denver, Colorado, 182 p.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E. O., and Cooper, G. A. 1936. New genera and species of Ozarkian and Canadian brachiopods. Journal of Paleontology, 10:616631.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E. O., and Cooper, G. A. 1938. New species of Ozarkian and Canadian brachiopods. Geological Society of America Special Paper, 13, 323 p.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1884. Paleontology of the Eureka District. U.S. Geological Survey Monograph, 8, 298 p.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1905. Cambrian Brachiopoda with description of new genera and species. Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum, 28:227237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1908. Cambrian Geology and Paleontology: 3. Cambrian Brachiopoda; Descriptions of new genera and species. 4. Classification and terminology of the Cambrian Brachiopoda. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 53(3):53165.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1912. Cambrian Brachiopoda. U.S. Geological Survey Monograph, 51, part 1, 872 p.; part 2, 361 p.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1924. Cambrian and Ozarkian Brachiopoda, Ozarkian Cephalopoda and Notostraca. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 67:477554.Google Scholar
Westrop, S. R. 1986. Trilobites of the Upper Cambrian Sunwaptan Stage, southern Canadian Rocky Mountains, Alberta. Palaeontographica Canadiana Number 3, 179 p.Google Scholar
Williams, A. ET AL. 1965. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part H, Brachiopoda. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, 927 p.Google Scholar
Winchell, N. H. 1886. New Species of Fossils. Minnesota Geological Survey. Annual Report, 14:313318.Google Scholar
Winston, D., and Nicholls, H. 1967. Late Cambrian and Early Ordovician faunas from the Wilberns Formation of central Texas. Journal of Paleontology, 41:6696.Google Scholar
Woodward, S. P. 1852. A manual of the Mollusca, being a treatise on recent and fossil shells. J. Weale, London, 486 p.Google Scholar