Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T16:07:13.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Volhynian (early Sarmatian sensu lato) fishes from Tsurevsky, North Caucasus, Russia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2017

Giorgio Carnevale ,
Alexandre F. Bannikov ,
Walter Landini  and
Chiara Sorbini
Giorgio Carnevale
Affiliation:
CNR – Istituto di Geoscienze e Georisorse, c/o Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, via S. Maria, 53, I-56126 Pisa, Italy,
Alexandre F. Bannikov
Affiliation:
Paleontological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Profsoyuznaya ul. 123, Moscow 117997,
Walter Landini
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, via S. Maria, 53 I-56126 Pisa, Italy,
Chiara Sorbini
Affiliation:
Museo di Storia Naturale e del Territorio of the Università di Pisa, via Roma, 103 Calci (PI), Italy,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A new fish fauna is described from the late Middle Miocene (Volhynian; early Sarmatian sensu lato) of Tsurevsky, North Caucasus, Russia. Ten taxa belonging to nine families are described, of which two may be new (Micromesistius sp., Bothus sp.), but not formally described awaiting better-preserved material. The predominant faunal element is Sardinella sardinites, including more than 42% of all investigated specimens. The paleoecological analysis reveals a semienclosed marine environment not far from the coast, characterized by shallow depths and a soft bottom. The sedimentological features of the deposits and the preservation of the specimens suggest that periodic oxygen minima affected the bottom waters, causing repeated hypoxic events, probably related to the decay of organic matter previously accumulated in the basin. Paleoenvironmental considerations of fish faunas from several Paratethyan localities suggest that marine waters characterized by a little shift in chemical composition (high alkalinity) filled up the entire basin during the Sarmatian.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 80 , Issue 4 , July 2006 , pp. 684 - 699
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agardh, C. A. 1827. Aufzählung einiger in den österreichischen Ländern gefundenen neuen Gattungen un Arten von Algen nebst Diagnostik und beigefügten Bemerkungen. Flora oder Botanische Zeitung, 10:625–645.Google Scholar
Ahlstrom, E. H., Amaoka, K., Hensley, D. A., Moser, H. G., and Sumida, B. Y. 1984. Pleuronectiformes: Development, p. 640–670. In Moser, H. G., Richards, W. J., Cohen, D. M., Fahay, M. P., Kendall, A. W. Jr., and Richardson, S. L. (eds.), Ontogeny and Systematics of Fishes. American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists, Special Publication 1, Lawrence, Kansas.Google Scholar
AnÐelković, J. S. 1962. Prilog poznavanju donjosarmatskih riba sa teritorije Beograda. Annales Géologiques de la Péninsule Balkanique, 29:132–145. (In Serbian) Google Scholar
AnÐelković, J. S. 1964. The genus Clupea from the Lower Sarmatian of Belgrade. Annales Géologiques de la Péninsule Balkanique, 31:161–167. (In Serbian) Google Scholar
AnÐelković, J. S. 1969. Fossilue riba is donjeg sarmata teritorije Beograda. Glasnik Prirodnjachkog Muzeja u Beogradu, 33:233–236. (In Serbian) Google Scholar
AnÐelković, J. S. 1970. Tertiary fishes of Serbia. Annales Géologiques de la Péninsule Balkanique, 35:281–366. (In Serbian) Google Scholar
AnÐelković, J. S. 1977. Prinove za poznavanje fosilnih riba iz okoline Bosnanske Kostajnice. Annales Géologiques de la Péninsule Balkanique, 41:233–248. (In Serbian) Google Scholar
AnÐelković, J. S. 1989. Tertiary fishes of Yugoslavia. A stratigraphic-paleontologic-paleoecological study. Paleontologia Jugoslavica, 38:1–121.Google Scholar
Arp, G., Reimer, A., and Reitner, J. 1999. Calcification in cyanobacterial biofilms of alkaline salt lakes. European Journal of Phycology, 34:393–403.Google Scholar
Arp, G., Reimer, A., and Reitner, J. 2003. Microbialite formation in seawater of increased alkalinity, Satonda Crater Lake, Indonesia. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 73:105–127.Google Scholar
Baciu, D. S., and Chanet, B. 2002. Les poissons plats fossiles (Teleostei: Pleuronectiformes) de l'Oligocene de Piatra Neamt (Roumanie). Oryctos, 4:17–38.Google Scholar
Bannikov, A. F. 1985. Iskopayemye skumbriyevye SSSR. Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Instituta Akademii Nauk SSSR, 210:1–111. (In Russian) Google Scholar
Bannikov, A. F. 1986. The first find of fossil wrasses (Teleostei) in the Sarmatian of Moldavia. Paleontologicheskii Zhurnal, 1:78–83. (In Russian) Google Scholar
Bannikov, A. F. 1989. The first discovery of scale-bearing blennies (Teleostei) in the Sarmatian of Moldavia. Paleontologicheskii Zhurnal, 2:64–70. (In Russian) Google Scholar
Bannikov, A. F. 1998. New blennioid fishes of the families Blenniidae and Clinidae (Perciformes) from the Miocene of the Caucasus and Moldova. Paleontological Journal, 32:385–389.Google Scholar
Bassani, F. 1889. Ricerche sui pesci fossili di Chiavon. Atti della Reale Accademia delle Scienze Fisiche e Matematiche di Napoli, 6:1–103.Google Scholar
Beluzhenko, E. V. 2002. Stratigrafiya sredne-verkhnemiotsenovykh i pliotsenovykh otlozheniy mezhdurech'ya Psekups–Belaya (Severo-Zapadnyj Kavkaz). Statya 1. Sredniy miotsen. Bulletin of Moscow Society of Naturalists. Geological Series, 77:47–59. (In Russian) Google Scholar
Ben-Tuvia, A. 1986. Mugilidae, p. 1197–1204. In Whitehead, P. J. P., Bauchot, M.-L., Hureau, J.-C., Nielsen, J., and Tortonese, E. (eds.), Fishes of the North-Eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean. Unesco, Paris.Google Scholar
Berg, L. S. 1937. A classification of fish-like vertebrates. Izvestiya Akademii Nauk USSR, Seriya Biologicheskaya, 4:1277–1280. (In Russian) Google Scholar
Birdsong, R. S., Murdy, E. O., and Pezold, F. L. 1988. A study of the vertebral column and median fin osteology in gobioid fishes with comments on gobioid relationships. Bulletin of Marine Science, 42:174–214.Google Scholar
Bleeker, P. 1859. Enumeratio specierum piscium hucusque in Archipelago indico observatarum, adjectis habitationibusque, ubi descriptiones earum recentiores reperiuntur, nec non speciebus Musei Bleekeriani Bengalensibus, Japonicis, Capensibus Tasmanicisque. Acta Societatis Scientiarum Indo-Neerlandensis, 6:1–276.Google Scholar
Bogatshev, V. V. 1933. Materialy po izucheniyu tretichnoy ikhtiofauny Kavkaza. Trudy Azerbaydzhanskogo neftyanogo issledovatel'skogo instituta. Geologicheskiy Otdel, 15:1–62. (In Russian) Google Scholar
Bogatshev, V. V. 1955. Amvrosievskiye nizhnesarmatskiye ryby. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, 105:570–572. (In Russian) Google Scholar
Böhm, B. 1942. Beitrage zur tertiären Fischfauna Ungarns. Geologica Hungarica, 19:1–42.Google Scholar
Bonaparte, C. L. 1831. Saggio di una distribuzione metodica degli animali vertebrati. Giornale Arcadico di Scienze Lettere ed Arti, 52:88–157.Google Scholar
Bonaparte, C. L. 1832. Iconografia della Fauna Italica per le Quattro Classi di Vertebrati. Tomo III. Pesci, 556 p.Google Scholar
Bory de Saint-Vincent, J. B. G. M. 1822. Dictionnaire Classique d'Histoire Naturelle. Baudoin Frëres, Paris.Google Scholar
Brian, L. 1957. Aspetti ecologici e biometrici nel problema sistematico dei mullidi. Doriana, 79:1–10.Google Scholar
Caldwell, M. K. 1962. Development and distribution of larval and juvenile fishes of the family Mullidae of the western North Atlantic. Fishery Bulletin, 62:403–457.Google Scholar
Capanna, E., Cataudella, S., and Monaco, G. 1974. The pharyngeal structure of Mediterranean Mugilidae. Monitore Zoologico Italiano, 8:29–46.Google Scholar
Carpenter, K. E., Collette, B. B., and Russo, J. L. 1995. Unstable and stable classifications of scombroid fishes. Bulletin of Marine Science, 56:379–405.Google Scholar
Chanet, B. 1996. Oranobothus arambourgi n.g. n.sp. (Pisces, Pleuronectiformes, Bothidae) provenant du Messinien (Miocène supérieur) d'Oran (Algérie). Bulletin du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, C, 18:555–568.Google Scholar
Chanet, B., and Schultz, O. 1994. Pleuronectiform fishes from the Upper Badenian (Middle Miocene) of St. Margarethen (Austria). Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museum in Wien, 96:95–115.Google Scholar
Chanet, B., and Sorbini, C. 2001. A male fish Bothus podas (Delaroche, 1809) [Pleuronectiformes: Bothidae] in the Pliocene of the Marecchia river (Italy). Bollettino della Società Paleontologica Italiana, 40:345–350.Google Scholar
Chapleau, F. 1993. Pleuronectiform relationships: A cladistic reassessment. Bulletin of Marine Science, 52:516–540.Google Scholar
Cohen, D. M. 1984. Gadiformes: Overview, p. 259–265. In Moser, H. G., Richards, W. J., Cohen, D. M., Fahay, M. P., Kendall, A. W. Jr., and Richardson, S. L. (eds.), Ontogeny and Systematics of Fishes. American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists, Special Publication 1, Lawrence, Kansas.Google Scholar
Cohen, D. M., Inada, T., Iwamoto, T., and Scialabba, N. 1990. Gadiform fishes of the world. FAO Fisheries Synopsis, 125(10):1–442.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. A., and Chapleau, F. 1998. Phylogenetic status of Paralichthodes algoensis (Pleuronectiformes: Paralichthodidae). Copeia, 1998:477–481.Google Scholar
Cuvier, G. 1829. Le Règne Animal, Distribué d'Après son Organisation, pour Servir à l'Histoire Naturelle des Animaux et d'Introduction à l'Anatomie Comparée. Paris, 532 p.Google Scholar
Cuvier, G., and Valenciennes, A. 1828. Historie Naturelle des Poissons. Tome second. Livre Troisième. Des poissons de la famille des perches, ou des percoïdes. Strasbourg edition, 490 p.Google Scholar
Danil'chenko, P. G. 1980. Otryad Clupeiformes, p. 7–26. In Novitskaya, L. I. (ed.), Iskopayemyye kostistyye ryby SSSR. Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Instituta Akademii Nauk SSSR, 178. (In Russian) Google Scholar
Dawson, C. E. 1982. Family Syngnathidae. The Pipefish, p. 1–141. In Fishes of the Western North Atlantic, 8: Order Gasterosteiformes, Suborder Syngnathoidei. Sears Foundation for Marine Research Memoir, 1, New Haven.Google Scholar
Dawson, C. E. 1986. Syngnathidae, p. 618–639. In Whitehead, P. J. P., Bauchot, M.-L., Hureau, J.-C., Nielsen, J., and Tortonese, E. (eds.), Fishes of the North-Eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean. Unesco, Paris.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, C. G. 1839. Ueber noch jest xahlreich lebende Thierarten der Kreidebildung und den Organisms der Polythalmiem. Abhandlungen der Akademie Wissenshaft Berlin, 1839:1–151.Google Scholar
Eichwald, E. 1853. Lethaea Rossica ou Paléontologie de la Russie 3, Dernière Période. Schweitzerbart, Stuttgart, 533 p.Google Scholar
Ershov, A. V., Brunet, M.-F., Korotaev, M. V., Nikishin, A. M., and Bolotov, S. N. 1999. Late Cenozoic burial history and dynamics of the Northern Caucasus molasse basin: Implications for foreland basin modelling. Tectonophysics, 313:219–241.Google Scholar
Fahay, M. P., and Markle, D. E. 1984. Gadiformes: Development and relationships, p. 265–283. In Moser, H. G., Richards, W. J., Cohen, D. M., Fahay, M. P., Kendall, A. W. Jr., and Richardson, S. L. (eds.), Ontogeny and Systematics of Fishes. American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists, Special Publication 1, Lawrence, Kansas.Google Scholar
Friebe, J. G. 1994. Serpulid-bryozoan-foraminiferal biostromes controlled by temperate climate and reduced salinity: Middle Miocene of the Styrian Basin, Austria. Facies, 30:51–62.Google Scholar
Fujita, K. 1990. The Caudal Skeleton of Teleostean Fishes. Tokai University Press, Tokyo, 897 p.Google Scholar
Fukui, A. 1997. Early ontogeny and systematics of Bothidae, Pleuronectoidei. Bulletin of Marine Science, 60:192–212.Google Scholar
Gaemers, P. A. M., and Schwarzhans, W. 1973. Fisch-Otolithen aus dem Pliozän von Antwerpen (Belgien) und Ouwerkerk (Niederlande) und aus dem Plio-Pleistozän der Westerschelde (Niederlande). Leidse Geologische Mededelingen, 49:207–257.Google Scholar
Gagic, N. 1988. Borelis curdica (Reichel) in the middle Miocene of Lybia, Iraq and Yugoslavia. Annales Géologiques de la Péninsule Balkanique, 52:353–369.Google Scholar
Gaudant, J. 1998. L'ichthyofaune des eaux continentales miocènes de Serbie (Yougoslavie): Une révision. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen, 207:107–123.Google Scholar
Gill, A. C. 1996. Comments on an intercalar path for Glossopharyngeal (Cranial IX) Nerve as a synapomorphy of the Paracanthopterygii and on the phylogenetic position of the Gobiesocidae (Teleostei: Acanthomorpha). Copeia, 1996:1022–1029.Google Scholar
Gill, T. N. 1863a. Synopsis of the North American gadoid fishes. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 15:229–242.Google Scholar
Gill, T. N. 1863b. Descriptions of the gobioid genera of the western coast of temperate North America. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 15:267–271.Google Scholar
Gorjanović-Kramberger, D. 1882. Die Jungtertiäre Fischfauna Croatiens. Beiträge zur Paläontologie Österreich-Ungarns und des Orients, 2:86–135.Google Scholar
Gorjanović-Kramberger, D. 1884. Die Jungtertiäre Fischfauna Croatiens. Beiträge zur Paläontologie Österreich-Ungarns und des Orients, 3:65–85.Google Scholar
Gosline, W. A. 1970. A reinterpretation of the teleostean fish order Gobiesociformes. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences, 38:363–381.Google Scholar
Gosline, W. A. 1984. Structure, function, and ecology in the goatfishes (family Mullidae). Pacific Science, 38:312–323.Google Scholar
Grande, L. 1985. Recent and fossil clupeomorph fishes with materials for revision of the subgroups of clupeoids. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 181:231–372.Google Scholar
Greenwood, P. H., Myers, G. S., Rosen, D. E., and Weitzman, S. H. 1967. Named main divisions of teleostean fishes. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 80:227–228.Google Scholar
Greenwood, P. H., Rosen, D. E., Weitzman, S. H., and Myers, G. S. 1966. Phyletic studies of teleostean fishes, with a provisional classification of living forms. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 131:339–356.Google Scholar
Harrison, I. J., and Howes, G. J. 1991. The pharyngobranchial organ of mugilid fishes; its structure, variability, ontogeny, possible function and taxonomic utility. Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History (Zoology), 57:111–132.Google Scholar
Harzhauser, M., and Kowalke, T. 2002. Sarmatian (Late Middle Miocene) gastropod assemblages of the central Paratethys. Facies, 46:57–82.Google Scholar
Harzhauser, M., and Piller, W. E. 2004. The Early Sarmatian—hidden seesaw changes. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 246:89–111.Google Scholar
Heckel, J. J. 1850. Beiträge zur Kennthis der fossilen Fische Österreichs. Denkschriften der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, mathematik-naturwissenshaft, Klasse 1:201–242.Google Scholar
Hensley, D. A. 1977. Larval development of Engyophris senta (Bothidae), with comments on intermuscular bones in flatfishes. Bulletin of Marine Science, 27:681–703.Google Scholar
Hensley, D. A., and Ahlstrom, E. H. 1984. Pleuronectiformes: Relationships, p. 670–687. In Moser, H. G., Richards, W. J., Cohen, D. M., Fahay, M. P., Kendall, A. W. Jr., and Richardson, S. L. (eds.), Ontogeny and Systematics of Fishes. American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists, Special Publication 1, Lawrence, Kansas.Google Scholar
Holec, P. 1975. Fisch-Otolithen aus dem Baden (Miozän) des Nördlichen Teiles des Wiener Beckens und der Donau-Tiefebene. Geologica Carpathica, 26:253–266.Google Scholar
Howes, G. J. 1991. Anatomy, phylogeny and taxonomy of the gadoid fish genus Macruronus Günther, 1873, with a revised hypothesis of gadoid phylogeny. Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History (Zoology), 51:77–110.Google Scholar
Howes, G. J. 1993. Anatomy of the Melanonidae (Teleostei: Gadiformes), with comments on its phylogenetic relationships. Bulletin of the Natural History Museum (Zoology), 59:11–31.Google Scholar
Hubbs, C. L., and Marini, T. L. 1933. Nueva especie de Mullidae para la Argentina: Mullus argentinae . Physis, 11:346.Google Scholar
Hureau, J.-C. 1986. Mullidae, p. 877–882. In Whitehead, P. J. P., Bauchot, M.-L., Hureau, J.-C., Nielsen, J., and Tortonese, E. (eds.), Fishes of the North-Eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean. Unesco, Paris.Google Scholar
Iljina, L. B., Nevesskaja, L. A., and Paramonova, N. O. 1976. Regularities of molluscs development in the Neogene semimarine and brackishwater basins of Eurasia (late Miocene-early Pliocene). Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Instituta Akademii Nauk SSSR, 155:1–287. (In Russian) Google Scholar
Ionko, V. I. 1954. O nakhodke iskopayemykh ryb v nizhnesarmatskikh otlozheniyakh MSSR. Trudy Odesskogo Universiteta. Sbornik Geologo-Geograficheskogo Fakul'teta, 2:109–119. (In Russian) Google Scholar
Jerzmañska, A. 1960. Ichtiofauna łupków jasielskich z Sobniova. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 5:367–420. (In Polish) Google Scholar
Jerzmañska, A. 1968. Ichthyofaune des couches á ménilite (Flysch des Karpathes). Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 13:379–481.Google Scholar
Johnson, G. D. 1984. Percoidei: Development and relationships, p. 464–498. In Moser, H. G., Richards, W. J., Cohen, D. M., Fahay, M. P., Kendall, A. W. Jr., and Richardson, S. L. (eds.), Ontogeny and Systematics of Fishes. American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists, Special Publication 1, Lawrence, Kansas.Google Scholar
Johnson, G. D. 1992. Monophyly of the euteleostean clades–Neoteleostei, Eurypterygii, and Ctenosquamata. Copeia, 1992:8–25.Google Scholar
Johnson, G. D., and Patterson, C. 1993. Percomorph phylogeny: A survey of acanthomorphs and a new proposal. Bulletin of Marine Science, 52:554–626.Google Scholar
Jones, R. W., and Simmons, M. D. 1996. A review of the stratigraphy of eastern Paratethys (Oligocene–Holocene). Bulletin of the Natural History Museum of London (Geology), 52:25–49.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. S., and Evermann, B. W. 1896. The fishes of North and Middle America: A descriptive catalogue of the species of fish-like vertebrates found in the waters of North America, north of the Isthmus of Panama, Pt. I. Bulletin of the United States National Museum, 47:1–1240.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. S., and Gilbert, C. H. 1882. Notes on fishes observed about Pensacola, Florida, and Galveston, Texas, with description of new species. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 5(282):241–307.Google Scholar
Kempler, D., and Garfunkel, Z. 1994. Structures and kinematics in the northeastern Mediterranean: A study of irregular plate boundary. Tectonophysics, 234:19–32.Google Scholar
Kojumdgieva, E. I., Paramonova, N. P., Belokrys, L. S., and Muskhelishvili, L. V. 1989. Ecostratigraphic subdivision of the Sarmatian after molluscs. Geologica Carpathica, 40:81–84.Google Scholar
Kowalke, T., and Harzhauser, M. 2004. Early ontogeny and paleoecology of the Mid-Miocene rissoid gastropods of the central Paratethys. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 49:111–134.Google Scholar
Lacepède, B. G. E. 1802. Histoire Naturelle des Poissons. Vol. 4. Paris, 728 p.Google Scholar
Lindsey, C. C., and Arnason, A. N. 1981. A model for responses of vertebral numbers in fish to environmental influences during development. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 38:334–347.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. V. 1758. Systema Naturae per Regna Tria Naturae, Secundum Classes, Ordines, Genera, Species, cum Characteribus, Differentiis, Synonymis, Locis. (Editio decima, reformata). Holmiae, 824 p.Google Scholar
Lo Bianco, S. 1907. L'origine dei barbigli tattili nel genere Mullus. Atti della Reale Accademia dei Lincei. Rendiconti della Classe di Scienze fisiche, matematiche e naturali, 16:577–586.Google Scholar
Lucila, M., Acosta Pomar, C., and Giuffre, G. 1996. Pico-, nano-and microplankton communities in hydrothermal marine coastal environments of the Eolian Islands (Panarea and Vulcano) in the Mediterranean Sea. Journal of Plankton Research, 18:715–730.Google Scholar
Micklich, N., and Parin, N. N. 1996. The fishfauna of Frauenweiler (Middle Oligocene, Rupelian; Germany): First results of a review. Publicaciones Especiales de l'Instituto Español de Oceanografia, 21:129–148.Google Scholar
Monod, T. 1968. Le complexe urophore des poissons téléostéens. Mémoires de l'Institut Fondamental d'Afrique Noire, 81:1–705.Google Scholar
Nagy, E. 1979. Changes in paleoenvironment and paleoclimate during the Miocene in Hungary. Annales Géologiques des Pays Helléniques, 1979:879–888.Google Scholar
Nakabo, T. 1982. Revision of genera of the dragonets (Pisces: Callionymidae). Publications of the Seto Marine Biological Laboratory, 27:77–131.Google Scholar
Nakabo, T. 1983. Comparative osteology and phylogenetic relationships of the dragonets (Pisces: Callionymidae) with some thoughts on their evolutionary history. Publications of the Seto Marine Biological Laboratory, 28:1–73.Google Scholar
Nolf, D. 1976. Les otolithes des téléostéens de l'Oligo-Miocène Belge. Annales de la Société Royale Zoologique de Belgique, 106:3–119.Google Scholar
Nolf, D., and Steurbaut, E. 1983. Revision des otolithes de téléostéens du Tortonien stratotipique et de Montegibbio (Miocène supérieur d'Italie Septentrionale). Mededelingen van de werkgroep voor Tertiaire en Kwartaire Geologie, 20:143–197.Google Scholar
Nolf, D., and Steurbaut, E. 1989. Evidence from otoliths for establishing relationships within gadiforms, p. 89–111. In Cohen, D. M. (ed.), Papers on the systematics of gadiform fishes. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Science Series, 32.Google Scholar
Norman, J. R. 1934. A Systematic Monograph of the Flatfishes (Heterosomata). Vol. 1: Psettodidae, Bothidae, Pleuronectidae. British Museum (Natural History), London, 459 p.Google Scholar
Norman, J. R. 1937. Coast fishes, Pt. II, The Patagonian region. Discovery Reports, 18:1–150.Google Scholar
Oken, L. 1817. V. Klasse Fische. Isis (Oken), 8:1779–1782.Google Scholar
Pallas, P. S. 1770. Spicilegia Zoologica Quibus Novae Imprimis et Obscurae Animalium Species Iconibus, Descriptionibus Atque Commentariis Illustrantur. Berolini, Gottlieb Augustus Lange, 56 p.Google Scholar
Papp, A. 1954. Die Molluskenfauna im Sarmat des Wiener Beckens. Mitteilungen der Geologischen Gessellschaft in Wien, 45:1–112.Google Scholar
Papp, A., Marinescu, F., and Senes, J. 1974. M5. Sarmatien. Chronostratigraphie und Neostratotypen, 4:1–707.Google Scholar
Paramonova, N. P., Ananova, E. N., Andeeva-Grigorovic, A. S., Belokrys, L. S., Gabunia, L. K., Grusinskaja, K. F., Kondkarian, S. O., Karmishina, G. I., Kozirenco, T. F., Majsuradze, L. S., Movlazade-Ateava, E. Z., Nevesskaya, L. A., Ponomareva, L. D., Roshka, V. N., and Chepalyga, A. L. 1979. Paleontological characteristics of the Sarmatian s.l. and Maeotian of the Ponto-Caspian area and possibilities of correlation to the Sarmatian s.str. and Pannonian of central Paratethys. Annales Géologiques des Pays Helléniques, 1979:961–971.Google Scholar
Patterson, C., and Rosen, D. E. 1977. Review of ichthyodectiform and other Mesozoic teleost fishes and the theory and practice of classifying fossils. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 158:81–172.Google Scholar
Patterson, C., and Rosen, D. E. 1989. The Paracanthopterygii revisited: Order and disorder, p. 5–36. In Cohen, D. M. (ed.), Papers on the Systematics of Gadiform Fishes. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Science Series, 32.Google Scholar
Paucǎ, M. 1934. Die fossile Fauna und Flora aus dem Oligozän von Suslanesti-Muscel in Rumänien. Eine systematische und palaeobiologische Studie. Annales de l'Institute de Gèologie de Roumanie, 16:575–668.Google Scholar
Paucǎ, M. 1938. Téléostéens fossiles du Tertiaire Roumain. Comptes rendus des sceances de l'Institut de Geologie de Roumanie, 22:1–15.Google Scholar
Pharisat, A. 1991. La Paléoichthyofaune du Rupélien marin de Froide-fontaine (Territoire de Belfort). Taxinomie et populations, genèse du gisement. Implications paléobiogéographiques. Annales Scientifiques de l'Université de Franche-Comté Besançon, Géologie, 4:13–98.Google Scholar
Pietsch, T. W. 1978. Evolutionary relationships of the sea moths (Teleostei: Pegasidae) with a classification of gasterosteiform families. Copeia, 1978:517–529.Google Scholar
Pisera, A. 1996. Miocene reefs of the Paratethys: A review, p. 97–104. In Franseen, E. K., Esteban, M., Ward, W. C., and Rouchy, J.-M. (eds.), Models for carbonate stratigraphy from Miocene reef complexes of Mediterranean regions. SEPM Concepts in Sedimentology and Paleontology. Vol. 5.Google Scholar
Pobedina, V. M. 1954. Iskopayemye otolity ryb miotsenovykh otlozheniy Azerbaydzhana i ikh stratigraficheskoye znacheniye. Izvestiya Akademii Nauk Azerbaydzhanskoy SSR, 10:23–37. (In Russian) Google Scholar
Radwañska, U. 1992. Fish otoliths in the Middle Miocene (Badenian) deposits of southern Poland. Acta Geologica Polonica, 42:141–328.Google Scholar
Rafinesque, C. S. 1810. Indice d'Ittiologia Siciliana; ossia, catalogo metodico dei nomi latini, italiani, e siciliani dei pesci, che si rinvengono in Sicilia disposti secondo un metodo naturale e seguito da un'appendice che contiene la descrizione di alcuni nuovi pesci siciliani. Messina, 70 p.Google Scholar
Rafinesque, C. S. 1815. Analyse de la Nature, ou Tableau de l'Univers et des Corps Organisès. Palermo, 224 p.Google Scholar
Regan, C. T. 1909. The classification of teleostean fishes. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, (8) 3:75–86.Google Scholar
Regan, C. T. 1910. The origin and evolution of the teleostean fishes of the order Heterosomata. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, (8) 6:484–496.Google Scholar
Risso, A. 1827. Histoire Naturelle des Principales Productions de l'Europe Méridionale, et Particulièrement de Celles des Environs de Nice et des Alpes Maritimes. F. G. Levrault, Paris, 480 p.Google Scholar
Rögl, F. 1998. Palaeogeographic considerations for Mediterranean and Paratethys seaways (Oligocene to Miocene). Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museum in Wien, 99:279–310.Google Scholar
Rögl, F., and Steininger, F. F. 1983. Vom Zerfall der Tethys zu Mediterran und Paratethys. Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museum in Wien, 85:135–163.Google Scholar
Rosen, D. E. 1964. The relationships and taxonomic position of the half-beaks, killifish, silversides, and their relatives. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 127:219–267.Google Scholar
Rosen, D. E. 1973. Interrelationships of higher euteleostean fishes, p. 397–513. In Greenwood, P. H., Miles, R. S., and Patterson, C. (eds.), Interrelationships of Fishes. Zoological Journal of the Linnaean Society, Supplement No. 1.Google Scholar
Rückert-Ülkümen, N. 1965. Fossile Fische aus dem Sarmat von Pinarhisar (Türkish Thrakien). Senckenbergiana Lethaea, 46:315–361.Google Scholar
Schmid, H. P., Harzhauser, M., Kroh, A., Coric, S., Rögl, F., and Schultz, O. 2001. Hypoxic events on a Middle Miocene carbonate platform of the central Paratethys (Austria, Badenian, 14 Ma). Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museum in Wien, 102:1–50.Google Scholar
Spicer, R. A. 1990. Plant material, p. 230–232. In Briggs, D. E. G. and Crowther, P. (eds.), Paleobiology—A Synthesis. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Stachowitsch, M. 1991. Anoxia in the Northern Adriatic Sea: Rapid death, slow recovery, p. 119–129. In Tyson, R. and Pearson, T. H. (eds.), Modern and ancient continental shelf anoxia. Geological Society of London Special Publication, 58.Google Scholar
Starks, E. C. 1899. The osteological characters of the fishes of the suborder Percesoces. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 22(1179):1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiassny, M. L. J. 1986. The limits and relationships of the acanthomorph teleosts. Journal of Zoology, 1:411–460.Google Scholar
Stiassny, M. L. J. 1990. Notes on the anatomy and relationships of the Bedotiid fishes of Madagascar, with a taxonomic revision of the genus Rheocles (Atherinomorpha: Bedotiidae). American Museum Novitates, 2979:1–33.Google Scholar
Stiassny, M. L. J. 1993. What are grey mullets? Bulletin of Marine Science, 52:197–219.Google Scholar
Svetovidov, A. N. 1962. Gadiformes, p. 1–304. In Pavlovskii, E. N. and Shtakel'berg, A. A. (eds.), Fauna of the U.S.S.R., Fishes. Vol. 9. N. 4. Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem.Google Scholar
Svetovidov, A. N. 1986. Gadidae, p. 680–710. In Whitehead, P. J. P., Bauchot, M.-L., Hureau, J.-C., Nielsen, J., and Tortonese, E. (eds.), Fishes of the North-Eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean. Unesco, Paris.Google Scholar
Switshenskaja, A. A. 1959. Iskopaemij predstavitelj semejstva Mullidae. Materiali k “Osnovam paleontologii,” 3:117–118. (In Russian) Google Scholar
Switshenskaja, A. A. 1973. Iskopaemye Kefaleobraznye SSSR. Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Instituta Akademii Nauk SSSR, 138:1–64. (In Russian) Google Scholar
Szymczyk, W. 1978. Clupeid scales from the Menilite beds (Paleogene) of the Carpathians. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 23:387–407.Google Scholar
Tåning, A. V. 1950. Influence of the environment on number of vertebrae in teleostean fishes. Nature, 165:28.Google Scholar
Thompson, W. 1840. On a new genus of fishes from India. Magazine of Natural History, 4:184–187.Google Scholar
Tortonese, E. 1975. Osteichthyes (pesci ossei). Parte 2. Fauna d'Italia, 11:1–636.Google Scholar
Valenciennes, A. 1847. Poissons. Catalogue des principales espèces de poissons-rapportées de l'Amérique méridionale, p. 1–11. In d'Orbigny, A. (ed.), Voyage dans l'Amerique Mèridionale. Paris.Google Scholar
Vorobyev, V. P. 1949. Benthos of the Sea of Azov. Proceedings of the Azov-Black Sea Institute of Marine Fisheries and Oceanography, 13:1–196. (In Russian) Google Scholar
Vukotinović, L. V. 1870. O petrefaktih (okaminah) u obće, i o podzenskoi fauni i flori susedskih laporah. Rad Jugoslavenske Akademije Znanosti i Umjetnosti, 13:172–212. (In Serbian) Google Scholar
Weiler, W. 1938. Neue Untersuchungeen an mitteloligozänen Fischen Ungarns. Geologica Hungarica, series Paleontologica, 15:5–30.Google Scholar
Winterbottom, R. 1993. Search for the gobioid sister group (Actinopterygii: Percomorpha). Bulletin of Marine Science, 52:395–414.Google Scholar
Woodward, A. S. 1901. Catalogue of the Fossil Fishes in the British Museum (Natural History), IV. London, 636 p.Google Scholar