Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T15:42:59.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A new anomalous giant limpet from the Oregon Eocene (Mollusca: Patellida)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2016

David R. Lindberg
Affiliation:
Museum of Paleontology and Department of Paleontology, University of California, Berkeley 94720
Carole S. Hickman
Affiliation:
Museum of Paleontology and Department of Paleontology, University of California, Berkeley 94720

Abstract

Cellana ampla n. sp. from late Eocene rocks in Oregon is the first New World record of a genus and family heretofore considered to have radiated in Australia and the mid-Pacific. Re-examination of some other Eocene limpets from the Pacific Northwest reveals that species previously assigned to Acmaea belong in Patelloida and Siphonaria. Thus, all three major components of the modern Australian limpet guild were present in the late Eocene of western North America along a coastline occupied today by acmaeid limpet guilds. Re-examination of a large Pliocene ‘Patella’ from South America shows the shell structure of a Cellana and constitutes a second documentation of a large nacellid limpet in the New World Tertiary.

Although the taxonomy of modern limpets is founded on anatomical characters, shell structure characters are sufficient to identify genera and families directly in the fossil record. Re-evaluation and reclassification of fossil limpets using shell structure contributes not only to a better understanding of the phylogeny of major limpet groups but also provides a powerful tool for elucidating the evolutionary, biogeographic, and ecologic development of the complexly structured limpet guilds of differing taxonomic composition that dominate rocky intertidal habitats throughout the world.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, H. 1869. Descriptions of a new genus and fourteen new species of marine shells. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1869:272275.Google Scholar
Branch, G. M. 1971. The ecology of Patella Linnaeus from the Cape Peninsula, South Africa. I. Zonation, movements and feeding. Zoologica Africana, 6:138.Google Scholar
Branch, G. M. 1981. The biology of limpets: Physical factors, energy flow, and ecological interactions. Oceanography and Marine Biology Annual Reviews, 19:235380.Google Scholar
Broderip, W. J. and Sowerby, G. B. 1829. Observations on new or interesting Mollusca contained, for the most part, in the Museum of the Zoological Society. Zoological Journal, London, 4:359379.Google Scholar
Creese, R. G. 1982. Distribution and abundance of the acmaeid limpet Patelloida latistrigata, and its interaction with barnacles. Oecologia, 52:8596.Google Scholar
Creese, R. G. and Underwood, A. J. 1982. Analysis of inter- and intra-specific competition amongst intertidal limpets with different methods of feeding. Oecologia, 53:337346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cuvier, G. 1797. Tableau élémentaire de l'histoire naturelle des animaux. Paris, 710 p.Google Scholar
Dickerson, R. E. 1917. Climate and its influence upon the Oligocene faunas of the Pacific Coast, with descriptions of some new species from the Molopophorus lincolnensis Zone. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences, 7:157192.Google Scholar
Dunker, W. 1847. Ueber die in dem Lias bei Halberstadt vorkommenden Versteinerungen. Palaeontographica, 1:107125.Google Scholar
Durham, J. W. 1950. Cenozoic marine climates of the Pacific Coast. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 61:12431246.Google Scholar
Golikov, A. N. and Starobogatov, Y. I. 1975. Systematics of prosobranch gastropods. Malacologia, 15:185232.Google Scholar
Gould, A. A. 1846. Expedition shells described for the work of the United States Exploring Expedition under the command of Charles Wilkes. Proceedings of the Boston Society of Natural History, 2:142152.Google Scholar
Hanna, G D. 1924. Rectifications of nomenclature. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences, 13:151186.Google Scholar
Hayami, I. and Kanie, Y. 1980. Mode of life of a giant capulid gastropod from the Upper Cretaceous of Saghalien and Japan. Palaeontology, 23:689698.Google Scholar
Herm, D. 1969. Marines Pliozoan und Pleistozoan in Nord- und Mittel-Chile unter besonderes Berucksichtigung der Entwicklung der Mollusken-Faunen. Zitteliana, 2:1159.Google Scholar
Hickman, C. S. 1980. Paleogene marine gastropods of the Keasey Formation in Oregon. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 78:1112.Google Scholar
Hickman, C. S. 1983. Radular patterns, systematics, diversity, and ecology of deep-sea limpets. The Veliger, 26:7392.Google Scholar
Ihering, H. von. 1876. Versuch eines natürlichen Systemes der Mollusken. Deutsche Malakozoologischen Gessellschaft Jahrbucher, 1876:97148.Google Scholar
Kanie, Y. 1975. Some Cretaceous patelliform gastropods from the northern Pacific region. Science Report of the Yokosuka City Museum, 21:144.Google Scholar
Kanie, Y., Kawashita, Y. and Club, Fossil, Tokai-Dai-Sagami High School. 1981. Occurrence of a giant capulid gastropod from the Upper Cretaceous of Kaminukibetsu area, southern-central Hokkaido. Science Report of the Yokosuka City Museum, 28:8590.Google Scholar
Kay, E. A. 1979. Hawaiian marine shells. Bernice P. Bishop Museum Special Publication, 64:1653.Google Scholar
Keen, A. M. 1971. Sea Shells of Tropical West America. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, 1,064 p.Google Scholar
Kensley, B. 1972. Pliocene marine invertebrates from Langebaanweg, Cape Province. Annals of the South African Museum, 60:173190.Google Scholar
Krauss, F. 1848. Die Sudafrikanischen Mollusken. Stuttgart, 140 p.Google Scholar
Lindberg, D. R. 1982. Acmaeidae: Gastropoda, Mollusca. Boxwood Press, Pacific Grove, California, 122 p.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae. 10th ed., Stockholm, 824 p.Google Scholar
MacClintock, C. 1967. Shell structure of patelloid and bellerophontoid gastropods (Mollusca). Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, Bulletin, 22:1140.Google Scholar
Marincovich, L. Jr. 1973. Intertidal mollusks of Iquique, Chile. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Science Bulletin, 16:149.Google Scholar
McLean, J. H. 1971. Order Archaeogastropoda, p. 307363. In Keen, A. M., Sea Shells of Tropical West America. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C. and Vokes, H. E. 1953. Lower Tertiary crinoids from northwestern Oregon. U.S. Geological Survey, Professional Paper 233-E:113148.Google Scholar
Powell, A. W. B. 1973. The patellid limpets of the world (Patellidae). Indo-Pacific Mollusca, 3:75206.Google Scholar
Quoy, J. R. C. and Giamard, J. P. 1834. Voyage découvertes de l'Astrolabe, exécuté par ordre du Roi, pendant les années 1826–29, sous le comandement de M. J. Dumond d'Urville. Volume 3. Zoologie, Mollusca, Paris, 366 p.Google Scholar
Reeve, L. 1855. Conchologia Iconica, volume 8. London, 42 plates.Google Scholar
Thiele, J. 1929. Handbuch der systematischen Weichtierkunde, volume 1. Jena, 778 p.Google Scholar
Underwood, A. J. and Jernakoff, P. 1982. Effects of interactions between algae and grazing gastropods on the structure of a low-shore intertidal algal community. Oecologia, 48:221233.Google Scholar