No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 April 2022
As early as 1704, noncitizen immigrants were legally allowed to vote in what would become the United States. By the end of the eighteenth century, noncitizens could legally vote in most states. State lawmakers offered the franchise as an incentive for white, male, Europeans of working age to migrate. However, rising immigration and nativism led states to reconsider alien suffrage, as noncitizen voting was known, and alien suffrage nearly disappeared by the 1840s. Revived by territorial expansion, demands for cheap labor, urbanization, racism, and sexism, alien suffrage expanded in the mid-to-late nineteenth century, peaking a century after the nation’s founding. However, resurgent nativism, wartime xenophobia, and corruption concerns pushed lawmakers to curtail noncitizen voting, and citizenship became a voting prerequisite in every state by 1926.
1. “Man without a Country: Man from Saxony Who Once Voted Here Held on His Return,” Dallas Morning News, August 31, 1905, 2.
2. “What Nationality Is This Man? A German Who Lived Thirty-Two Years in America Barred from Returning,” Kansas City Star, August 30, 1905, 3.
3. “Voter Here, but Can’t Get in: Michigan Man Barred after a Trip to Europe—Had Never Taken out Final Papers, but Had Cast Ballots for Several Presidents,” Charlotte Daily Observer, September 3, 1905, 12.
4. “Had Voted, but Is Held as Immigrant: Michigan Farmer Returning from Visit to Old Country Finds He Is Not a Citizen,” Forth Worth Telegram, August 31, 1905, 1.
5. “The Ellis Island Authorities Are Struggling with a Weighty Problem,” Prescott Morning Courier, September 26, 1905, 2.
6. “Well-to-Do Farmer Held Liable to Deportation: Denied Admission Because Aged Sixty-Three,” Los Angeles Herald, August 31, 1905, 1.
7. “SS Hamburg: List or Manifest of Alien Passengers for the U.S. Immigration Officer at Port of Arrival,” Statue of Liberty-Ellis Island Foundation, August 28, 1905, http://www.ellisisland.org.
8. “Man without a Country: Man from Saxony,” 2; “Man without a Country: Immigration Officials Refuse Admission to Traveler Returning Home after Visit to Saxony,” Los Angeles Times, August 31, 1905, I5.
9. “Voter Here, but Can’t Get in,” 12.
10. “Had Voted, but Is Held as Immigrant,” 1.
11. “A Citizen Who Is Not a Citizen,” Washington Post, September 17, 1905, E4.
12. “Citizen, Not a Citizen,” Philadelphia Inquirer, September 2, 1905, 8.
13. “The Ellis Island Authorities Are Struggling with a Weighty Problem,” 2.
14. “A Citizen Who Is Not a Citizen,” E4.
15. “August Albert Has Been Given Freedom,” Washington Times, September 2, 1905, 12; “SS Hamburg: Record of Aliens Held for Special Inquiry,” Statue of Liberty-Ellis Island Foundation, August 28, 1905, http://www.ellisisland.org.
16. Porter, Kirk H., A History of Suffrage in the United States (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago, 1918), 112.Google Scholar
17. Declaration of Independence (U.S. 1776); also cited in Zolberg, Aristide R., A Nation by Design: Immigration Policy in the Fashioning of America (New York: Russell Sage, 2006), 24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Oscar Handlin, Immigration as a Factor in American History (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1959), 7.Google Scholar
19. U.S. Const. art. I, § 8, cl. 4.
20. George Washington to Joshua Holmes, December 2, 1783,” National Archives, Washington, DC; also cited in Hayduk, Ron, Democracy for All: Restoring Immigrant Voting Rights in the United States (New York: Routledge, 2006), 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. King, Desmond, Making Americans: Immigration, Race, and the Origins of the Diverse Democracy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000), 125.Google Scholar
22. Porter, A History, 114.
23. “Delaware Constitutional Convention of 1776,” Proceedings of the Convention of the Delaware State Held at New-Castle on Tuesday the Twenty-Seventh of August, 1776 (Wilmington, DE: James Adams, 1776), 18.
24. Colby, James F., ed., Manual of the Constitution of the State of New Hampshire (Concord, NH: Ira C. Evans Co., 1902), 152.Google Scholar
25. Raskin, Jamin B., “Legal Aliens, Local Citizens: The Historical, Constitutional and Theoretical Meanings of Alien Suffrage,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 141 (1993): 1400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Porter, A History, 112.
27. Harper-Ho, Virginia, “Noncitizen Voting Rights: The History, the Law and Current Prospects for Change,” Law and Inequality Journal 18, no. 2 (2000): 274.Google Scholar
28. Keyssar, Alexander, The Right to Vote: The Contested History of Democracy in the United States (New York: Basic Books, 2000), 68.Google Scholar
29. Smith, Rogers M., Civic Ideals: Conflicting Visions of Citizenship in U.S. History (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1997), 9.Google Scholar
30. DuBois, Ellen Carol, Suffrage: Women’s Long Battle for the Vote (New York: Simon and Schuster, 2020)Google Scholar; Flexner, Eleanor and Fitzpatrick, Ellen, Century of Struggle: The Woman’s Rights Movement in the United States, 3rd ed. (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1996).Google Scholar
31. Jennifer Schuessler, “On the Trail of America’s First Women to Vote,” New York Times, February 24, 2020; Jan E. Lewis, “Rethinking Women’s Suffrage in New Jersey, 1776-1807,” Rutgers Law Review 63, no. 3 (Spring 2011).
32. Marian L. Smith, “Any Woman Who Is Now or May Hereafter Be Married …”; Women and Naturalization, ca. 1802–1940,” Prologue Magazine 30, no.2 (Summer 1998), https://www.archives.gov/publications/prologue/1998/summer/women-and-naturalization-1.html.
33. John Higham, Strangers in the Land: Patterns of American Nativism, 1860-1925, 2nd ed. (New York: Atheneum, 1963), 98; Keyssar, Alexander, The Right to Vote: The Contested History of Democracy in the United States, 2nd ed. (New York: Basic Books, 2009).Google Scholar
34. Baseler, Marilyn C., “Asylum for Mankind”: America, 1607-1800 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1998), 197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35. Kessler-Harris, Alice, In Pursuit of Equity: Women, Men, and the Quest for Economic Citizenship in 20th-Century America (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001), 22.Google Scholar
36. Glenn, Evelyn N., Unequal Freedom: How Race and Gender Shaped American Citizenship and Labor (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002), 28.Google Scholar
37. Porter, A History, 118.
38. Trask, Nelson J., ed., The Adjusted Constitution of Massachusetts (Boston: David Clapp and Son, 1883), 31.Google Scholar
39. Trask, The Adjusted Constitution of Massachusetts, 34.
40. Porter, A History, 115.
41. Christopher Collier, “The American People as Christian White Men of Property: Suffrage and Elections in Colonial and Early National America,” in Voting and the Spirit of American Democracy: Essays on the History of Voting and Voting Rights in America, ed. Donald W. Rogers (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1992), 24.
42. Briggs, Vernon M. Jr., Immigration Policy and the American Labor Force (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
43. Baseler, “Asylum for Mankind,” 308.
44. Madison Grant and Charles Stewart Davison, eds., The Founders of the Republic on Immigration, Naturalization, and Aliens (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1928), 11.
45. Williamson, Chilton, American Suffrage from Property to Democracy, 1760-1860 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1960), 189.Google Scholar
46. “Political: On the Impolicy of a Speedy Admission of Aliens to a Participation of the Rights of Suffrage,” Balance and Columbian Repository, April 5, 1803, 105.
47. William L. Scruggs, “Citizenship and Suffrage,” North American Review 177, (1903): 837.
48. Handlin, Immigration, 94; Henry H. Simms, “The Controversy over the Admission of the State of Oregon,” Mississippi Valley Historical Review 32, no. 3 (1945): 362.
49. Harper-Ho, “Noncitizen Voting Rights,” 276.
50. Hayduk, Democracy for All, 15–17.
51. “To the Citizens of Delaware,” Delaware Gazette, April 22, 1814, 1.
52. Flanagan, Maureen A., America Reformed: Progressives and Progressivisms, 1890s-1920s (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007), 107.Google Scholar
53. Grant, Madison, The Passing of the Great Race, or, The Racial Basis of European History (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1923), 5.Google Scholar
54. Keyssar, The Right to Vote, 137; Hayduk, Democracy for All, 25; Jennifer Gordon, “Let Them Vote,” A Community of Equals: The Constitutional Protection of New Americans, ed. Owen Fiss (Boston: Beacon Press, 1999), 44; Marta Tienda, “Demography and the Social Contract,” Demography 39, no. 4 (2002): 603; Raskin, “Legal Aliens,” 1407; Hattie P. Williams, “The Road to Citizenship: A Study of Naturalization in a Nebraska County,” Academy of Political Science 27, (1912): 399–427.
55. Handlin, Immigration, 1.
56. Simms, “The Controversy,” 358.
57. Oscar Ameringer, If You Don’t Weaken: The Autobiography of Oscar Ameringer (New York: Henry Holt, 1940); Flanagan, America Reformed, 95; Gary Gerstle and John Mollenkopf, eds., E Pluribus Unum: Contemporary and Historical Perspectives on Immigrant Political Incorporation (New York: Russell Sage, 2001), 37.
58. “Domestic: Congress,” Boston Recorder, April 15, 1836, 63.
59. “Wisconsin,” American Almanac and Repository of Useful Knowledge,” 1849, 307.
60. M. W. Cluskey, ed., The Political Text-Book or Encyclopedia: Containing Everything Necessary for the Reference of the Politicians and Statesmen of the United States, 12th ed. (Philadelphia, PA: James B. Smith, 1860), 31–32; “Notices of New Publications,” Bankers, September 1859, 199.
61. Erie, Steven P., Rainbow’s End: Irish-Americans and the Dilemmas of Urban Machine Politics, 1840-1985 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988), 33.Google Scholar
62. Morse, Samuel F. B., Imminent Dangers to the Free Institutions of the United States through Foreign Immigration, and the Present State of the Naturalization Laws (New York: E. B. Clayton, 1835), 8–10.Google Scholar
63. Stewart v. Foster, 2 Binn. 110 (1809); Morse, Imminent Dangers, 14.
64. “Legislature of New York,” Emancipator, February 25, 1846, 174.
65. Daniel J. Tichenor, Dividing Lines: The Politics of Immigration Control in America (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002), 56.
66. W. Darrell Overdyke, The Know-Nothing Party in the South (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1950), 81.
67. “Disfranchisement and Proscription of Aliens,” National Era, March 23, 1854, 46.
68. “Alien Suffrage in the Territories,” Clarksville Standard, September 12, 1857, 1.
69. “Disfranchisement and Proscription of Aliens,” 46.
70. “Speech of Eli Thayer on the Admission of Oregon,” Herald of Freedom, June 11, 1859.
71. “The Minnesota Land Bill,” Easton Gazette, April 4, 1857, 2.
72. “A Heretic in the Party,” Ripley Bee, 1857.
73. “Judge Curtis and Naturalization,” New York Times, December 12, 1854.
74. Page Smith, The Rise of Industrial America: A People’s History of the Post-Reconstruction Era (New York: Penguin Books, 1984), 332.
75. McMillan, Malcolm C., Constitutional Development in Alabama, 1798-1901: A Study in Politics, the Negro, and Sectionalism (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1955), 107.Google Scholar
76. Charles R. Lee, Jr., The Confederate Constitutions (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1963), 172; “The National Question,” New York Times, November 28, 1866.
77. Faye E. Dudden, Fighting Chance: The Struggle over Woman Suffrage and Black Suffrage in Reconstruction America (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011).
78. Hough, Franklin B., American Constitutions: Comprising the Constitution of Each State in the Union, and of the United States: With the Declaration of Independence and the Articles of Confederation, vol. 1 (Albany, NY: Wee, Parsons, 1872), 103.Google Scholar
79. McMillan, Constitutional Development, 194.
80. Dudden, Fighting Chance, 173; J. Kousser, Morgan, Colorblind Injustice: Minority Voting Rights and the Undoing of the Second Reconstruction (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1999), 13.Google Scholar
81. McGerr, Michael E., The Decline of Popular Politics: The American North, 1865-1928 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986), 46 Google Scholar; State v. Cloksey, 37 Tenn. 482 (1858).
82. Spragins v. Houghton, 3 Ill. 377 (1840).
83. Thomasson v. Indiana, 15 Ind. 449 (1860).
84. In re Wehlitz, 16 Wis. 443 (1863).
85. Conway v. Gibbons, 17 Wis. 526 (1863).
86. McCarthy v. Froelke, 63 Ind. 507 (1878).
87. Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393, 422 (1856).
88. Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162, 177 (1874).
89. Harold U. Faulkner, Politics, Reform and Expansion: 1890-1900 (New York: Harper and Row, 1959), 25; Richard F. Bensel, The American Ballot Box in the Mid-Nineteenth Century (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004).
90. Gary Gerstle, Working-Class Americanism: The Politics of Labor in a Textile City, 1914-1960 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989), 1.
91. Flanagan, America Reformed, 107.
92. Oscar Handlin, Adventure in Freedom: Three Hundred Years of Jewish Life in America (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1954), 130; John Higham, Send These to Me: Jews and other Immigrants in Urban America (New York: Atheneum, 1975).
93. Eric Foner, A Short History of Reconstruction, 1863-1877 (Grand Rapids, MI: Harper and Row, 1990), 131.
94. “Minnesota’s Constitution(s),” Minnesota Historical Society, https://www.mnhs.org/library/constitution/.
95. Michael Douma, Anders B. Rasmussen, and Robert Faith, “The Impressment of Foreign-Born Soldiers in the Union Army,” Journal of American Ethnic History 38, no. 3 (Spring 2019): 76, 81, 82, 85.
96. Richard F. Bensel, “The American Ballot Box: Law, Identity, and the Polling Place in the Mid-Nineteenth Century,” Studies in American Political Development 17, no. 1 (2003): 10, 12, 17; Alec C. Ewald, The Way We Vote: The Local Dimension of American Suffrage (Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press, 2009), 45.
97. Brody, David, Labor Embattled: History, Power, Rights (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2005), 34.Google Scholar
98. “Doings at Nashville,” Daily Memphis Avalanche, January 18, 1868, 2.
99. Joaquin Miller, “Reforms of the Ballot,” Washington Post, August 3, 1884, 3.
100. “Civics in General,” American Magazine of Civics, June 1896, 663.
101. “The Suffrage in New States,” New York Times, July 27, 1889; “Crimes against the Suffrage,” New York Times, November 3, 1893.
102. “Immigrants and Citizenship,” Washington Post, July 25, 1891, 4.
103. “Political Prophets,” Washington Post, August 11, 1894, 4.
104. James R. Green, The World of the Worker: Labor in Twentieth-Century America (New York: Hill and Wang, 1980), 4.
105. U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, The Tarnished Golden Door: Civil Rights Issues in Immigration (Washington, DC: Report of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 1980), 8; Roger Daniels, Guarding the Golden Door: American Immigration Policy and Immigrants Since 1882 (New York: Hill and Wang, 2004), 19.
106. George Lawyer, “Aliens and Citizenship,” Central Law Journal 40, no. 6 (1895): 106.
107. “Yesterday in Congress,” Washington Post, March 3, 1882; Robert Eric Barde, Immigration at the Golden Gate: Passenger Ships, Exclusion, and Angel Island (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2008).
108. Lincoln Steffens, The Shame of the Cities (New York: McClure, Phillips, 1904); U.S. Immigration Commission, Reports of the Immigration Commission, 42 vols. (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1911); John R. Commons, Races and Immigrants in America (New York: MacMillan Company, 1911); Peter Roberts, The New Immigration: A Study of the Industrial and Social Life of Southeastern Europeans in America (New York: MacMillan, 1914); Philip Davis, ed., Immigration and Americanization: Selected Readings (Boston: Ginn and Company, 1920); Emory S. Bogardus, Essentials of Americanization, 3rd ed. (Los Angeles: University of Southern California Press, 1923); Grant, The Passing of the Great Race; Henry P. Fairchild, The Melting-Pot Mistake (Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1926).
109. “Election-Law Tendencies,” Morning Oregonian, June 4, 1895.
110. “Voting and Citizenship,” Youth’s Companion, September 10, 1903, 422.
111. R. L. Semans, “Alien Voters,” Christian Advocate, March 23, 1905, 461.
112. “Aliens as Voters,” Washington Post, November 5, 1901, 6.
113. “Naturalization and Immigration,” Washington Post, November 22, 1901, 6.
114. “Not Fit for Citizenship,” Washington Post, April 4, 1902, 6.
115. “For Intelligent Suffrage,” Washington Post, July 29, 1902, 6; “Frauds in Naturalization,” Washington Post, February 21, 1903, 6.
116. “Calls Us All Foreigners,” Washington Post, June 24, 1906, E4.
117. “Always Near the Front,” Washington Post, July 1, 1907, 6.
118. “Bill to Bar Votes of 250,000 Aliens,” New York Times, March 12, 1918.
119. “Texas Senate for Suffrage,” Kansas City Times, January 23, 1919, 4.
120. Henderson v. Gladish, 128 S.W.2d 257 (Ark. 1939).
121. Hildreth v. Taylor, 175 S.W. 40 (Ark. 1915); Brickhouse v. Hill, 268 S.W. 865 (Ark. 1925); Combs v. Gray, 281 S.W. 918 (Ark. 1926).
122. Leon E. Aylsworth, “The Passing of Alien Suffrage,” American Political Science Review 25, no. 1 (1931): 116; U.S. Const. art. I, § 9, cl. 3; U.S. Const. art. I, § 10, cl. 1.
123. Lisa Garcia Bedolla, “Rethinking Citizenship: Noncitizen Voting and Immigrant Political Engagement in the United States,” in Transforming Politics, Transforming America: The Political and Civic Incorporation of Immigrants in the United States, eds. Taeku Lee, S. Ramakrishnan, and R. Ramírez (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2006), 53.
124. Calavita, Kitty, U.S. Immigration Law and the Control of Labor: 1820-1924 (London: Academic Press, 1984), 23, 37.Google Scholar
125. Bryant Y. F. Yang, “Fighting for an Equal Voice: Past and Present Struggle for Noncitizen Enfranchisement,” Asian American Law Journal 13, no. 1 (2006): 59; Isaac A. Hourwich, Immigration and Labor: The Economic Aspects of European Immigration to the United States (New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1912); U.S. Department of State, “The Immigration Act of 1924,” https://history.state.gov/milestones/1921-1936/immigration-act.
126. Roediger, David R., Working toward Whiteness: How America’s Immigrants Became White: The Strange Journey from Ellis Island to the Suburbs (New York: Basic Books, 2005).Google Scholar
127. Wyman, Mark, Round-Trip to America: The Immigrants Return to Europe, 1880-1930 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
128. Aylsworth, “The Passing,” 114.
129. Gerald M. Rosberg, “Aliens and Equal Protection: Why Not the Right to Vote?” Michigan Law Review 75, no. 5/6 (1977): 1098.
130. Scruggs, “Citizenship and Suffrage,” 837.
131. Keyssar, The Right to Vote, 137.
132. Robert F. Worth, “Push is On to Give Legal Immigrants a Vote in the City,” New York Times, April 8, 2004; “A Citizen’s Right,” New York Times, April 19, 2004.
133. Grace Ashford, “Noncitizens’ Right to Vote Becomes Law in New York City,” New York Times, January 9, 2022.
134. Maggie Astor, “City in Maryland May Let Noncitizens Vote, a Practice with U.S. Precedent,” New York Times, August 10, 2017; Miriam Valverde, “Can Noncitizens Vote in San Francisco, Takoma Park Elections?” Tampa Bay Times, September 15, 2017.
135. Joshua A. Douglas, “Noncitizens Are Gaining the Right to Vote. Good,” Washington Post, August 18, 2017; Miriam Valverde, “Can Noncitizens Vote in San Francisco, Takoma Park Elections?” Tampa Bay Times, September 15, 2017.
136. Deborah Sontag, “Noncitizens and Right to Vote; Advocates for Immigrants Explore Opening up Balloting,” New York Times, July 31, 1992.
137. Chelsea Cox, “Fact Check: Claim That Voting Noncitizens Affected 2020 Election Outcome Is Unverified,” USA Today, November 19, 2020.
138. Mihir Zaveri, “Trump’s Immigration Statistics Are Challenged by Experts,” New York Times, January 27, 2019.