Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T23:19:01.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What if Anything is Wrong with Big Government?*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Richard Rose
Richard Rose
Affiliation:
Centre for the Study of Public Policy, University of Strathclyde
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Starting without any a priori assumption that government is necessarily a force for good or ill, this article examines what negative consequences are likely to arise from big government – or government growing bigger still. Three generic effects are postulated: a loss of effectiveness, because of the use of weaker means-ends programme technologies for new programmes; an increase in contradictions between existing, growing and new programmes; and a possible reduction of consent, insofar as growth increases the ‘impropriety’ of government actions. The growth of government is shown to be ‘unbalanced’, that is, to occur in incommensurable ways and at varying rates for major resources (government revenue, personnel, and laws); government organizations; and programme outputs. The different character of growth in each element is examined, and particular consequences hypothesized for resource elements singly, for internal characteristics of organizations, and for their combination in programmes. The analysis suggests that while much growth involves no intrinsic problems of size (as long as economic resources are available to meet the costs), there is likely to be disproportionate loss of effectiveness, and increasing contradictions between programmes if big government grows bigger still.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , February 1981 , pp. 5 - 36
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aaron, Henry J. (1978) Politics and the Professors: the Great Society in Perspective. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
ACIR (1980) The Federal Role in the Federal System: the Dynamics of Growth. Washington, D.C.: Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations.Google Scholar
Bacon, Roger and Eltis, Walter (1976) Britain's Economic Problem: Too Few Producers. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Baumol, W. J. (1967) Macro-economics of unbalanced growth: the anatomy of urban crisis, American Economic Review, 57, 415–26.Google Scholar
Beck, Morris (1976) The expanding public sector: some contrary evidence, National Tax Journal, 29, 15–21.Google Scholar
Beck, Morris (1979) Public sector growth: a real perspective, Public Finance, 34, 313–55.Google Scholar
Wilfred, Beckerman (ed.) (1979) Slow Growth in Britain: Causes and Consequences. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Beer, Samuel H. (1969) Modern British Politics, 2nd edition. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Beer, Samuel H. (1976) The adoption of general revenue sharing: a case study in public sector politics, Public Policy, 24, 127–95.Google Scholar
Brittan, Samuel (1975) The economic consequences of democracy, British Journal of Political Science, 5, 129–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. and Wagner, Richard (1977) Democracy in Deficit. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Butler, D. E. and Sloman, Anne (1980) British Political Facts: 1900–1979, 5th edition. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Central Statistical Office (1979) Social Trends: 10. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Clark, Colin (1945) Public finance and changes in the value of money, Economic Journal, 55, 371–89.Google Scholar
SirClarke, Richard (1971) New Trends in Government. Civil Service College Studies I. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Coughlin, Richard M. (1980) Ideology, Public Opinion and Welfare Policy. Berkeley: University of California Institute of International Studies Research Series No. 42.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. and Tufte, E. R. (1974) Size and Democracy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Claude S. (1975) The city and political psychology, American Political Science Review, 69, 559–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Milton (1976) The line we dare not cross: the fragility of freedom at 60 per cent, Encounter, 47, 8–14.Google Scholar
Geiger, Theodore and Geiger, Frances M. (1978) Welfare and Efficiency. Washington D.C.: National Planning Association.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Craufurd D. (ed.) (1975) Exhortation and Controls: the Search for a Wage-Price Policy, 1945–71. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Gregory, Roy (1971) The Price of Amenity. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Grodzins, Morton (1966) The American System. Chicago: Rand, McNally.Google Scholar
Gutmann, Peter M. (1977) The subterranean economy, Financial Analysis Journal, 33, 26–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenneth, Hanf and Scharpf, Fritz W. (eds.) (1978) Interorganizational Policy Making: Limits to Coordination and Central Control. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Heclo, Hugh (1974) Modern Social Policy in Britain and Sweden. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Heclo, Hugh (1975) Frontiers of social policy in Europe and America, Policy Sciences, 6, 403–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hugh, Heclo (1978) Issue networks and the executive establishment. In King, Anthony (ed.), The New American Political System, 87–124. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Valentine, Herman (1972) Backbench and opposition amendments to government Legislation. In Leonard, D. and Herman, V. (eds.), The Backbencher and Parliament, 141–55. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hewitt, Christopher J. (1974) Policy making in post-war Britain, British Journal of Political Science, 4, 187–216.Google Scholar
Hogwood, Brian W. (1977) Intergovernmental Structures and Industrial Policy in the United Kingdom. Glasgow: University of Strathclyde Studies in Public Policy no. 2.Google Scholar
Hood, Christopher C. (1976) The Limits of Administration, London: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Kochen, Manfred and Deutsch, K. W. (1980) Decentralization. Cambridge, Mass.: Oelgeschlager, Gunn and Hain.Google Scholar
Knorr, Klaus (1956) The War Potential of Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
La Porte, Todd R. (ed.) (1975) Organized Social Complexity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Larkey, , Stolp, Patrick C. and Winer, M. (forthcoming) Theorizing about the growth of government: a research assessment, Journal of Public Policy, vol. 1, no. 2.Google Scholar
Levine, Charles H. (1978) Organizational decline and cutback management, Public Administration Review, 38, 315–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowi, Theodore J. (1969) The End of Liberalism. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Lord, McCarthy (1978) The politics of incomes policy. In Butler, D. E. and Halsey, A. H. (eds.), Policy and Politics, 182–99. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
McCracken, Paul et al. (1977) Towards Full Employment and Price Stability. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Musgrave, Richard A. (1978) The Future of Fiscal Policy: a Reassessment. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
Newton, Kenneth (1978) Is Small Really so Beautiful? Is Big Really so Ugly? Glasgow: University of Strathclyde Studies in Public Policy no. 18.Google Scholar
Niskanen, William A. (1971) Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Nove, Alec (1977) The Soviet Economic System. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Nutter, G. Warren (1978) Growth of Government in the West. Washington D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
O'Connor, James (1973) The Fiscal Crisis of the State. New York: St Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Mancur (1963) Rapid growth as a destabilizing force, Journal of Economic History, 23. 529–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Mancur (1968) Economics, sociology and the best of all possible worlds, Public Interest, no. 12, 96–118.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (1978) Public Expenditure Trends. Paris: OECD Studies in Resource Allocation, no. 5.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (1980) Economic Surveys: Sweden, Ireland, the Netherlands. Paris, OECD.Google Scholar
Parry, Richard (1979) United Kingdom laws and regulations. Glasgow: University of Strathclyde Centre for the Study of Public Policy unpublished typescript.Google Scholar
Peacock, Alan P. (1980) On the anatomy of collective failure, Public Finance, 35, 33–43.Google Scholar
Peters, B. Guy and Hogwood, Brian W. (1980) Policy Succession: the Dynamics of Policy Change. Glasgow: University of Strathclyde Studies in Public Policy, no. 69.Google Scholar
Pressman, Jeffrey L. and Wildavsky, Aaron (1973) Implementation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1980) Analysing intergovernmental relations, European Journal of Political Research, 8, 289–322.Google Scholar
Richardson, Jeremy J. and Jordan, A. G. (1979). Governing under Pressure. Oxford: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
Rose, Richard (1976) On the priorities of government, European Journal of Political Research, 4, 247–89.Google Scholar
Rose, Richard (1979) Ungovernability: is there fire behind the smoke?, Political Studies, 27. 351–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Richard (1980) Changes in Public Employment: a Multi-Dimensional Comparative Analysis. Glasgow: University of Strathclyde Studies in Public Policy, no. 61.Google Scholar
Rose, Richard (1980a) The makings of a do-it-yourself tax revolt, Public Opinion, 3, no. 4, 13–18.Google Scholar
Rose, Richard (1980b) Do Parties Make a Difference? London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Richard, Rose (1980c) Government against subgovernments. In Rose, R. and Suleiman, E. (eds.), Presidents and Prime Ministers, 284–347. Washington D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Richard, Rose (forthcoming) Misperceiving public expenditure: feelings about ‘cuts’. In Levine, C. and Rubin, I. (eds.), Fiscal Stress and Public Policy. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Rose, Richard and Peters, B. Guy (1978) Can Government Go Bankrupt? New York: Basic Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richard, Rose and Peters, B. Guy (forthcoming) The juggernaut of incrementalism. In Aranson, P. and Ordeshook, P. (eds.), Causes and Consequences of the Growth of Government. Lexington, Mass.: D. C. Heath.Google Scholar
Schwerin, Don S. (1980) The limits of organization as a response to wage-price problems. In Rose, R. (ed.), Challenge to Governance, 71–106. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Arthur, Seldon (1979) Microeconomic controls – disciplining by price. In Seldon, A. (ed.), The Taming of Government, 67–89. London: Institute of Economic Affairs Readings, no. 21.Google Scholar
Arthur, Seldon (ed.), (1979a) Tax Avoision. London: Institute of Economic Affairs Readings, no. 22.Google Scholar
Sharpe, L. J. (1977) Whitehall – structures and people. In Kavanagh, D. and Rose, R. (eds.) New Trends in British Politics, 53–81. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Sundquist, J. A. (1970) Where shall they live?, Public Interest, no. 18.Google Scholar
Tarschys, Daniel (1975) The growth of public expenditure: nine modes of explanation, Scandinavian Political Studies, 1, 9–31.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. L. and Hudson, M. C. (1972) World Handbook of Political and Social Indicators, 2nd edition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. D. (1967) Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Veverka, Jindrich (1963) The growth of government expenditure in the United Kingdom since 1790, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 1, 111–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wildavsky, Aaron (1979) Speaking Truth to Power: the Art and Craft of Policy Analysis. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Wolf, Charles (1979) A theory of nonmarket failure, Journal of Law and Economics, 22, 107–39.Google Scholar
Wright, Deil S. (1978) Understanding Intergovernmental Relations. North Scituate, Mass.: Duxbury.Google Scholar
Wright, Deil S. and Hebert, F. Ted (1980) Bureaucratic expansion, organizational autonomy and institutional influence in American state governments. Paper to the Midwest Conference of Political Scientists, Chicago, 24–6 April 1980.Google Scholar