Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T14:14:56.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

European taxation during the crisis: does politics matter?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2012

Hanna Lierse
Hanna Lierse*
Affiliation:
School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Jacobs University Bremen, Germany
*
Dr Hanna Lierse Postdoctoral Fellow Jacobs University Bremen Campus Ring 1 Research IV, Room 93 28759 Bremen, Germany Tel.: 0049 (0)421 2003458 Fax: 0049 (0)421 2003303 Email: h.lierse@jacobs-university.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

With the outbreak of the financial crisis in 2008, European governments extensively intervened to avert a severe economic recession. Taxation is a crucial instrument to achieve such economic objectives, but it also represents a redistributive tool in democratic societies. Generally, left-wing parties are more supportive of progressive taxes and redistribution than right-wing governments. As a crisis response, one could assume that European governments, especially social-democratic ones, reinforced a redistributive stance to compensate for the substantial amounts of public money used to bail out financial institutions. Based on the tax reforms introduced between 2008 and 2010, the paper explores the tax strategies adopted by European governments. The findings do not reveal a direct effect of party politics on taxation but rather show that pressures from the capital markets significantly restrained governments’ policy capacities to act.

Keywords

CrisisEuropean Unionfiscal stresspolitical partiestax policy
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , December 2012 , pp. 207 - 230
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armingeon, K. (2002) The effects of negotiation democracy: a comparative analysis. European Journal of Political Research 41: 81–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, D., Huber, E., Moller, S.Nielsen, F. (2003) Distribution and redistribution in postindustrial democracies. World Politics 55(2): 193–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castels, F. G.Obinger, H. (2007) Social expenditure and the politics of redistribution. Journal of European Social Policy 17(3): 206–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cusack, T. R. (1997) Partisan politics and public finance: changes in public spending in the industrialized democracies, 1955-1989. Public Choice 91(3/4): 375–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G.Korpi, W. (1984) Social policy as class politics in post-war capitalism: Scandinavia, Austria, and Germany. In Goldthorpe, J. (ed.). Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism: Studies in the Political Economy of Western European Nations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
European Election Database (2011) European Election Database. Bergen: Norwegian Social Science Data Services. Accessed in April 2011 at www.nsd.uib.noGoogle Scholar
European Tax Trends (2011) Taxation Trends in the European Union 2009. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
European Tax Trends (2010) Taxation Trends in the European Union 2010. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
European Tax Trends (2009) Taxation Trends in the European Union 2009. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
Eurostat (2011) Statistics of the European Commission. European Commission. Accessed in April 2011 at http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.euGoogle Scholar
Garrett, G. (1998) Partisan Politics in the Global Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, G.Lange, P. (1991) Political responses to interdependence: what's “left” for the left? International Organization 45(4): 539–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, G.Mitchell, D. (2001) Globalization, government spending and taxation in the OECD. European Journal of Political Research 39: 145–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genschel, P. (2004) Globalization and the welfare state: a retrospective. Journal of European Public Policy 11(4): 613–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genschel, P. (2002) Globalization, tax competition, and the welfare state. Politics and Society 30: 245–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genschel, P.Schwarz, P. (2011) Tax competition: a literature review. Socio-Economic Review 9: 339–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerring (2008) Case selection techniques in case study research: a menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly 2008 61: 294–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hays, J. C. (2009) Globalization and the New Politics of Embedded Liberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heise, A.Lierse, H. (2011) Wirtschaftskrise, Austeritätspolitik und das Europäische Sozialmodell. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft 37(2).Google Scholar
Hibbs, D. A. (1977) Political parties and macroeconomic policy. The American Political Science Review 71(4): 1467–1487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, E.Stephens, J. D. (2001) Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keefer, P.Stasavage, D. (2003) The limits of delegation: veto players, central bank independence and the credibility of monetary policy. American Political Science Review 97(3): 407–423, available at http://go.worldbank.orgCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plümper, T., Troeger, V. W.Winner, H. (2009) Why is there no race to the bottom in capital taxation? International Studies Quarterly 53: 761–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, D. P.Shapiro, R. Y. (1991) economic growth strategies: the effects of ideological partisanship on interest rates and business taxation in the United States. American Journal of Political Science 35(3): 656–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rixen, T. (2008) The Political Economy of International Tax Governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrik, D. (1997) Has Globalisation Gone Too Far? Washington DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Scharpf, F. W. (1991) Crisis and Choice in European Social Democracy. Ithaka, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M. G. (2002) Political performance and types of democracy: findings from comparative studies. European Journal of Political Research 41: 147–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, M. G. (1996) When parties matter: a review of the possibilities and limits of partisan influence on public policy. European Journal of Political Research 30: 155–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starke, P. (2006) The politics of welfare state retrenchment: a literature review. Social Policy & Administration 40(1): 104–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starke, P. A.Kaasch, F. (2011) Explaining the variety of social policy responses to economic crisis: How parties and welfare state structures interact. Paper presented at the DVPW for Political Economy, Bamberg, 16 September 2011.Google Scholar
Stephens, J. D. (1979) The Transition from Capitalism to Socialism. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swank, D. (2006) Tax policy in an era of internationalization: explaining the spread of neoliberalism. International Organization 60: 847–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swank, D. (2002) Global Capital, Political Institutions, and Policy Change in Developed Welfare States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swank, D.Steinmo, S. (2002) The new political economy of taxation in advanced capitalist democracies. American Journal of Political Science 46(3): 642–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmons, J. F. (2010) Taxation and credible commitment: left, right, and partisan turnover. Comparative Politics, January 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomz, M., Wittenberg, J.King, G. (2001) CLARIFY: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results Version 2.0. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, 1 June, available at http://gking.harvard.edu.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, G. (2000): Veto Players and Institutional Analysis. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 13(4): 441–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volkens, A., Lacewell, O., Regel, S., Schultze, H.Werner, A. (2011) The Manifesto Data Collection: Full Dataset. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung. Party Manifesto Project (2011). Accessed in June 2011 at http://manifestoproject.wzb.euGoogle Scholar
Watt, A. (2011) Withdrawal symptoms: an assessment of the austerity packages in Europe. Brussels: ETUI Working Paper.Google Scholar