Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T22:01:06.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Photon beam attenuation characteristics of three commercial radiation therapy treatment couch-tops

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 June 2018

Hamza Wajid ,
Andre Fleck ,
Johnson Darko  and
Ernest Osei
Hamza Wajid
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Physics, Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener, ON, Canada Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
Andre Fleck
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Physics, Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener, ON, Canada Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada
Johnson Darko
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Physics, Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener, ON, Canada Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada
Ernest Osei
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Physics, Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener, ON, Canada Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada Department of Systems Design, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Aim

The purpose of the study was to investigate the detailed angularly dependent attenuation characteristics of three different commercial couch-tops: Varian IGRT, Qfix kVue Standard and Qfix kVue Dose Max couch-tops used in radiation therapy.

Materials and methods

The attenuation of photon beams by the treatment couch-tops was measured using a farmer chamber inserted at the centre of a 16 cm diameter cylindrical acrylic phantom for five different photon energies: 6 MV, 6FFF MV, 10 MV, 10FFF MV and 15 MV photon beams. The Varian IGRT couch-top has three different thicknesses thus attenuation measurements were done at the three different longitudinal locations. Measurements were made with the sliding support rails of the Qfix kVue Standard and Qfix kVue Dose Max couch-tops at both ‘rails-in’ and ‘rails-out’ positions. All measurements were taken for several projections through 360° movement of the gantry and for two different field sizes; 5×5 cm2 and 10×10 cm2.

Results and findings

The results indicate that the maximum attenuation of the Varian IGRT couch-top at the thin, medium and thick portions are 5·1, 5·7 and 8·9%, respectively, the Qfix kVue Standard couch with the rails-in and rails-out are 11·2 and 13·7%, respectively, and Qfix kVue Dose Max couch-top with rails-in and rails-out are 9·7 and 13·8%, respectively. The results from this study can be used to account for the couch-top attenuation during radiation treatment planning of patients treated with these couch-tops.

Keywords

photon beam attenuationvarian IGRT couch-topqfix kVue couch toptreatment couch toptreatment planning
Type
Original Article
Information
Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , December 2018 , pp. 377 - 383
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. De Ost, B, Vanregemorter, J, Schaeken, B, Van den Weyngaert, D. The effect of carbon fibre inserts on the build-up and attenuation of high energy photon beams. Radiother Oncol 1997; 45: 275–277.Google Scholar
2. Meara, S J, Langmack, K A. An investigation into the use of carbon fibre for megavoltage radiotherapy applications. Phys Med Biol 1998; 43: 1359–1366.Google Scholar
3. Munjal, R, Negi, P, Babu, A, Sinha, S, Anand, A, Kateria, T. Impact of 6MV photon beam attenuation by carbon fiber couch and immobilization devices in IMRT planning and dose delivery. J Med Phys 2006; 31 (2): 67–71.Google Scholar
4. Spezi, E, Ferri, A. Dosimetric characteristics of the siemens IGRT carbon fiber tabletop. Med Dosim 2007; 32 (4): 295–298.Google Scholar
5. Myint, W K, Niedbala, M, Wilkins, D, Gerig, L H. Investigating treatment dose error due to beam attenuation by a carbon fiber tabletop. Am Coll Med Phys 2006; 21: 27.Google Scholar
6. Vieira, S, Kaatee, R, Dirkx, M, Meijmen, B. Two-dimensional measurements of photon beam attenuation by the treatment couch and immobilization devices using electronic portal imaging device. Med Phys 2003; 30: 2931–2987.Google Scholar
7. Pulliam, K, Howell, R, Followill, D, Luo, D, White, A, Kry, S. The clinical impact of the couch top and rails on IMRT and arc therapy. Phys Med Biol 2011; 56: 7435–7447.Google Scholar
8. Njeh, C, Raines, T, Saunders, M. Determination of the photon beam attenuation by Brainlab imaging couch: angular and field size dependence. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2009; 10: 16–27.Google Scholar
9. Mihaylov, IB, Corry, P, Yan, Y, Ratanatharathorn, V, Moros, EG. Modeling of carbon fiber attenuation properties with a commercial treatment planning system. Med Phys 2008; 35: 4982–4985.Google Scholar
10. Gerig, L, Neidbala, M, Nyiri, B. Dose perturbations by two carbon fiber treatment couches and the ability of a commercial treatment planning system to predict these effects. Med Phys 2010; 37: 322–328.Google Scholar
11. Seppala, J, Kulmala, J. Increased beam attenuation and surface dose by different couch-tops of treatment tables used in megavoltage radiotherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2011; 12: 3554.Google Scholar
12. Chung, H, Jin, H, Dempsey, J F et al. Evaluation of surface and build-up region dose for intensity modulated radiation therapy in head and neck cancer. Med Phys 2005; 32: 2682–2689.Google Scholar
13. Butson, M J, Cheung, T, Yu, P K, Webb, B. Variation in skin dose association with bed material at MV X-ray energy. Phys Med Biol 2002; 47: N25–N30.Google Scholar
14. Gillis, S, Bral, S, Wagter, C et al. Evaluation of the SINMED Master couch as replacement for a standard couch. Radiother Oncol 2005; 75: 227–236.Google Scholar
15. Vieira, S C, Kaatee, R S, Dirkx, M L, Heijmen, B J. Two dimensional measurement of photon beam attenuation by the treatment couch and immobilization devices using an electronic portal imaging device. Med Phys. 2003; 30: 2981–2987.Google Scholar
16. McCormack, S, Diffey, J, Morgan, A. The effects of gantry angle on megavoltage photon beam attenuation by a carbon fiber couch insert. Med Phys 2005; 32: 83–87.Google Scholar
17. Higgins, D M, Whitehurst, P, Morgan, A M. The effect of carbon fiber couch inserts on surface dose with beam size variations. Med Dosim 2001; 26: 51–54.Google Scholar
18. Butson, M J, Cheung, T, Yu, P K N et al. Variations in skin dose associated with linac bed material at 6 MV x-ray energy. Phys Med Biol 2002; 47: 25–30.Google Scholar