Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T09:35:05.330Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In Response to “Caution in comparing keloid treatment regimens through linear quadratic model”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2018

Misbah Ahmad  and
Habib Ahmad
Misbah Ahmad*
Affiliation:
Institute of Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine (IRNUM), Peshawar, Pakistan
Habib Ahmad
Affiliation:
Institute of Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine (IRNUM), Peshawar, Pakistan
*
Correspondence to: Misbah Ahmad, Institute of Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine (IRNUM), Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. E-mail: misbahirnum@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letter to the Editor
Information
Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , March 2018 , pp. 135 - 136
Check for updates
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ahmad, I, Rauf Khattak, M. Caution in comparing keloid treatment regimens through linear quadratic model. J Radiother Pract 2017; 16 (4): 478.Google Scholar
2. Ahmad, M, Ahmad, H, Khattak, M R et al. Postoperative single versus multiple fractions high-dose rate iridium-192 surface mould brachytherapy for keloid treatment: a comparative study. J Radiother Pract 2017; 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1460396917000395.Google Scholar
3. Karagounis, I V, Skourti, E K, Liousia, M V, Koukourakis, M I. Assessment of radiobiological α/β ratio in lung cancer and fibroblast cell lines using viability assays. In Vivo (Brooklyn) 2017; 31 (2): 175–179.Google Scholar
4. Flickinger, J C. A radiobiological analysis of multicenter data for postoperative keloid radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011; 79 (4): 1164–1170.Google Scholar
5. Hoang, D, Reznik, R, Orgel, M, Li, Q, Mirhadi, A, Kulber, D A. Surgical excision and adjuvant brachytherapy vs external beam radiation for the effective treatment of keloids: 10-year institutional retrospective analysis. Aesthetic Surg J 2017; 37 (2): 212–225.Google Scholar
6. Kal, H B, Veen, R E. Biologically effective doses of postoperative radiotherapy in the prevention of keloids dose-effect relationship. Strahlenther Onkol 2005; 181 (11): 717–723.Google Scholar