Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T13:44:07.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An End to the Means Test? Social Security and the Attlee Government*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

Alan Deacon
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The post-war Labour Government has often been criticized for its failure to remove the means test from social security. Labour ministers, however, had no reason to anticipate the problems which were later to arise in the administration of means tested social assistance. The experience of the supplementary pension scheme during the war had indicated that there would be few problems of take-up or stigma if old people were required to claim assistance as a supplement to their pensions. Furthermore, the abolition of the household means test in 1941 was believed to have removed the cause of much of the bitterness surrounding the means test in the 1930s. A further, crucial, point is that the assistance scale was not seen as a poverty line, but was believed to provide more than a bare subsistence income. Indeed, the recent opening of the official records of the period has revealed that the 1948 scale was not based upon the subsistence diets calculated by Beveridge, and the comparisons which have often been made between the benefits rates proposed by Beveridge and those introduced in 1948 are of little value, whatever price index is used to express the Beveridge figures in 1948 prices.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , July 1982 , pp. 289 - 306
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abel-Smith, B. (1963), ‘Beveridge: Another Viewpoint’, New Society, 28 February 1963.Google Scholar
Addison, P. (1975), The Road to 1945, Jonathan Cape, London.Google Scholar
Cmnd 4185 (1932), Report of the Royal Commission on Unemployment Insurance, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Cmnd 6204 (1940), Explanatory Memorandum on the Draft Supplementary Pensions (Determination of Needs and Assessment of Needs) Regulations 1940, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Cmnd 6265 (1941), Explanatory Memorandum on the Draft Supplementary Pensions (Determination of Need and Assessment of Needs) (Amendment) Regulations 1941, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Cmnd 6338 (1942), Report by the Assistance Board on the Administration of the Determination of Needs Act, 1941, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Cmnd 6404 (1942), Social Insurance and Allied Services (Beveridge Report), HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Cmnd 6550 (1944), Social Insurance, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Cmnd 6700 (1945), Report of the Assistance Board for 1944, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Cmnd 6883 (1946), Report of the Assistance Board for 1945, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Cmnd 7184 (1947), Report of the Assistance Board for 1946, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Cmnd 7502 (1948), Report of the Assistance Board for 1947, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Cmnd 7767 (1949), Report of the National Assistance Board for 1948, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Cmnd 8900 (1953), Report of the National Assistance Board for 1952, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Cmnd 9333 (1954), Report of the Committee on the Economic and Financial Problems of the Provision for Old Age, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Cole, D. and Utting, J. (1962), The Economic Circumstances of Old People, Codicote Press, Welwyn.Google Scholar
Deacon, A. (1981a), ‘Thank You God for the Means Test Man’, New Society, 25 06 1981.Google Scholar
Deacon, A. (1981b), ‘The Duration of Unemployment Benefit under the National Insurance Act 1946’, in Burghes, L. and Lister, R. (eds), Unemployment: Who Pays the Price?, CPAG, London, pp. 114–16.Google Scholar
Harris, J. (1977), William Beveridge: A Biography, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Harris, J. (n.d.), ‘Workers and Social Welfare: G. D. H. Cole's Survey of Consumer Opinion’, unpublished.Google Scholar
Hannington, W. (1940), Ten Lean Years, Gollancz, London.Google Scholar
Kopsch, H. (1970), ‘The Approach of the Conservative Party to Social Policy during World War II’, unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
LCES (1971), The British Economy: Key Statistics 1900–1970, Times Newspapers, London.Google Scholar
Lynes, T. (n.d.), ‘Benefit Levels in Public Assistance 1934–1946’, unpublished.Google Scholar
McCallum, R. and Readman, A. (1964), The British General Election of 1945, Cass, London.Google Scholar
Marsh, D. (1950), National Insurance and Assistance in Great Britain, Pitmans, London.Google Scholar
PRO (1937), Minutes of Meeting of 28 January 1937; AST 12/21.Google Scholar
PRO (1940a), Memorandum to Lord President's Committee, 16 October 1940; CAB 71/1 LP (40) 36.Google Scholar
PRO (1940b), Memorandum to Cabinet, 12 January 1940; CAB 67/4 WP (G) (40) 5.Google Scholar
PRO (1940c), Meeting of Home Policy Committee, 19 January 1940; CAB 75/4.Google Scholar
PRO (1940d), ‘Annual Report of Assistance Board for 1940’; [Typescript] AST 12/29.Google Scholar
PRO (1941a), Memorandum No. 362, 9 September 1941; AST 12/13.Google Scholar
PRO (1941b), Memorandum No. 351, 1 June 1941: AST 11/13.Google Scholar
PRO (1942), ‘The Assistance Board: Memorandum by Nuffield College Social Reconstruction Survey’; PIN 8/80 SIC (42) 82.Google Scholar
PRO (1943a), ‘Report of Official Committee on the Beveridge Report’, n.d.; PIN 8/115.Google Scholar
PRO (1943b), Memorandum to Lord President's Committee, 15 October 1943; CAB 71/14 LP (43) 231.Google Scholar
PRO (1943c), Memorandum to Cabinet, 8 November 1943; CAB 66:43 WP (43) 508.Google Scholar
PRO (1943d), ‘Stabilisation of the Cost of Living Index’; LAB 17: 170 and LAB 17:172.Google Scholar
PRO (1945). Memorandum to Social Services Committee, 9 November 1945; CAB 134/697 SS (45) 18.Google Scholar
PRO (1946), ‘National Insurance Bill (1946)’; T 161 1249 S.53086/1.Google Scholar
PRO (1948a), Memorandum No. 499, 15 April 1948; AST 12/53.Google Scholar
PRO (1948b), Letter from Wilkinson (Ministry of Health) to Bullard (Assistance Board), 5 April 1948; File 14106 AST 7/93.Google Scholar
PRO (1948c), Letter from Fieldhouse to Hancock (Ministry of National Insurance) 13 April 1948; File 14106 AST 7/93.Google Scholar
Rowntree, B. Seebohm and Lavers, G. S. (1951), Poverty and the Welfare State, Longmans, London.Google Scholar
Sayers, R. S. (1956), Financial Policy 1939–45, HMSO and Longmans, London.Google Scholar
Schulz, T. (1941), ‘A Human Needs Diet in War Time’, Bulletin of the Oxford University Institute of Statistics, April 1941.Google Scholar
Schulz, T. (1943), ‘A Human Needs Diet in November 1943’, Bulletin of the Oxford University Institute of Statistics, 12 1943.Google Scholar
Schulz, T. (1949), ‘Human Needs Diets from 1936 to 1949’, Bulletin of the Oxford University Institute of Statistics, 10 1949.Google Scholar
Seers, D. (1948), ‘The Increase in the Working-Class Cost-of-Living Since Before the War’, Bulletin of the Oxford University Institute of Statistics, 05 1948.Google Scholar
Titmuss, R. M. (1950), Problems of Social Policy, HMSO and Longmans, London.Google Scholar
Townsend, P. (1973), ‘Unemployment and Social Security in Lancashire’, in The Social Minority, Allen Lane, London, pp. 63–90.Google Scholar
Townsend, P. and Wedderburn, D. (1965), The Aged in the Welfare State, G. Bell, London.Google Scholar
Warburton, E. and Butler, C. (1935), Disallowed: The Tragedy of the Means Test, Wishart, London.Google Scholar