Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T12:23:53.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New Welfare, New Policies: Towards Preventive Worker-Directed Active Labour-Market Policies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2015

Rik van Berkel  and
Paul van der Aa
Rik van Berkel
Affiliation:
School of Governance, Faculty of Law, Economics and Governance, Utrecht University, Bijlhouwerstraat 6, 3511ZC Utrecht, The Netherlands email: r.vanberkel@uu.nl
Paul van der Aa
Affiliation:
School of Governance, Faculty of Law, Economics and Governance, Utrecht University, Bijlhouwerstraat 6, 3511ZC Utrecht, The Netherlands email: p.h.j.vanderaa@uu.nl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Debates about the new welfare, and the new social policies that go (or should go) with it, share an emphasis on risk-prevention strategies and pluralistic risk management. Focusing specifically on the risk of unemployment, this article discusses the case for so-called preventive worker-directed active labour market policies as part of the new welfare architecture. These policies are aimed at preventing unemployment and promoting labour-market transitions and employability. They involve responsibilities on the part of the state, social partners and employers. First, the case for these policies is elaborated by analysing the social investment, flexicurity and transitional labour-market literature. In this context, several issues related to the feasibility of the pluralistic management of preventing unemployment, as well as the possible impact of pluralistic risk management on dualisation, are discussed. Secondly, recent policy initiatives in the Netherlands are presented as an illustration of the incremental emergence of preventive worker-directed active labour-market policies. It is argued that although these policy initiatives were initially introduced as responses to the crisis, they may eventually turn out to reflect a more fundamental reorientation in managing and dealing with the risks of unemployment. The conclusion critically reflects and argues that pluralistic risk management may exacerbate, rather than mitigate, the insecurities of flexible and non-standard workers.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , July 2015 , pp. 425 - 442
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahamson, P. (2010), ‘European welfare states beyond neoliberalism: toward the social investment state’, Development and Society, 39: 1, 61–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auer, P., Efendioglu, Ü. and Leschke, J. (2005), Active Labour Market Policies around the World: Coping with the Consequences of Globalization, Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
Bekker, S. and Wilthagen, T. (2008), ‘Flexicurity: a European approach to labour market policy’, Intereconomics, 43: 2, 68–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonoli, G. (2005), ‘The politics of the new social policies: providing coverage against new social risks in mature welfare states’, Policy and Politics, 33: 3, 431–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonoli, G. (2007), ‘Time matters: postindustrialization, new social risks and welfare state adaptation in advanced industrial democracies’, Comparative Political Studies, 40: 5, 495–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonoli, G. (2009), ‘Varieties of social investment in labour market policy’, in Morel, N., Palier, B. and Palme, J. (eds.), What Future for Social Investment?, Stockholm: Institute for Future Studies, pp. 55–67.Google Scholar
Bonoli, G. and Natali, D. (2012), ‘The politics of the new welfare states: analysing reforms in Western Europe’, in Bonoli, G. and Natali, D. (eds.), The Politics of the New Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonoli, G. and Emmenegger, P. (2010), ‘State-society relationships, social trust and the development of labour market policies in Italy and Sweden’, West European Politics, 33: 4, 830–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulin, J. and Cette, G. (2013), ‘Labour market adjustments during the crisis: the role of working time arrangements’, Transfer, 19: 4, 475–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burroni, L. and Keune, M. (2011), ‘Flexicurity: a conceptual critique’, European Journal of Industrial Relations, 17: 1, 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantillon, B. and Van Lancker, W. (2012), ‘Solidarity and reciprocity in the social investment state: what can be learned from the case of Flemish school allowances and truancy?’, Journal of Social Policy, 41: 4, 657–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, M. (2012), ‘Paradigms in EU social policy: a critical account of Europe 2020’, Transfer, 18: 3, 273–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Groot, N., Friperson, R., Weda, J. and De Jong, P. (2012), Werkt werktijdverkorting? Evaluatie bijzondere werktijdverkorting en deeltijd-WW, The Hague: Ape.Google Scholar
Ellison, M. and Fenger, M. (2013), ‘Social investment, protection and inequality within the new economy and politics of welfare in Europe’, Social Policy and Society, 12: 4, 611–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmenegger, P., Häusermann, S., Palier, B. and Seeleib-Kaiser, M. (2012), The Age of Dualization: The Changing Face of Inequality in Deindustrializaing Societies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (2002), Why We Need a New Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallie, D. (2002), ‘The quality of working life in welfare strategy’, in Esping-Andersen, G. (ed.), Why We Need a New Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 96–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Häusermann, S. and Palier, B. (2008), ‘The politics of employment-friendly welfare reforms in post-industrial economies’, Socio-Economic Review, 6: 3, 559–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heilbron, J. and Quak, S. (2012), ‘Changing labour policies of transnational corporations’, in Van der Veen, R., Yerkes, M. and Achterberg, P. (eds.), The Transformation of Solidarity: Changing Risks and the Future of the Welfare State, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 139–64.Google Scholar
Hemerijck, A. (2002), ‘The self-transformation of the European social model(s)’, in Esping-Andersen, G. (ed.), Why We Need a New Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 173–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemerijck, A. (2013), Changing Welfare States, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heyes, J. (2013a), ‘Flexicurity in crisis: European labour market policies in a time of austerity’, European Journal of Industrial Relations, 19: 1, 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyes, J. (2013b), ‘Vocational training, employability and the post-2008 jobs crisis: responses in the European Union’, Economic Industrial Democracy, 34: 2, 291–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenson, J. (2012), ‘A new politics for the social investment perspective: objectives, instruments, and areas of intervention in welfare regimes’, in Bonoli, G. and Natali, D. (eds.), The Politics of the New Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 21–45.Google Scholar
Jenson, J. and Saint-Martin, D. (2003), ‘New routes to social cohesion? Citizenship and the social investment state’, Canadian Journal of Sociology, 28: 1, 77–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jessoula, M., Graziano, P. and Madama, I. (2010), ‘“Selective flexicurity” in segmented labour markets: the case of Italian ‘mid-siders’, Journal of Social Policy, 39: 4, 561–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kluve, J. (2010), Active Labor Market Policies in Europe: Performance and Perspectives, Essen: Springer.Google Scholar
Knill, C. and Lehmkuhl, D. (2002), ‘Private actors and the state: internationalization and changing patterns of governance’, Governance, 15: 1, 41–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lister, R. (2003), ‘Investing in the citizen-workers of the future: transformations in citizenship and the state under new labour’, Social Policy and Administration, 37: 5, 427–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundvall, B. and Lorenz, E. (2009), ‘On the role of social investment in the learning economy: a European perspective’, in Morel, N., Palier, B. and Palme, J. (eds.), What Future for Social Investment?, Stockholm: Institute for Future Studies, pp. 79–99.Google Scholar
Mandl, I., Hurley, J., Mascherini, M. and Storrie, D. (2010), Extending Flexicurity – the Potential of Short-Time Working Schemes, Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.Google Scholar
Marshall, T. H. (1965), Social Policy, London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
McKinnon, R. (2010), ‘Promoting the concept of prevention in social security: issues and challenges for the International Social Security Association’, International Journal of Social Welfare, 19: 4, 455–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morel, N., Palier, B. and Palme, J. (2009), What Future for Social Investment?, Stockholm: Institute for Future Studies.Google Scholar
Rein, M. (1982), ‘The social policy of the firm’, Policy Sciences, 14: 2, 117–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schils, T. and Houwing, H. (2010), ‘Sectoral variation in collectively agreed employment protection: evidence from Dutch flexicurity’, European Journal of Industrial Relations, 16: 2, 137–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, G. (2006), ‘Social risk management through transitional labour markets’, Socio-Economic Review, 4: 1, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, G. (2015), ‘Sharing risks of labour market transitions: towards a system of employment insurance’, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 53: 1, 70–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinfield, A. (2007), ‘Preventing poverty in the European Union’, European Journal of Social Security, 9: 1, 11–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjöberg, O. (2008), ‘Labour market mobility and workers’ skills in a comparative perspective: exploring the role of unemployment insurance benefits’, International Journal of Social Welfare, 17: 1, 74–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van de Arbeid, Stichting (2013), Perspectief voor een sociaal èn ondernemend land, The Hague: SvdA.Google Scholar
Sultana, R. (2013), ‘Flexibility and security? “Flexicurity” and its implications for lifelong guidance’, British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 41: 2, 145–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. (2008), ‘The new welfare state settlement in Europe’, European Societies, 10: 1, 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, K. (2014), Varieties of Liberalization and the New Politics of Social Solidarity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trampusch, C. (2007), ‘Industrial relations as a source of social policy: a typology of the institutional conditions for industrial agreements on social benefits’, Social Policy and Administration, 41: 3, 251–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Berkel, R. (2013), ‘From Dutch disease to Dutch fitness? Two decades of disability crisis in the Netherlands’, in Lindsay, C. and Houston, D. (eds.), Disability Benefits, Welfare Reform and Employment Policy, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 199–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Berkel, R. and Leisink, P. (2013), ‘Both sides now: theoretical perspectives on the link between social and HR policies in promoting labour market participation’, in Leisink, P., Boselie, P., Van Bottenburg, M. and Hosking, D. (eds.), Managing Social Issues: A Public Value Perspective, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 143–62.Google Scholar
Van der Veen, R., Yerkes, M. and Achterberg, P. (2012), The Transformation of Solidarity, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Gestel, N. and Nyberg, D. (2009), ‘Translating national policy changes into local HRM’, Personnel Review, 38: 5, 544–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Kersbergen, K. and Hemerijck, A. (2012), ‘Two decades of change in Europe: the emergence of the social investment state’, Journal of Social Policy, 41: 3, 475–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandenbroucke, F. and Vleminckx, K. (2011), ‘Disappointing poverty trends: is the social investment state to blame?’, Journal of European Social Policy, 21: 5, 450–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visscher, K., De Groot, M., Van Eck, S., Van Gestel, N. and Borghouts, I. (2012), Evaluatie experiment van werk naar werk, Utrecht: Capgemini Consulting.Google Scholar
Yerkes, M. and Tijdens, K. (2010), ‘Social risk protection in collective agreements: Evidence from the Netherlands’, European Journal of Industrial Relations, 16: 4, 369–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar