Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T14:25:34.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Study of the BMA–TUC Joint Committee on Medical Questions, 1935–1939*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

Ray Earwicker
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The BMA (British Medical Association)–TUC (Trades Union Congress) Joint Committee on Medical Questions, established in 1936, was an experiment in consensus. It was the first attempt to cross the barriers in medical politics. In the 1930s the strategy of ‘administration rather than advocacy’ prompted the co-operation of the TUC with the BMA on medical questions of mutual interest. The operation of the partnership is explored here in the formulation of a scheme for a national maternity service acceptable to both parties. However, the reality of co-operation at the level of specific proposals was an insistence by the BMA on its own point of view. The TUC had to decide whether a joint scheme was worth the price. Although a scheme was eventually produced, as an experiment in consensus the committee had failed. To some extent the war obscured this failure, but the consensus itself was wrecked by the intransigence of the BMA and the hostility of the Labour movement, which was angry at the extent of the concessions which the TUC had made for a national maternity scheme.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , July 1979 , pp. 335 - 356
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 TUC, Annual Conference Report, London, 4 09 1930, pp. 321–3.Google ScholarPubMed

2 TUC Social Insurance Committee, Proposed Committee on Medical Questions, Memorandum 7: 1, London, 8 04 1936, p. 9.Google Scholar

3 Correspondence, MPU to TUC, London, 9 October 1935.Google Scholar

4 TUC, Annual Conference Report, London, 1936, p. 130.Google ScholarPubMed

5 The South Wales Post, 8 November 1935.Google Scholar

6 Correspondence, Dr C. Hill to Dr H. B. Morgan, 9 November 1935.Google Scholar

7 Memorandum, Dr Morgan to J. L. Smyth, 16 November 1935.Google Scholar

8 TUC Social Insurance Committee, Proposed Extension of NHI Benefits to Uninsured Persons, Memorandum 6: 1, London, 12 March 1936.Google Scholar

9 TUC National Women's Advisory Committee, Memorandum on MPU Document on a National Maternity Service, Memorandum 6: 1, London, 17 April 1936.Google Scholar

10 Correspondence on the proposed committee on medical questions, SirCitrine, Walter to DrAnderson, G. C., 19 November 1936.Google Scholar

11 TUC Social Insurance Committee, Proposed Extension of NHI Benefits to Uninsured Persons.Google Scholar

12 TUC Social Insurance Committee, Proposed Committee on Medical Questions, p. 6.Google Scholar

13 Correspondence, Dr A. Welply to Sir Walter Citrine, 24 November 1936.Google Scholar

14 Brook, Charles W., Making Medical History, Percy P. Buxton, London, 1946, p. 7.Google Scholar

15 TUC, Annual Conference Report, London, 1937, pp. 180–4.Google ScholarPubMed

16 Labour Party, For Socialism and Peace, London, 1934, pp. 26–7.Google ScholarPubMed

17 BMA, A General Medical Service for the Nation, London, 1930, p. 22.Google ScholarPubMed

18 Independent Labour Party, Health Service: Under BMA or Socialism? London, 1930.Google ScholarPubMed

19 Bullock, Alan, Ernest Bevin, Vol. 1, Heinemann, London, 1960, p. 600.Google Scholar

20 Ibid. p. 566.

21 Ministry of Health, Fifteenth Annual Report, Cmd 4664, HMSO, London, 1934, pp. 44–5.Google ScholarPubMed

22 Labour Party, Protect the Nation's Mothers, London, 1936, p. 27.Google Scholar

23 ‘Maternal Mortality’, leading article in The Times, 28 October 1930, p. 15.Google Scholar

24 Ministry of Health, Seventeenth Annual Report, Cmd 5287, HMSO, London, 1936, p. 30.Google ScholarPubMed

25 ‘Memorandum Regarding a National Maternity Service’, British Medical Journal, 7 December 1936.Google Scholar

26 TUC Social Insurance Committee, Maternity Convention, Memorandum 4: 1, London, 14 January 1937.Google Scholar

27 TUC Social Insurance Committee, A National Maternity Service, Memorandum 7: 1, London, 5 May 1937.Google Scholar

28 BMA-TUC Joint Committee on Medical Questions, ‘National Maternity Service’, Minutes, London, 16 June 1937.Google Scholar

29 Correspondence, Dr Morgan to Dr Hill, 7 December 1937.Google Scholar

30 Correspondence, Dr Hill to Dr Morgan, 7 April 1938.Google Scholar

31 BMA-TUC Joint Committee on Medical Questions, A National Maternity Service, Memorandum 3: 1, London, 4 May 1938.Google Scholar

32 TUC Social Insurance Committee, ‘National Maternity Service’, Minutes, London, 8 June 1938.Google Scholar

33 TUC Social Insurance Committee, ‘National Maternity Service’, Minutes, London, 6 July 1938.Google Scholar

34 ‘Poverty and Public Health’, The Economist, 2 July 1938, p. 8.Google Scholar

35 ‘First Aid for Mothers’, The Daily Herald, 25 June 1938, p. 8.Google Scholar

36 Comments by Dr Somerville Hastings and Others on the TUC and BMA National Maternity Scheme, Memorandum, New Fabian Research Bureau, London, 18 October 1938.Google Scholar

37 MPU, Memorandum of Views of MPU on the Joint BMA-TUC Maternity Scheme, New Fabian Research Bureau, London, 21 September 1938.Google Scholar

38 ‘TUC: National Maternity Scheme’, special meeting of the Social Insurance Advisory Committee and representatives of the unions concerned, Minutes, London, 19 January 1939, p. 2.Google Scholar

39 Ibid. p. 3.

40 ‘TUC: National Maternity Scheme’, special meeting of the Social Insurance Advisory Committee and representatives of the unions concerned, Minutes, London, 16 February 1939.Google Scholar

41 Ibid.

42 Ibid.

43 Labour Party, Local Government Department, TUC-BMA Maternity Scheme, Memorandum 121, London, 05 1939.Google ScholarPubMed

44 Ibid.

45 Ibid.

46 TUC Social Insurance Committee and Labour Party representatives, ‘National Maternity Scheme’, Minutes, London, 27 June 1939.Google Scholar

47 A National Service for Health, Cmd 6502, HMSO, London, 1944.Google Scholar

48 Birmingham: Maternity and Child Welfare 1908–1918. Public Record Office papers (PRO), Ministry of Health (MH) 48: 182–3.Google Scholar

49 BMA-TUC Joint Committee on Medical Questions, ‘National Health Service’, Minutes, London, 2 May 1944.Google Scholar

50 NHS: Representations from the TUC 1944–6, PRO, MH 77:73.Google Scholar

51 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, A Report on a National Maternity Service, London, 05 1944.Google Scholar

52 NHS: Discussions with Medical Profession, 24 April 1945, PRO, MH 80:32.Google Scholar

53 Ministry of Health Bill 1946, Clause 23(3).

54 NHS: Discussions with Medical Profession 27 May 1946, PRO, MH 80: 32.Google Scholar

55 NHS: Representations from the BMA, 31 May 1946, PRO, MH 77: 91Google Scholar – letter from Eardley Holland to the Minister of Health.

56 British Medical Journal, 5 June 1948, Supplement, p. 155Google Scholar. It was proposed to pay £7–7s. to doctors on the special list and £5–5s. to other doctors for maternity work.

57 House of Commons Reports, fifth series, Vol. 452, col. 1,547, 24 June 1948.Google Scholar

58 Statutory Instrument (SI), 1948, no. 506Google Scholar, as amended by SI, 1948, no. 1,448, Schedule 1, Part V – ‘(19) A person who, after diagnosis of pregnancy by a medical practitioner, requires the provision of maternity medical services may arrange for the provision of such services either (a) with any practitioner on a medical list having obstetric experience or (b) with the practitioner in whose list her name is included.’

59 The Times, 9 July 1948.Google Scholar

60 The Times, 18 November 1948.Google Scholar