Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T10:13:38.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Understanding Default Behaviour in Workplace Pensions: Automatic Enrolment in the UK.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2019

LYNNE ROBERTSON-ROSE Open the ORCID record for LYNNE ROBERTSON-ROSE [Opens in a new window]
LYNNE ROBERTSON-ROSE*
Affiliation:
Social Policy, School of Social & Political Science, University of Edinburgh, 15a George Square, Edinburgh, EH8 9LD email: Lynne.Robertson-rose@ed.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines the retirement savings behaviour of twenty-five 30-40 years olds automatically enrolled into a workplace pension scheme. Using qualitative interviews, the paper explores the interaction between savings motivation and willingness to adhere to, or deviate from, the pension scheme defaults. Integrating insights from different savings paradigms, including sociological approaches and behavioural economics, the paper highlights how social motives drove willingness to accept enrolment defaults. Participants’ reactions to the contribution defaults were motivated by a complex combination of factors including anchoring effects, the salience of ageing, and emotional responses such as pride, uncertainty and loss aversion. The author’s main premise is that greater attention needs to be given to the interaction between subjective feelings about saving for retirement and pension scheme design.

Keywords

automatic enrolmentworkplace pensionsdefaultsanchoringemotional responses
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , January 2021 , pp. 21 - 39
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ambrus, A., Asgeirsdottir, T., Noor, J. and Sandor, L. (2015), Compensated Discount Functions: An Experiment on the Influence of Expected Income on Time Preferences, Economic Research Initiatives at Duke (ERID) Working Paper, 168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, M., Bhaskar, R., Collier, A., Lawson, T. and Norrie, A. (2013), Critical Realism: Essential Readings, Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, A. and Messy, F. (2011), ‘Assessing Financial Literacy in 12 Countries,’ Journal of Pension Economic Finance, 10, 657–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beauvois, J. (2004), Judgement Norms, Social Utility and Individualism, in Dubois, N. (ed), A Socio-cognitive Approach to Social Norms, London, Routledge, 123–148.Google Scholar
Bernheim, B., Fradkin, A. and Popov, I. (2015), ‘The Welfare Economics of Default Options in 401(k) Plans,’ American Economic Revue, 105, 2798–2837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beshears, J., Choi, J., Laibson, D. and Madrian, B. (2009), ‘The Importance of Default Options for Retirement Saving Outcomes, Brown, J., Liebman, J., Wise, A., (eds), Social Security Policy in a Changing Environment, University of Chicago Press, 167–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beshears, J., Choi, J., Laibson, D. and Madrian, B. (2010), The Limitations of Defaults, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER). NB10-02.Google Scholar
Brown, J., Farrell, A. and Weisbenner, S. (2016), ‘Decision-making Approaches and the Propensity to Default,’ Journal of Financial Economics, 121, 477–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruin, W., Parker, A. and Fischhoff, B. (2012), ‘Explaining Adult Age Differences in Decision-Making Competence,’ Journal of Behavioural Decision Making, 25, 352–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, G., Strauss, K. and Knox-Hayes, J. (2012), Saving for Retirement, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davidai, S., Gilovich, T. and Ross, L. (2012), ‘The Meaning of Default Options for Potential Donors,’ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 109, 38, 15201–15205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ditto, P. and Tannenbaum, D., (2011), Information Asymmetries in Default Options http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.710.8180andrep=rep1andtype=pdfGoogle Scholar
Duflo, E. and Saez, E. (2002), ‘Participation and Investment Decisions in a Retirement Plan: The Influence of Colleagues’ Choices,’ Journal of Public Economics. 85, 1, 121–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DWP (2017), Automatic Enrolment Review 2017: Maintaining the Momentum. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/automatic-enrolment-review-2017-maintaining-the-momentumGoogle Scholar
Foster, L. (2017), ‘Young People and Attitudes towards Pension Planning,’ Social Policy and Society. 16, 1, 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goda, G. and Manchester, C.F. (2013), ‘Incorporating Employee Heterogeneity into Default Rules for Retirement Plan Selection,’ The Journal of Human Resources, 48, 198–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haselton, M. and Nettle, D. (2006), ‘The Paranoid Optimist: An Integrative Evolutionary Model of Cognitive Biases,’ Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 1, 47–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hershey, D., Jacobs-Lawson, J., McArdle, J. and Hamagami, F. (2007), ‘Psychological Foundations of Financial Planning for Retirement,’ Journal of Adult Development, 14, 1–2, 26–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huberman, G., Iyengar, S. and Jiang, W. (2007), ‘Defined Contribution Pension Plans: Determinants of Participation and Contributions Rates,’ Journal of Financial Services Research, 31, 1, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huh, Y., Vosgerau, J. and Morewedge, C. (2014), ‘Social Defaults: Observed Choices Become Choice Defaults,’ Journal of Consumer Research, 41, 746–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, J., Li, Y., Valdesolo, P. and Kassam, K. (2015), ‘Emotion and Decision Making,’ Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 799–823.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loewenstein, G. (1996), ‘Out of Control: Visceral Influences on Behavior,’ Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 3, 272–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loewenstein, G. and Lerner, J. (2003), The Role of Affect in Decision Making, in Davidson, R., Scherer, K., Goldsmith, H., Handbook of Affective Science, Oxford University Press. 619–642Google Scholar
Lowe, S., Searle, B. and Smith, S. (2011), ‘From Housing Wealth to Mortgage Debt. The Emergence of Britain’s Asset Shaped Welfare State,’ Social Policy and Society, 11, 1, 106–116Google Scholar
Lusardi, A. and Mitchell, O. (2009), How Ordinary Consumers Make Complex Economic Decisions: Financial Literacy and Retirement Readiness, NBER Working Paper 15350. http://www.nber.org/papers/w15350Google Scholar
McCrea, S., Liberman, N., Trope, Y. and Sherman, S. (2008), ‘Construal Level and Procrastination,’ Psychological Science, 19, 12, 1308–1314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meissner, T. (2016), ‘Intertemporal Consumption and Debt Aversion,’ Experimental Economics, 19, 281–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morewedge, C. and Giblin, C.E. (2015), ‘Explanations of the Endowment Effect: An Integrative Review,’ Trends in Cognitive Science, 19, 339–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morewedge, C., Yoon, H., Scopelliti, I., Symborski, C., Korris, J. and Kassam, K. (2015), ‘Debiasing Decisions: Improved Decision Making with a Single Training Intervention, Behavioural Brain Science, 2, 129–140.Google Scholar
Madrian, B. and Shea, D. (2001), ‘The Power of Suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) Participation and Savings Behavior,’ Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 4, 1149–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Donoghue, T. and Rabin, M. (1999), ‘Doing it Now or Later,’ American Economic Review, 89, 1, 103–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietrzak, A. and Tokarz, A. (2016), ‘Procrastination as a Form of Misregulation in the Context of Affect and Self-Regulation,’ Studia Humana 5, 70–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabinovich, A. and Webley, P. (2007), ‘Filling the Gap Between Planning and Doing. Psychological Factors Involved in the Successful Implementation of Savings Intentions,’ Journal of Economic Psychology, 28, 4, 444–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson-Rose, L. (2016), ‘Behavioural Responses to Automatic Enrolment in Workplace Pension Schemes,’ Doctoral Thesis, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Robertson-Rose, L. (2019), ‘Good Job, Good Pension? The Influence of the Workplace on Saving for Retirement,’ Ageing and Society, 39, 11, 2483–2501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, N., Goldstein, D. and Johnson, E. (2013), ‘Choice Without Awareness: Ethical and Policy Implications of Defaults,’ Journal of Public Policy and Marketing. 32, 2, 159–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, K. (2007), ‘Re-engaging with Rationality in Economic Geography: Behavioural Approaches and the Importance of Context in Decision-Making,’ Journal of Economic Geography, 8, 2, 137–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C. (2017), ‘Nudges That Fail,’ Behavioural Public Policy, 1, 1, 4–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, N. and Baker, A. (2016), ‘Self-esteem, Financial Knowledge and Financial Behaviour,’ Journal of Economic Psychology, 54, 164–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, R. and Sunstein, C. (2008), Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth and Happiness, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1974), ‘Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases,’ Science, New Series, 185, 1124–1131.Google ScholarPubMed
Van Winssen, K., van Kleef, R. and van de Ven, W. (2016), ‘Potential Determinants of Deductible Uptake in Health Insurance,’ European Journal of Health Economics, 17, 1059.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Schie, R., Donkers, B. and Dellaert, B. (2012), ‘Savings Adequacy Uncertainty: Driver or Obstacle to Increased Pension Contributions?’, Journal of Economic Psychology, 33, 882–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar