Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T23:49:39.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘They have not progressed enough’: Development's negated identities among two indigenous peoples (orang asli) in Indonesia and Thailand

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2010

Nathan Porath
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper is ethnographically concerned with two different orang asli communities: the Meniq living in Southern Thailand and the Orang Sakai in Riau, Indonesia. The focus is on the different discursive rhetorics of development in the two nation-states. These rhetorics have been absorbed by the two indigenous groups to form part of their own modern cultural discourses within their respective countries. These rhetorics of development define the indigenous groups as somewhat lacking in culture and provide them with new understandings of themselves that devalue their customary way of life. The post-development indigenous identity work (such as the development of an ethno-cultural identity) will therefore usually be constructed through these negated developmental foundations.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Southeast Asian Studies , Volume 41 , Issue 2 , June 2010 , pp. 267 - 289
Copyright
Copyright © The National University of Singapore 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Crush, Jonathan, Power of development (London and New York: Routledge, 1995)Google Scholar; Escobar, Arturo, Encountering devlopment: The making and unmaking of the Third World (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995)Google Scholar; Mehmet, Ozay, Westernising the Third World: The Eurocentricity of economic development theories (London and New York: Routledge, 1997)Google Scholar; Discourses of development: Anthropological perspectives, ed. Ralph D. Grillo and Roderick L. Stirrat (Oxford, New York: Berg, 1997); Nederveen, Jan P., ‘The dilemmas of development discourse: The crisis of development and the comparative method’, Development and Change, 22 (1991): 5–29Google Scholar.

2 Rigg, Jonathan, Southeast Asia: The human landscape of modernisation and development (London and New York: Routledge, 1997), p. 29CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Porath, Nathan, ‘Enwrapped by Thai national development: When hunter-gatherers come out of the forest to live in the village in Southern Thailand’, in Globalising rural development, competing paradigms and emerging realities, ed. Behera, M.C. (Oxford, New Delhi: Sage, 2006)Google Scholar.

4 Skeat, Walter William and Blagden, Charles Otto, Pagan races of the Malay Peninsula, vol. 1 (London: Macmillan and Co, 1906)Google Scholar; Dentan, Robert Knox, The Semai: A non-violent people of Malaya (New York: Holt Rineheart and Winston, 1979)Google Scholar.

5 For a discussion of this ethonym see Winichakul, Thongchai, ‘The others within: Travel and ethno-spatial differentiation of Siamese subjects, 1885–1910’, in Civility and savagery: Social identity in Tai states, ed. Turton, Andrew (London: Curzon Press, 2000), pp. 38–62Google Scholar.

6 Shanin, Teodor, ‘The idea of progress’, in The post-development reader, ed. Rahnema, Majid and Bawtree, Victoria (London, New Jersey: Zed Books, 1997), pp. 65–71Google Scholar.

7 In this paper, my ethnographic present is between the mid-1990s and the first years of the 21st century.

8 Unless the word or phrase appears on its own, the first word or phrase is Thai and the second is Indonesian.

9 Rigg, Southeast Asia, p. 48; Andrew Turton, ‘Introduction’, in Turton, ed., Civility and savagery, p. 22; Thongchai, ‘Others within’; Winichakul, Thongchai, ‘The quest for “siwilai”: A geographical discourse of civilisational thinking in the late nineteenth and early twentieth-century Siam’, Journal of Asian Studies, 59, 3 (2002): 528–49Google Scholar.

10 Ibid., p. 531.

11 Peleggi, Maurizio, Lords of things: The fashioning of the Siamese monarchy's modern image (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2002)Google Scholar.

12 Thongchai, ‘Others within’, p. 52.

13 Rigg, Southeast Asia, p. 48.

14 O'Connor, Richard A., ‘From “fertility” to “order”, paternalism to profits: The Thai city's impact on the culture-environment interface’, in Culture and environment in Thailand, ed. Shari, Michael (Bangkok: The Siam Society, 1989), p. 398Google Scholar.

15 Heryanto, Ariel, ‘The “development” of development’, Indonesia, 48 (1988): 1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 Li, Tania, ‘Compromising power: Development, culture, and rule in Indonesia’, Cultural Anthropology, 14 (1999): 295–322;CrossRefGoogle ScholarPersoon, Gerald A., ‘The Kubu of central Sumatra, Indonesia’, in Southeast and Southeast Asia struggles to survive and thrive, ed. Sponsel, Leslie E. (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 2000), pp. 157–72Google Scholar.

17 Persoon, Gerard, ‘Isolated groups or indigenous peoples: Indonesia and the international discourse’, Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land -, en Volkenkunde [henceforth BKI], 154 (1998): 281–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 Colchester, Marcus, ‘Unity and diversity: Indonesian policy towards tribal people’, The Ecologist, 16, 23 (1986): 89–98Google Scholar; Schefold, Reimar, ‘The domestication of culture: Nation-building and ethnic diversity in Indonesia’, BKI, 154, 2 (1998): 259–80Google Scholar.

19 See Duncan, Christopher R., ‘From development to empowerment: Changing Indonesian government policies toward indigenous minorities’, in Civilising the margins, Southeast Asian government policies for development of minorities, ed. Duncan, Christopher R. (Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2004), pp. 86–115Google Scholar; quotation from p. 91.

20 See Hooker, Virginia Matheson, ‘New Order language in context’, in Culture and society in New Order Indonesia, ed. Hooker, Virginia M. (Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press, 1995), pp. 272–93Google Scholar.

21 Dove, Michael R., ‘Introduction: Traditional culture and development in contemporary Indonesia’, in Rural development and imagined role of culture in development, ed. Dove, Michael R. (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1988), pp. 1–37Google Scholar.

22 Schebesta, Paul, Among the forest dwarfs of Malaya (Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press, 1973)Google Scholar.

23 Rigg, Jonathan, ‘Roads, marketization and social exclusion in Southeast Asia: What do roads do to people?’, BKI, 158, 4 (2002): 619–36Google Scholar.

24 Suparlan, Parsudi, Orang Sakai di Riau: Masyarakat terasing dalam masyarakat Indonesia (Jakarta: Obor, 1995)Google Scholar.

25 Kathirithamby-Wells, Jeyamalar, ‘Royal authority and the Orang Kaya in the Western Archipelego circa 1500–1800’, Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 17, 2 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

26 Ralph Grillo, ‘Discourses of development: The view from anthropology’, in Grillo and Stirrat, eds., Discourses of development, pp. 1–33.

27 Hirsch, Philip, ‘The state in the village: Interpreting rural development in Thailand’, Development and Social Change, 20 (1989): 35–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar.