Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:36:09.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The consistency strength of the free-subset property for ωω

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Peter Koepke*
Affiliation:
Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, West Germany
*
Current address: Mathematical Institute, St. Giles, Oxford, England

Extract

A subset X of a structure S is called free in S if ∀xXxS[X − {x}]; here, S[Y] is the substructure of S generated from Y by the functions of S. For κ, λ, μ cardinals, let Frμ(κ, λ) be the assertion:

for every structure S with κS which has at most μ functions and relations there is a subset Xκ free in S of cardinality ≥ λ.

We show that Frω(ωω, ω), the free-subset property for ωω, is equiconsistent with the existence of a measurable cardinal (2.2,4.4). This answers a question of Devlin [De].

In the first section of this paper we prove some combinatorial facts about Frμ(κ, λ); in particular the first cardinal κ such that Frω(κ, ω) is weakly inaccessible or of cofinality ω (1.2). The second section shows that, under Frω(ωω, ω), ωω is measurable in an inner model. For the convenience of readers not acquainted with the core model κ, we first deduce the existence of 0# (2.1) using the inner model L. Then we adapt the proof to the core model and obtain that ωω is measurable in an inner model. For the reverse direction, we essentially apply a construction of Shelah [Sh] who forced Frω(ωω, ω) over a ground model which contains an ω-sequence of measurable cardinals. We show in §4 that indeed a coherent sequence of Ramsey cardinals suffices. In §3 we obtain such a sequence as an endsegment of a Prikry sequence.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[De]Devlin, K. J., Some weak versions of large cardinal axioms, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 5 (1973), pp. 291325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[De-Je]Devlin, K. J. and Jensen, R. B., Marginalia to a theorem of Silver, ⊨ ISILC Logic Conference, Kiel 1974, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 499, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1975, pp. 115142Google Scholar
[Do]Dodd, A., The core model, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, no. 61, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Sh]Shelah, S., Independence of strong partition relation for small cardinals, and the free-subset problem, this Journal, vol. 45 (1980), pp. 505509Google Scholar