Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T17:36:09.164Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Small substructures and decidability issues for first-order logic with two variables

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Emanuel Kieroński  and
Martin Otto
Emanuel Kieroński
Affiliation:
Institute of Computer Science, University of Wrocław, Joliot-Curie 15, PL-50-383 Wrocław, Poland, E-mail: kiero@cs.uni.wroc.pl
Martin Otto
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Schlossgartenstrasse 7, D-64289 Darmstadt, Germany, E-mail: otto@mathematik.tu-darmstsdt.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We study first-order logic with two variables FO2 and establish a small substructure property. Similar to the small model property for FO2 we obtain an exponential size bound on embedded substructures, relative to a fixed surrounding structure that may be infinite. We apply this technique to analyse the satisfiability problem for FO2 under constraints that require several binary relations to be interpreted as equivalence relations. With a single equivalence relation, FO2 has the finite model property and is complete for non-deterministic exponential time, just as for plain FO2. With two equivalence relations, FO2 does not have the finite model property, but is shown to be decidable via a construction of regular models that admit finite descriptions even though they may necessarily be infinite. For three or more equivalence relations, FO2 is undecidable.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 77 , Issue 3 , September 2012 , pp. 729 - 765
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Andréka, H., Németi, I., and van Benthem, J., Modal languages and bounded fragments of predicate logic, Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol. 27 (1998), no. 3, pp. 217–274.Google Scholar
[2] Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., and Patel-Schneider, P. (editors), The description logic handbook, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003.Google Scholar
[3] Berger, R., The undecidability of the domino problem, Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 66 (1966), p. 72.Google Scholar
[4] Bojańczyk, M., David, C., Muscholl, A., Schwentick, T., and Segoufin, L., Two-variable logic on words with data, LICS, Proceedings of the 21st IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, 2006, pp. 7–16.Google Scholar
[5] Börger, E., Grädel, E., and Gurevich, Y., The classical decision problem, Perspectives in Mathematical Logic, Springer, 1997.Google Scholar
[6] Borgida, A., On the relative expressiveness of description logics and predicate logics, Artificial Intelligence, vol. 82 (1996), pp. 353–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] David, C., Libkin, L., and Tan, T., On the satisfiability of two-variable logic over data words, LPAR, Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Reasoning, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6397, 2010, pp. 248–262.Google Scholar
[8] Eisenbrand, F. and Shmonin, G., Carathéodory bounds for integer cones, Operations Research Letters, vol. 34 (2006), no. 5, pp. 564–568.Google Scholar
[9] Ganzinger, H., Meyer, C., and Veanes, M., The two-variable guarded fragment with transitive relations, LICS, Proceedings of the 14th Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 1999, pp. 24–34.Google Scholar
[10] Goldfarb, W., The unsohability of the Godel class with identity, this Journal, vol. 49 (1984), pp. 1237–1252.Google Scholar
[11] Grädel, E., On the restraining power of guards, this Journal, vol. 64 (1999), pp. 1719–1742.Google Scholar
[12] Grädel, E., Kolaitis, P., and Vardi, M., On the decision problem for two-variable first-order logic, The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, vol. 3 (1997), pp. 53–69.Google Scholar
[13] Grädel, E. and Otto, M., On logics with two variables, Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 224 (1999), pp. 73–113.Google Scholar
[14] Grädel, E., Otto, M., and Rosen, E., Two-variable logic with counting is decidable, LICS, Proceedings of the 12th IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, 1997, pp. 306–317.Google Scholar
[15] Grädel, E., Otto, M., and Rosen, E., Undecidability results on two-variable logics, Archive for Mathematical Logic, vol. 38 (1999), pp. 313–354.Google Scholar
[16] Gurevich, Y. and Koryakov, I., Remarks on Berger's paper on the domino problem, Siberian Mathematical Journal, vol. 13 (1972), pp. 319–321.Google Scholar
[17] Immerman, N. and Lander, E., Describing graphs : a first-order approach to graph canonization, Complexity theory retrospective (Selman, A., editor), Springer, 1990, pp. 59–81.Google Scholar
[18] Kazakov, Y., Saturation-based decision procedures for extensions of the guarded fragment, Ph.D. thesis, Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken, Germany, 2006.Google Scholar
[19] Kieroński, E., Results on the guarded fragment with equivalence or transitive relations, CSL, Proceedings of Computer Science Logic, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3634, Springer, 2005, pp. 309–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20] Kieroński, E., On the complexity of the two-variable guardedfragment with transitive guards, Information and Computation, vol. 204 (2006), pp. 1663–1703.Google Scholar
[21] Kieroński, E., Michaliszyn, J., Pratt-Hartmann, I., and Tendera, L., Two-variable first-order logic with equivalence closure, in preparation.Google Scholar
[22] Kieroński, E. and Otto, M., Small substructures and decidability issues for first-order logic with two variables, Proceedings of the 20th IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, LISC 2005, pp. 448–457.Google Scholar
[23] Kieroński, E. and Tendera, L., On finite satisfiability of the guardedfragment with equivalence or transitive guards, LPAR, Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Reasoning, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4790, 2007, pp. 318–322.Google Scholar
[24] Kieroński, E. and Tendera, L., On finite satisfiability of two-variable first order logic with equivalence relations., LICS, Proceedings of the 23rd IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, 2009, pp. 123–132.Google Scholar
[25] Manuel, A., Two variables and two successors, Proceedings ofthe 35th International Symposium on Mathematicalfoundations of Computer Science, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6281, Springer, MFCS 2010, pp. 513–524.Google Scholar
[26] Mortimer, M., On languages with two variables, Zeitschrift für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik, vol. 21 (1975), pp. 135–140.Google Scholar
[27] Niewerth, M. and Schwentick, T., Two-variable logic and key constraints on data words, ICDT, Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Database Theory, 2011, pp. 138–149.Google Scholar
[28] Otto, M., Two variable first-order logic over ordered domains, this Journal, vol. 66 (2001), pp. 685–702.Google Scholar
[29] Pacholski, L., Szwast, W., and Tendera, L., Complexity of two-variable logic with counting, LICS, Proceedings of the 12th IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, 1997, pp. 318–327.Google Scholar
[30] Schwentick, T. and Zeume, T., Two-variable logic with two order relations, CSL, Proceedings of Computer Science Logic, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6247, 2010, pp. 499–513.Google Scholar
[31] Scott, D., A decision method for validity of sentences in two variables, this Journal, vol. 27 (1962), p. 377.Google Scholar
[32] Szwast, W. and Tendera, L., On the decision problem for the guarded fragment with transitivity, LICS, Proceedings of the 16th IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, 2001, pp. 147–156.Google Scholar