Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T08:18:07.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Metamathematical Condition Equivalent to the Existence of a Complete Left Invariant Metric for a Polish Group

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Alex Thompson
Alex Thompson*
Affiliation:
Mathematics Department, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1555, USA, E-mail: act2@math.ucla.edu, URL: www.math.ucla.edu/~act2
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Strengthening a theorem of Hjorth this paper gives a new characterization of which Polish groups admit compatible complete left invariant metrics. As a corollary it is proved that any Polish group without a complete left invariant metric has a continuous action on a Polish space whose associated orbit equivalence relation is not essentially countable.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 71 , Issue 4 , December 2006 , pp. 1108 - 1124
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Becker, H. and Kechris, A. S., The descriptive set theory of Polish group actions, London Mathematical Society Lecture Notes Series, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Dougherty, R., Jackson, S., and Kechris, A. S., The structure of hyperfinite Borel equivalence relations, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 341 (1994), pp. 193–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Gao, S., On automorphism groups of countable structures, this Journal, vol. 63 (1998), no. 3, pp. 891–896.Google Scholar
[4]Hjorth, G., Orbit cardinals: On the effective cardinalities arising as quotient spaces of the form X/G where G acts on a Polish space X, Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 111 (1999), pp. 221–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Hjorth, G. and Kechris, A. S., Recent developments in the theory of Borel reducibility, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 170 (2001), pp. 21–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Jech, T., Set theory, 3rd millenium ed., Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer, 2002.Google Scholar
[7]Kechris, A. S., Classical descriptive set theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Moschovakis, Y. N., Descriptive set theory, North-Holland Press, Amsterdam, 1980.Google Scholar