Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T17:49:20.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Williams, Smith, and the Peculiarity of Piacularity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2015

SIMON BLACKBURN*
Affiliation:
UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGEswb24@cam.ac.uk

Abstract:

This article reflects on some of the complexities in Williams' discussion of moral luck. It compares this discussion with previous work, especially by Adam Smith, and argues that Williams' fear that the phenomenon of moral luck threatens the coherence of our moral concepts is unfounded.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Philosophical Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hume, David. (1975) An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals. Edited by Selby-Bigge, L. A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Knobe, Joshua. (2003) ‘Intentional Action and Side Effects in Ordinary Language’. Analysis, 63, 190–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Shaun, and Knobe, Joshua. (2007) ‘Moral Responsibility and Determinism: The Cognitive Science of Folk Intuitions’. Nous, 41 (4), 663–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proust, Marcel. (1934) Remembrance of Things Past. Vol. 1: Swann in Love. Translated by Moncrieff, Charles Scott. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. (1976) The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Edited by Raphael, D. D. and Macfie, A. L.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. (1981) ‘Moral Luck’. In Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980 (Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press), 20–39.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. (1996) ‘Contemporary Philosophy: A Second Look’. In Bunnin, N. and Tsui-James, P. (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Philosophy (Oxford: Blackwell), 23–35.Google Scholar