Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-7tdvq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-18T03:25:42.080Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Concerning non-measurable subsets of a given measurable set

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

H. W. Pu
Affiliation:
Texas A & M University CollegeStation, Texas
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Let R, μ and Mμ denote the set of real numbers, Lebesgue outer measure and the class of Lebesgue measurable subsets of R respectively. It is easy to prove that the complement Ec of EMμ is a set of Lebesgue measure zero if the inequality holds for some δ > 0 and all intervals I of R. However, in Hewitt [1], raised a problem whether the result is still true if E is not a priori measurable set. In this paper, a negative answer to this question is given through a counter-example. Also, it is proved that for a given set EM,μ with μ(E) > 0 there is a non-measurable subset A of E satisfying μ(E)

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1972

References

[1]Hewitt, E. and Stromberg, K., Real and Abstract Analysis (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1965, p. 295).Google Scholar
[2]Munroe, M. E., Introduction to Measure and Integration (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1959, pp. 9697).Google Scholar