Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T10:31:11.549Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A maximum principle related to level surfaces of solutions of parabolic equations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

Carlo Pucci
Affiliation:
Instituto Matematico, “Ulisse Dini”, Universita Degli Studi 50134, Firenze, Italy
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Let u be a solution of a parabolic equation ut = F(u, Du, D2u). Under convenient hypotheses it is proved that the angle between a given direction and the normal to the level surfaces of u(·,t) satisfies a maximum principle.

MSC classification

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1989

References

[1]Brascamp, H. J. and Lieb, E. H., ‘On extensions of the Brunn-Minkowski and PrékopaLendler theorems, including inequalities for log-concave functions, and with an application to the diffusion equation’, J. Funct. Anal. 22 (1976), 366389.Google Scholar
[2]Gage, M. E., ‘An isoperimetric inequality with applications to curve shortening’, Duke Math. J. 50 (1983), 12251229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Jones, C., ‘Spherically symmetric solutions of a reaction-diffusion equation’, J. Differential Equations 49 (1983), 42169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Matano, H., ‘Asymptotic behaviour and stability solutions of semilinear diffusion equations’, Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 15 (1979), 401454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Pucci, C., ‘An angle's maximum principle for the gradient of solutions of elliptic equations’, Boll. Un. Mat. Ital. A 1 (1987).Google Scholar
[6]Pucci, C., ‘An angle's maximum principle for the gradient of solutions of elliptic and parabolic equations’, Ist. Anal. Glob. C. N. R. Quad 17 (1987), 17.Google Scholar
[7]Tso, Kaising, ‘Deforming a hypersurface by its Gauss-Kronecker curvature’, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 38 (1985), 867882.Google Scholar