Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T19:15:21.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Theta functions on Hermitian symmetric domains and fock representations

Part of: Lie groups Discontinuous groups and automorphic forms Abelian varieties and schemes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

Min Ho Lee
Min Ho Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics University of Northern IowaCedar Falls, Iowa 50614USA e-mail: lee@math.uni.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

One way of realizing representations of the Heisenberg group is by using Fock representations, whose representation spaces are Hilbert spaces of functions on complex vector space with inner products associated to points on a Siegel upper half space. We generalize such Fock representations using inner products associated to points on a Hermitian symmetric domain that is mapped into a Seigel upper half space by an equivariant holomorphic map. The representations of the Heisenberg group are then given by an automorphy factor associated to a Kuga fiber variety. We introduce theta functions associated to an equivariant holomorphic map and study connections between such generalized theta functions and Fock representations described above. Furthermore, we discuss Jacobi forms on Hermitian symmetric domains in connection with twisted torus bundles over symmetric spaces.

MSC classification

Secondary: 22E45: Representations of Lie and linear algebraic groups over real fields 11F55: Other groups and their modular and automorphic forms (several variables) 11F27: Theta series; Weil representation; theta correspondences 14K10: Algebraic moduli, classification 14K25: Theta functions
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 74 , Issue 2 , April 2003 , pp. 201 - 234
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 2003

References

[1]Abdulali, S., ‘Conjugates of strongly equivariant maps’, Pacific J. Math. 165 (1994), 207–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Addington, S., ‘Equivariant holomorphic maps of symmetric domains’, Duke Math. J. 55 (1987), 65–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Berndt, R. and Böcherer, S., ‘Jacobi forms and discrete series representations of the Jacobi group’, Math. Z. 204 (1990), 13–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Borcherds, R., ‘Automorphic forms on O s+2.2(R) and infinite products’, Invent. Math. 120 (1995), 161–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Faltings, G. and Chai, C. L., Degeneration of abelian varieties (Springer, Berlin, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Freitag, E., Singular modular forms and theta relations, Lecture Notes in Math. 1487 (Springer, Heidelberg, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Freitag, E. and Hermann, C., ‘Some modular varieties of low dimension’, Adv. Math. 152 (2000), 203–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Gordon, B. B., ‘Algebraic cycles in families of abelian varieties over Hilbert-Blumenthal surfaces’, J. Reine Angew. Math. 449 (1994), 149–171.Google Scholar
[9]Hammond, W., ‘The modular groups of Hilbert and Siegel’, in: Algebraic Groups and Discontinuous Subgroups (Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Boulder, Colo., 1965) (Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, 1966) pp. 358–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Hulek, K., Kahn, C. and Weintraub, S., Moduli spaces of abelian surfaces: compactification, degenerations and theta functions (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Igusa, J.-I., Theta functions (Springer, Heidelberg, 1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Kuga, M., Fiber varieties over a symmetric space whose fibers are abelian varieties I, II (Univ. of Chicago, Chicago, 1963/1964).Google Scholar
[13]Lange, H. and Birkenhake, Ch., Complex abelian varieties (Springer, Berlin, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Lee, M. H., ‘Conjugates of equivariant holomorphic maps of symmetric domains’, Pacific J. Math. 149 (1991), 127–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Lee, M. H., ‘Twisted torus bundles over arithmetic varieties’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 123 (1995), 2251–2259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Lee, M. H., ‘Mixed automorphic vector bundles on Shimura varieties’, Pacific J. Math. 173 (1996), 105–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Lee, M. H., ‘Generalized Jacobi forms and abelian schemes over arithmetic varieties’, Collect. Math. 49 (1998), 121–131.Google Scholar
[18]Lee, M. H., ‘Jacobi forms on symmetric domains and torus bundles over abelian schemes’, J. Lie Theory 11 (2001), 545–557.Google Scholar
[19]Mumford, D., Tata lectures on theta III (Birkhäuser, Boston, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20]Murakami, S., Cohomology of vector-valued forms on symmetric spaces (Univ. of Chicago, Chicago, 1966).Google Scholar
[21]Satake, I., ‘Fock representations and theta-functions’, in: Advances in the Theory of Riemann Surfaces (Proc. Conf., Stony Brook, NY, 1969) Ann. of Math. Studies 66 (Princeton Univ. Press, 1971) pp. 393–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22]Satake, I., Algebraic structures of symmetric domains (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1980).Google Scholar
[23]Taylor, M., Noncommutative harmonic analysis (Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24]Ziegler, C., ‘Jacobi forms of higher degree’, Abh. Math. Sem. Univ. Hamburg 59 (1989), 191–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar