Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-qks25 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-08T09:29:36.153Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

IN SEARCH OF “COLLEGE-LEVEL TEACHING”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2015

Jonathan Zimmerman
Jonathan Zimmerman*
Affiliation:
New York University
*
email: jlzimm@aol.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Teaching Forum: Pedagogy and Controversy in The New Advanced Placement U.S. History Framework
Information
The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , July 2015 , pp. 429 - 432
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Historians of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1 The College Board, “10 years of Advanced Placement Exam Data Show Significant Gains in Access and Success; Areas for Improvement,” February 11, 2014, https:// www.collegeboard.org/releases/2014/class-2013-advanced-placement-results-announced. For an excellent condensed history of the AP program, emphasizing its evolution from an elite activity to a more broadly shared one, see Tim Lacy, “Examining AP: Access, Rigor, and Revenue in the History of the Advanced Placement Program” in AP: A Critical Examination of the AP Program, ed. Philip M. Sadler et al. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press, 2010), 17–48.

2 Richard Arum and Josipa Roksa, Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011), 8, 3, 71; Catherine Rampell, “A History of College Grade Inflation,” New York Times, July 14, 2011.

3 Cohen, Daniel J., “By the Book: Assessing the Place of Textbooks in U.S. Survey Courses,” Journal of American History 91 (Mar. 2005): 1407, 1412CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Pace, David, “The Amateur in the Operating Room: History and the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning,” American Historical Review 109 (Oct. 2004): 1186CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Carrell, Scott E. and West, James E., “Does Professor Quality Matter? Evidence from Random Assignment of Students to Professors,” Journal of Political Economy 118:3 (2010): 409–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 See, e.g., Daniel Bernstein, et al., Making Teaching and Learning Visible: Course Portfolios and the Peer Review of Teaching (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2006); Nancy Van Note Chism, Peer Review of Teaching: A Sourcebook, 2nd ed. (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2007).

6 Special thanks to Dan Bernstein for suggesting this point to me, humorously but forcefully.

7 “Changes in AP History Trigger a Culture Clash in Colorado,” Washington Post, October 5, 2014.