Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T15:25:12.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ann Mari May, Gender and the Dismal Science: Women in the Early Years of the Economics Profession (New York: Columbia University Press, 2022), pp. 256, $32 (paperback). ISBN: 9780231192910.

Review products

Ann Mari May, Gender and the Dismal Science: Women in the Early Years of the Economics Profession (New York: Columbia University Press, 2022), pp. 256, $32 (paperback). ISBN: 9780231192910.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2023

Miriam Bankovsky Open the ORCID record for Miriam Bankovsky [Opens in a new window]
Miriam Bankovsky*
Affiliation:
La Trobe University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 45 , Issue 4 , December 2023 , pp. 679 - 686
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the History of Economics Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

American Economic Association. 1949. “Exhibit IV: The Profession of Economist.” American Economic Review 39 (1): 341–343.Google Scholar
Badgett, Lee. 1995a. “Gender, Sexuality, and Sexual Orientation: All in the Feminist Family?” Feminist Economics 1 (1): 121–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badgett, Lee. 1995b. “The Last of the Modernists?” Feminist Economics 1 (2): 63–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Michael A. 2001. A Perilous Progress: Economists and Public Purpose in Twentieth Century America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casselman, Ben, and Tankersley, Jim. 2019. “Female Economists Push Their Field Toward a #MeToo Reckoning.” New York Times, January 10.Google Scholar
Cherrier, Beatrice. 2017. “Classifying Economics: A History of the JEL Codes.” Journal of Economic Literature 55 (2): 545–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coats, A. W. (Bob). 1993. The Sociology and Professionalization of Economics: British and American Economic Essays. Volume II. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dewey, Davis R. 1908. “Letter from Dewey to Fetter, dated October 10.” American Economic Association Records, Box 62, “Correspondence of AEA re founding journal.”Google Scholar
Forget, Evelyn. 2011. “American Women and the Economics Profession in the Twentieth Century.” Economia: History/Methodology/Philosophy 1 (1): 19–30.Google Scholar
Jhun, Jennifer, Suprinyak, Carlos Eduardo, and Scheall, Scott. 2022. “Episode 62: Ann Mari May on Gender and the Dismal Science.” Marx and Smith Walk Into a Bar: A History of Economics Podcast. History of Economics Society. https://hetpodcast.libsyn.com/episode-sixty-two. Accessed March 17, 2023.Google Scholar