Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T22:52:37.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Culture of Quantification and the History of Public Reason

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Theodore M. Porter
Theodore M. Porter
Affiliation:
Department of History, 405 Hilgard Avenue, Box 951361, Los Angeles, CA 90095–1361.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is an unusual and memorable privilege to address so international a gathering here in North Carolina on the Fourth of July. American nationalism in recent times has not been very broad-minded, and I'm envious of a society that can attract so many participants from all over the world. But the issue of cosmopolitanism and parochialism pertains to academic discipline as well as to nationality. Historians and economists do not always understand one another very well, and while economists are able to bring in bigger incomes and to maintain a higher public profile, historians maintain a certain authority in regard to scholarly writing about the past. Practitioners of history of economics have often been upbraided for failing to write “real” history, and I have been known to write in this vein. At least I am among those who have tried to persuade members of this society of the merits of history, history of science, and science studies as models for writing history of economics. At the same time I have been seduced by the fascination of this field to devote much of my own research to it, and in these efforts I have come to admire and to draw inspiration from what is distinctive in historical writing on economics, as well as what seems most familiar from the standpoint of the historical discipline.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , June 2004 , pp. 165 - 177
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Backhouse, R. E. and Biddle, J. eds. 2000. Toward a History of Applied Economics, Annual Supplement to Volume 32 of History of Political Economy Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, M. 2001. A Perilous Progress: Economists and Public Purpose in Twentieth-Century America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, I. 1990. The Taming of Chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanigel, R. 1997. The One Best Way: Frederick Winslow Taylor and the Enigma of Efficiency. New York: Viking Penguin.Google Scholar
Keyssar, A. 1986. Out of Work: The First Century of Unemployment in Massachusetts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Klein, J. L. & Morgan, M. S. eds. 2001. The Age of Economic Measurement, Annual Supplement to volume 33 of History of Political Economy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, D. 1981. Statistics in Britain, 1865–1930: The Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, M. S. 2003. “Economics.” In Porter, Theodore M. and Ross, Dorothy, eds., The Cambridge History of Science, Volume 7: Modern Social Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 275–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, K. 1978. The History of Statistics in the 17th and 18th Centuries, edited by Pearson, E. S.. London: Griffin.Google Scholar
Porter, T. M. 1986. The Rise of Statistical Thinking, 1820–1900. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, T. M. 1995. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Porter, T. M. 2003. “Social Science.” In Cahan, David, ed., From Natural Philosophy to the Sciences: Writing the History of Nineteenth-Century Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 254–90.Google Scholar
Porter, T. M. 2004. Karl Pearson: The Scientific Life in a Statistical Age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Porter, T. M. & Ross, D. eds. 2003. The Cambridge History of Science, Volume 7: Modern Social Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, D. 1991. The Origins of American Social Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schorske, C. E. 1998. Thinking With History: Explorations in the Passage to Modernism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Topalov, C. 1994. Naissance du chômeur, 1880–1910. Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar
Weintraub, E. R. 2002. How Economics Became a Mathematical Science. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar