Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-20T12:34:00.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Schumpeter on Invention, Innovation and Technological Change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Govindan Parayil
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The resurgence of neo-Schumpeterian theories and models of technological innovation and development1 is an enduring sign of the historical significance of Joseph A. Schumpeters theoretical works on the dynamics of economic change as a result of long-term technological change.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , June 1991 , pp. 78 - 89
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beer, John J. 1958. “Coal Tar Dye Manufacture and the Origins of the Modern Industrial Research Laboratory,” Isis, 58, 123–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeBresson, Chris. 1989. “Breeding Innovation Clusters: A Source of Dynamic Development,” World Development, 17, no. 1, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dosi, Giovanni. 1982. “Technological Paradigms and Technologica l Trajectories,” Research Policy, 11, no. 3, 147–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilfillan, S. C. 1935/1970. The Sociology of Invention, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Hughes, Thomas P. 1983. Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880–1930, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenney, Martin. 1986. “Schumpeterian Innovation and Entrepreneurs in Capitalism: A Case Study of the U.S. Biotechnology Industry,” Research Policy, 15, 21–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakatos, Imre. 1978. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKenzie, Donald. 1984. “Marx and the Machine,” Technology and Culture, 25, 473–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, Robert K. 1935. “Fluctuations in the Rate of Industrial Innovation,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 49, 454–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Richard R. 1959. “The Economics of Invention: A Survey of the Literature,” Journal of Business, 32, no. 2, 101–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Richard R. and Winter, S. G.. 1977. “In Search of Useful Theory of Innovation,” Research Policy, 6, 36–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Richard R.. 1989. “What Is Private and What Is Public About Technology,” Science Technology, & Human Values, 14, no. 3, 229–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reich, Leonard S. 1985. The Making of American Industrial Research, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Nathan. 1982. Inside the Blackbox: Technology and Economics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Nathan. 1976. Perspectives on Technology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, Nathan. 1971. The Economics of Technological Change, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Ruttan, Vernon W. 1971. “Usher and Schumpeter on Invention, Innovation and Technological Change,” in Rosenberg 1971, 73–85.Google Scholar
Sahal, Devendra, 1985. “Technological Guideposts and Innovations Avenues,” Research Policy, 14, 61–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, Paul. 1951. “Schumpeter as a Teacher and Economic Theorist,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 33, 98–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmookler, Jacob. 1966. Invention and Economic Growth, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1939. Business Cycles, 2 vols., McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A.. 1934. The Theory of Economic Development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A.. 1950. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A.. 1951. “The Analysis of Economic Change,” reprinted in Clemence, R. A., ed., Essays of J. A. Schumpeter, Addison-Wesley, Cambridge, MA, 134–42.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, Paul R. 1961. “Usher and Schumpeter on Invention, Innovation and Technological Change: Comment,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75, no. 1, 152–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solo, Carolyn S. 1951. “Innovation in the Capitalist Process: A Critique of the Schumpeterian Theory,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 65, no. 3, 417–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solow, Robert M. 1971. “Technical Change and Aggregate Production Functions,” in Rosenberg 1971, 344–62.Google Scholar
Strassmann, Paul W. 1959. “Creative Destruction and Partial Obsolescence in American Economic Development,” Journal of Economic History, 19, no. 3, 335–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Usher, A. P. 1971. “Technical Change and Capital Formation,” in Rosenberg 1971, 43–72.Google Scholar
Usher, A. P.. 1951. “Historical Implications of the Theory of Economic Development,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 33, no. 1, 158–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Usher, A. P.. 1929. A History of Mechanical Inventions, McGraw-Hill, New York; ed., Harvard University Press, 1954.Google Scholar
Van den, Belt, Henk, and Arie, Rip. 1987. “The Nelson-Winter-Dosi Model and Synthetic Dye Chemistry,” in Bijker, W. B., et al. eds, The Social Construction of Technological Systems, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA., 135–58.Google Scholar
Wolfson, Robert J. 1958/1959. “The Economic Dynamics of Joseph Schumpeter,” Economic Development and Cultural Change, 7, 31–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuscovitch, Ehud. 1986. “The Economic Dynamics of Technologies Development,” Research Policy, 15, 175–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar