Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T01:03:17.491Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Emil Lederer: Business Cycles, Crises, and Growth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Elisabeth Allgoewer
Affiliation:
Graduate Institute of International Studies, Geneva, and University of St. Gallen, Dufourstrasse 48, CH-9000 St. Gallen, Switzerland.

Extract

Emil Lederer (18821939) was exposed to diverse influences. In Vienna he was a student of Eugen von Bhm-Bawerk, Friedrich von Wieser, and Eugen von Philippovich, but when Hilferding and Otto Bauer spoke in those Viennese seminars Lederer must often have taken the side of the Marxists believe Jakob Marschak et al. (1941, p. 80). In Berlin, Lederer attended Gustav Schmoller's lectures. His supervisor in Munich, where he received a second doctoral degree, was Lujo Brentano. Lederer's habilitation submitted to the University of Heidelberg entailed the first comprehensive analysis of the working conditions and political attitudes of salaried employees (Dickler 1987, p. 157). As much as his last work, on the State of the Masses, published posthumously in 1940, it was an important contribution to sociology.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright The History of Economics Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bouniatian, Mentor. 1933. Technical Progress and Unemployment. International Labour Review 27 (3): 32718.Google Scholar
Cassel, Gustav. 1919. Theoretische Sozialkonomie. Leipzig: C. F. Winter.Google Scholar
De Vecchi, Nicol. 1995. Entrepreneurs, Institutions and Economic Change: The Economic Thought of J. A. Schumpeter (19051925). Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Dickler, Robert A. 1981. Emil Lederer und die moderne Theorie des wirtschaftlichen Wachstums. Nachwort zu Emil Lederer: Technischer Fortschritt und Arbeitslosigkeit. Eine Untersuchung der Hindernisse des konomischen Wachstums. Frankfurt am Main: Europische Verlagsanstalt, pp. 263327.Google Scholar
Dickler, Robert A. 1983. Lederer's Theorie der strukturellen Arbeitslosigkeit und lange Wellen. In Hagemann, Harald and Kalmbach, Peter, eds., Technischer Fortschritt und Arbeitslosigkeit. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag, pp. 186203.Google Scholar
Dickler, Robert A. 1987. Lederer, Emil. In John, Eatwell, Milgate, Murray, and Newman, Peter, eds., The New Palgrave: ADictionary of Economics, Vol. III. London: Macmillan, pp. 15758.Google Scholar
Diebolt, Claude. 1997. La thorie de la sous-consommation du cycle des affaires de Emil Lederer. Economie Applique 50 (1): 2750.Google Scholar
Ellis, Howard S. 1934. German Monetary Theory 19051933. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Esslinger, Hans Ulrich. 1997. Einflsse der Emigrationserfahrung auf Emil Lederers wirtschaftstheoretische und soziologische Arbeiten. In Hagemann, Harald, ed., Zur deutschsprachigen wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Emigration nach 1933. Marburg: Metropolis Verlag, pp. 353381.Google Scholar
Esslinger, Hans Ulrich. 1999. Lederer, Emil Hans. In Hagemann, Harald and Krohn, Claus-Dieter, eds., Biographisches Handbuch der deutschsprachigen wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Emigration nach 1933. Mnchen: Saur, pp. 35462.Google Scholar
Gourvitch, Alexander. 1940. Survey of Economic Theory on Technological Change and Employment. New York: Augustus M. Kelley, 1960.Google Scholar
Haberler, Gottfried. 1937. Prosperity and Depression. New York: Atheneum, 1963.Google Scholar
Hagemann, Harald. 1997. Zerstrung eines innovativen Forschungszentrums und Emigrationsgewinn. Zur Rolle der Kieler Schule 19261933 und ihrer Wirkung im Exil. In Hagemann, Harald, ed., Zur deutschsprachigen wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Emigration nach 1933. Marburg: Metropolis Verlag, pp. 293341.Google Scholar
Hagemann, Harald. 2000. Emil Lederer (18821939): Economical and sociological analyst and critic of capitalist development. In Koslowski, Peter, ed., The Theory of Capitalism in the German Economic Tradition: Historism, Ordo-Liberalism, Critical Theory, Solidarism. Berlin: Springer, pp. 2651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagemann, Harald and Kalmbach, Peter, eds. 1983. Technischer Fortschritt und Arbeitslosigkeit. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
Hagemann, Harald and Krohn, Claus-Dieter, eds. 1999. Biographisches Handbuch der deutschsprachigen wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Emigration nach 1933. Mnchen: Saur.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, John R. 1965. Capital and Growth. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hicks, John R. 1973. Capital and Time. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Janssen, Hauke. 1998. Nationalkonomie und Nationalsozialismus: die deutsche Volkswirtschaftslehre in den dreissiger Jahren. Marburg: Metropolis.Google Scholar
James, Harold. 1986. The German Slump. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kaldor, Nicholas. 1932. A case against technical progress? Economica 36 (05): 18096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krohn, Claus Dieter. 1993. Intellectuals in exile: Refugee scholars and the New School for Social Research. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press. Translated by Rita and Robert Kimber from the German Wissenschaft im Exil. Deutsche Sozial- und Wirtschaftswissenschaftler in den USA und die New School for Social Research. Frankfurt and New York: Campus, 1987.Google Scholar
Kruse, Alfred. 1959. Geschichte der volkswirtschaftlichen Theorien, 4th edition. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
Lasker, Bruno, Staudinger, Hans, and Salomon, Albert. 1940. Emil Lederer, 18821939. I: The Sociologist. Social Research 7 (3): 33758.Google Scholar
Lederer, Emil. 1925. Konjunktur und Krisen. In Grundriss der Sozialokonomik. Tubingen: J.C.B. Mohr, pp. 354413.Google Scholar
Lederer, Emil. 1927. Monopole und Konjunktur. In Vierteljahreshefte zur Konjunkturforschung I Erg-zungsband 2: 1332.Google Scholar
Lederer, Emil. 1931a. Aufriss der konomischen Theorie. Dritte erweiterte und vllig umgearbeitete Auflage der Grundzge der konomischen Theorie. Tbingen: Verlag J.C.B. Mohr.Google Scholar
Lederer, Emil. 1931b. Technischer Fortschritt und Arbeitslosigkeit. Tbingen: J.C.B. Mohr.Google Scholar
Lederer, Emil. 1931c. Wirkungen des Lohnabbaus. Ein Vortrag. Tbingen: J.C.B. Mohr.Google Scholar
Lederer, Emil. 1932. Planwirtschaft. Tbingen.Google Scholar
Lederer, Emil. 1933. Technical Progress and Unemployment. International Labour Review 28 (1): 125.Google Scholar
Lederer, Emil. 1934. Technology. In Seligman, Edwin R. A. and Johnson, Alvin S., eds., Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. 14. New York: Macmillan, pp. 55360.Google Scholar
Lederer, Emil. 1938. Technical Progress and Unemployment: An Enquiry into the Obstacles to Economic Expansion. Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
Lwe, Adolf. 1933. Contribution to Der Stand und die nchste Zukunft der Konjunkturforschung. Festschrift fr Arthur Spiethoff.Mnchen: Duncker & Humblot, pp. 15460.Google Scholar
Marschak, Jakob, Kahler, Alfred, and Heimann, Eduard. 1941. Emil Lederer, 18821939. II: The Economist. Social Research 6: 79105.Google Scholar
Mehrling, Perry G. 1997. The Money Interest and the Public Interest: American Monetary Thought, 19201970. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mongiovi, Gary. 1997. migr Economists at the New School, 19331945. In Hagemann, Harald, ed., Zur deutschsprachigen wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Emigration nach 1933. Marburg: Metropolis Verlag, pp. 383402.Google Scholar
Pribram, Karl. 1981. A History of Economic Reasoning. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1954. History of Economic Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tugan-Baranovsky, Michael von. 1901. Studien zur Theorie und Geschichte der Handelskrisen in England. Jena: Verlag von Gustav Fischer. Originally published in Russian in 1894. The German translation is from the second Russian edition of 1900 (the name is spelled Tugan-Baranowsky in this edition, here the spelling has been adjusted to the prevailing usage).Google Scholar