Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:29:44.221Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessing the solvency and financial strength of a general insurance company

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2012

C.D. Daykin ,
G.D. Bernstein ,
S.M. Coutts ,
E.R.F. Devitt ,
G.B. Hey ,
D.I.W. Reynolds  and
P.D. Smith
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

After reviewing some general issues concerning solvency and the problems associated with establishing the financial strength of a general insurance company using the traditional balance sheet concept, the authors put forward an emerging costs approach for examining the strength of a company. This enables the true nature of the assets and liabilities to be taken into account, including their essential variability. Simulation is suggested as a powerful tool for use in examining the financial strength of a company and in exploring the impact of alternative scenarios. A particular example of such a simulation model is then presented and used to explore the resilience of a company's financial position to variations in a wide variety of parameters. The model enables the user to quantify the probability that the assets will prove adequate to meet the liabilities with or without an assumption of continuing business. This in turn permits an appropriate asset margin to be assessed individually for any particular company in the light of the strategy that the company intends to follow. Some of the implications of this approach for the management and supervision of general insurance companies are explored. The suggestion is made that the effectiveness of statutory supervision based on the balance sheet and a crude solvency margin requirement is limited, since it cannot have proper regard to the risk profile of individual companies. More responsibility should be placed on an actuary or other suitably qualified professional individual to report on the overall financial strength of the company, both to management and to the supervisory authorities.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Institute of Actuaries , Volume 114 , Issue 2 , September 1987 , pp. 227 - 325
Copyright
Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. GISG Working Party on Solvency (1983) (Report to Bristol Seminar).Google Scholar
2. Daykin, C.D., Devitt, E.R.F., Khan, M.R. and McCaughan, J.P. (1984) The Solvency of General Insurance Companies J.I.A. 111, 279).Google Scholar
3. Daykin, C.D. and Bernstein, G.D. (1985) A Simulation Model to Examine Questions of Solvency in the Light of Asset and Run-off Risks. (Presented to ASTIN Colloquium in Biarritz, October 1985).Google Scholar
4. GISG Working Party on Solvency (1985) The Solvency of General Insurance Companies Revisited. (Report to Cheltenham Seminar).Google Scholar
5. Pentikäinen, T. and Rantala, J. (1982) Solvency of Insurers and Equalization Reserves (Helsinki).Google Scholar
6. Beard, R.E., Pentikäinen, T. and Pesonen, E. (1984) Risk Theory (3rd Edition). Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Pentikäinen, T. and Rantala, J. (1986) Run-off Risk as a Part of Claims Fluctuation (ASTIN Bulletin 16, 113)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Daykin, C.D., Bernstein, G.D., Coutts, S.M., Devitt, E.R.F., Hey, G.B., Reynolds, D.I.W. and Smith, P.D. (1986) The Solvency of a General Insurance Company in Terms of Emerging Costs (Presented to the International Conference on Insurance Solvency, Philadelphia, USA and to the ASTIN Colloquium in Tel Aviv).Google Scholar
9. Maturity Guarantees Working Party (1980) Report (J.I.A. 107, 103)Google Scholar
10. Coutts, S.M., Devitt, E.R.F. and Ross, G.A.F. (1984) A Probabilistic Approach to Assessing the Financial Strength of a General Insurance Company (Transactions of the 22nd International Congress of Actuaries Vol.3, 129).Google Scholar
11. Coutts, S.M. and Devitt, E.R.F. (1986) The Assessment of the Financial Strength of Insurance Companies — A Generalized Cash Flow Model (Presented to the International Conference on Insurance Solvency, Philadelphia, USA).Google Scholar
12. Coutts, S.M. and Devitt, E.R.F. (1987) A Generalized Cash Flow Model for Assessing Financial Strength. (Unpublished)Google Scholar
13. Campagne, C. (1957) Minimum Standards of Solvency for Insurance Firms (OEEC, TFD/PC/565).Google Scholar
14. Daykin, C.D. (1984) The Development of Concepts of Adequacy and Solvency in Non-life Insurance in the EEC (Transactions of the 22nd International Congress of Actuaries Vol.3, 299).Google Scholar
15. Humphrys, R. (1984) Standards and Solvency Requirements under Canadian Insurance Legislation (Transactions of the 22nd International Congress of Actuaries Vol.3, 489).Google Scholar
16. Slee, D.J. (1984) Solvency and Adequacy of Reserves for a Direct Writer of Workers’ Compensation Insurance in Australia (Transactions of the 22nd International Congress of Actuaries Vol.3, 237).Google Scholar
17. Wootton, R. (1984) The Concept of Solvency in the Context of Funded Pension Schemes (Transactions of the 22nd International Congress of Actuaries Vol.3, 159).Google Scholar
18. Stewart, C.M. (1971) The Assessment of Solvency (ASTIN Bulletin 6, 79).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Pentikäinen, T. (1986) On the Solvency of Insurers — A Survey on the Aspects Involved (Presented to the International Conference on Insurance Solvency, Philadelphia, USA).Google Scholar
20. Buchanan, R.A. and Taylor, G.C. (1986) The Management of Solvency (Presented to the International Conference on Insurance Solvency, Philadelphia, USA).Google Scholar
21. First Council Directive of 24 July 1973 on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the taking-up and pursuit of the business of direct insurance other than life insurance (Official Journal of the European Communities Vol 16, No 228, 16 August 1973).Google Scholar
22. Limb, A.P. (1984) Desiderata for Solvency (Transactions of the 22nd International Congress of Actuaries Vol.3, 1).Google Scholar
23. De Hullu, A. (1984) A Management Oriented Approach to Solvency (Transactions of the 22nd International Congress of Actuaries Vol.3, 21).Google Scholar
24. Skerman, R.S. (1984) The Responsibility of the Actuary for the Adequacy of Life Insurance Reserves (Transactions of the 22nd International Congress of Actuaries Vol.3, 49).Google Scholar
25. Collett, R.L. (1984) Life Company Policyholder Policy Protection in the United States: An Examination of the Options for Assuring Reserve Adequacy (Transactions of the 22nd International Congress of Actuaries Vol.3, 173).Google Scholar
26. Kastelijn, W.M. and Remmerswaal, J.C.M. (1986) Solvency (Surveys of Actuarial Studies No 3, Nationale-Nederlanden NV).Google Scholar
27. Kahane, Y. (1979) Solidity, Leverage and the Regulation of Insurance Companies (The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance No 14).Google Scholar
28. Tapiero, C.S., Kahane, Y. and Jacoue, L. (1986) Insurance Premiums and Default Risk in Mutual Insurance (to be published in the Scandinavian Actuarial Journal).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29. Cummins, J.D. (1986) Risk-based Premiums for Insurance Guaranty Funds (Presented to the International Conference on Insurance Solvency, Philadelphia, USA).Google Scholar
30. Doherty, N. (1986) On the Capital Structure of Insurance Firms (Presented to the International Conference on Insurance Solvency, Philadelphia, USA).Google Scholar
31. Derrig, R.A. (1986) Solvency Levels and Risk Loadings Appropriate for Fully Guaranteed Property-Liability Insurance Contracts: A Financial View (Presented to the International Conference on Insurance Solvency, Philadelphia, USA).Google Scholar
32. Benjamin, S. (1980) Solvency and Profitability in Insurance (Transactions of the 21st International Congress of Actuaries Vol.1, 33).Google Scholar
33. Ryan, J.P. (1980) An Application of Model Office Techniques to the Solvency Question (Transactions of the 21st International Congress of Actuaries Vol.1, 403).Google Scholar
34. Ryan, J.P. (1984) Application of Simulation Techniques to Solvency Testing for a Non-life Office (Transactions of the 22nd Internation al Congress of Actuaries Vol.3, 269).Google Scholar
35. Kahane, Y. and Biger, N. (1977) Balance Sheet Optimisation in Inflationary Circumstances — The Case of Non-life Insurance Companies (The Journal of Insurance Issues and Practices Vol.1, No 2).Google Scholar
36. Paulson, A.S. and Deekshit, R.V.S. (1986) The Influence of Size of Firm, Number of Insurance Lives and Investment Behaviour on Issues of Solvency (Presented to the International Conference on Insurance Solvency, Philadelphia, USA).Google Scholar
37. Faculty of Actuaries Solvency Working Party (1986) The Solvency of Life Assurance Companies (T.F.A. 39, 251).Google Scholar
38. Wilkie, A.D. (1984) Steps towards a Comprehensive Stochastic Investment Model (OARD 36), Institute of Actuaries.Google Scholar
39. Wilkie, A.D. (1986) A Stochastic Investment Model for Actuarial Use (T.F.A. 39, 341).Google Scholar
40. Wilkie, A.D. (1986) Some Applications of Stochastic Investment Mod els (J.S.S. 29, 25).Google Scholar
41. Abbott, W.M. (1986) Actuaries and General Insurance (J.I.A. 113, 299).Google Scholar
42. Abbott, W.M., Clarke, T.G. and Treen, W.R. (1981) Some Financial Aspects of a General Insurance Company (J.I.A. 108, 119).Google Scholar
43. Craighead, D.H. (1979) Some Aspects of the London Reinsurance Market in World-Wide Short-Term Business (J.I.A. 106, 227).Google Scholar
44. Byrnes, J.F. (1984) A Survey of the Relationship between Claims Reserves and Solvency Margins (Presented to a General Insurance Seminar at Macquarie University).Google Scholar