Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T00:11:15.256Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coronal place contrasts in Argentine and Cuban Spanish: An electropalatographic study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2011

Alexei Kochetov  and
Laura Colantoni
Alexei Kochetov
Affiliation:
University of Toronto, Canada al.kochetov@utoronto.ca, laura.colantoni@utoronto.ca
Laura Colantoni
Affiliation:
University of Toronto, Canada al.kochetov@utoronto.ca, laura.colantoni@utoronto.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Theoretical and descriptive work on Spanish phonetics and phonology has been largely based on Peninsular varieties. This study uses electropalatography (EPG) to investigate articulatory characteristics of coronal consonant contrasts in Argentine and Cuban Spanish. Simultaneous EPG and acoustic data were collected from five speakers from Buenos Aires (Argentina) and three speakers from Havana (Cuba) reading sentences with various syllable-initial coronal consonants corresponding to the orthographic 〈t, ch, n, ñ, s, z, ll, y, l, r〉. As a control, the same data were collected from a single speaker of Peninsular Spanish from Madrid. As expected, the main distinction in both varieties was made between anterior and posterior coronal consonants ((denti-)alveolars vs. (alveolo-)palatals) and reflected the historical merger of the sounds represented by 〈s–z〉 and 〈ll–y〉. At the same time, the results revealed some consistent differences between the two varieties in the location of the constriction and the amount of linguopalatal contact for most coronal consonants. First, the coronal consonants produced by the Argentine speakers were overall considerably more fronted and more constricted than the corresponding consonants produced by the Cuban speakers. Second, 〈ll, y〉 were produced as a fronted alveolo-palatal fricative by the Argentine speakers, and as an approximant by the Cuban speakers. Inter-speaker variation was observed within the varieties in the articulation of some consonants, namely in the Argentine alveolo-palatal fricative and nasal (〈ll, y〉 and 〈ñ〉), and the Cuban alveolo-palatal affricate 〈ch〉.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , December 2011 , pp. 313 - 342
Copyright
Copyright © International Phonetic Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alarcos Llorach, Emilio. 1965. Fonología española. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Blecua, Beatriz. 2001. Las vibrantes del español: manifestaciones acústicas y procesos fonéticos. Ph.D. dissertation, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Bradley, Travis G. 1999. Assibilation in Ecuadorian Spanish. A phonology–phonetics account. In Authier, Marc, Bullock, Barbara & Reed, Lisa (eds.), Formal perspectives on Romance Linguistics, 57–71. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunner, Jana, Fuchs, Susanne & Perrier, Pascal. 2009. On the relationship between palate shape and articulatory behavior. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 125, 3936–3949.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colantoni, Laura. 2001. Mergers, chain shifts, and dissimilatory processes: Palatals and rhotics in Argentine Spanish. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Colantoni, Laura. 2006. Increasing periodicity to reduce similarity: An account of deassibilation in rhotics. In Díaz-Campos, Manuel (ed.), 2nd Conference on Laboratory Approaches to Spanish Phonology, 22–34. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Colantoni, Laura & Kochetov, Alexei. 2010. Palatal nasals or nasal palatalization? Presented at the Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL 40), University of Washington.Google Scholar
Colantoni, Laura & Steele, Jeffrey. 2005. Liquid asymmetries in French and Spanish. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 24, 1–14.Google Scholar
Collins Spanish Dictionary. 2011. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Corneau, Caroline. 2000. An EPG study of palatalization in French: Cross-dialect and inter-subject variation. Language Variation and Change 12, 25–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández Planas, Ana María. 2000. Estudio electropalatográfico de la coarticulación vocálica en estructuras VCV del castellano. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Barcelona.Google Scholar
Fernández Planas, Ana María. 2007. Cuestiones metodológicas en palatografía dinámica y clasificación electropalatográfica de las vocales y de algunas consonantes linguales del español peninsular. Estudios de fonética experimental XVI, 11–80.Google Scholar
Fernández Planas, Ana María. 2008. La electropalatografía (EPG) en el estudio articulatorio del habla. El WinEPG de Articulate Instruments Ltd. Estudios de fonética experimental XVII, 286–299.Google Scholar
Fernández Planas, Ana María. 2009. Características linguopalatales de la nasal palatalizada en español. Estudios de fonética experimental XVIII, 161–174.Google Scholar
Fernández Planas, Ana María & Celdrán, Eugenio Martínez. 1997. Sobre la articulación de [t] y [d] en español. Estudios de fonética experimental VIII, 297–317.Google Scholar
Fontdevila, Jordi, Pallarès, Maria Dolors & Recasens, Daniel. 1994. The contact index method of electropalatographic data reduction. Journal of Phonetics 22, 141–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guitart, Jorge M. 1985. The resolution of phonological ambiguity in a simulated English–Spanish borrowing situation. In King, Larry & Maley, Catherine (eds.), 13th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, 117–125. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hammond, Robert. 1999. On the non-occurrence of the phone [r] in the Spanish sound system. In Gutiérrez-Rexach, Javier & Martínez-Gil, Fernando (eds.), Advances in Hispanic linguistics, 135–151. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Honikman, Beatrice. 1969. Articulatory settings. In Abercrombie, David, Fry, Dennis, MacCarthy, P., Scott, N. C. & Trim, J. (eds.), In honour of Daniel Jones, 73–84. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Honorof, Douglas. 1999. Articulatory gestures and Spanish nasal assimilation. Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University.Google Scholar
Hualde, José Ignacio. 2005. The sounds of Spanish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kochetov, Alexei & Colantoni, Laura. 2010. Spanish nasal assimilation revisited: A cross-dialect electropalatographic study. Presented at 12th Meeting on Laboratory Phonology (LabPhon12), Albuquerque, NM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter & Maddieson, Ian. 1999. The sounds of the world's languages. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lavoie, Lisa. 2001. Consonant strength: Phonological patterns and phonetic manifestations. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipski, John M. 1994. Latin American Spanish. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Paul. 1994. Del latín al español. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Malmberg, Bertil. 1950. Études sur la phonétique de l'espagnol parlé en Argentine. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Marinescu, Irina. 2010. Difficult vowel contrasts, native dialect and experience in non-native perception: Cuban and Peninsular Spanish learners of English. Presented at the Canadian Linguistic Association Annual Meeting, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, 30 May – 2 June.Google Scholar
Martínez Celdrán, Eugenio. 2008. Some chimeras of traditional Spanish phonetics. In Colantoni, Laura & Steele, Jeffrey (eds.), 3rd Conference on Spanish Laboratory Phonology, 32–46. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Martínez Celdrán, Eugenio & Planas, Ana María Fernández. 2007. Manual de fonética española. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Martínez Celdrán, Eugenio, Planas, Ana María Fernández & Sabaté, Josefina Carrera. 2003. Castilian Spanish. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 33, 255–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menéndez Pidal, Ramón. 1918. Manual de gramática histórica española, 4th edn. Madrid: Librería general de Victoriano Suárez.Google Scholar
Navarro Tomás, Tomás. 1918 [1970]. Manual de pronunciación española. Madrid: CSIC.Google Scholar
Payne, Elinor. 2006. Non-durational indices of Italian geminates: An EPG study. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 36, 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quilis, Antonio. 1993. Tratado de fonética y fonología españolas. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Real Academia Española. 2001. Diccionario de la lengua española, 22nd edn. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Recasens, Daniel. 2008. Mètodes de normalització i de representació de dades acústiques i articulatoriès. Estudios de fonética experimental 17, 331–348.Google Scholar
Recasens, Daniel & Espinosa, Aina. 2006a. Articulatory, positional and contextual characteristics of palatal consonants: Evidence from Majorcan Catalan. Journal of Phonetics 34, 295–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Recasens, Daniel & Espinosa, Aina. 2006b. Dispersion and variability of Catalan vowels. Speech Communication 48, 645–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Recasens, Daniel & Espinosa, Aina. 2007. An electropalatographic and acoustic study of affricates and fricatives in two Catalan dialects. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 37, 143–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Recasens, Daniel, Farnetani, Edda, Fontdevila, Jordi & Pallarès, Maria Dolors. 1993. An electropalatographic study of alveolar and palatal consonants in Catalan and Italian. Language and Speech 36, 213–234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Recasens, Daniel & Pallarès, Maria Dolors. 1999. A study of /ɾ/ and /r/ in the light of the ‘DAC’ coarticulation model. Journal of Phonetics 27, 143–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Recasens, Daniel & Pallarès, Maria Dolors. 2001. De la fonètica a la fonologia. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Recasens, Daniel, Pallarès, Maria Dolors & Fontdevila, Jordi. 1997. A model of lingual coarticulation based on articulatory constraints. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 102, 544–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohena Madrazo, Marcos. 2008. Devoicing of palatal fricatives in Buenos Aires Spanish: A sociolinguistic profile in real time. Presented at Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.Google Scholar
Romero, Joaquin. 1995. Gestural organization in Spanish: An experimental study of spirantization and aspiration. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Terrell, Tracy D. 1979. Final /s/ in Cuban Spanish. Hispania 62, 599–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willis, Erik. 2007. An acoustic study of pre-aspirated trills in narrative Cibaeño Dominican Spanish. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 37, 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, C. 1984. Tiempo real y tiempo aparente en el estudio de una variación lingüística: ensordecimiento y sonorización del yeísmo porteño. In Lerner, Lia Schwartz & Lerner, Isaias (eds.), Homenaje a Ana María Barrenechea, 175–196. Madrid: Castalia.Google Scholar
Wolf, Clara & Jiménez, Elena. 1979. El ensordecimiento del yeísmo porteño. In Barrenechea, Ana María (ed.), Estudios lingüísticos y dialectológicos, 115–145. Buenos Aires: Hachette.Google Scholar
Wrench, Alan A., Gibbon, Fiona E., McNeill, Alison M. & Wood, Sara E.. 2002. An EPG therapy protocol for remediation and assessment of articulation disorders. In Hansen, John H. L. & Pellom, Bryan (eds.), ICSLP–2002, 965–968. Denver, CO.Google Scholar