Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T19:28:15.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Acoustic covariants of length contrast in Japanese stops

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2008

Kaori Idemaru  and
Susan G. Guion
Kaori Idemaru
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Department of East Asian Languages and Literatures, University of Oregonidemaru@cmu.edu
Susan G. Guion
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Oregon, guion@uoregon.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study explores acoustic correlates to the singleton vs. geminate stop length contrast in Japanese. The proposal examined is that multiple acoustic features covary with the stop length distinction and that these features are available in the signal as potential secondary cues. The results support the proposal, revealing the presence of several acoustic features covarying with the singleton vs. geminate contrast in both durational and non-durational domains. Specifically, the preceding vowel is longer, the following vowel is shorter, there are greater fundamental frequency and intensity changes from the preceding to the following vowel, and there is evidence of more creakiness in voice quality for geminate than singleton consonants. It is also demonstrated that the vowel durations, as well as fundamental frequency and intensity changes have fairly strong categorization power.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 38 , Issue 2 , August 2008 , pp. 167 - 186
Copyright
Copyright © Journal of the International Phonetic Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramson, Arthur S. 1987. Word-initial consonant length in Pattani Malay. The 11th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Tallinn, Academy of Sciences of the Estonian S.S.R. 6, 68–70.Google Scholar
Abramson, Arthur S. 1992. Amplitude as a cue to word-initial consonant length: Pattani Malay. Haskins Laboratories Report on Speech Research SR-109/110, 251–254.Google Scholar
Beckman, Mary E. 1982. Segment duration and the ‘Mora’ in Japanese. Phonetica 39 (2–3), 113–135.Google Scholar
Blevins, Juliette. 2004. Evolutionary phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boucher, Victor J. 2002. Timing relations in speech and the identification of voice-onset times: A stable perceptual boundary for voicing categories across speaking rates. Perception & Psychophysics 64 (1), 121–130.Google Scholar
Campbell, Nick. 1999. A study of Japanese speech timing from the syllable perspective. Journal of Phonetic Society of Japan 3 (2), 29–39.Google Scholar
Catford, J. C. 1977. Fundamental problems in phonetics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Diehl, Randy L., Kluender, Keith R., Walsh, Margaret A. & Parker, Ellen M.. 1991. Auditory enhancement in speech perception and phonology. In Hoffman, Robert R. & Palermo, David S. (eds.), Cognition and the symbolic processes: Applied and ecological perspectives, 59–76. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Diehl, Randy L., Molis, Michelle R. & Castleman, Wendy A.. 2001. Adaptive design of sound systems: Some auditory considerations. In Hume, Elizabeth V. & Johnson, Keith (eds.), The role of speech perception in phonology, 123–139. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fant, Gunnar. 1960. Acoustic theory of speech production. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Fujisaki, Hiroya. 1979. On the modes and mechanisms of speech perception: Analysis and interpretation of categorical effects in discrimination. In Lindblom, Björn & Öhman, Sven E. G. (eds.), Frontiers of speech communication research, 177–189. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ham, William H. 2001. Phonetic and phonological aspects of geminate timing. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Han, Mieko S. 1992. The timing control of geminate and single stop consonants in Japanese: A challenge for nonnative speakers. Phonetica 49 (2), 102–127.Google Scholar
Han, Mieko S. 1994. Acoustic manifestations of mora timing in Japanese. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 96 (1), 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hankamer, Jorge, Lahiri, Aditi & Koreman, Jacques. 1989. Perception of consonant length: Voiceless stops in Turkish and Bengali. Journal of Phonetics 17 (4), 283–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, Helen M. 1997. Glottal characteristics of female speakers: Acoustic correlates. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 101 (1), 466–481.Google Scholar
Hanson, Helen M., Stevens, Kenneth N., Kuo, Hong-Kwang J., Chen, Marilyn Y. & Slifka, Janet. 2001. Towards models of phonation. Journal of Phonetics 29 (4), 451–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirata, Yukari & Whiton, Jacob. 2005. Effects of speaking rate on the single/geminate stop distinction in Japanese. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 118 (3), 1647–1660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirayama, Teruo. 1957. Nihongo oncho no kenkyu [A study of Japanese accent]. Tokyo: Meiji Shoin.Google Scholar
Homma, Yayoi. 1981. Durational relationships between Japanese stops and vowels. Journal of Phonetics 9 (3), 273–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idemaru, Kaori. 2005. An acoustic and perceptual investigation of the geminate and singleton stop contrast in Japanese. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oregon.Google Scholar
Kawahara, Shigeto. 2006a. A faithfulness ranking projected from a perceptibility scale: The case of [+voice] in Japanese. Language 82 (3), 536–574.Google Scholar
Kawahara, Shigeto. 2006b. Contextual effects on the perception of duration. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119 (5), 3243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klatt, Dennis. 1976. Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 59 (5), 1208–1221.Google Scholar
Lahiri, Aditi & Hankamer, Jorge. 1988. The timing of geminate consonants. Journal of Phonetics 16 (3), 327–338.Google Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse. 1970. Suprasegmentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lisker, Leigh. 1957. Closure duration and the intervocalic voiced–voiceless distinction in English. Language 33 (1), 42–49.Google Scholar
Lisker, Leigh. 1958. The Tamil occlusives: short vs. long or voiced vs. voiceless? Indian Linguistics (Turner Jubilee Volume I) 19, 294–301.Google Scholar
Lisker, Leigh. 1986. ‘Voicing’ in English: A catalog of acoustic features signaling /b/ versus /p/ in trochees. Language and Speech 29 (1), 3–11.Google Scholar
Maddieson, Ian. 1985. Phonetic cues to syllabification.Fromkin, Victoria (ed.), Phonetic linguistics: Essays in honor of Peter Ladefoged, 203–221. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Nakajo, Osamu. 1989. Nihongo no onin to akusento [Japanese phonology and accent]. Tokyo: Keisho Shobo.Google Scholar
Ofuka, Etsuko, Mori, Yoko & Kiritani, Shigeru. 2005. Perception of a Japanese geminate stop: The effect of the duration of the preceding/following vowel. Journal of Phonetic Society of Japan 9 (2), 59–65.Google Scholar
Payne, Elinor M. 2005. Phonetic variation in Italian consonant gemination. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 35 (2), 153–181.Google Scholar
Payne, Elinor M. 2006. Non-durational indices in Italian geminate consonants. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 36 (1), 83–95.Google Scholar
Peterson, Gordon E. & Lehiste, Ilse. 1960. Duration of syllable nuclei in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 32 (6), 693–703.Google Scholar
Pickett, Emily R., Blumstein, Sheila E. & Burton, Martha W.. 1999. Effects of speaking rate on the singleton/geminate contrast in Italian. Phonetica 56 (3–4), 135–157.Google Scholar
Pitt, Mark A. & Samuel, Arthur G.. 1993. An empirical and meta-analytic evaluation of the phoneme identification task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 19 (4), 699–725.Google ScholarPubMed
Port, Robert & Dalby, Jonathan. 1982. Consonant/vowel ratio as a cue for voicing in English. Perception & Psychophysics 32 (2), 141–152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swadesh, Morris. 1947. The phonemic structure of Proto-Zapotec. International Journal of American Linguistics 13, 220–230.Google Scholar
Vance, Timothy J. 1987. An introduction to Japanese phonology. New York: University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Walley, Amanda C. & Flege, James E.. 1999. Effect of lexical status on children's and adults' perception of native and non-native vowels. Journal of Phonetics 27 (3), 307–332.Google Scholar