Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:18:37.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Age, growth and maturation of the loliginid squids Alloteuthis africana and A. Subulata on the west African shelf

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Alexander Arkhipkin  and
Nataly Nekludova
Alexander Arkhipkin
Affiliation:
Atlantic Research Institute of Marine Fisheries and Oceanography (AtlantNIRO), 5 Dmitry Donskoy Street, Kaliningrad, 236000, Russia
Nataly Nekludova
Affiliation:
Atlantic Research Institute of Marine Fisheries and Oceanography (AtlantNIRO), 5 Dmitry Donskoy Street, Kaliningrad, 236000, Russia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Samples of two loliginid squids Alloteuthis africana and A. subulata were collected from the continental shelf off the west Sahara in August-September 1987. Statoliths were taken from 124 specimens and processed using statolith ageing techniques. Statoliths of both species were very similar in shape. In the ground statolith, growth increments were examined and grouped into four growth zones distinguished mainly by the width of the increments. Age of adult mature males of both species did not exceed eight months, that of females six months. Alloteuthis africana grew faster than A. subulata in weight and, particularly, in length. At age 180 d the mantle of A. africana was twice as long and the body weight 1·2–1·5 times as large. Both species matured over a wide range of sizes and ages (from 120 to 180 d). The life span of A. africana and A. subulata hatching between January and May on the west Saharan shelf is about six months, much shorter than that of A. subulata in its northern temperate range.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 73 , Issue 4 , November 1993 , pp. 949 - 961
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arkhipkin, A.I., 1989. Taxonomic description plan, collection and processing technique used for statoliths of squids and cuttlefish. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal, 68 (3), 115–120. [In Russian with English summary.]Google Scholar
Arkhipkin, A.I. & Murzov, S.A., 1986. Statolith morphology, growth and development in squids of the family Ommastrephidae from the south-eastern part of the Pacific Ocean. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal, 65, 499–505. [In Russian with English summary.]Google Scholar
Balch, N., Sirois, A. & Hurley, G.V., 1988. Growth increments in statoliths from paralarvae of the ommastrephid squid Illex (Cephalopoda: Teuthoidea). Malacologia, 29, 103–112.Google Scholar
Clarke, M.R., 1978. The cephalopod statolith- an introduction to its form. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 58, 701–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawe, E.G. & Natsukari, Y., 1991. Light microscopy. In Squid age determination using statoliths (ed. P., Jerebet al.), pp. 83–96. Mazara del Vallo, NTR-ITPP. Special publications, no.l.Google Scholar
Forsythe, J.W. & Van Heukelem, W.F., 1987. Growth. In Cephalopod life cycles, vol. II (ed. P.R., Boyle), pp. 135–156. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, G.D., 1990. Age and growth of the tropical nearshore loliginid squid Sepioteuthis lessoniana determined from statolith growth-ring analysis. Fishery Bulletin. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Washington, DC, 88, 113–118.Google Scholar
Jackson, G.D. & Choat, J.H., 1992. Growth in tropical cephalopods: an analysis based on statolith microstructure. Canadian journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 49, 218–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristensen, T.K., 1980. Periodical growth rings in cephalopod statoliths. Dana, 1, 39–51.Google Scholar
Lipinski, M.R., 1985. Laboratory survival of Alloteuthis subulata (Cephalopoda: Loliginidae) from the Plymouth area. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 65, 845–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipinski, M.R., 1986. Methods for the validation of squid age from statoliths. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 66, 505–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mangold-Wirz, K., 1963. Biologie des Cephalopodes benthiques et nectoniques de la Mer Catalane. Vie et Milieu, supplement no. 13, pp. 1–285.Google Scholar
Morris, C.C., 1988. Statolith growth lines and statocyst function in the Cephalopoda. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Morris, C.C., 1991. Methods for in situ experiments on statolith increment formation, with results for embryos of Alloteuthis subulata. In Squid age determination using statoliths (ed. P., Jerebet al.), pp. 67–72. Mazara del Vallo, NTR-ITPP. Special publications, no. 1.Google Scholar
Morris, C.C. & Aldrich, F.A., 1984. Statolith development in the ommastrephid squid Illex illecebrosus (Lesueur, 1821) (Cephalopoda: Ommastrephidae). American Malacological Bulletin, 2, 51–56.Google Scholar
Natsukari, Y., Nakanose, T. & Oda, K., 1988. Age and growth of the loliginid squid Photololigo edulis (Hoyle, 1885). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 116, 177–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesis, K.N., 1987. Cephalopods of the world. Neptune City: TEH Publications.Google Scholar
Nigmatullin, Ch.M., 1989. Las especies de calamar mas abundantes del Atlantico Sudoeste y synopsis sobre la ecologia del calamar (Illex argentinus). Frente Maritimo, 5A, 71–81.Google Scholar
Rodhouse, P.G., Swinfen, R.C. & Murray, A.W.A., 1988. Life cycle, demography and reproductive investment in the myopsid squid Alloteuthis subulata. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 45, 245–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roper, C.F.E., Sweeney, M.J. & Nauen, C.E., 1984. FAO species catalogue. Vol. 3. Cephalopods of the world. An annotated and illustrated catalogue of species of interest to fisheries. Fisheries Synopsis. FAO, no. 125, 277 pp.Google Scholar