Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T10:12:47.222Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Check-List of the Freshwater, Brackish and Marine Diatoms of the British Isles and Adjoining Coastal Waters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Bernard Hartley ,
Robert Ross  and
David M. Williams
Bernard Hartley
Affiliation:
Teasel Cottage, 195 Preston Road, Yeovil, Somerset BA20 2EG
Robert Ross
Affiliation:
Teasel Cottage, 195 Preston Road, Yeovil, Somerset BA20 2EG
David M. Williams
Affiliation:
Teasel Cottage, 195 Preston Road, Yeovil, Somerset BA20 2EG
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This is the first comprehensive check-list of the diatoms of the British Isles to cover all currently reported taxa from freshwater, brackish and marine habitats. It contains a classification of the genera in order of families, followed by a complete list of species and lower taxa set out in alphabetical order within each genus.

The two main orders of the British Diatomaceae are represented in:- 5 sub-orders, 20 families, 3 sub-families, 152 genera, 1798 species, 6 sub-species, 745 varieties and 73 forms.

The check-list also includes 2048 synonyms formerly in common use, together with 512 cross references to the names of taxa in current use.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 66 , Issue 3 , August 1986 , pp. 531 - 610
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Works in Which British Diatoms are Recorded

Aleem, A. A., 1949. Distribution and ecology of marine littoral diatoms. Botaniska notiser, 1949, 414–140.Google Scholar
Aleem, A. A., 1950 a. The diatom community inhabiting the mudflats at Whitstable. New Phytologist, 49, 174–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aleem, A. A., 1950 b. Distribution and ecology of British marine littoral diatoms. Journal of Ecology, 38, 75–106.Google Scholar
Aleem, A. A. & Hustedt, F., 1951 a. Littoral diatoms from the Salstone, near Plymouth. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 30, 177–196.Google Scholar
Aleem, A. A. & Hustedt, F., 1951 b. Einige neue diatomeen von der Südküste Englands. Botaniska notiser, 1951, 13–20.Google Scholar
Andrews, G. W., 1980. Revision of the diatom genus Delphineis and morphology of Delphineis surirella (Ehrenberg) G. W. Andrews, n.comb. In Proceedings of the Sixth Symposium on Recent and Fossil Diatoms, Budapest, 1980 (ed. Ross, R.), pp. 81–90. Koenigstein: Otto Koeltz.Google Scholar
Arnold, F., 1886. Flora of West Yorkshire. Section XXIV. Diatomaceae. [Fascimile edition of original publication.]Google Scholar
Barber, H. G., 1956. A Record of Diatoms from the River Learn, Leamington, Warwickshire. [Limited private edition.]Google Scholar
Barber, H. G., 1976 a. Observations on the marine taxon known as Pinnularia ambigua Cleve. Microscopy, 33, 44–46.Google Scholar
Barber, H. G., 1976 b. The Diatom Flora of the County of Leicestershire. [Limited private edition.]Google Scholar
Barber, H. G., 1978. The Illustrated Diatom Flora of Great Britain. [Limited edition.]Google Scholar
Barber, H. G., 1979. An Illustrated Account of the Diatom Flora in a Sediment Core from Windermere, Cumbria. [Limited private edition.]Google Scholar
Barber, H. G., 1981. Some Freshwater Diatoms from Malham Tarn. [Limited private edition.]Google Scholar
Barber, H. G. & Carter, J. R., 1978. Pinnularia carminata n.sp. Microscopy, 33, 305–307.Google Scholar
Barber, H. G. & Haworth, E. Y., 1981. A guide to the morphology of the diatom frustule. Scientific Publications. Freshwater Biological Association, no. 44, 112 pp.Google Scholar
Belcher, J. H. & Swale, E. M. F., 1977. Species of Thalassiosira (Diatoms, Bacillariophyceae) in the plankton of English rivers. British Phycological Journal, 12, 291–297.Google Scholar
Belcher, H. G. & Swale, E. M. F., 1981. Records of Simonsenia delognei and some interesting Navicula (diatoms) from English rivers, mainly near Cambridge. Microscopy, 34, 201–206.Google Scholar
Carter, J. R., 1960 a. Diatom notes. British freshwater forms of the genus Gomphonema. Microscope, 12, 255–264.Google Scholar
Carter, J. R., 1960 b. Diatom notes. Some minute forms of the genus Navicula. Microscope, 12, 283–289Google Scholar
Carter, J. R., 1961 a. Diatom notes. The genus Achnanthes as it occurs in British waters. Microscope, 12, 320–326; 13, 15–22; 13, 37–45.Google Scholar
Carter, J. R., 1961 b. Diatom notes. Loch-na-Cuilc, a preliminary notice. Microscope, 12, 74–78.Google Scholar
Carter, J. R., 1962 a. Diatom notes. Some unusual British forms. Microscope, 13, 156–162.Google Scholar
Carter, J. R., 1962 b. Diatom notes. More unusual British forms. Microscope, 13, 231–237.Google Scholar
Carter, J. R., 1963. Some new diatoms from British waters. Journal of the Quekett Microscopical Club, 29, 199–203. 1964. Part II, 29, 225–228.Google Scholar
Carter, J. R., 1970. Observations on some British forms of Achnanthes saxonica Krasske. Microscopy, 31, 313–316.Google Scholar
Carter, J. R., 1971. Diatoms from the Devil's Hole Cave, Fife, Scotland. Nova Hedwigia, 21, 651–681.Google Scholar
Carter, J. R., 1972 a. Diatoms of Slapestone Sike, Upper Teesdale. Vasculum, 58, 35–41.Google Scholar
Carter, J. R., 1972 b. Some observations on the diatom Pinnularia acoricola Hustedt. Microscopy, 32, 162–165.Google Scholar
Carter, J. R., 1979. On the identity of Navicula cincta Ehrenberg. Bacillaria, 2, 73–84.Google Scholar
Carter, J. R. & Bailey-Watts, A. E., 1981. A taxonomic study of the diatoms from the standing freshwaters in Shetland. Nova Hedwigia, 33, 513–630.Google Scholar
Compere, P., 1982. Taxonomic revision of the diatom genus Pleurosira (Eupidiscaceae). Bacillaria, 5, 165–190.Google Scholar
Cox, E. J., 1975 a. A reappraisal of the diatom genus Amphipleura Kiitz. using light and electron microscopy. British Phycological Journal, 10, 1–12.Google Scholar
Cox, E. J., 1975 b. Further studies in the genus Berkeleya Grev. British Phycological Journal, 10, 205–217.Google Scholar
Cox, E. J., 1978. Taxonomic studies on the diatom genus Navicula Bory. Navicula grevillii (C. A. Ag.) Heiberg and N. comoides (Dillwyn) H. & M. Peragallo. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 76, 127–143.Google Scholar
Cox, E. J., 1979. Taxonomic studies on the diatom genus Navicula Bory. Navicula scopulorum Breb. British Phycological Journal, 14, 161–174.Google Scholar
Cox, E. J., 1982. Taxonomic studies on the diatom genus Navicula Bory. IV. Climaconeis Grun., a genus including Okedenia inflexa (Breb.) Eulenst. ex De Toni and members of Navicula sect. Johnsonieae sensu Hustedt. British Phycological Journal, 17, 147–168.Google Scholar
Crawford, R. M., 1975. The frustule of the initial cells of some species of the diatom genus Melosira C. Agardh. Nova Hedwigia, Beiheft, 53, 37–50.Google Scholar
Crawford, R. M., 1975. The taxonomy and classification of the diatom genus Melosira C. Ag. British Phycological Journal, 10, 323–338.Google Scholar
Crawford, R. M., 1977. The taxonomy and classification of the diatom genus Melosira C. A. Ag. Phycologia, 16, 277–285.Google Scholar
Crawford, R. M., 1978. The taxonomy and classification ofthe diatom genus MelosiraC. A. Agardh III. Melosira lineata (Dillw.) C. A. Agardh and M. varians C. A. Agardh. Phycologia, 17, 237–250.Google Scholar
Crawford, R. M., 1979. Filament formation in the diatom genus Melosira Ag. and Paralia Heiberg. Nova Hedwigia, Beiheft 64, 121–133.Google Scholar
Crawford, R. M., 1981. The diatom genus Aulacoseira Thwaites: its structure and taxonomy. Phycologia, 20, 174–192.Google Scholar
Davidson, G., 1887. List of Diatomaceae found in Loch Kinnord kieselguhr. Transactions of the Edinburgh Geological Society, 1887, 207–213.Google Scholar
Donkin, A. S., 1858. On the marine Diatomaceae of Northumberland. Transactions of the Microscopical Society of London, 1858, 12–34.Google Scholar
Donkin, A. S., 1870–1873. The Natural History of the British Diatomaceae, parts I—III. London.Google Scholar
Evans, G. H., 1964. Two fossil diatoms from the lake deposits of the English Lake District. New Phytologist, 63, 413–417.Google Scholar
Firth, R. I., 1977. The diatoms of Broad Oak Water, Accrington. Journal of the Accrington Naturalists' and Antiquarian Society, 7, 22–24.Google Scholar
Firth, R. I., 1981. The diatoms ofthe tarmac runway of 5 Albany Road, Seaford Sussex. Journal of the Accrington Naturalists' and Antiquarian Society, 11, 34–36.Google Scholar
Firth, R. I. & Hartley, B., 1971. A Pennine diatom site. Microscopy, 32, 108–113.Google Scholar
Firth, R. I. & Hartley, B., 1981. A Collection of Microscope Slides of British Diatoms, including 1,000 Slides of Selected and Named Species, and over 500 Strewn Slides from British Localities. London: Department of Botany, British Museum (Natural History).Google Scholar
Foged, N., 1977. Freshwater diatoms of Ireland. Bibliotheca phycologia, 34, 221 pp.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bastow R., 1949 b. The fresh water Bacillariales (diatoms) of Devonshire. Report and Transactions of the Devonshire Association for the Advancement of Science, 81, 303–310.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bastow R., 1949 b. List of Mid-European Freshwater Diatoms without British Recordings. [Typed list by the author 4 July 1949.]Google Scholar
Fraser, Bastow R., 1949 c. Lundy freshwater diatom flora. Report. Lundy Field Society, 3, 32–41.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bastow R., 1952 a. British freshwater diatoms. Journal of the Queckett Microscopical Club, 4 (3), 122.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bastow R., 1952 b. Freshwater diatoms in the outer Hebrides. Some new British recordings from material in the West's collection. Journal of the Quekett Microscopical Club, 4 (3), 383–384.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bastow R., 1954. New and rare freshwater diatoms of Devon. Report and Transactions of the Devonshire Association for the Advancement of Science, 86, 285–291.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bastow R., 1955. Diatoms of calcareous waters of East Devon. Report and Transactions of the Devonshire Association for the Advancement of Science, 87, 335–342.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bastow R., 1956. The diatom flora ofthe Torquay Corporation waterworks in the parish of Hennock. Report and Transactions of the Devonshire Association for the Advancement of Science, 88, 15–21.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bastow R. & Wilson, W., 1951. The freshwater Bacillariales of Ulverston and district, North Lancashire. Proceedings of the Barrow Naturalists' Field Club, 7, 1–19.Google Scholar
Gleave, H. H., 1972. Hydrosera triquetra, a diatom new to European waters. Microscopy, 32, 208.Google Scholar
Gleave, H. H. & Moss, M. O., 1980. A note on the diatom Synedra closterioides Grunow. Microscopy, 34, 63–66.Google Scholar
Gregory, W., 1853. Notice of a diatomaceous earth found in the Isle of Mull. Transactions of the Microscopical Society of London, 1, 92–99.Google Scholar
Gregory, W., 1854 a. Additional observations on the diatomaceous deposit of Mull. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, 2, 24–28.Google Scholar
Gregory, W., 1854 b. Notice of new forms and varieties of known forms occurring in the diatomaceous earth of Mull; with remarks on the classification of the Diatomaceae. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, 2, 90–100.Google Scholar
Gregory, W., 1855 a. On a post-tertiary lacustrine sand, containing diatomaceous exuviae, from Glenshira, near Inverary. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, 3, 30–43.Google Scholar
Gregory, W., 1855 b. On some new species of freshwater Diatomaceae, with remarks on the value of certain specific characters. Proceedings of the Botanical Society of Edinburgh, 1855, 28–41.Google Scholar
Gregory, W., 1856. Notice of some new species of British fresh-water Diatomaceae. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, 4, 1–14.Google Scholar
Gregory, W., 1856–1857. On the post tertiary diatomaceous sand of Glenshira. Part II, containing an account of a number of additional undescribed species. Transactions of the Microscopical Society of London, 4, 35–48; 5, 67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, W., 1857. On new forms of marine Diatomaceae, found in the Firth of Clyde and in Loch Fine. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 21, 473–542.Google Scholar
Greville, R. K., 1859. Description of new species of British Diatomaceae, chiefly observed by the late Prof. Gregory. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, 7, 79–86.Google Scholar
Harris, G. T., 1930. The freshwater Bacillariales of Devonshire. Report and Transactions of the Devonshire Association for the Advancement of Science, 62, 285–310.Google Scholar
Hartley, B., 1981. Flora: diatoms. In Steep Holm, A Survey, pp. 66–68. Taunton: Somerset Archaeological and Natural History Society, Taunton Castle.Google Scholar
Hasle, G. R., 1977. Morphology and taxonomy of Actinocyclus normanii fo. subsalsa. Phycologia, 16, 321–328.Google Scholar
Hasle, G. R., 1979. Thalassiosira decipiens (Grun.) Jorg. (Bacillariophyceae). Bacillaria, 2, 85–108.Google Scholar
Ha Worth, E. Y., 1969. The diatoms of a sediment core from Blea Tarn, Langdale. Journal of Ecology, 57, 429–439.Google Scholar
Haworth, E. Y., 1972. The recent diatom history of Loch Leven, Kinross. Freshwater Biology, 2, 131–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haworth, E. Y., 1974. Some problems of diatom taxonomy in Scottish lake sediments. British Phycological Journal, 9, 47–55.Google Scholar
Haworth, E. Y., 1975. A scanning electron microscope study of some different frustule forms of the genus Fragilaria found in Scottish late-glacial sediments. British Phycological Journal, 10, 73–80.Google Scholar
Haworth, E. Y., 1976. Two late-glacial (late Devensian) diatom assemblage profiles from northern Scotland. New Phytologist, 77, 227–256.Google Scholar
Haworth, E. Y., 1979. The distribution of a species of Stephanodiscus in the recent sediments of Blelham Tarn, English Lake District. Nova Hedwigia, Beiheft, 64, 395–409.Google Scholar
Haworth, E. Y., 1980. Comparison of continuous phytoplankton records with diatom stratigraphy in the recent sediments in Blelham Tarn. Limnology and Oceanography, 25, 1093–1103.Google Scholar
Hendey, N. I., 1951. Littoral diatoms of Chichester Harbour with special reference to fouling. Journal of the Royal Microscopical Society, 71, 1–86.Google Scholar
Hendey, N. I., 1964. An introductory account of the smaller algae of British coastal waters. V. Bacillariophyceae (diatoms). Fishery Investigations. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ser. 4), 5, 317 pp.Google Scholar
Hendey, N. I., 1973. Some benthic diatoms from the coast of Cornwall in the neighbourhood of Porthleven. Nova Hedwigia, Beiheft 45, 291–327.Google Scholar
Hendey, N. I., 1974. A revised check-list of British marine diatoms. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 54, 277–300.Google Scholar
Hendey, N. I., 1977 a. Note on Stauroneis spicula, a brackish water diatom. Nova Hedwigia, Beiheft 54, 281–290.Google Scholar
Hendey, N. I., 1977 b. The species diversity index of some in-shore diatom communities and its use in assessing the degree of pollution on parts of the north coast of Cornwall. Nova Hedwigia, Beiheft 54, 355–378.Google Scholar
Hendey, N. I. & Crawford, R. M., 1977. Notes on the occurrence, distribution and fine structure of Druridgea compressa (West) Donkin. Nova Hedwigia, Beiheft 54, 1–14.Google Scholar
Knudson, B. M., 1952–3. The diatom genus Tabellaria. Pt I (1952) Taxonomy and morphology. Annals of Botany, 16, 421–440; Pt II (1953) Taxonomy and morphology of the plankton varieties. Annals of Botany, 17, 131–155; Pt III (1953) Problems of infraspecinc taxonomy. Annals of Botany, 17, 599–607.Google Scholar
Lebour, M. V., 1930. The Plankton Diatoms of the Northern Seas. London: Ray Society.Google Scholar
Lund, J. W. G., 1945. Observations on soil algae. (I) The ecology, size and taxonomy of British soil diatoms. Part 1. New Phytologist, 44, 196–219.Google Scholar
Lund, J. W. G., 1946. Observations on soil algae. (I) The ecology, size and taxonomy of British soil diatoms. Part 2. New Phytologist, 45, 56–110.Google Scholar
Macadam, W. I., 1883. On the analysis of a sample of white deposit from the peat of Aberdeenshire. Transactions of the Edinburgh Geological Society, 1883, 207–216.Google Scholar
Macadam, W. I., 1896. On some new localities of mineral diatomite, with notes on the chemical composition of the specimens exhibited. Mineralogical Magazine and Journal of the Mineralogical Society, 8, 30–34.Google Scholar
Mccall, D., 1933. Diatoms (recent and fossil) of the Tay district. Journal of the Linnean Society (Botany), 49, 219–308.Google Scholar
Mann, D. G., 1977. The diatom genus Hantzschia - an appraisal. Nova Hedwigia, Beiheft 54, 323–354.Google Scholar
Mann, D. G., 1980. Studies in the diatom genus Hantzschia. II. H. distinctepunctata. Nova Hedwigia, 33, 341–352.Google Scholar
Mills, F. W. & Philip, R. H., 1901. The Diatomaceae of the Hull district. Transactions of the Hull Scientific and Field Naturalists' Club. 1, 157–223.Google Scholar
Moss, M. O. & Gibbs, G., 1974. The frustule of Achnanthes lanceolata (Breb.) Grunow. Journal of Microscopy, 32, 401–406.Google Scholar
Moss, M. O., Gibbs, G., Gray, V. & Ross, R., 1978. The presence of a Raphe in Semiorbis hemicyclus (Ehr.) R. Patr. Bacillaria, 1, 137–149.Google Scholar
Odam, C. L., 1949. A beginner's guide to diatom recognition. Journal of the Quekett Microscopical Club, 2, 330–334.Google Scholar
Odam, C. L., 1951. Diatoms of the Thames estuary. Journal of the Quekett Microscopical Club, 3, 225–236.Google Scholar
Odam, C. L., 1953. Periodic observations of the plankton diatoms of a Kentish river. Journal of the Quekett Microscopical Club, 3, 437–447.Google Scholar
O'Meara, E., 1863. New diatoms from the island of Arran Co. Galway. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, 8, 113.Google Scholar
O'Meara, E., 1878. Report on the Irish Diatomaceae. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy, 2, 235–435.Google Scholar
Paddock, T. B. B., 1978. The Island of Mull – A Survey of its Flora and Environment. Section 18. Marine Diatoms. London: British Museum (Natural History).Google Scholar
Paddock, T. B. B. & Sims, P. A., 1977. A preliminary survey of the Raphe structure of some advanced groups of diatoms (Epithemiaceae-Surirellaceae). Nova Hedwigia, Beiheft 54, 291–322.Google Scholar
Paddock, T. B. B. & Sims, P. A., 1980. Observations on the marine diatom genus Auricula and two new genera, Undatella and Proboscidea. Bacillaria, 3, 161–196.Google Scholar
Pennington, W., Haworth, E. Y., Bonny, A. P. & Lishman, J. P., 1972. Lake sediments in northern Scotland. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (B), 264, 191–294.Google Scholar
Reynolds, C. S., 1973. The seasonal periodicity of planktonic diatoms in a shallow eutrophic lake. Freshwater Biology, 3, 89–110.Google Scholar
Roper, F. C. S., 1854. Some observations on the Diatomaceae of the Thames. Transactions of the Microscopical Society of London, 2, 67–80.Google Scholar
Roper, F. C. S., 1858. Some new British marine diatoms. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, 6, 17–26.Google Scholar
Roper, F. C. S., 1859. Notes on the genus Biddulphia. Transactions of the Microscopical Society of London, 7, 1–24.Google Scholar
Ross, R., 1952. The dates of publication of two important works on diatoms. Journal of the Society for the Bibliography of Natural History, 2, 378–380.Google Scholar
Ross, R. & Abdin, G., 1949. Notes on some diatoms from Norfolk. Journal of the Royal Microscopical Society, 69, 225–230.Google Scholar
Ross, R. & Sims, P. A., 1978. Notes on some diatoms from the Isle of Mull, and other Scottish localities. Bacillaria, 1, 151–168.Google Scholar
Round, F. E., 1956. The phytoplankton of three water supply reservoirs in central Wales. Archiv fur Hydrobiologie, 52, 457–469.Google Scholar
Round, F. E., 1957 a. A note on some diatom communities in calcareous springs and streams. Journal of the Linnean Society (Botany), 55, 662–668.Google Scholar
Round, F. E., 1957 b. The late-glacial and post-glacial diatom succession in the Kentmere Valley deposit. Part 1: Introduction, methods and flora. New Phytologist, 56, 98–126.Google Scholar
Round, F. E., 1957 c. The distribution of Bacillariophyceae in some littoral sediments in the English Lake District. Oikos, 8, 16–37.Google Scholar
Round, F. E., 1957 d. The benthic algal flora of three City of Birmingham waterworks reservoirs in central Wales. Archiv fur Hydrobiologie, 53, 562–573.Google Scholar
Round, F. E., 1958 a. Observations on the diatom flora of Braunton Burrows, N. Devon. Hydrobiologia, 11, 119–127.Google Scholar
Round, F. E., 1958 b. A note on the diatom flora of Harlech sand dunes. Journal of the Royal Microscopical Society, 77, 130–135.Google Scholar
Round, F. E., 1958 c. The algal flora of Massom's slack, Freshfield, Lancashire. Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 54, 462—476.Google Scholar
Round, F. E., 1959. A comparative study of the epipelic diatom flora of some Irish Loughs. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy (B), 60, 193–215.Google Scholar
Round, F. E., 1960 a. The algal flora of a salt spring region at Manesty, Grange in Borrowdale. Naturalist, 1960, 117–121.Google Scholar
Round, F. E., 1960 b. The diatom flora of a salt marsh on the river Dee. New Phytologist, 59, 332–348.Google Scholar
Round, F. E., 1960 c. A note on the diatom flora of some springs in the Malham Tarn area of Yorkshire. Archiv für Protistenkunde, 104, 514–526.Google Scholar
Round, F. E., 1960 d. The diatom flora of streams around the Malham Tarn, Yorkshire. Archiv für Protistenkunde, 104, 527–540.Google Scholar
Round, F. E., 1972. Stephanodiscus binderanus (Kutz.) Kreiger. Phycologia, 11, 109–117.Google Scholar
Round, F. E. & Brook, A. J., 1959 a. The phytoplankton of some Irish Loughs and an assessment of their trophic status. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy (B), 60, 167—191.Google Scholar
Round, F. E. & Mann, D. G., 1980. Psammodiscus nov. gen. based on Coscinodiscus nitidus. Annals of Botany, 46, 367–373.Google Scholar
Round, F. E. & Mann, D. G., 1981. The diatom genus Brachysira. I. Typification and separation from Anomoeoneis. Archiv für Protistenkunde, 124, 221–231.Google Scholar
Salah, M. M., 1952. Diatoms from Blakeney Point, Norfolk. New species and records for Britain. Journal of the Royal Microscopical Society, 72, 155–169.Google Scholar
Salah, M. M., 1955. Some new diatoms from Blakeney Point (Norfolk). Hydrobiologia, 7, 88–102.Google Scholar
Sims, P. A., 1978. The Island of Mull - A Survey of its Flora and Environment. Section 17. Freshwater Diatoms. London: British Museum (Natural History).Google Scholar
Sims, P. A. & Paddock, T. B. B., 1979. Observations and comments on some prominent morphological features of naviculoid genera. Nova Hedwigia, Beiheft, 64, 169–191.Google Scholar
Smith, W., 1853–6. A Synopsis of the British Diatomaceae, 2 vols. London.Google Scholar
Smith, W., 1859. List of the British Diatomaceae in the Collection of the British Museum. [Printed by order of the Trustees 1859.]Google Scholar
Stolterfoth, H. W., 1878. List of Diatomaceae found in Chester and district, and Cwm Bychan, N. Wales. Proceedings of the Chester Society of Natural Science, 2, 28–41.Google Scholar
Stolterfoth, H. W.Bequest of Diatom Slides to the Chester Museum. [Report and list of species compiled by E. G. Williams of Chester in 1970.]Google Scholar
Taylor, F. B., 1929. Notes on Diatoms. An Introduction to the Study of the Diatomaceae. Bournemouth.Google Scholar
Tempere, J. & Peragallo, H., 1889–1895. Diatomees Collection, J. Tempere & H. Peragallo, 8 supplements. (Texte et Tables de la Collection des Diatomees du Monde Entier.) Paris: Imp. Hy-Tribont. [525 slides.]Google Scholar
Thomas, D., 1972. Diatomaceous Deposits in Snowdonia. London: Natural Environment Research Council, Institute of Geological Sciences. [Report no. 72/5.]Google Scholar
Van Heurck, H., 1886. A Treatise on the Diatomaceae. London: William Wesley & Sons. [Translated by W. E. Baxter.]Google Scholar
West, W. & West, G. S., 1900–1901. The alga-flora of Yorkshire. Transactions of the Yorkshire Naturalists' Union, nos. 22, 23, 25, 27, 239 pp. [Date given 1896–1901 but published 1900 onwards in parts as above.]Google Scholar
Woodhead, N. & Tweed, R. D., 1954. The freshwater algae of Anglesey and Caernarvonshire. Parts II and III. North Western Naturalist, 2, 85–122; 255–289.Google Scholar

References to Other Works Concerning Taxonomic or Nomenclatural Matters

Cleve, P. T., 2873. On diatoms from the Arctic Sea. Bihang till Kungliga Svenska vetenskapakademiens handlingar, 1 (13), 28 pp.Google Scholar
Cleve, P. T., 1891. The diatoms of Finland. Acta Societatis pro fauna et flora fennica, 8 (2), 70 pp.Google Scholar
Cleve, P. T., 1894–1895. Synopsis of naviculoid diatoms. Kungliga Svenska vetenskapsakademiens handlingar, (1894) 26 (2), 194 pp.; (1895), 27 (3), 220 pp.Google Scholar
Cleve-Euler, A., 1951–1955. Die diatomeen von Schweden und Finnland. Kungliga Svenska vetenskapsakademiens handlingar, 2 (1), 163 pp. (Teil I, Centricae, 1951); 4 (1), 158 pp. (Teil. II Arraphideae, Brachyraphideae, 1953); 4 (5), 225 pp. (Teil. Ill, Monoaraphideae, Biraphideae I, 1953); 5 (4), 232 pp. (Teil. IV. Biraphideae II, 1955).Google Scholar
Donkin, A. S., 1861. On the marine Diatomaceae of Northumberland, with a description of several new species. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, 1, 1–15.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, C. G., 1838. Die Infusionsthierchen als volkommene Organismen. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, C. G., 1840. Herr E. legte 274 Blatter von ihm selbst ausgefuhrter Zeichnungen von eben so vielen Arten. Bericht iiber die zur Bekanntmachung geeigneten Verhandlungen der Koniglichen Preuss ischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 1840, 197–219.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, C. G., 1858. Feststellung des Kalk-Uberzuges am Serapis-Tempel zu Pozzuoli bei Neapel als Siisswasserkalk durch das Mikroskop. Monatsbericht der Koniglichen Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 1858, 585–602.Google Scholar
Foged, N., 1964. Freshwater diatoms from Spitzbergen. Tromse museums skrifter, 11, 205 pp.Google Scholar
Foged, N., 1966. Freshwater diatoms from Ghana. Biologiske Skrifter, 15 (1), 169 pp.Google Scholar
Foged, N., 1974. Freshwater diatoms in Iceland. Bibliotheca phycologia, 15, 118 pp.Google Scholar
Foged, N., 1978. Freshwater diatoms in eastern Australia. Bibliotheca phycologia, 41, 147 pp.Google Scholar
Foged, N., 1980. Diatoms in Oland, Sweden. Bibliotheca phycologia, 49, 96 pp.Google Scholar
Foged, N., 1981. Diatoms in Alaska. Bibliotheca phycologia, 53, 188 pp.Google Scholar
Frenguelli, J., 1938. Diatomeas de la Bahia de San Bias. Revista del Museo de la Plata (seccion botanica), 1, 251–337.Google Scholar
Frenguelli, J., 1939 a. Diatomeas de Rada Tilly en el Golfo de San Jorge (Chubut). Revista del Museo de la Plata (seccion botanica), 2, 179—199.Google Scholar
Frenguelli, J., 1939 b. Diatomeas del Golfo de San Matias, (Rió Negro). Revista del Museo de la Plata [sección botánica), 2, 201–226.Google Scholar
Frenguelli, J., 1942. Diatomeas del Neuquen (Patagonia). Revista del Museo de la Plata (sección botánica), 5, 73–219.Google Scholar
Fryxell, G. A., 1978. The diatom genus Thalassiosira: T. licea sp. nov., and T. angstii (Gran) Makarova, species with occluded processes. Botanica marina, 21, 131–141.Google Scholar
Fryxell, G. A. & Hasle, G. R., 1972. Thalassiosira eccentrica (Ehrenb.) Cleve, T. symmetrica sp. nov., and some related centric diatoms. Journal of Phycology, 8, 297–317.Google Scholar
Fryxell, G. A. & Hasle, G. R., 1980. The marine diatom Thalassiosira oestrupii: structure, taxonomy and distribution. American Journal of Botany, 67, 804–814.Google Scholar
Grunow, A., 1860. Uber neue und ungenugend bekannte Algen, Diatomeen. Verhandlungen der Zooligisch-botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien, 10, 503–582.Google Scholar
Hasle, G. R., 1972 a. The inclusion of Coscinosira Gran (Bacillariophyceae) in Thalassiosira Cleve. Taxon, 21, 543–544.Google Scholar
Hasle, G. R., 1972 b. Thalassiosira subtilis (Bacillariophyceae) and two allied species. Norwegian Journal of Botany, 19, 111–137.Google Scholar
Hasle, G. R., 1973. Thalassiosiraceae, a new diatom family. Norwegian Journal of Botany, 20, 67–69.Google Scholar
Hasle, G. R., 1978 a. Some Thalassiosira species with one central process. Norwegian Journal of Botany, 25, 77–110.Google Scholar
Hasle, G. R., 1978 b. Some freshwater and brackish water species of the diatom genus Thalassiosira Cleve. Phycologia, 17, 263–292.Google Scholar
Hasle, G. R., 1979. Thalassiosira decipiens (Grun.) Jorg. Bacillaria, 2, 852–858.Google Scholar
Hasle, G. R. & Fryxell, G. A., 1977. The genus Thalassiosira: some species with linear areola array. Nova Hedwigia, Beiheft 54, 15–66.Google Scholar
Hustedt, F., 1930. Die Susswasserflora Mitteleuropas. Heft 10. Bacillariophyta (Diatomeae), 2nd ed.Jena: Fischer.Google Scholar
Hustedt, F., 1930–66. Die Kieselalgen. In Kryptogramen - Flora von Deutschland, Oesterreich und der Schweiz, bd 7, 1931–1966 (ed. Rabenhorst, L.). Leipzig.Google Scholar
Hustedt, F., 1955. Marine littoral diatoms of Beaufort, North Carolina. Bulletin. Duke University Marine Station, no. 6, 67 pp.Google Scholar
Kutzing, F. T., 1833. Synopsis Diatomearum. Linnaea, 8, 529–620.Google Scholar
Kutzing, F. T., 1844. Die kieselschaligen Bacillarien oder Diatomeen. Nordhausen.Google Scholar
Lange-Bertalot, H., 1977. Eine Revision zur Taxonomie der Nitzschiae Lanceolatae Grunow. Die “klassischen” bis 1930 beschriebenen Siisswasserarten Europas. Nova Hedwigia, 28, 253–307.Google Scholar
Lange-Bertalot, H., 1978. Zur systematik, taxonomie und ökologie des abwasserspezifisch wichtigen Formenkireses urn “Nitzschia thermalis”. Nova Hedwigia, 30, 638–652.Google Scholar
Lange-Bertalot, H., 1979. Simonsenia a new genus with morphology intermediate between Nitzschia and Surirella. Bacillaria, 2, 127–136.Google Scholar
Lange-Bertalot, H., 1980 a. New species, combinations and synonyms in the genus Nitzschia. Bacillaria, 3, 41–78.Google Scholar
Lange-Bertalot, H., 1980 b. Zur taxonomisch Revision einiger ökologisch wichtiger “Naviculae lineolateae” Cleve. Die formenkreise um Navicula lanceolata, N. viridula, N. cari, Cryptogamie: Algologie, 1, 29–50.Google Scholar
Lange-Bertalot, H., 1980 c. Ein Beitrag zur Revision der Gattungen Rhoicosphenia Grun., Gomphonema C. Ag., Gomphoneis Cl. Botaniska notiser, 133, 585—594.Google Scholar
Lange-Bertalot, H. & Ruppel, M., 1980. Zur revision taxonomisch problematischer, okologisch jedoch wichtiger Sippen der Gattung Achnanthes Bory. Archivfur Hydrobiologie, supplement 60, Algological studies 26, 31 pp.Google Scholar
Lange-Bertalot, H. & Simonsen, R., 1978. A taxonomie revision of the Nitzschiae Lanceolatae Grunow. 2. European and related extra-European freshwater and brackish taxa. Bacillaria, 1, 11–111.Google Scholar
Manguin, E., 1964. Contribution à la connaissance des Diatomées des Andes du Perou. Mémoires du Museum nationale d'histoire naturelle (sér. B, Botanique), 12, 41–98.Google Scholar
Meister, F., 1912. Die Kieselalgen der Schweiz. Beiträge zur Kryptogamenflora der Schweiz, 4 (1), 254 pp.Google Scholar
Mills, F. W. (compiler), 1933–1935. An Index of the Genera and Species of the Diatomaceae and Their Synonyms. London.Google Scholar
Pantocsek, J., 1902. Die Bacillarien des Balatonsees. Resultate der Wissenschaftlichen Erforschorschung des Balatonsees, 1902, 114 pp.Google Scholar
Pantocsek, J., 1912. Afertö tó Kovamozat virdnya (Bacillariae lacus Peisonis). Pozsony.Google Scholar
Patrick, R. & Reimer, C. W., 1966. The diatoms of the United States exclusive of Alaska and Hawaii, Vol. 1. Monographs. Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, no. 13, 688 pp.Google Scholar
Patrick, R. & Reimer, C. W., 1975. The diatoms of the United States, part 2. Monographs. Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, no. 13, 213 pp.Google Scholar
Pelletan, J., 1889. Les Diatomées. Histoire Naturélle, Préparation, Classification et Description des Principales Especes, vol. 2 [2nd part].Google Scholar
Peragallo, H., 1890–1891. Monographic du genre Pleurosigma et des genres allies. Diatomiste, 1 (4), 35 pp.Google Scholar
Peragallo, H. & Peragallo, M., 1897–1908. Diatomees Marines de France, et des Districts Maritimes Voisins. Paris et Grez-sur-Loing.Google Scholar
Reimer, C. W., 1959. The diatom genus Neidium. I. New species, new records and taxonomic revisions. Proceedings of the Academy of Natur, Sciences of Philadelphia, 111, 1–35.Google Scholar
Ross, R., 1947. Freshwater Diatomeae (Bacillariophyta). Bulletin. National Museum of Canada, 97 (Biology series no. 26), 178–233.Google Scholar
Round, F. E. & Mann, D. G., 1981. The diatom genus Brachysira I. Typification and separation from Anomoeoneis. Archiv fur Protistenkunde, 124, 221–231.Google Scholar
Schmidt, A., 1874–1959. Atlas der Diatomaceen-Kunde, heft 1–105. Leipzig: R. Reisland.Google Scholar
Schoeman, F. R. & Archibald, R. E. M., 1976–1980. The Diatom Flora of Southern Africa. Pretoria. [Nos 1–6 CSIR Special Report WAT. 50.]Google Scholar
Simonsen, R., 1979. The diatom system: ideas on phylogeny. Bacillaria, 2, 9–71.Google Scholar
Van Heurck, H., 1880–1885. Synopsis des Diatomees de Belgique. Anvers: Dukajuet Cie.Google Scholar
Vanlandingham, S. L., 1967–79. Catalogue of the Fossil and Recent Genera and Species of Diatoms and Their Synonyms, parts 1–8. Vaduz: J. Cramer.Google Scholar