Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:24:12.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Host-use pattern and sexual dimorphism reveals the mating system of the symbiotic pea crab Austinixa aidae (Crustacea: Brachyura: Pinnotheridae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 June 2012

Douglas F. Peiró ,
J. Antonio Baeza  and
Fernando L. Mantelatto
Douglas F. Peiró
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Bioecology and Crustacean Systematics (LBSC), Department of Biology, Faculty of Philosophy, Science and Letters of Ribeirão Preto (FFCLRP), University of São Paulo (USP), Postgraduate Program in Comparative Biology, Avenida Bandeirantes 3900, 14040-901, Ribeirão Preto (SP), Brazil
J. Antonio Baeza
Affiliation:
Smithsonian Marine Station at Fort Pierce, 701 Seaway Drive, Fort Pierce (FL), USA Department of Biological Sciences Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia 23435, USA Departamento de Biología Marina, Facultad de Ciencias del Mar, Universidad Católica del Norte, Larrondo 1281, Coquimbo, Chile
Fernando L. Mantelatto*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Bioecology and Crustacean Systematics (LBSC), Department of Biology, Faculty of Philosophy, Science and Letters of Ribeirão Preto (FFCLRP), University of São Paulo (USP), Postgraduate Program in Comparative Biology, Avenida Bandeirantes 3900, 14040-901, Ribeirão Preto (SP), Brazil
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: F.L. Mantelatto, Laboratory of Bioecology and Crustacean Systematics (LBSC), Department of Biology, Faculty of Philosophy, Science and Letters of Ribeirão Preto (FFCLRP), University of São Paulo (USP), Graduate Program in Comparative Biology, Avenida Bandeirantes 3900, 14040-901, Ribeirão Preto (SP), Brazil email: flmantel@usp.br
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Austinixa aidae inhabits burrows of the ghost shrimp Callichirus major at Perequê-açu beach, Ubatuba, Brazil. We described the host-use pattern and sexual dimorphism of A. aidae to test for monogamy given the generality of this mating system in the subfamily Pinnothereliinae (family Pinnotheridae) to which A. aidae belongs. Against expectations, A. aidae lives as solitary individuals within burrows more frequently than expected by chance alone. Additional observations suggested that A. aidae exhibits a polygynandrous mating system with males moving among burrows in search of receptive females. First, only 21% of the burrows harboured heterosexual pairs of crabs and the body size of paired crabs was poorly correlated. This suggests pair instability and frequent shifts among burrows by male and/or female crabs, as reported before for other symbiotic crustaceans in which the body size of paired crabs is poorly correlated. Second, males paired with females that were sexually receptive (without embryos) or that have been receptive recently (carrying early embryos) were found more frequently than expected by chance alone. The above agrees with that reported for species in which sexual pairing does not last long. Third, sexual dimorphism in terms of claw size and coloration was evident. Claws were larger in males than in females, a condition that argues in favour of male–male competition in A. aidae. In addition, the body coloration of males was more similar to the sand grains of the beach than that of females. This sex-specific coloration suggests that males are ‘better adapted' than females to roam on the surface of the beach in search of burrows because their coloration should diminish the risk of detection by predators. Experiments are needed to reveal the details of the polygynandrous mating system herein inferred for A. aidae and to understand those conditions favouring particular reproductive strategies in symbiotic decapod crustaceans.

Keywords

AxiideaCallianassidaemating systempea crabPinnotheressexual dimorphismsymbiosis
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 93 , Issue 3 , May 2013 , pp. 715 - 723
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alves, E.S. and Pezzuto, P.R. (1998) Population dynamics of Pinnixa patagoniensis Rathbun, 1918 (Brachyura: Pinnotheridae) a symbiotic crab of Sergio mirim (Thalassinidea: Callianassidae) in Cassino Beach, Southern Brazil. Marine Ecology—Pubblicazioni della Stazione Zoologica di Napoli I 19, 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asakura, A. (2009) The evolution of mating systems in decapod crustaceans. In Martin, J.W., Crandall, K.A. and Felder, D.L. (eds) Decapod crustacean phylogenetics. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis/CRC Press, pp. 121–182. [Crustacean Issues, no. 18.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkins, D. (1926) The moulting stages of the pea-crab (Pinnotheres pisum). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 14, 475–492.Google Scholar
Baeza, J.A. (1999) Indicators of monogamy in the commensal crab Pinnixa transversalis (Milne Edwards & Lucas) (Decapoda: Brachyura: Pinnotheridae): population distribution, male–female association and sexual dimorphism. Revista de Biologia Marina y Oceanografia 34, 303–313.Google Scholar
Baeza, J.A. (2008) Social monogamy in the shrimp Pontonia margarita, a symbiont of Pinctada mazatlanica, off the Pacific coast of Panama. Marine Biology 153, 387–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baeza, J.A. (2010) The symbiotic lifestyle and its evolutionary consequences: social monogamy and sex allocation in the hermaphroditic shrimp Lysmata pederseni . Naturwissenschaften 97, 729–741.Google Scholar
Baeza, J.A., Bolaños, J.A., Hernandez, J.E., Lira, C. and López, R. (2011) Monogamy does not last long in Pontonia mexicana, a symbiotic shrimp of the Amber pen-shell Pinna carnea from the southeastern Caribbean Sea. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 407, 41–47.Google Scholar
Baeza, J.A. and Piantoni, C. (2010) Sexual system, sex ratio, and group living in the shrimp Thor amboinensis (De Man): relevance to resource-monopolization and sex-allocation theories. Biological Bulletin . Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole 219, 151–165.Google Scholar
Baeza, J.A. and Thiel, M. (2000) Host use pattern and life history of Liopetrolisthes mitra, a crab associate of the black sea urchin Tetrapygus niger . Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 80, 639–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baeza, J.A. and Thiel, M. (2003) Predicting territorial behavior in symbiotic crabs using host characteristics: a comparative study and proposal of a model. Marine Biology 142, 93–100.Google Scholar
Baeza, J.A. and Thiel, M. (2007) The mating system of symbiotic crustaceans: a conceptual model based on optimality and ecological constraints. In Duffy, J.E. and Thiel, M. (eds) Evolutionary ecology of social and sexual systems. Crustaceans as model organisms. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 249–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baeza, J.A. and Díaz-Valdés, M. (2011) The symbiotic shrimp Ascidonia flavomaculata lives solitarily in the tunicate Ascidia mentula; implications for its mating system. Invertebrate Biology 130, 351–361.Google Scholar
Baeza, J.A., Thiel, M. and Stotz, W.B. (2001) The life history of Allopetrolisthes spinifrons, a crab associate of the sea anemone Phymactis clematis . Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 81, 69–76.Google Scholar
Bauer, R.T. (2004) Remarkable shrimps. Norman, OK: Oklahoma University Press.Google Scholar
Becker, C. and Türkay, M. (2010) Taxonomy and morphology of European pea crabs (Crustacea: Brachyura: Pinnotheridae). Journal of Natural History 44, 1555–1575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biagi, R. and Mantelatto, F.L. (2006) Relative growth and sexual maturity of the hermit crab Paguristes erythrops (Anomura, Diogenidae) from South Atlantic. Hydrobiologia 559, 247–254.Google Scholar
Bruyn, C., Rigaud, T., David, B. and de Ridder, C. (2009) Symbiosis between the pea crab Dissodactylus primitivus and its echinoid host Meoma ventricosa: potential consequences for the crab mating system. Marine Ecology Progress Series 375, 173–183.Google Scholar
Christensen, A.M. and McDermott, J.J. (1958) Life-history and biology of the oyster crab, Pinnotheres ostreum Say. Biological Bulletin . Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole 114, 146–179.Google Scholar
Courtney, L.A. and Couch, J.A. (1981) Aspects of the host–commensal relationship between a palaemonid shrimp (Pontonia domestica) and the pen shell (Atrina rigida). Northeast Gulf Science 5, 49–54.Google Scholar
Diesel, R. (1986) Optimal mate searching strategy in the symbiotic spider crab Inachus phalangium (Decapoda). Ethology 72, 311–328.Google Scholar
Diesel, R. (1988) Male–female association in the spider crab Inachus phalangium: the influence of female reproductive stage and size. Journal of Crustacean Biology 8, 63–69.Google Scholar
Elliott, J.M. (1983) Some methods for the statistical analysis of samples of benthic invertebrates. 3rd edition. Ambleside, UK: Freshwater Biological Association [Scientific Publication, no. 25.]Google Scholar
Grant, W.C. Jr and Ulmer, K.M. (1974) Shell selection and aggressive behavior in two sympatric species of hermit crabs. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole 146, 32–43.Google Scholar
De Grave, S, Pentcheff, N.D., Ahyong, S.T., Chan, T.Y., Crandall, K.A., Dworschak, P.C., Felder, D.L., Feldmann, R.M., Fransen, C.H.J.M., Goulding, L.Y.D., Lemaitre, R., Low, M.E.Y., Martin, J.W., Ng, P.K.L., Schweitzer, C.E., Tan, S.H., Tshudy, D. and Wetzer, R. (2009) A classification of living and fossil genera of decapod crustaceans. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology Supplement 21, 1–109.Google Scholar
Grove, M.W. and Woodin, S.A. (1996) Conspecific recognition and host choice in a pea crab, Pinnixa chaetopterana (Brachyura: Pinnotheridae) Biological Bulletin . Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole 190, 359–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamel, J.F., Ng, P.K.L. and Mercier, A. (1999) Life cycle of the pea crab Pinnotheres halingi sp. nov., an obligate symbiont of the sea cucumber Holothuria scabra Jaeger. Ophelia 50, 149–175.Google Scholar
Harrison, J.S. (2004) Evolution, biogeography, and the utility of mitochondrial 16s and COI genes in phylogenetic analysis of the grab genus Austinixa (Decapoda: Pinnotheridae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 30, 743–754.Google Scholar
Harrison, J.S. and Hanley, P.W. (2005) Austinixa aidae Righi, 1967 and A. hardyi Heard and Manning, 1997 (Decapoda: Brachyura: Pinnotheridae) synonymized, with comments on molecular and morphometric methods in crustacean taxonomy. Journal of Natural History 39, 3649–3662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartnoll, R.G. (1972) Swimming in the hard stage of the pea crab, Pinnotheres pisum (L.). Journal of Natural History 6, 475–480.Google Scholar
Hartnoll, R.G. (1978) The determination of relative growth in Crustacea. Crustaceana 34, 282–292.Google Scholar
Hartnoll, R.G. (1982) Growth. In Bliss, D.E. (ed.) The biology of Crustacea, embryology, morphology, and genetics. New York: Academic Press Inc, pp. 11–196.Google Scholar
Hazlett, B.A. (1966) Factors affecting the aggressive behavior of the hermit crab Calcinus tibicen . Zeitschrift für Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie—Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 6, 655–671.Google Scholar
Knowlton, N. (1980) Sexual selection and dimorphism in two demes of a symbiotic, pair-bonding snapping shrimp. Evolution 34, 161–173.Google Scholar
Manning, R.B. (1975) Two methods for collecting decapods in shallow water. Crustaceana 29, 317–319.Google Scholar
Manning, R.B. and Morton, B. (1987) Pinnotherids (Crustacea: Decapoda) and leptonaceans (Mollusca: Bivalvia) associated with sipunculan worms in Hong Kong. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 100, 543–551.Google Scholar
Manning, R.B. and Felder, D.L. (1989) The Pinnixa cristata complex in the Western Atlantic, with descriptions of two new species (Crustacea: Decapoda: Pinnotheridae). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 473, 1–26.Google Scholar
McDermott, J.J. (2006) The biology of Austinixa gorei (Manning & Felder, 1989) (Decapoda, Brachyura, Pinnotheridae) symbiotic in the burrows of intertidal ghost shrimp (Decapoda, Thalassinidea, Callianassidae) in Miami, Florida. Crustaceana 79, 345–361.Google Scholar
Ng, P.K.L., Guinot, D. and Davie, P.J.F. (2008) Systema Brachyurorum: Part 1. An annotated checklist of extant brachyuran crabs of the world. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 17, 1–286.Google Scholar
Orton, J.H. (1920) Mode of feeding and sex-phenomena in the pea-crab (Pinnotheres pisum). Nature 106, 533–534.Google Scholar
Palacios-Theil, E., Cuesta, J.A., Campos, E. and Felder, D.L. (2009) Molecular genetic re-examination of subfamilies and polyphyly in the Family Pinnotheridae (Crustacea: Decapoda). In Martin, J.W., Crandall, K.A. and Felder, D.L. (eds) Decapod crustacean phylogenetics. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis/CRC Press, pp. 423–442. [Crustacean Issues, no. 18]Google Scholar
Pearce, J.B. (1966) The biology of the mussel crab, Fabia subquadrata, from the waters of the San Juan Archipelago, Washington. Pacific Science 20, 3–35.Google Scholar
Peiró, D.F. and Mantelatto, F.L. (2011) Population dynamics of the pea crab Austinixa aidae (Brachyura: Pinnotheridae): a symbiotic of the ghost shrimp Callichirus major (Thalassinidea: Callianassidae) from the southwestern Atlantic. Iheringia, Série Zoologia 101, 5–14.Google Scholar
Peiró, D.F., Pezzuto, P.R. and Mantelatto, F.L. (2011) Relative growth and sexual dimorphism of Austinixa aidae (Brachyura: Pinnotheridae): a symbiont of the ghost shrimp Callichirus major from the southwestern Atlantic. Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research 39, 261–270.Google Scholar
Rahman, N., Dunham, D.W. and Govind, C.K. (2002) Size-assortative pairing in the big-clawed snapping shrimp, Alpheus heterochelis . Behaviour 139, 1433–1468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahman, N., Dunham, D.W. and Govind, C.K. (2003) Social monogamy in the big-clawed snapping shrimp, Alpheus heterochelis . Ethology 109, 457–473.Google Scholar
Reeves, M.N. and Brooks, W.R. (2001) Host selection, chemical detection, and protection of the symbiotic pinnotherid crabs Dissodactylus crinitichelis and Clypeasterophilus rugatus associated with echinoderms. Symbiosis 30, 239–256.Google Scholar
Rice, W.R. (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43, 223–225.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, S.A. (1966) Estudos sobre Callianassa: Sistemática, Biologia e Anatomia. PhD thesis. Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, S.A. and Shimizu, R.M. (1997) Autoecologia de Callichirus major (Say, 1818). In Absalão, R.S. and Esteves, A.M. (eds) Ecologia de Praias Arenosas do Litoral Brasileiro, pp. 155–170. [Oecologia Brasiliensis, no. 3]Google Scholar
Schmitt, W.L., McCain, J.C. and Davidson, E.S. (1973) Family Pinnotheridae. Brachyura I. In Gruner, H.E. and Holthuis, L.B. (eds) Crustaceorum Catalogus. The Hague, The Netherlands: W. Junk, pp. 32–37.Google Scholar
Shimizu, R.M. and Rosso, S. (2000) Influence of an oil spill on the abundance of Callichirus major (Say, 1818) on a sand beach in southeastern Brazil (Crustacea: Decapoda: Thalassinidea). Nauplius 8, 63–72.Google Scholar
Shuster, S.M. and Wade, M.J. (2003) Mating systems and strategies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sokal, R.R. and Rohlf, F.J. (1981) Biometry. 2nd edition. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
Thiel, M. and Baeza, J.A. (2001) Factors affecting the social behaviour of symbiotic Crustacea: a modelling approach. Symbiosis 30, 163–190.Google Scholar
Thiel, M., Zander, A. and Baeza, J.A. (2003) Movements of the symbiotic crab Liopetrolisthes mitra between its host sea urchin Tetrapygus niger . Bulletin of Marine Science 72, 89–101.Google Scholar
Van der Meeren, G.I. (1994) Sex- and size-dependent mating tactics in a natural population of shore crabs Carcinus maenas (Crustacea: Brachyura). Journal of Animal Ecology 63, 307–314.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G.J. (1983) Intimate associations and coevolution in the sea. In Futuyma, D.J. and Slatkin, M. (eds) Coevolution. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, pp. 311–327.Google Scholar
Wickler, W. and Seibt, U. (1983) Monogamy: an ambiguous concept. In Bateson, P.P.G. (ed.) Mate choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 33–50.Google Scholar