Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T19:10:41.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Identity of Some Cyphonautes Larvae (Polyzoa)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

J. S. Ryland
J. S. Ryland
Affiliation:
Fisheries Laboratory, Lowestoft
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Five cyphonautes are described in Nordisches Plankton (Lohmann, 1911). Cyphonautes schneideri and C. borealis are larvae of Membranipora membranacea and represent extremes of variation in the shape of the shell. Cyphonautes balticus, like C. compressus which was very inadequately described, is the larva of Electra pilosa. The cyphonautes of these two species are the only ones likely to be encountered in the plankton of normally saline European seas. Cyphonautes barroisi is the larva of the brackish-water Electra crustulenta.

Cyphonautes balticus Thorson (1946), not Lohmann, is the larva of M. membranacea.

Larval synonymies for M. membranacea and E. pilosa are given.

The use of the Cyphonautes names is undesirable, and those of the polyzoan adults should be employed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , October 1964 , pp. 645 - 654
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Androsova, E. I., 1962. The Bryozoa of the Baltic Sea. Zool. Zh., Vol. 41, pp. 826–32. [In Russian: English summary.]Google Scholar
Atkins, D., 1955 a. The cyphonautes larvae of the Plymouth area and the metamorphosis of Membranipora membranacea (L.). J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 34, pp. 441–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkins, D., 1955 b. The ciliary feeding mechanism of the cyphonautes larva (Polyzoa Ectoprocta). J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 34, pp. 451–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrois, J., 1877. Memoire sur l'embryologie des Bryozoaires, 305 pp. Thèse de Paris: Lille.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, K. J., 1950. Über die Bryozoen und Kamptozoen der Kieler Bucht. Kieler Meeresforsch., Bd. 7, pp. 161–6.Google Scholar
Bock, K. J. 1954. Einige Zahlen zur Bewuchsdichte von Epizoen auf Laminarien aus der östlichen Kieler Bucht. Veröff Inst. Meeresforsch., Bd. 3, pp. 42–5.Google Scholar
Borg, F., 1930. Moostierchen oder Bryozoen (Ectoprocten). Tierwelt Dtsch., Teil 17, pp. 25–142.Google Scholar
Claparède, A. R. E., 1863. Beobachtungen Über Anatomie und Entwicklungsgeschichte wirbelloser Thiere an der Küste von Normandie angestellt, 120 pp. Leipzig: W. Engelmann.Google Scholar
Cook, P. L., 1960. The development of Electra crustulenta (Pallas) (Polyzoa, Ectoprocta). Essex Nat., Vol. 30, pp. 258–66.Google Scholar
Cook, P. L., 1962. The early larval development of Membranipora seurati (Canu) and Electra crustulenta (Pallas), Polyzoa. Cahiers Biol. mar., T. 3, pp. 57–60.Google Scholar
Ehlers, E., 1876. Hypophorella expansa. Ein Beitrag zur Kenntniss der minirenden Bryozoen. Abh. Ges. Wiss. Göttingen, Bd. 21, pp. 1–156.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, C. G., 1835 Beitrag zur Erkenntniss grosser Organisation in der Richtung des kleinsten Raumes. Abh. dtsch. Akad. Wiss. Berl., 1833, pp. 145–336.Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, C. G., 1838. Die Infusionsthierchen als vollkommene Organismen, xvii + 547 pp.; 64 Pls. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Harmer, S. F., 1926. The Polyzoa of the Siboga Expedition. Part 2. Cheilostomata Anasca. Siboga Exped., Monogr. 28b, pp. 183–501.Google Scholar
Hastings, A. B., 1929. Cheilostomatous Polyzoa from the vicinity of the Panama Canal collected by Dr C. Crossland on the cruise of the S.Y. ‘St. George’. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond., 1929, pp. 697–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hincks, T., 1880. A History of the British Marine Polyzoa, cxli + 601 pp.; 83 Pls. London: van Voorst.Google Scholar
Kupelwieser, H., 1905. Untersuchungen über den feineren Bau und die Metamorphose des Cyphonautes. Zoologica, Stuttgart, Heft 47, iv + 50 pp.Google Scholar
Lohmann, H., 1904. Die Cyphonautes-Formen der Expedition. Ergebn. Atlant. Planktonexped., Bd. 4 N, pp. 53–7.Google Scholar
Lohmann, H., 1911. Die Cyphonautes der nordischen Meere. Nord. Plankt., Bd. 5 (9), pp. 31–40.Google Scholar
Marcus, E., 1926. Beobachtungen und Versuche an lebenden Meeresbryozoen. Zool. Jb., Abt. I, Bd. 52, pp. 1–102.Google Scholar
Marcus, E., 1940. Mosdyr (Bryozoa eller Polyzoa). Danm. Fauna, No. 46, pp. 1–401.Google Scholar
Muller, J., 1854. Ueber verschiedene Formen von Seethieren. Arch. Anat. Physiol., Lpz., 1854, pp. 69–98.Google Scholar
O'donoghue, C. H., 1927. Observations on the early development of Membranipora villosa Hincks. Contr. Canad. Biol., N.S., Vol. 3, pp. 249–63.Google Scholar
Prouho, H., 1892. Contribution à l'histoire des Bryozoaires. Arch. Zool. exp. gen., Sér. 2, T. 10, pp. 557–656.Google Scholar
Robertson, A., 1908. The incrusting chilostomatous Bryozoa of the west coast of North America. Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool., Vol. 4, pp. 253–344.Google Scholar
Schneider, A., 1869. Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte und systemischen Stellung der Bryozoen und Gephyreen. Arch. mikr. Anat., Bd. 5, pp. 260–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segerstråle, S. G., 1957. Baltic Sea, pp. 751–800, in Treatise on Marine Ecology and Paleoecology, Vol. 1, 1296 pp., ed. Hedgpeth, J. W.. New York: Geological Society of America.Google Scholar
Semper, C., 1857. Sur le Cyphonautes compressus, qui n'est qu'une larve de mollusque lamellibranche. Bull. Acad. Belg., Ser. 2, T. 3, pp. 353–4.Google Scholar
Thorson, G., 1946. Reproduction and larval development of Danish marine bottom invertebrates, with special reference to the planktonic larvae in the Sound (Øresund). Medd. Komm. Havundersog. Kbh., Ser. Plankton, Bd. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–523.Google Scholar
Zenkevitch, L., 1963. Biology of the Seas of the U.S.S.R., 955 pp. Translated by S., Botcharskaya. London: Allen and Unwin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar