Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T18:53:16.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New diagnostic characters for Amphiodia and Ophiophragmus (Amphiuridae, Ophiuroidea, Echinodermata)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2020

Gisella C.S. Chagas Open the ORCID record for Gisella C.S. Chagas [Opens in a new window] ,
Renata A.S. Alitto Open the ORCID record for Renata A.S. Alitto [Opens in a new window] ,
Helena Serrano ,
Gabriela Granadier ,
Pablo D.B. Guilherme  and
Michela Borges
Gisella C.S. Chagas*
Affiliation:
University of Campinas, Institute of Biology, Zoology Museum, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
Renata A.S. Alitto
Affiliation:
University of Campinas, Institute of Biology, Zoology Museum, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
Helena Serrano
Affiliation:
University of Campinas, Institute of Biology, Zoology Museum, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
Gabriela Granadier
Affiliation:
University of Campinas, Institute of Biology, Zoology Museum, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
Pablo D.B. Guilherme
Affiliation:
University of the State of Paraná, Paranaguá, PR, Brazil
Michela Borges
Affiliation:
University of Campinas, Institute of Biology, Zoology Museum, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: Gisella C.S. Chagas, E-mail: gisella.biologia@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The genera Ophiophragmus and Amphiodia are amphiurids that are considered taxonomically difficult due to their great resemblance, few diagnostic characters and synonymy problems. Our aim is to redescribe the species using scanning electron microscopy and morphometry of diagnostic structures, and to provide new information for the identification of these Ophiuroidea. Five Amphiodia spp. and six Ophiophragmus spp. recorded in Brazil were rigorously redescribed. The descriptions include new diagnostic characters derived from external morphology, arm microstructures and morphometry. We also provided comparative analyses of species with shared characters such as Amphiodia riisei and Amphiodia trychna. The geographic and bathymetric distributions of the studied species were updated, and new records are provided. All the information presented may be used in taxonomic, ecological and phylogenetic studies, helping to fill gaps in the knowledge of the biodiversity, ecology and evolution of these Ophiuroidea. Conclusively, all the tools applied here assisted in the identification of genera and species and could be useful in other taxonomic studies of Echinodermata.

Keywords

Arm platesarm vertebraebiodiversitybrittle starstaxonomy
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 100 , Issue 5 , August 2020 , pp. 759 - 781
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albuquerque, MN (1986) Ophiuroidea Gray, 1840 (Echinodermata) da plataforma continental do norte e nordeste brasileiro (PhD thesis). Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo.Google Scholar
Albuquerque, MN and Guille, A (1991) Ophiuroidea (Echinodermata) ao largo do Brasil: Banco dos Abrolhos, cadeia submarina Vitória-Trindade e plataforma continental adjacente. Boletim do Museu Nacional 353, 1–30.Google Scholar
Albuquerque, MN, Campos-Creasey, LS and Guille, A (2001) Two new species of Amphiuridae (Echinodermata, Ophiuroidea) from the southeastern coast of Brazil. Zoosystema 23, 591–604.Google Scholar
Alitto, RAS, Bueno, ML, Guilherme, PDB, Di Domenico, M, Christensen, AB and Borges, M (2018) Shallow-water brittle stars (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea) from Araçá Bay (Southeastern Brazil), with spatial distribution considerations. Zootaxa 4405, 1–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alitto, RAS, Amaral, ACZ, Oliveira, LD, Serrano, H, Seger, KR, Guilherme, PDB, Di Domenico, M, Christensen, AB, Lourenço, LB, Tavares, M and Borges, M (2019) Atlantic West Ophiothrix spp. in the scope of integrative taxonomy: confirming the existence of Ophiothrix trindadensis Tommasi, 1970. PLoS ONE 14, e0210331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alvarado, JJ and Solís-Marín, FA (2013) Echinoderm Research and Diversity in Latin America. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arribas, P, Andújar, C, Sánchez-Fernández, D, Abellán, P and Millán, A (2013) Integrative taxonomy and conservation of cryptic beetles in the Mediterranean region (Hydrophilidae). Zoologica Scripta 42, 182–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barboza, CAM (2010) Variabilidade espacial das associações de ofiuróides ao longo de um gradiente de contaminação no Canal da Cotinga, Baía de Paranaguá, Paraná (Master dissertation). Universidade Federal do Paraná, Paraná.Google Scholar
Barboza, CAM and Borges, M (2012) A checklist of the extant species of ophiuroids (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea) from Brazilian waters. Zootaxa 3447, 1–21.Google Scholar
Bernasconi, I and D'Agostino, MM (1977) Ofiuroideos del mar Epicontinental Argentino. Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”, Hidrobiología 5, 65–114.Google Scholar
Borges, M (2006) Taxonomia, distribuição e biologia reprodutiva de Ophiuroidea (Echinodermata) das Regiões Sudeste e Sul do Brasil (PhD thesis). Universidade Estadual Paulista “Julio de Mesquita Filho”, Rio Claro.Google Scholar
Borges, M and Amaral, ACZ (2005) Classe Ophiuroidea. In Amaral, ACZ, Rizzo, AE and Arruda, EP (eds), Manual de identificação dos invertebrados marinhos da região sudeste-sul do Brasil, vol. 1. São Paulo: EdUSP, pp. 237–272.Google Scholar
Borges, M and Amaral, ACZ (2007) Ophiuroidea (Echinodermata): quatro novas ocorrências para o Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 24, 855–864.Google Scholar
Borges, M, Monteiro, AMG and Amaral, ACZ (2002) Taxonomy of Ophiuroidea (Echinodermata) from the continental shelf and slope of the southern and southeastern Brazilian coast. Biota Neotropica 2, 1–69.Google Scholar
Bueno, MDL, Alitto, RAS, Guilherme, PDB, Di Domenico, M and Borges, M (2018) Guia ilustrado dos Echinodermata da porção sul do Embaiamento Sul Brasileiro. Pesquisa e Ensino em Ciências Exatas e da Natureza 2, 169–237.Google Scholar
Capítoli, RR and Bemvenuti, CE (2004) Distribuição batimétrica e variações de diversidade dos macroinvertebrados bentônicos da plataforma continental e talude superior no extremo sul do Brasil. Atlántica 26, 27–43.Google Scholar
Capítoli, RR and Monteiro, AMG (2000) Distribuição e abundância de ofiuróides na plataforma interna do extremo sul do Brasil. Atlántica 22, 41–56.Google Scholar
Clark, AH (1915) Catalogue of recent Ophiurans: based on the collection of the Museum of Comparative Zoölogy. Memoirs of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 25, 165–376.Google Scholar
Clark, AH (1917) Four new echinoderms from the West Indies. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 30, 63–70.Google Scholar
Clark, HL (1918) Brittle-stars, new and old. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College 62, 263–338.Google Scholar
Fell, HB (1962) A revision of the major genera of Amphiurid Ophiuroidea. Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand Zoology 2, 1–26.Google Scholar
Gondim, AI, Alonso, C, Dias, TLP, Manso, CLC and Christoffersen, ML (2013 a) A taxonomic guide to the brittle-stars (Echinodermata, Ophiuroidea) from the State of Paraíba continental shelf, Northeastern Brazil. ZooKeys 307, 45–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gondim, AI, Dias, TLP and Christoffersen, ML (2013 b) Annotated checklist of echinoderms from Maranhão and Piauí States, Northeastern Brazil. Check List 9, 510–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendler, G (2018) Armed to the teeth: a new paradigm for the buccal skeleton of brittle stars (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea). Contributions in Science 526, 189–311.Google Scholar
Hendler, G, Miller, JE, Pawson, DL and Kier, PM (1995) Sea Stars, Sea Urchins, and Allies: Echinoderms of Florida and the Caribbean. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Hotchkiss, FHC and Glass, A (2012) Observations on Onychaster Meek & Worthen, 1868 (Ophiuroidea: Onychasteridae) (Famennian–Visean age). In Kroh, A and Reich, M (eds), Echinoderm Research 2010: Proceedings of the Seventh European Conference on Echinoderms, Göttingen, Germany 2–9 October 2010. Auckland: Magnolia Press, Zoosymposia, pp. 121–138.Google Scholar
Hotchkiss, FHC, Prokop, RJ and Petr, V (2007) Isolated ossicles of the family Eospondylidae Spencer et Wright, 1966, in the Lower Devonian of Bohemia (Czech Republic) and correction of the systematic position of Eospondylid brittle-stars (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea: Oegophiurida). Acta Musei Nationalis Pragae 63, 3–18.Google Scholar
Koehler, R (1914) A Contribution to the Study of Ophiurans of the United States National Museum. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Koehler, R (1926) Révision de quelques Ophiures de Ljungman appartenant au Musée d'Histoire Naturelle de Stockholm. Arkiv for Zoologi Stockholm 19A, 1–29.Google Scholar
Lima, EJB and Fernandes, MLB (2009) Diversidade de equinodermos (Echinodermata) no Estado de Pernambuco (Brasil). Revista Brasileira de Zoociências 11, 55–63.Google Scholar
Litvinova, NM (1994) The life forms of Ophiuroidea (based on the morphological structures of their arms). In David, B, Guille, A and Feral, JP (eds), Echinoderms Through Time. Rotterdam: Balkema, pp. 449–454.Google Scholar
Lütken, CF (1859) Additamenta ad historiam Ophiuridarum: Beskrivelser af nye eller hidtil kun ufuldstaendigt kjendte Arter af Slangestjerner. Copenhagen: Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskabs Skrifter.Google Scholar
Lyman, T (1865) Ophiuridae and Astrophytidae. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, Welch, Bigelow, & Company.Google Scholar
Lyman, T (1875) Zoological results of the Hassler Expedition. II. Ophiuridae and Astrophytidae. Illustrated Catalogue of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 8, 1–34.Google Scholar
Magalhães, WF, Martins, LR and Alves, OFS (2005) Inventário dos Echinodermata do Estado da Bahia. Brazilian Journal of Aquatic Science and Technology 9, 61–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manso, CLC (1988) Sobre a ocorrência de Ophionema intricata Lütken, 1869 e Ophiophragmus brachyactis HL Clark, 1915 no Brasil (Echinodermata, Ophiuroidea, Amphiurudae). Revista Brasileira de Biologia 48, 965–968.Google Scholar
Manso, CLC (1989) Os Echinodermata da plataforma continental interna entre Cabo Frio e Saquarema, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Biologia 49, 355–359.Google Scholar
Manso, CLC (1993) Ofiuróides da Plataforma Brasileira. Parte II: Norte do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Estado do Espírito Santo, Sul do Estado da Bahia e Bancos Royal Charlotte, Hostpur e Davis (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea). Revista Brasileira de Biologia 35, 189–195.Google Scholar
Manso, CLC (2004) Echinodermata da Bacia de Camamu, Bahia, Brasil. Biologia Geral e Experimental, Universidade Federal de Sergipe 5, 19–25.Google Scholar
Manso, CLC and Absalão, RS (1988) Ophiuroidea: Situação Pré Operacional nos sacos de Piraquara, região sob influência da descarga da Central Nuclear Almirante Álvaro Alberto (CNAAA). Revista Brasileira de Biologia 48, 75–82.Google Scholar
Manso, CLC, Alves, OFS and Martins, LR (2008) Echinodermata da Baía de Todos os Santos e da Baía de Aratu (Bahia, Brasil). Biota Neotropica 8, 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martynov, A (2010) Reassessment of the classification of the Ophiuroidea (Echinodermata), based on morphological characters. I. General character evaluation and delineation of the families Ophiomyxidae and Ophiacanthidae. Zootaxa 2697, 1–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martynov, AV and Litvinova, NM (2008) Deep-water Ophiuroidea of the northern Atlantic with descriptions of three new species and taxonomic remarks on certain genera and species. Marine Biology Research 4(1–2), 76–111.Google Scholar
Monteiro, AMG (1987) Ophiuroidea (Echinodermata) da região de Ubatuba (SP) – Aspectos morfológicos e ecológicos (PhD thesis). Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo.Google Scholar
Netto, LF, Hadel, VF and Tiago, CG (2005) Echinodermata from São Sebastião Channel (São Paulo, Brazil). Revista de Biología Tropical 53, 207–218.Google Scholar
Nielsen, E (1932) Papers from Dr. Th. Mortensen's Pacific Expedition 1914–1916–59. – Ophiurans from the Gulf of Panama. California, and the Strait of Georgia. Videnskabelige Meddelelser fra Dansk Naturhistorisk Forening 91, 241–346.Google Scholar
O'Hara, TD, Hugall, AF, Thuy, B, Stöhr, S and Martynov, AV (2017) Restructuring higher taxonomy using broad-scale phylogenomics: the living Ophiuroidea. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 107, 415–430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Hara, TD, Stöhr, S, Hugall, AF, Thuy, B and Martynov, A (2018) Morphological diagnoses of higher taxa in Ophiuroidea (Echinodermata) in support of a new classification. European Journal of Taxonomy 416, 1–35.Google Scholar
Oliveira, JP, Oliveira, J and Manso, CLC (2010) Inventário da coleção de equinodermos do LABIMAR, Campus Prof. Alberto Carvalho, Universidade Federal de Sergipe. Scientia Plena 6, 1–14.Google Scholar
Paim, FG, Guerrazzi, MC and Borges, M (2015) Descriptive and illustrated diagnosis of Ophiuroidea fauna (Echinodermata) in the shallow waters of North-eastern Brazil. Marine Biodiversity Records 8, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parslow, RE and Clark, AM (1963) Ophiuroidea of the Lesser Antilles. Studies on the Fauna of Curaçao and others Caribbean Islands XV, 24–50.Google Scholar
Pires-Vanin, AMS, Corbisier, TN, Arasaki, E and Moellmann, AM (1997) Composição e distribuição espaço-temporal da fauna bêntica no Canal de São Sebastião. Relatórios Técnicos do Instituto Oceanográfico 41, 29–46.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team (2018) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Stöhr, S (2012) Ophiuroid (Echinodermata) systematics—where do we come from, where do we stand and where should we go? Zoosymposia 7, 147–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stöhr, S, Conand, C and Boissin, E (2008) Brittle stars (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea) from La Réunion and the systematic position of Ophiocanops Koehler, 1922. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 153, 545–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stöhr, S, O'Hara, TD and Thuy, B (2012) Global diversity of brittle stars (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea). PLoS ONE 7, e31940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stöhr, S, O'Hara, TD and Thuy, B (2019) World Ophiuroidea Database. Available at http://www.marinespecies.org/ophiuroidea.Google Scholar
Thomas, LP (1962) The shallow water amphiurid brittle stars (Echinodermata, Ophiuroidea) of Florida. Bulletin of Marine Science 12, 623–694.Google Scholar
Thomas, LP (1963) A redescription of the amphiurid brittlestar Ophiocnida cubana A. H. Clark, 1917. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 76, 217–221.Google Scholar
Thuy, B and Stöhr, S (2011) Lateral arm plate morphology in brittle stars (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea): new perspectives for ophiuroid micropalaeontology and classification. Zootaxa 3013, 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thuy, B and Stöhr, S (2016) A new morphological phylogeny of the Ophiuroidea (Echinodermata) accords with molecular evidence and renders microfossils accessible for cladistics. PLoS ONE 11, e0156140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tommasi, LR (1965) Alguns Amphiuridae (Ophiuroidea) do litoral de São Paulo e Santa Catarina. Contribuições Avulsas do Instituto Oceanográfico, Universidade de São Paulo 8, 1–9.Google Scholar
Tommasi, LR (1970) Os ofiuróides recentes do Brasil e de regiões vizinhas. Contribuições Avulsas do Instituto Oceanográfico, Universidade de São Paulo 20, 1–146.Google Scholar
Tommasi, LR (1974) Equinodermes do Brasil. III. Observações sobre algumas espécies coletadas durante as viagens do N/Oc. “Almirante Saldanha”. Boletim do Instituto Oceanográfico, Universidade de São Paulo 23, 1–15.Google Scholar
Tommasi, LR, Castro, SM and Sousa, ECPM (1988) Echinodermata coletados durante as campanhas oceanográficas do N/Oc. “Almirante Saldanha” no Atlantico Sul Ocidental. Relatórios Internos do Instituto Oceanográfico, Universidade de São Paulo 21, 1–11.Google Scholar
Venables, WN and Ripley, BD (eds) (2002) Random and mixed effects. In Modern Applied Statistics with S. New York, NY: Springer, pp. 271–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ventura, CRR, Lima, RPN, Nobre, CC, Veríssimo, I and Zama, PC (2006) Filo Echinodermata. In Lavrado, HP and Ignacio, BL (eds), Biodiversidade bentônica da região central da Zona Econômica Exclusiva brasileira. Rio de Janeiro: Museu Nacional (Brasil), pp. 339–389.Google Scholar
Wickham, H (2009) Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (ggplot2). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Chagas et al. supplementary material

Chagas et al. supplementary material

Download Chagas et al. supplementary material(File)
File 4.1 MB